Package: flash-kernel
Version: 3.66
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I have an ODROID XU4 (a SBC based on Exynos5422). Since I'm one of those
PC people that would like everything to work like my PC does, I use GRUB
on it (plus, it gives me a nice boot menu when I can choose older kernels
or rescue mode,
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 04:29:26PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> I suppose there's no d-i support happening for the XU4 anytime soon? :-)
> I *think* pxe/tftp using distro_bootcmd was working fine from mainline
> u-boot on the Odroid-XU4; if so the netboot images should work ok.
I've seen
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 10:39:26AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
After the mount, both of sd[ab]1 would have to be recovered and
usable, but out of sync.
Actually, as Sesse claims, it's entirely likely that md didn't think
the partitions were out of sync. That would explain some pretty bad
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:12:09AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
An alternative to providing ext2prepare is to remove tune2fs. If
/sbin/tune2fs isn't available, partman-ext3 will use the code path
calling mkfs.ext3, and thus generate file systems with the
resize_inode option enabled.
The
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.53
Severity: normal
I've talked to the X maintainers, and been told that the patch for
#381952 (laptop multimedia key detection) will go into experimental
quite soon, and possibly from there to unstable if the results are good.
However, the patch requires dmidecode
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 05:03:39PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
I've tested this patch, and it proved to be incomplete. ext2prepare
need an argument extra, with the new maximum size for the partition.
Not sure how to properly calculate that value, so I just picked a
fairly large number
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 04:54:06PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
I'm leaving this bug open targeted at including a cpu frequcny scaling daemon
in the laptop task. Choosing between the three is difficult, and an
added problem is that currently 2 of the 3 don't automatically load the
kernel modules.
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 01:37:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
I don't care if it's a daemon, but I don't know of any package that just
loads the right cpufreq modules and gets out of the way either. If there
is one, it could be a possibility, except for systems that don't support
the ondemand
Package: tasksel-data
Version: 2.53
Severity: wishlist
Please add gnome-power-manager to the laptop task; it provides various
user-friendly functions related to power management, such as battery
event warnings, catching of the right keys to suspend/hibernate,
user-friendly policy setting on lid
Package: tasksel-data
Version: 2.53
Severity: wishlist
Please add the bluetooth package to the laptop task; most modern laptops
have Bluetooth, and even though there isn't much autodetection and
graphical configuration, it's still useful for a wide variety of tasks.
-- System Information:
Debian
Package: tasksel-data
Version: 2.53
Severity: normal
The laptop task pulls in xfree86-driver-synaptics (to get the touchpads
on many laptops working, of course); however, after the transition to
X.org, this is now a transitional package that only depends on
xserver-xorg-input-synaptics.
--
Package: discover1-data
Version: 1.2006.01.14
Severity: normal
When installing X on my Dell D420, the driver was autodetected as
vesa. However, it has a much better driver available:
fugl:~ lspci | grep VGA
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/940GML
Express
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 04:19:18PM -0500, Christian Perrier wrote:
When installing X on my Dell D420, the driver was autodetected as
So, finally you bought a D420. Good choice, imho, even if some people
don't like Dell machines.
Thanks. I'm positively surprised so far; we'll see in a few
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 03:31:14PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Joey applied this patch yesterday and today I've built cdebconf for the
new version and after that a mini.iso including that.
When pkgsel is run, the debconf database is still being trashed...
/me is confused
Ouch, that's not good.
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 08:57:02PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
After some discussion on IRC, here's the updated patch.
One change is needed yet; the current code in debconf-copydb simply turns off
i18n support (since the old code couldn't handle that properly, it seems, or
perhaps it's
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 10:44:23PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
The relevant files (hope the filenames speak for themselves) and an strace
are available from:
http://people.debian.org/~fjp/d-i/debconf-copydb.tgz
(uploaded instead of attached because of size)
I figured out the bug. If you tweak
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 01:10:47PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
If it's using ascii that's valid, anyway cdebconf should also be sure to
copy Description-xx[_XX] fields too, as debconf will store them that way
if the package doesn't specifiy an encoding.
