Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -- Package-specific info:
Boot method: usb
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/wheezy_di_beta2/amd64/iso-cd/debian-wheezy-DI-b2-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: 23 September 2012
Hi all,
On 15-05-18 15:11, Paul Gevers wrote:
> tl;dr: debootstrap/1.0.98 breaks debomatic/0.23-1 autopkgtest in testing
> see: https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/debomatic/testing/amd64/
The autopkgtest of debomatic in testing is apparently already broken¹
without the new debootstrap for r
Hi Luca,
On 16-05-18 13:33, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> 2018-05-16 10:05 GMT+02:00 Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org>:
>> The autopkgtest of debomatic in testing is apparently already broken¹
>> without the new debootstrap for reasons unclear to me. As a result it
>> isn't
Hi Tianon,
On 14-06-18 10:19, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> The patch for #839046 also disabled --merged-usr for stretch as stretch
> was added to the blacklist in first_stage_install().
>
> debootstrap should default to non-merged-usr for stretch, but it should
> be possible to enable merged-usr
Dear maintainers,
With a recent upload of debootstrap the autopkgtest of debuerreotype
version 0.6-1 started to fail. See:
https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/debuerreotype/
and
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=debootstrap
I looked at the test¹ and it compares the result of the current run
Package: release-notes
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
As now discussion on the RT sprint, the release notes should probably
say something about the work on secure boot.
I wouldn't know what to put in, so proposals are welcome. Until that
time, I file this bug to not forget.
Paul
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi all,
On Wed, 06 Dec 2017 19:39:08 +0100 Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> [Please keep debian-boot@ and hert...@debian.org in copy of your answers.]
done.
> Raphaël Hertzog enabled unattended-upgrades support by default in pkgsel,
> which is first shipped with the D-I
Source: di-netboot-assistant
Version: 0.60
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: issue
Control: affects -1 src:grub2
Dear maintainers,
With a recent upload of grub2 the autopkgtest of di-netboot-assistant
fails in testing when
Hi
On 23-03-2019 12:47, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> This was backed out at the request of the security team:
>
> https://tracker.debian.org/news/974578/accepted-pkgsel-057-source-into-unstable/
>
> so I guess this makes this bug report moot?
So let's close the bug.
Paul
signature.asc
severity 55 grave
merge 929172 904699
thanks
Hi Diederik,
On 31-05-2019 21:16, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Control: severity -1 serious
Please don't use this if you CC multiple bugs that aren't all of the
same severity.
> The fix has actually been made. But the problem is that it needs an
Hi Ben, Holger,
On 22-04-2019 00:25, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-03-29 at 16:45 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Package: release-notes
>> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
>>
>> As now discussion on the RT sprint, the release notes should probably
>
Hi all,
On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 14:38:07 + Iain Lane
wrote:
> Package: keyboard-configuration
> Version: 1.188
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
[...]
> The generated names in keyboard-configuration.config are translated
> incorrectly:
>
> laney@raleigh> dpkg --ctrl-tarfile
Hi Debian-boot,
Friendly ping.
On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 07:44:30 + Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 04:45:20PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> >As now discussion on the RT sprint, the release notes should probably
> >say something about the work on secure boot.
> &g
Hi Holger,
On 25-04-2019 08:11, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Paul Gevers wrote:
> First, I wonder why you ask personally me for this.
Because the task was originally self-assigned to kibi and was documented
on the wiki [1] as "ask Holger".
> Why not ask the debian-boot team?
clone 933829 -2
reassign -2 release.debian.org
retitle -2 buster-pu: package win32-loader/0.9.3+deb10u1
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags pu
thanks
Let's hope I got that right.
On 16-08-2019 08:55, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> debian-boot@ / debian-release@: can I upload
Source: kernel-wedge
Version: 2.100
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainers,
With a recent upload of kernel-wedge you introduced an autopkgtest in
your package. However the test fails. I copied some of the output at the
Source: installation-guide
Version: 20190622
Severity: serious
Control: fixed -1 20191229
Tags: sid bullseye pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync
Hi Holger,
On 10-05-2020 19:38, Holger Wansing wrote:
> This has already been noted on debian-boot some days ago.
Ack.
> I fail to see what's the reason for this.
I'll have a more careful look.
> We have some pending changings in git.
> Should I do another upload, to try to get this fixed?
