Re: Bug#633561: kfreebsd-i386 d-i/squeeze FTBFS (was Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1)

2011-10-07 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 23:12 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/10/6 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org: On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 07:20:50 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: Attached patch should fix the problem. I can upload a fixed kfreebsd-8 this evening (feel free to NMU if someone has time to

Re: kfreebsd-i386 d-i/squeeze FTBFS (was Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1)

2011-10-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 07:20:50 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/10/6 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: test -e ./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/zfs || rmdir ./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/ rmdir: failed to remove `./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/': Directory not empty [...] $ debdiff

Re: Bug#633561: kfreebsd-i386 d-i/squeeze FTBFS (was Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1)

2011-10-06 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 07:20:50 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: Attached patch should fix the problem. I can upload a fixed kfreebsd-8 this evening (feel free to NMU if someone has time to verify earlier than that). What's the status of that upload? Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: Bug#633561: kfreebsd-i386 d-i/squeeze FTBFS (was Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1)

2011-10-06 Thread Robert Millan
2011/10/6 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org: On Thu, Oct  6, 2011 at 07:20:50 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: Attached patch should fix the problem.  I can upload a fixed kfreebsd-8 this evening (feel free to NMU if someone has time to verify earlier than that). What's the status of that

Re: kfreebsd-i386 d-i/squeeze FTBFS (was Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1)

2011-10-06 Thread Robert Millan
2011/10/6 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: Forgive my ignorance on the precise mechanics, but is it correct that the /boot/kernel/kernel.gz symlink creation was also removed? Yes, this is all curft for backward compatibility with versions of Debian GNU/kFreeBSD that have never been

kfreebsd-i386 d-i/squeeze FTBFS (was Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1)

2011-10-05 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[tl,dr; these changes broke d-i in stable] On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 00:25 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/9/27 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: - Does this affect which modules end up in the udebs? It looks like this was missed in the original follow-up. As a related query, has

Re: Bug#633561: kfreebsd-i386 d-i/squeeze FTBFS (was Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1)

2011-10-05 Thread Philipp Kern
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 11:20:00PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [tl,dr; these changes broke d-i in stable] I think in the worst case we can just keep the current (as in non-point release version) of d-i on kfreebsd-* for the next point release and don't update to the binNMU. It's actually from

Re: kfreebsd-i386 d-i/squeeze FTBFS (was Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1)

2011-10-05 Thread Robert Millan
2011/10/6 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: test -e ./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/zfs || rmdir ./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/ rmdir: failed to remove `./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/': Directory not empty [...] $ debdiff kernel-image-8.1-1-486-di_0.6_kfreebsd-i386.udeb

Re: Bug#633561: kfreebsd-i386 d-i/squeeze FTBFS (was Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1)

2011-10-05 Thread Robert Millan
2011/10/6 Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org: That said, this needs to be fixed, and we're all not very happy, given the fact that we actually did ask before if something changes in the udeb output. I have to say in my defense that I did check for changes in udeb output. However these changes

Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1

2011-10-03 Thread Robert Millan
2011/10/2 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: If I'd been sure that binNMUs would work then we could have scheduled them directly; the previous uploads have all been sourceful, so I assumed there was a reason for that. In any case, I've flagged the uploads for acceptance at the next

Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1

2011-10-02 Thread Robert Millan
2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: If there are changes which need propagating to the udebs Yes. The if_msk update is specially important for the installer. If the aim is to do that for 6.0.3 then those uploads need to happen within the next day, or they'll miss the cut-off.

Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1

2011-10-02 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 14:37 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: If there are changes which need propagating to the udebs Yes. The if_msk update is specially important for the installer. If the aim is to do that for 6.0.3 then those uploads

Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1

2011-10-01 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 22:59 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 12:23 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: Please go ahead, bearing in mind that the upload window for the Squeeze

Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1

2011-10-01 Thread Robert Millan
2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 12:23 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: Please go ahead, bearing in mind that the upload window for the Squeeze point release closes over this weekend. Uploaded.