Well, some of the fields seem to be ASCII;
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 01:23:17PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
What do you propose in this case -- hacking support for this kind of
undefined encoding stuff into cdebconf?
No, I don't think that cdebconf should worry about supporting this stuff
beyond not corrupting it if reading a debconf
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 01:42:53PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
The easiest way would probably be to not track the information and store
(and output) the field as utf-8 without doing any transcoding. This is
not exactly what debconf does, but fields that do not define an encoding
are basically
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 09:58:17PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
I am not sure that this is desirable, next time you will encounter utf8
instances, and maybe other names too (except that I cannot find another
one ;))
Well, either we'll have to keep adding special-casing of UTF-8, or we'll have
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 07:29:44PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
I can still reproduce the problem during an installation though...
Ugh. Could you provide an strace of it, or would that be too much of a
hassle?
One idea is the encoding (installer is running with nl_NL.UTF8, although
the pkgsel
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 11:42:29PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
When debconf-copydb is run from pkgsel's postinst script, it deletes the
existing /var/cache/debconf/templates.dat in /target; after it has run
only copied templates are present.
This results in the problem that has been reported
[I'm only Cc-ing 265597 to tell people to stop Cc-ing the wrong bug now :-P]
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 07:25:19AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Linux,parisc* ) ARCH=LINUXHPPA ;;
Linux,arm* )ARCH=LINUXARM ;;
Linux,x86_64* )
Hi,
Is there any reason why UTF-8 seems to be the default in Debian nowadays? I
installed sid with d-i (current businesscard as of 2004-07-21) and noticed
that LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (a locale that was not even generated); this
confused aterm and probably other applications.
A friend of mine
Package: grub-installer
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
grub-installer fails to install, with the following message in syslog:
Jul 18 20:45:52 main-menu[298]: (process:25772):
/var/lib/dpkg/info/grub-installer.postinst: 7: get_serial_console: not found
On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 09:22:29PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Doing touch /bin/get_serial_console ; chmod +x /bin/get_serial_console
makes the package work.
AFAICS this papers only over the problem, and fails for serial installs.
Yes, of course, it was only intended to show that the
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 06:13:57PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
Anaconda does a fine job on Red Hat Linux, and Progeny has ported it to
Debian.
Anaconda for Debian is very unfinished at the moment -- AFAIK Kickstart is
one of the parts that don't work at all.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage:
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 12:41:23AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Anyway, this patch add ID printing support for types bridge, ethernet,
sound, usb, video and isdn. It is tested and works at least on my
laptop.
Works on my PC (an Athlon) as well.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 03:33:11PM +0300, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
Steinar's email-poll was announced to end on March 24th. Steinar, how's
it going?
Oh yes, sorry about that. The results, as produced by devotee (a hacked
version so I wouldn't have to bother with all the GPG stuff etc.) are:
===
[Please do not mail me a copy of your followup, I am indeed subscribed to
debian-boot]
On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 07:10:42PM +0300, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
42 votes came in (or rather 43, but one was a correction of an earlier vote
with the updated vote sheet), which I think is quite nice for
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 06:33:18PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
So I take it that Steinar's CLEARSEEN thing, which would also fix this,
never happened.
That is correct; it was never applied as nobody ever commented on it. I had
code ready; the disk it was on died, but it should be quite easy to
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 04:57:33PM +0100, Baptiste Cadiou wrote:
i like the _M_a_r_k_ _R_i_e_d_e_s_e_l_ _(_K_l_o_w_n_e_r_) one :)
Just to clarify: I won't count votes that don't follow the vote form and/or
doesn't come to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Could whoever hosts the boot logo gallery
please link to
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 06:47:56PM +0100, Erich Waelde wrote:
Quite clearly:
[X] Mark Riedesel (Klowner)
[ ] Matthew A. Nicholson
[...]