Hi Holger,
On 10-05-2020 19:55, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> I fail to see what's the reason for this.
>
> I'll have a more careful look.
The britney output [1] shows that tasksel isn't migrating because it
would make task-pkgs-are-installable-faux non-installable in testing:
skipped: ta
Source: tasksel
Version: 3.58
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.59
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s), kibi,
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync between testing and
Hi all again,
On 07-06-2021 23:08, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-06-07 at 20:38 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Nevermind 10 July. Steve, you can stop contemplating about it. We'll
>> go for 24 July as the *tentative* release date.
>
> Unfortunately I've just discov
Hi all,
On 06-06-2021 20:03, Paul Gevers wrote:
> With the availability of Adam now known (and some off-list info), we have:
>
> 26 June
> [Ansgar (ftp), Sebastian (release), Adam (release)]
> 3 July
> [Ansgar (ftp), Paul (release), Adam (release)]
> 10 July
> [S
Hi kibi,
On 20-05-2021 17:55, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> If that's fine for the release team, I'd be happy to have the package in
> unstable so that can be tested via daily builds of the installer (they
> pull udebs from unstable). I'm not sure how much testing those daily
> builds get from people
Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i
On 19-05-2021 21:54, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Please unblock package gtk+2.0
Ok from my side. As this upload is to fix the d-i issue I'm pretty sure
that debian-boot is also fine, but I promised kibi this morning that
I'll follow the process and wait for an explicit
Hi Cyril
On 20-05-2021 08:23, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Having udeb-producing packages change under our feet when we're in
> the middle of unentangling the rendering mess isn't exactly nice…
I'm terribly sorry, but I thought we discussed migrating udeb generating
packages recently on IRC
Control: tags -1 d-i confirmed
Hi,
This needs an ACK from d-boot as well.
On 16-05-2021 12:05, Colin Watson wrote:
> Please unblock grub2 2.04-18. This is mostly fixes from Steve to sort
> out UEFI Secure Boot on i386. The upstream patch to fix section size
> calculation *seems* to only fix a
Hi all,
On 24-04-2021 00:41, Donald Norwood wrote:
> Indeed, from this and the last few posts in the discussion it reads that
> perhaps June is the better option for the 'timed' ready when ready
> release date.
The progress of fixing the blocking issues in the debian-installer is
good enough to
Control: tags -1 d-i confirmed
Hi,
On 20-05-2021 10:26, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Please unblock package libx11
This needs also an ack from d-i, boot CC-ed.
> This fixes CVE-2021-31535, a bug in libX11 which could lead to the
> execution of additional X requests due to insufficient
Hi kibi,
On 24-05-2021 06:30, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Nothing dramatic, we'll be more explicit next time and pick an option
> for real instead of considering both options and letting one pick a
> favorite. :)
Let's agree on that indeed. It's a shame that we get into these
annoyances, while all
Hi,
On 30-05-2021 06:35, Donald Norwood wrote:
> On 5/29/21 9:12 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 10:17:55PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>>> Assuming all goes well
>>> with RC2 and RC3, we'd be looking at the following candidate release dates:
>&g
Hi all,
On 04-06-2021 06:49, Paul Gevers wrote:
> 26 June [Ansgar (ftp)]
> 3 July[Ansgar (ftp), Sebastian (release), Paul (release)]
> 10 July [Steve (CD) MAYBE , Ansgar (ftp), Paul (release)]
> 17 July [Steve (CD), press, Ansgar (ftp), Paul (release)]
> 24 July [St
Control: tags -1 = confirmed d-i
Hi Theodore,
Sorry it took so long.
On 20-05-2021 19:40, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> That patch is rather long, but it's all mostly of the form:
>
> - tail = (struct ext4_fc_tail *)ext4_fc_tag_val(tl);
> + memcpy(, ext4_fc_tag_val(tl), sizeof(tail));
>
>
Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i
@boot: needs d-i ACK. As I believe you are aware of, the upload has
already happened.
