Hello Ferenc,
2011/2/15 Ferenc Wagner wf...@niif.hu:
Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br writes:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 22:06, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
FEATURE_SHADOWPASSWDS
support for getspent() and friends.
Current: deb n static y udeb n
Proposed action: enable for
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:55:13 +
Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 20:44, Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com
wrote: ...
Crush development has been postponed until multiarch is ready but
some of the bits for the proof of concept can be found at emdebian
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 20:44, Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Crush development has been postponed until multiarch is ready but some
of the bits for the proof of concept can be found at emdebian svn [0].
...
What should we do? Just sync static with deb and later work on that?
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 21:06, Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote:
...
I cannot recommend any embedded system should use any version of
busybox built by Debian for d-i without *also* installing and using
coreutils, login, passwd, shadow, perl and all the rest. i.e. busybox
from Debian is
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:15:57 +
Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 21:06, Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org
wrote: ...
I cannot recommend any embedded system should use any version of
busybox built by Debian for d-i without *also* installing and using
Part one of the discussion series. Config options which
are enabled in udeb and static builds but not enabled
in regular build.
I assume two things:
1) regular build should include at least all options (with
very few exceptions, see below) as udeb and static builds
does.
2) generally, we want
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 01:06:46AM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Part one of the discussion series. Config options which
are enabled in udeb and static builds but not enabled
in regular build.
I don't disagree with anything you've mentioned. If all of the changes you
recommend were
First I'd like to thank you for doing that but I'd also want to make
clear that we need to be conservative on udeb flavour since the
installer heavily depends on it. More bellow...
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 22:06, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
...
Just for the record, non-static
Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br writes:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 22:06, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
FEATURE_SHADOWPASSWDS
support for getspent() and friends.
Current: deb n static y udeb n
Proposed action: enable for deb
Discussion: It is quite unexpected that busybox
Quoting Michael Tokarev (m...@tls.msk.ru):
Part one of the discussion series. Config options which
are enabled in udeb and static builds but not enabled
in regular build.
I won't comment myself (as said already, this is out of my field of
expertise), but I'd suggest to also wait for Joey
10 matches
Mail list logo