Please send this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you want it to count. :-) Also, note
that you can rank entries if you like to; you don't have to choose only
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 08:54:12PM +0100, Gruppe LAMP wrote:
which one I like best is, from:
Mark Selby
Shouldn't we have a semi-formal poll on this anytime soon? I don't think
it'll be easy summarizing all the loose mails that have been posted on this
issue without some work :-)
/* Steinar */
Since we obviously need to pick a boot logo, I'm setting up an informal poll.
I don't have the power to say whatever the poll says, we do, but I guess
most people will be quite OK with the results.
We'll follow Debian's ordinary voting procedures with regard to determining
a winner (ie. modified
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 11:33:07PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
Since we obviously need to pick a boot logo, I'm setting up an informal poll.
I don't have the power to say whatever the poll says, we do, but I guess
most people will be quite OK with the results.
Obviously I had to mess up
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 08:39:13PM -0600, John Buttery wrote:
IMO the biggest feature that distinguishes distributions is the
package management.
Or perhaps more the _packaging_. Debian has lots and lots of software
packaged, most of which is of extremely good quality. The Debian policy is
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 03:41:36PM +0100, Nikolai Prokoschenko wrote:
1. Something in the installer should automagically install appropriate
drivers, if a proprietary video card is detected. A good approach
found to the archives newly in form of nvidia-kernel-2.4.24-1-*
packages. Does
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 02:58:41PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
From my experience, what I believe the automated installs in d-i to do (not
having seen it done or tested it yet), it's not going to scratch the surface
of the functionality that FAI does, and FAI pisses all over KickStart for
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 05:23:19PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Language: English
Country:United States
Keyboard: us
Network:eth0 using DHCP
Hostname: debian
Mirror: http.us.debian.org
Mode:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 12:31:14PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
What if we changed how some items on the main menu are displayed, so
the short version (before the whole installer is loaded) looked
something like this:
Could we please avoid making such drastic changes at this point? I feel we
are
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 02:31:33PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Aaw. This does address some common annoyances, and it's not that big a
change..
Well, it does sound rather hairy at points, and I'm not really sure if being
presented with a big blob of information really helps a new user all that
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 10:39:39PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
FAIR
Full Automatic Installation Revisited.
More or less. :-) I don't know FAI in detail, but as far as I can tell, it
contains a lot of infrastructure (ie. a full installation program, lots of
server stuff etc.) that simply
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 01:40:41PM +0100, sferriol wrote:
another simple way is to add an ldap driver in cdebconf.
i use ldap with debconf, and it works fine
Yes, alternative cdebconf backends was one of the things I noted in an
earlier mail. It is not the entire solution, though.
/* Steinar
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 04:18:30PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Here are the items from the TODO that are possibilities for the next
release, with commentary. I'm trying to get an early sense of what time
period to aim for for the next release too. Please add comments and
corrections and new items.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 09:05:19PM -0200, Andre Luis Lopes wrote:
I for sure would love to use automated d-i installs since I have close
to 70 machines which are all going to be used for giving students
training on FLOSS (Free/Libre and Open Source Software) using Debian.
I'm really interested
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 07:17:49AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
Umm, main-menu definitely did this before;
Main-menu calls 'udpkg --configure --force-configure' to force
maintainers scripts to be run, but that's all. Either main-menu
or udpkg must tell cdebconf to display seen questions.
OK,
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 01:46:54PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Tollef made that change to main-menu (version 0.018), but did not say
why in the changelog.
I've hit Tollef, but he still can't remember why. :-)
However, I'm quite sure this has worked long after 0.018 -- this was correct
the last
Package: cdebconf
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
cdebconf seen handling seems to be broken again -- I've preseeded
debconf with the information that autopartkit/confirm is seen, yet
autopartkit asks me if I really want to use the automatic partitioning
tool. (autopartkit does not fset seen false
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 06:31:40PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
What say we move i386 up to the 2.4.24 kernel? All the udebs are already
available, all images build ok (and still fit!), and I have even done
partial CD installs using 2.4.24, though never all the way due to the
broken CD I
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 01:11:17AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
Udpkg (and maybe other tools?) must set debconf/showold (or
DEBCONF_SHOWOLD) to true when reconfiguring packages, and when
this is done, cdebconf can safely set debconf/showold to false
by default.