@kibi: feel free to age it if/when you see fit
Paul
On 19-05-2021 17:27, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 unblock: linux/5.10.38-1 (pre-approval checking)
>
>
Control: reassign -1 installation-guide
On 13-05-2021 18:32, Justin B Rye wrote:
> Marc Haber wrote:
>> Package: release-notes
>> Severity: minor
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Chapter 4.3.3.1 of the release notes suggest using install-mbr /dev/sdX
>> followed by mkdosfs /dev/sdX1. On a really blank medium,
Hi,
On 25-05-2021 01:01, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I'm happy to have gtk+2.0 migrate to testing as soon as seems reasonable
> from the release team point of view. Ditto for cdebconf, but I can file
> a separate request for that, as is customary for unblock requests.
unblocked both gtk+2.0 and
Hi,
On 01-06-2021 08:06, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> The version is not 4 days in unstable, looks good to me to let it
> migrate to testing (unless Cyril spotted issues in recent d-i tests).
I'm still good to go.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi all,
On 30-05-2021 09:09, Paul Gevers wrote:
> 26 June
> 3 July
> 10 July
> 17 July [Steve (CD), press]
> 24 July [Steve (CD), press]
> 31 July
> 7 August
> 14 August
This can now be updated to:
26 June [Ansgar (ftp)]
3 July[Ansgar (ftp), Sebastian (release),
Control: tags -1 d-i
Hi
On 03-07-2021 07:17, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> [ Other info ]
> Builds an udeb and needs a d-i hint as well.
So, let's make kibi aware of this too (via boot).
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i
Hi,
On 01-07-2021 14:02, Colin Watson wrote:
> Please unblock grub2 2.04-19. This fixes unbootability problems after
> certain kinds of grub-install failure, which I think constituted an
> important-severity bug at the very least. I did this by resyncing the
>
Hi all,
On 08-06-2021 21:30, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 08:50:55PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> 31 July: ** tentative ** release date
>
> Cool, works for me. Pencilled into my calendar now. :-)
With less than three weeks to go until the tentative release dat
Control: tags -1 d-i
Hi,
On 10-07-2021 22:15, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi release team, hi Cyril (specifically for d-i)
So, let's add him (via d-boot) in.
> Please unblock package linux
>
> It contained a rebase of the 5.10.y series to 5.10.46 upstream and
> included the following
Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i
Hi Steve,
On 11-07-2021 12:21, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Please unblock package udpkg
unblocked
> I've added locking for the status file, so parallel udpkg invocations
> will not break the world. This fixes #987368. We definitely want this
> fix for Bullseye.
Hi ftpmasters, Adam,
On 09-04-2021 20:47, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Dear release team, ftpmasters, press team, cd team, d-i team,
[...]
> We propose to aim for a release date in May. Would either of the
> following work for you and do you have any preference?
> - May 1
> - May 8
>
Hi Cyril,
On 23-04-2021 15:13, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Seems like our current best option is May 22 if you can make it.
>
> That's definitely not what I would call “best option” from an
> installer point of view.
I hear you. So, I fear that we're getting into a situation where
everything
Hi Holger,
On 10-04-2021 18:14, Holger Wansing wrote:
>>> 2. A problem came up during freeze regarding input methods for several
>>>languages:
>>>Starting with bullseye, GNOME depends on ibus, which is not fully
>>>compatible with the view of some language teams, who would like to
Hi boot team,
As is custom in the final phases of the release, I'm asking you to think
about issues that are worth mentioning in the release notes for bullseye
from the perspective of the installer.
Feel free to reply to this e-mail, or, even better, to bts against the
release-notes package if
Hi Holger,
On 10-04-2021 12:59, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Maybe the release-team could look into the pending unblock issues for d-i
> in the meantime?
Were unblock requests filed? If so, can you point me at them as I don't
know which unblock requests you're talking about? If not, they don't
appear
Dear release team, ftpmasters, press team, cd team, d-i team,
The Release Team believes that the state of bullseye is pretty good.
Yes, there are some blocking bugs [1] and d-i and shim still need some
love, but the state is much better than we remembered from the same time
in buster.
Last time
Package: tasksel
Version: 3.63
Severity: serious
Justification: not installable
Hi,
man-pages-it has been removed from unstable. Don't ask me how that is
possible as your package still depends on it, but it happened. Please
drop the dependency. The RM bug #979034 suggests the data now lives
Hi,
Excuse me if I totally got this wrong, but to an outsider this looks
like a typo...
