Re: Installation report: FAILED on i386

2004-03-17 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Martin Michlmayr wrote: Apparently beta3 has better SATA support. Can you try? I did. :-P Here's the lowdown: the installer basically works and installs the system. Unfortunately I can't get either grub or lilo to work, so I can't boot it. This may have something to do with device mapping

Re: Installation report: FAILED on i386

2004-03-17 Thread elijah wright
Apparently beta3 has better SATA support. Can you try? This may have something to do with device mapping in the BIOS -- I may not be feeding the right information to lilo and/or grub. Or it may have something to do with the fact that my system doesn't appear to have a 'compatibility

Re: Installation report: FAILED on i386

2004-03-17 Thread Nathanael Nerode
elijah wright wrote: Apparently beta3 has better SATA support. Can you try? This may have something to do with device mapping in the BIOS -- I may not be feeding the right information to lilo and/or grub. Or it may have something to do with the fact that my system doesn't appear to have a

Re: Installation report: FAILED on i386

2004-01-27 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Herbert Xu wrote: Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2 Serial ATA drives, 1 IDE drive, e1000 Ethernet card. * It hangs on loading module ide-detect if RAID is disabled in the BIOS. * If RAID is enabled in the BIOS, it gets past that, but it never detects either Serial ATA drive. *

Re: Re: Installation report: FAILED on i386

2004-01-20 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-20 12:03]: So it turns out, having installed Linux to the one drive which is visible to Linux, that the BIOS won't boot from that drive. And I can't Boot from floppy or CD and use root=/dev/... or boot from the net via PXE. Or can you add a

Re: Re: Installation report: FAILED on i386

2004-01-20 Thread Nathanael Nerode
* Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-18 18:44]: Perhaps you didn't notice that I'm completely stuck on another matter (the wget failure). Happy to try once I can work around that. Put the drive in another PC and use debootstrap to create a base system. Or install another distro, make a

Re: Re: Installation report: FAILED on i386

2004-01-20 Thread Joey Hess
Martin Michlmayr wrote: Boot from floppy or CD and use root=/dev/... I don't think that works, you get the d-i initrd, which is not very good at booting a regular debian system. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Re: Installation report: FAILED on i386

2004-01-20 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-20 12:43]: Boot from floppy or CD and use root=/dev/... I don't think that works, you get the d-i initrd, which is not very good at booting a regular debian system. Yeah, you'll need a special CD. However, this used to work with woody - I really hope

Re: Re: Installation report: FAILED on i386

2004-01-20 Thread Joey Hess
Martin Michlmayr wrote: Yeah, you'll need a special CD. However, this used to work with woody - I really hope we can make a rescue option which allows this. It has been useful many times. If we had a good and reasonably small rescue initrd, we could include it on the CD easily. -- see shy

Re: Re: Installation report: FAILED on i386

2004-01-20 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-20 13:12]: If we had a good and reasonably small rescue initrd, we could include it on the CD easily. Yeah, but even booting without an initrd (from an existing installation) should be possible. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: Re: Installation report: FAILED on i386

2004-01-20 Thread Joey Hess
Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-20 13:12]: If we had a good and reasonably small rescue initrd, we could include it on the CD easily. Yeah, but even booting without an initrd (from an existing installation) should be possible. The standard debian install

Re: Installation report: FAILED on i386

2004-01-20 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-20 12:03]: So it turns out, having installed Linux to the one drive which is visible to Linux, that the BIOS won't boot from that drive. And I can't Boot from floppy or CD and use root=/dev/... or boot from the net via PXE.

Re: Installation report: FAILED on i386

2004-01-18 Thread Herbert Xu
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2 Serial ATA drives, 1 IDE drive, e1000 Ethernet card. * It hangs on loading module ide-detect if RAID is disabled in the BIOS. * If RAID is enabled in the BIOS, it gets past that, but it never detects either Serial ATA drive. * DHCP configuration

Re: Installation report: FAILED on i386

2004-01-18 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Herbert Xu wrote: Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2 Serial ATA drives, 1 IDE drive, e1000 Ethernet card. * It hangs on loading module ide-detect if RAID is disabled in the BIOS. * If RAID is enabled in the BIOS, it gets past that, but it never detects either Serial ATA drive. *

Re: Installation report: FAILED on i386

2004-01-18 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-18 18:44]: Perhaps you didn't notice that I'm completely stuck on another matter (the wget failure). Happy to try once I can work around that. Put the drive in another PC and use debootstrap to create a base system. Or install another distro,

Re: Installation report: FAILED on i386

2004-01-17 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-17 19:15]: 2 Serial ATA drives, 1 IDE drive, e1000 Ethernet card. * If RAID is enabled in the BIOS, it gets past that, but it never detects either Serial ATA drive. Does a standard 2.4 kernel normally work? Or do you have patches or 2.6? --

Re: Installation report: FAILED on i386

2004-01-17 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-17 20:26]: the mysterious hang was much more disturbing. I know. :/ Other people have experienced it as well (e.g. 224494), but I don't think our kernel maintainer has looked at it yet. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: Installation report: FAILED on i386

2004-01-17 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-17 19:15]: 2 Serial ATA drives, 1 IDE drive, e1000 Ethernet card. * If RAID is enabled in the BIOS, it gets past that, but it never detects either Serial ATA drive. Does a standard 2.4 kernel normally work? Or do you have