Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
snip/
I 've just looked at theme PNGs in Bladr which are referred to by gtkrc
ls -l pixmaps | awk '{system(grep $8 gtkrc /dev/null; if [ $? -eq 0
]; then echo $8 used_png; else echo $8 unused_png; fi)}'
and it turned out that below listed PNGs are *not* referred
Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
snip/
I 've just looked at theme PNGs in Bladr which are referred to by gtkrc
ls -l pixmaps | awk '{system(grep $8 gtkrc /dev/null; if [ $? -eq
0 ]; then echo $8 used_png; else echo $8 unused_png; fi)}'
and it turned out that below
Denis Barbier wrote:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 04:10:09PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 22 September 2006 15:12, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
I think we may want let icons PNGs in place because this would allow
me to replace the special PNGs used for the error (error_icon.png)
and warning
On Friday 22 September 2006 09:42, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
any progress in packaging the Bladr and HighContrastLarge GTK themes
for g-i ? IIRC it was proposed to pack them into rootskel-gtk package.
Yes, I'm working on it. We need some other changes first, but those are in
progress. I can
Frans Pop scrisse:
Question: are all the PNGs currently included in your tarball
actually used? Could any of them be left out?
IIRC there are still some of them which can be stripped down, but
first I need to see which icons and pixmaps are needed by the new
graphical partitioner.
Cheers,
On Friday 22 September 2006 14:39, Luca Bruno wrote:
Frans Pop scrisse:
Question: are all the PNGs currently included in your tarball
actually used? Could any of them be left out?
IIRC there are still some of them which can be stripped down, but
first I need to see which icons and pixmaps
Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 22 September 2006 09:42, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
any progress in packaging the Bladr and HighContrastLarge GTK themes
for g-i ? IIRC it was proposed to pack them into rootskel-gtk package.
Yes, I'm working on it. We need some other changes first, but those are
Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 22 September 2006 14:39, Luca Bruno wrote:
Frans Pop scrisse:
Question: are all the PNGs currently included in your tarball
actually used? Could any of them be left out?
IIRC there are still some of them which can be stripped down, but
first I need to see which
On Friday 22 September 2006 15:12, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
I think we may want let icons PNGs in place because this would allow
me to replace the special PNGs used for the error (error_icon.png)
and warning (note_icon.png) questions with PNGs belonging to the
current theme in use (e.g.:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 04:10:09PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 22 September 2006 15:12, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
I think we may want let icons PNGs in place because this would allow
me to replace the special PNGs used for the error (error_icon.png)
and warning (note_icon.png)
Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 09:20:28PM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Hi
Luca Bruno has just finished polishing up his nice Bladr GTK+ theme,
that i propose as default GTK theme for use in the g-i.
A tarball can be found here [1] and i suggest (at least for the short
Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 16 September 2006 21:20, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Luca Bruno has just finished polishing up his nice Bladr GTK+ theme,
that i propose as default GTK theme for use in the g-i.
Could you provide some screenshots?
IMO the look of the theme should be approved
Loïc Minier wrote:
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
I suppose: s/gtk2-engines-pixmap/gtk-engines-pixmap/
I think it's gtk2-engines-pixbuf which has
/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libpixmap.so and is 32K.
Here are the ELF deps of the directfb flavor:
bee% objdump -x
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
I suppose: s/gtk2-engines-pixmap/gtk-engines-pixmap/
Again right :)
For the record, that's a GTK+ 1.2 engine package.
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Sunday 17 September 2006 11:41, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
I suppose: s/gtk2-engines-pixmap/gtk-engines-pixmap/
Again right :)
For the record, that's a GTK+ 1.2 engine package.
My error. I did not read the output of my search on p.d.o correctly
There is starting a discussion on debian-desktop for artwork for debian,
regarding etch and etch+1 [0]. It would be nice if the debian installer
come with the same theme (layout, colour scheme).
Just to let you know.
[0] = http://wiki.debian.org/DebianDesktopArtwork
Dom, 2006-09-17 às 12:04
Hi
Luca Bruno has just finished polishing up his nice Bladr GTK+ theme,
that i propose as default GTK theme for use in the g-i.
A tarball can be found here [1] and i suggest (at least for the short
period) to package Bladr in the rootskel-gtk theme like it was proposed
to do for the GTK
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 09:20:28PM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Hi
Luca Bruno has just finished polishing up his nice Bladr GTK+ theme,
that i propose as default GTK theme for use in the g-i.
A tarball can be found here [1] and i suggest (at least for the short
period) to package
On Saturday 16 September 2006 21:20, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Luca Bruno has just finished polishing up his nice Bladr GTK+ theme,
that i propose as default GTK theme for use in the g-i.
Could you provide some screenshots?
IMO the look of the theme should be approved first, at least by the
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
An issue arises: to make GTKDFB able to load PNGs for themes, the pixmap
loading library must be provided, like the package gtk2-engines-pixmap
does on a regular debian system by providing libpixmap.so on a X GTK
target.
I guess this issue
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
I suppose: s/gtk2-engines-pixmap/gtk-engines-pixmap/
I think it's gtk2-engines-pixbuf which has
/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libpixmap.so and is 32K.
Here are the ELF deps of the directfb flavor:
bee% objdump -x
Hi Loïc,
Thanks for the quick reaction.
On Saturday 16 September 2006 23:15, Loïc Minier wrote:
Must this file be split in a separate udeb as in the archive?
No, I see no reason to have it in a separate udeb if it can be added to
the existing one.
We may want the pending changes for
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
We may want the pending changes for experimental (this one and the fix for
#382435) in current 2.8.x too.
Would that be possible? No need to upload right now; just want to know if
an upload to unstable would be possible.
Yes, it would be possible. In
23 matches
Mail list logo