On Sat, 26 Sep 2020 12:17:13 +0200 Wilco Baan Hofman
wrote:
> debconf: --> FGET clock-setup/utc seen ^ hyphen
> debconf: <-- 0 true
> debconf: --> SET clock-setup/utc true INPUT low
Hi Didier,
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 08:45:26 +0100 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
wrote:
> It'll be updated to be marked "found" in the latest version, and "notfound"
> in any version allowed to migrate.
I think it's a tiny bit better to use "fixed" for the version that's
allowed to migrate. "notfound" is
Hi
On 04-08-2021 21:36, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr wrote (Wed, 4 Aug 2021 17:03:05 +0800):
>> * Holger Wansing [2021-08-04 10:57]:
>>> Moreover, couldn't this be simplified then, into something like
>>>
>>> "Support for all QNAP Turbo Station devices (TS-xxx) was dropped?"
>>
>>
Hi,
On 06-08-2021 21:52, Holger Wansing wrote:
> I would like to add a paragraph to the release-notes, describing a bit the
> new "install-firmware" mechanism via modalias, with a link to the new doc
> in the installation-guide, for those who experience problems.
>
> Please find a patch
Dear Debian-boot,
On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 20:55:11 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
Can somebody please judge if win32-loader should
migrate in the current state and take appropriate actions if so: contact
ftp to process the package on their side and update bug 982838 (I
wouldn't close it, but reuse
Source: win32-loader
Version: 0.10.4
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.10.5
Tags: sid bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The following template feels a bit weird for the somewhat special
package that win32-loader is, but I leave it
Hi all,
Current overview to check if I got things right and to hopefully trigger
more replies. We currently don't have any day yet with all involved
teams comfortably present, the one coming closest is 4 September.
Somebody from ftp available on 14 august?
14 August (day before DebCamp)
Hi Salvatore,
On 20-07-2021 20:05, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> We do not have yet the signed packages that said, but once present
> ideally the package get's aged as well to have fixes asap in bullseye.
As asked on IRC: IIUC it's best to wait until all binaries are in and
migrate the set
Hi all,
On 11-07-2021 21:11, Paul Gevers wrote:
> With less than three weeks to go until the tentative release date, I
> would love to confirm the date by now, but there is a serious issue with
> crucial infrastructure (cdbuilder.d.o). Apart from this issue (and what
> it means
Hi all,
Thanks to the reply from Ansgar, we now have a release date for
bullseye: 14 August. For the avoidance of doubt, this is *not* a
tentative date anymore. I'll do a proper announcement later today or
tomorrow evening.
14 August (day before DebCamp)
RT: Adam
Image: Steve,
Hi Cyril,
On 24-07-2021 09:05, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> @RT: I'd be happy to have some feedback from your regarding this
> approach; telling people to enable contrib/non-free so that they
> can install firmware packages is definitely *not* something I take
> lightly, but I'd be
Hi Holger,
On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 21:38:11 +0100 Holger Wansing
wrote:
Andika Triwidada wrote (Tue, 15 Mar 2022 11:26:40 +):
>
> Attached is update to Indonesian translation.
Just applied to GIT.
Thanks
Shall we have an upload of this soon and do the ftp-master dance with
this package
Control: fixed 982838 0.10.6
Control: found 982838 0.10.7
Dear Holger, ftpmasters,
On 22-03-2022 23:31, Holger Wansing wrote:
I'm not aware of the exactly needed process, that needs to happen now
for migration to testing (I guess, this is what you called "the ftp-master
dance").
Is this
Hold your horses.
On 23-03-2022 07:44, Paul Gevers wrote:
Last time [1], I just CC'ed ftpmaster and the magic happened, so dear
ftpmasters, can you do "that" again?
win32-loader is blocked behind grub2 now. I'm not aware of progress with
bug #1001057 (in CC).
Paul
OpenPGP
Hi,
Subject: 983357: Why is it not mentioned in bullseye release notes /
installation guide?
For at least the release notes, because nobody asked the editors to
include it.
On 09-02-2022 21:04, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
However, this is a well-known problem, but neither the Bullseye release
Hi Chuck,
On 10-02-2022 01:34, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
The problem as I see it is that the debian
installer team is already aware of the problem and has been aware of it
for over six months because #983357 is marked as affecting d-i. So I do
not understand why #983357 is not included on the
Hi,
On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 17:17:54 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:49:42 +0100 Julien Cristau
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:36:00 +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> > Does this mean the
> > architectures are not equal in rights - an 'all' pac
Source: netcfg
Version: 1.177
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer,
Your package failed to migrate for 60 days, hence I spotted it. It
fails to build from source on s390x. I hit the giveback button once
because looking at the failing test result I suspected it is "just" a
flaky test.
