Re: Debian Buster release to partially drop non-systemd support

2018-10-16 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 07:20:24PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 05:54:34PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > Absolutely. And the sysvinit boot system have lots of unsolved problems > > we never got around to figuring out, related to disk and other device > > setup.

Re: Archiving the attic folders from d-i for ports

2018-04-27 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 05:37:25AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Since there are still some repositories that we need for debian-ports > in the attic, I was wondering whether we should take care of the > attic stuff and move it over to salsa or github. Could you show a list? Just

Re: Bug#757985: kfreebsd: hang with ENOSPC after a few components are loaded

2014-08-20 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 01:19:52AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: On 14/08/14 18:15, Cyril Brulebois wrote: [...] If a single extra udeb (or udeb size increase, which happens from time to time) is going to break kfreebsd-*, it seems to me that their status is far too brittle. The

Re: Preparing (lib)gnome-keyring for the freeze.

2014-08-02 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 08:47:54AM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote: There has been discussions about the use of mlock(all) and we have over the past year not been able to reach a consensus. I don't feel comfortable making the descision to rip out security features on my own as proposed by

Re: libstdc++6-udeb package (Re: RFC: auto-load of D-I drivers in GNU/kFreeBSD)

2012-03-11 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 08:07:46PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: El 5 de març de 2012 21:51, Robert Millan r...@debian.org ha escrit: 1- Add libstdc++6-udeb package (needed by devd). Oh, I wasn't aware that libstdc++ udeb had already been proposed, and it seems to be a controversial topic...

Bug#559695: kfreebsd-8 - Incomplete licensing information

2009-12-06 Thread Bastian Blank
Package: kfreebsd-8 Version: 8.0-1 Severity: serious The licensing information in the copyright file of the kfreebsd-8 package are incomplete and missleading. It refers to /usr/share/common-licenses/BSD, which is a 3-clause license. Also it lists licenses of sources that are not actually included

Re: [busybox on kbsd] patches ported to 1.14

2009-09-29 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:07:02PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: I'd suggest getting it commited in the package and uploaded to sid; Bastian, do you object? Well, there is a 1.15.1 already as stable. Bastian -- I'm a soldier, not a diplomat. I can only tell the truth. --

Bug#459747: kfreebsd-7 - FTBFS: failure: cannot read files list file: No such file or directory

2008-01-08 Thread Bastian Blank
Package: kfreebsd-7 Version: 7.0~cvs20080107-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of kfreebsd-7_7.0~cvs20080107-1 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 98 [...] /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch # We have nothing to do