On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 12:29:58PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 29.02.2012 17:20, dann frazier wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:20:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Feel free to go ahead with the kernel upload, so we can get it
chucked at the buildds.
[...]
Ack.
Unfortunately, the
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 06:31:06PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
I reuploaded w/o that patch - that fix was POWER7 specific, and it
looks like POWER7 support wasn't supported in the lenny timeframe
anyway.
POWER7 only really got added to the installer in 6.0.4 (not even 6.0)
so, seems perfectly
On 29.02.2012 17:20, dann frazier wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:20:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Feel free to go ahead with the kernel upload, so we can get it
chucked at the buildds.
[...]
Ack.
Unfortunately, the powerpc build died:
CC [M] arch/powerpc/oprofile/op_model_power4.o
On 27.02.2012 01:12, dann frazier wrote:
Ok - sounds like no DSA, but maybe an upload via o-p-u. My vote is to
do no kernel upload if the release gets scheduled for the first
weekend in march - that's one week out, and I'll have spotty
availability beginning mid-week. For later weekends, I'm for
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:20:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 27.02.2012 01:12, dann frazier wrote:
Ok - sounds like no DSA, but maybe an upload via o-p-u. My vote is to
do no kernel upload if the release gets scheduled for the first
weekend in march - that's one week out, and I'll have
On 14.02.2012 21:36, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 23:05 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
As the security team have recently confirmed that security support
for
lenny will end on February 6th (a year after the release of squeeze)
it
makes sense to schedule 5.0.10 to be after that
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 10:12:11PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 08:44:46PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Assuming the technical side still works, I do worry a little that a new
DSA three weeks after the announced EOL for security support might
confuse people.
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 08:44:46PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Assuming the technical side still works, I do worry a little that a new
DSA three weeks after the announced EOL for security support might
confuse people.
I suppose we could do a last-minute kernel update via o-p-u,
[Cc list trimmed]
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 15:03 -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 04:55:32PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:36:38PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
-kernel, -boot - were there any plans for a final kernel and/or d-i
upload for lenny?
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 21:36 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
-kernel, -boot - were there any plans for a final kernel and/or d-i
upload for lenny? If so we need to get those sorted asap.
*prod*?
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 09:12:00PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 21:36 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
-kernel, -boot - were there any plans for a final kernel and/or d-i
upload for lenny? If so we need to get those sorted asap.
*prod*?
I got nothing. Dann?
Ben.
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 23:05 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Working on the four-monthly schedule for oldstable, the next lenny point
release would be due in early February.
As the security team have recently confirmed that security support for
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 23:05 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Working on the four-monthly schedule for oldstable, the next lenny point
release would be due in early February.
As the security team have recently confirmed that security support for
lenny will end on February 6th (a year after the
13 matches
Mail list logo