Source: win32-loader
Version: 0.10.4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: Thomas Gaugler
Dear maintainers,
As part of my Release Team member checks, I have been investigating
why the RC buggy src:vkd3d is part of the key package set. It turns
out that vkd3d is part of the current key
Hi kibi,
On 17-09-2022 01:41, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
A few questions I can think of:
- Is that a good idea in the first place? I think so, sidestepping
temporary issues in unstable looks like a valid usecase?
AFAIK that *is* the most common use of tpu these days (getting things
into
Hi,
With the point release scheduled for April 29th, it's probably good to
have at least one weekend in between, or do people not mind doing two
weekends in a row?
On 17-03-2023 15:59, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 11:26:00AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
So, shall we add
Dear all,
On 15-03-2023 21:33, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
We're overdue for 11.7 and need it done with a keyring update included
before bookworm can be released. The wheels are turning on the keyring so
how do dates in April look for everybody? Saturdays are 1st (probably too
soon), 8th, 15th,
Dear Release Team colleagues, dear Boot team colleagues,
I just sent out a bits from the RT where I'm claiming that bookworm is
in a good state. And now I'm going to be extremely bold now: aim for the
shortest freeze in Debian history. What do people think of the idea to
start picking a
Hi all,
On 18-02-2023 00:57, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 11:44:47PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
That'd mean end of March, beginning April at the soonest.
it's probably best to
add 2-4 extra weeks to that.
+1
Thanks kibi and Sledge for the feedback. With such a time
Hi all,
On 26-03-2023 19:55, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Nobody else seems to have replied yet, so... :-)
Two weeks have gone by since the last mail in this thread.
If I did the bookkeeping correctly, the missing necessary teams are press and
release team, as I now have:
kibi - 6, 13, 20, 27
Dear all,
Progress \o/.
On 13-04-2023 11:29, Paul Gevers wrote:
For me to do the release, I'd need to get my hands on the key.
I'm in contact with Jonathan and we're convinced we'll be able to get
the key to me in time.
Which leaves finding a date (and me learning what to do :) ).
We
Hi all,
TL;DR: ftp & press input for June needed.
On 20-04-2023 18:29, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
The 13th does seem a bit close now, without having announced.
After some consideration today, and the vibe felt in this discussion,
let's not rush this, so let's skip May 13 (also giving Press some
Hi,
Any FTP master for 10 or 17 June?
kibi - 10, 17, 24 d-i
Luna - 10, 17, 24 CD testing
elbrus - 10, 17, 24 release team
adsb - 10, 17, 24 release team
Sledge - 10, 17, 24 images team
donald- 10, 17press
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description:
Hi all,
Let's book June 10 as the bookworm release date. A more formal
announcement will follow.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
On 29-03-2023 23:38, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
unblock linux/6.1.20-1
ACK on the unblock/age-days 10 request for the d-i team, happy to build
the installer against it. :)
Done. In the passing I also took along the signed versions.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital
Hi,
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:49:42 +0100 Julien Cristau
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:36:00 +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> Does this mean the
> architectures are not equal in rights - an 'all' package is allowed to
> be uninsallable on kFreeBSD but not on Linux?
>
No, it's fine.
While
Hi,
On 03-03-2024 9:01 p.m., Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Maybe have it marked Not-For-Us on armel, also requesting the binary to
be dropped there? And maybe poke the ftp team to have installer-armel/
cleaned up?
Those actions sound appropriate to me, but I don't know the inner
details well enough
Hi
On 04-05-2024 3:36 p.m., Holger Wansing wrote:
I think Bastian's approach is, to remove kbd-chooser from the archive, since
it was stated (see below) that it's no longer in use.
It might be that udd assumes all packages that build a udeb are used.
d-i has switched away from it to
Hi Bastian,
On Sat, 9 Sep 2023 19:03:07 +0200 Bastian Germann wrote:
Control: severity -1 serious
Can you please elaborate? I'm not seeing anything serious in this bug
report.
On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 21:42:34 +0200 Holger Wansing wrote:
> kbd-chooser is no longer in use, I think.
> Or am I
83 matches
Mail list logo