Umm, main-menu definitely did
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 08:47:50PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
My suggestion was much more humble, I was thinking about something like:
Language selected: English
Based on your chosen language, the following
default settings can be used for the install.
If they are fine,
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 10:03:42PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
What about something taking the above and transforming it into a menu?
Something along the lines of
Right, that's what I was trying to illistrate in the example denis
replied to.
Oh, sorry, I read that one a tad too quick. :-)
/*
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 12:10:06AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
Awesome! Thanks Joey and aj and anyone else who was involved in this. Would
someone please sponsor an upload of discover? As I previously posted, this
includes some major fixes including the module sorting as well as initial 2.6
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 03:18:50PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
I've prepared a new upload of discover1. It's available at
http://www.tufts.edu/~dnusin01/discover/. It includes numerous fixes,
including the module load sorting fix and support for 2.6 kernels. If an
upload won't break beta2
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 08:18:15PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
I'd also like to send out a second request to any brave souls out there
who'd be willing to test out the new discover deb with their 2.6 system.
I've only heard of successes overall (although it takes a long time on my
system,
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 04:11:47PM +0100, Holger Schurig wrote:
This brought my so far that all the right answers were pre-selected.
Unfortunately, the dialogs were still displayed, despite the Flags: seen
fields. Not only in kbd-chooser, but also in other modules.
Gah, I thought I fixed this
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 12:30:22AM -0800, Anmar Oueja wrote:
1. Hack Newt for now to pipe all output through bidi and some custom
written shaping code (should be simple to do). this requires intimiate
knowlege of Newt and fribidi. Currently the .lb LUG is looking into it.
They might do it
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 03:46:59PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Other countries in Europe
-
Missing languages:
sr (Serbian), mk (Macedonian), hr (Croatian), sq (Albanian), bs
(Bosnian), is (Icelandic), uk (Ukrainian), be (Belarussian), mo (Moldavian)
Among
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 09:33:31AM -0800, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
True, but we like to specify the number of blocks:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda count=5 bs=512
This only takes about 5 secs to run and clears the MBR as well as wipes
enough off the front of the platter to let us create a
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 06:40:38PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
cut -c 1-512 /dev/zero | head -5 /dev/hda
Blah, sorry, that won't work, of course, unless you're fond of having all
0x0a on your disks. :-)
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 09:54:25AM -0800, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
I guess you missed my point... I wasn't looking for a fix... I was
asking if it was slated for addition...
It probably isn't, but you could of course file a wishlist bug against
busybox-udeb. (We already have space problems, so I
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 10:33:57PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
- a manual
Seems to be making progress, but needs to make more progress.
Should how to customize d-i be a part of this?
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 01:17:16AM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
I don't hold high hopes for this, but just in case... Actually it
would be really nice if we got some volume discounts, I'm sure lots
of other DDs would benefit from this.
AFAIK there was some free licenses handed out
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 04:00:24PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Total time to install Debian: 5 minutes 15 seconds
Wow. :-)
klogd: orinoco_cs: RequestIRQ: Resource in use
Not sure what do to about that. I've googled around but have not found
anything that has helped.
FWIW I've seen this too. I
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 08:08:47AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
lvmcfg installs the package this way:
# install lvm-tools in /target if needed
set -- `vgdisplay -v | grep 'NOT active' | wc -l`
[ $1 -gt 0 ] apt-install lvm10
Why all this set and wc stuff? The code should be
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 09:35:35PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Why all this set and wc stuff? The code should be something along the lines
of
( vgdisplay -v | grep -q ACTIVE ) apt-install lvm10
Do you mean pvscan? vgdisplay -v doesn't show ACTIVE at all here.
Possibly; I wasn't really
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 09:01:25PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Before installing debs from the CD it displayed a new progress bar as it
checked the size of each udeb. I'm not sure what this was (not
cdrom-checker), and it should be a bit clearer what it's doing there.
Sounds like the extra
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 11:27:21AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
I noticed that a blank blue screen appears also during fs making.
For large disks this is quite annoying.
Known bug, should be fixed for beta 2. We're a bit unsure as of how to do
this best, though. :-)
/* Steinar */
--
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 01:08:01PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[?] Debian Installer Main Menu
| |
| Choose the next step in the install process: |
|
(Sending this in batches of three and three, as BTS seems to get mad at me if
I send to too many at once. :-) )
I've committed most of your template polishing (#218208, #218273, #218342,
#218567, #218884, #220543) to CVS, and the bug reports will be closed when
the respective packages are upload.
(Sending this in batches of three and three, as BTS seems to get mad at me if
I send to too many at once. :-) )
I've committed most of your template polishing (#218208, #218273, #218342,
#218567, #218884, #220543) to CVS, and the bug reports will be closed when
the respective packages are upload.
(Sending this in batches of three and three, as BTS seems to get mad at me if
I send to too many at once. :-) )
I've committed most of your template polishing (#218208, #218273, #218342,
#218567, #218884, #220543) to CVS, and the bug reports will be closed when
the respective packages are upload.
(Sending this in batches of three and three, as BTS seems to get mad at me if
I send to too many at once. :-) )
I've committed most of your template polishing (#218208, #218273, #218342,
#218567, #218884, #220543) to CVS, and the bug reports will be closed when
the respective packages are upload.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:22:33PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
# ... Lowering debconf priority limit from 'debconf/priority doesn't
exist' to 'critical'
Sounds like the main-menu bug that was fixed quite recently (giving weird
debconf/priority and lots of other ickyness).
/* Steinar */
--
tags 221447 + d-i patch pending
thanks
People, _please_ remember to set the pending tag if you've committed a patch
to CVS but not uploaded the package yet. This is the fifth patch today where
this happens, every one of which means duplicate work (especially when gluck
is slow). :-)
(Other tags,
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 10:05:33PM +0100, Julien TOUCHE wrote:
what is the status of unattended install with debian-installer ? there
were some discusions about it some times ago, but there is no reference
in Howto or TODO.
some feature planned ? (or suggested)
- normal install save to
How do we handle this as smoothly as possible? Should we insist on a naming
standard of some sort?
For reiserfs we have progsreiserfs and reiserfsprogs (yes, two different
packages with different maintainers), for xfs we have xfsprogs, for ext2 and
ext3 we have e2fsprogs, for jfs jfsutils etc..
Hi,
This has been fixed in CVS. The problem was that total_wanted was decremented
by the amount of distributed space after each partition (which makes no
sense anyhow; all partitions should be treated equal, regardless of which
order they are listed in). Thus, if there was enough space on the
Hi,
The included (untested) patch implements a new CLEARSEEN command, which
should be called right before the module aborts. I don't really like adding
new debconf commands all the time, so I'm not committing it before somebody
else acks me on this :-)
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage:
Did we get anywhere on this? I'd vote in favour of rewriting partconf using
libparted for the file system generation, but if people disagree I could
probably write a simple progress bar. (In that case, do we want to try to
grok the mkfs output for a few known filesystems, or not?)
/* Steinar */
OK, I've got a patch ready for this, which simply stats /target/bin/sh and
uses that as a heuristic of an already existing install (which would make
debootstrap fail). This would fail if an old /usr partition was mounted
inside a fresh / partition, but it would at least help in 95% of the cases.
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 06:56:01PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
Are you talking about Exim?
Bugreport 551125 becomes next sunday 4 years.
( http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=51125 )
sarge will use exim4 for precisely these reasons (exim3 isn't
debconf-configurable, exim4 is).
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 07:13:54PM +0100, Sebastian Ley wrote:
What about a private debconf question, which holds a comma separated
list of files to apt-install. This template would come with the
userspace-tools udeb and partconf would apt-install the packages in
question if corresponding
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 07:58:37PM +0100, Sebastian Ley wrote:
Yes, in case of reiserfs, the template would come with mkreiserfs-udeb.
I neither don't know what provides mkfs.ext3 but I suppose it is
parted-udeb?
fdisk-udeb (source package util-linux), actually, according to Tollef.
/*
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 11:22:01PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
The new template shown when no disk has been detected has two problems:
Another error in this package templates
less then 1 minutes should be less thAn 1 minute
Both errors fixed in CVS, thanks.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 01:21:17AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
Due to your last change in database.c, setting debconf/showold to true
does nothing, DEBCONF_SHOWOLD must be used instead. Why should we call
dpkg-reconfigure when debconf/showold could be easily set up?
Well, same thing, and yes,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 08:39:56PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
When you reselect an menu item it does a udpkg --reconfigure, right? I
udpkg --configure --force-configure, but this is similar, yes.
Which in turn is supposed to call dpkg-reconfigure, isn't it?
hope that will show seen questions
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 03:30:30PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
It would definitely help compared to what we have today, but it would still
suck.
Yes, but I don't think it's worth to invest more time in that now. This
would be an easy and acceptable solution.
Well, it's not a matter of
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 11:03:53AM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
This depends on the size of the filesystem and if dma is enabled or not.
enabling DMA speeds up filesystem creation a lot on big disks. With DMA
disabled it can take several minutes to create a big filesystem.
It can, even with
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 10:08:43PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
In my tests it looks like cdebconf writes the database quite frequently
(suprisingly frequently, really), so getting the full db should not be a
problem.
To make cdebconf write the database, kill the frontend with SIGUSR1.
main-menu
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 08:17:07PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
The progress bar dialog does of course resize a few times, even with
debootstrap fixes, since the descriptions of some kernel modules are
rather long. I wish it would only grow bigger, not smaller..
This is already the case, isn't it?
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 10:45:54PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
If one first runs a module that fails (for instance, install LILO on a
non-existant drive, or install base from network with cable unplugged)
and then run hw-detect, weird stuff happens:
Can you provide an easier way to reproduce this?
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:43:09PM +0100, Jeremie Koenig wrote:
BTW, anna does :
debconf_fset(debconf, ANNA_CHOOSE_MODULES, seen, false);
before the question is asked. I think there are other instances of this.
Maybe this sould be moved after we input the question ?
Definitely.
A quick test indicates that most interesting mkfs-variations (ext2, ext3,
reiserfs; vfat and jfs are so quick it doesn't need progress, and xfs seems
only a bit slower than that) has at least some kind of progress output, so we
_could_ theoretically grok that. It will be ugly, though...
What is the current status on alpha? (The ports page say that the images are
bootable, but not much more.) I have access to an AS2100 (SRM-based, in other
words) and could probably help testing/fixing bugs if the Alpha guys need it
to get on the beta 2 release.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage:
Could somebody add the URL for the daily-built images
(http://people.debian.org/~sjogren/d-i/images/daily/) back to the website?
They seem to have been removed, and they are useful for people who want to
test the d-i beta via netboot or floppy.
Also, the last built images are from the 9th; isn't
Wasn't this bug fixed in autopartkit 0.64?
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: autopartkit
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
If autopartkit can't find any drives to partition (say, a SCSI-only
system where the SCSI card was not properly detected), it dies with the
following (rather confusing) error message:
Could not stat device autopartkit/device_name doesn't exist -
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 06:27:47PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
Recently cdebconf behavior has been changed to not display already seen
questions, in order to help non-interactive installations.
But this change makes back up quite useless, because one cannot go
back and forth without trouble,
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
