Re: Future of kFreeBSD in Debian unstable

On Monday 15 January 2018 11:10:18 CET Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > Hardware resources shouldn't be a problem: I'm fairly sure the buildds > were VMs anyway. Jep one VM with reasonable IO each and a second VM mostly due to redundancy requirements > kFreeBSD could have chosen to use another default

Who is still here?

Hi all! As you undoubtedly have noticed I'm essentially gone from the debian-bsd@ world for more than a year now. And with the stretch release (where we didn't have a stretch-kfreebsd) the question becomes somewhat important: Who is still here and working on kfreebsd? If you are still

Re: kfreebsd-* buildd issues

Steven Chamberlain writes: > Would this be possible again please :/ psmisc is still not fixed, and > there are still surprisingly many gcc-6 uploads. And gcc-5. Done > (Maybe even a daily cron for this would be a good idea...) that cron would need to run as buildd user at

Re: Bug#832485: task-xfce-desktop: uninstallable on kfreebsd due to dependency on light-locker

cker-1.7.0/debian/changelog 2017-02-05 14:01:01.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +light-locker (1.7.0-3.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * kfreebsd port + + -- Christoph Egger <christ...@debian.org> Sun, 05 Feb 2017 14:01:01 +0100 + light-locker (1.7.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium [ Ja

Re: kfreebsd-* buildd issues

Hi! Steven Chamberlain <ste...@pyro.eu.org> writes: > Christoph Egger wrote: >> Steven Chamberlain <ste...@pyro.eu.org> writes: >> > Please could someone check the gcc-7 build on fayrfax, to see of it is >> > stuck again with hung gdb processes? >>

Re: kfreebsd-* buildd issues

Hi! Steven Chamberlain writes: > Please could someone check the gcc-7 build on fayrfax, to see of it is > stuck again with hung gdb processes? It is, will kill it in a minute just need to remember my sudo password > Also, I can't see that buildd fano has built much recently

gcc 7, 6 builds killed on kfreebsd

Hi! I've just killed the gcc builds on kfreebsd. THey're all looping with a | WARNING: 30 signals -- adjust and recompile. Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#840624: src:vim: FTBFS on kfreebsd (testsuite failure)

Package: src:vim Version: 2:8.0.0022-1 Severity: important User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd Hi! vim FTBFS on kfreebsd-* due to testsuite failures (see below) which also breaks bootstrap of porterbox chroots. Christoph 6 FAILED: Found errors in Test_command_count_2():

Re: [neon27] racy testsuite

Hi! Christoph Egger <christ...@debian.org> writes: > Would you mind making the testsuite non-fatal until this race is > fixed? I can prepare a NMU as well if you want me to. The failure's > currently blocking also libreoffice to build on !linux FWIW I'd apply the below patch fr

[neon27] racy testsuite

Hi! Would you mind making the testsuite non-fatal until this race is fixed? I can prepare a NMU as well if you want me to. The failure's currently blocking also libreoffice to build on !linux Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker |

Re: init

Hi! Jon Boden writes: > What are your plans for the future of init on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD? Are you > going to continue with sysvinit for the time being? > > For the upcoming release of ubuntuBSD I'm thinking about using BusyBox > + OpenRC >

F_GETPATH missing on *BSD

Hi! Seems F_GETPATH is missing on kFreeBSD. This is actually funny as this seems to be a feature originally from BSD and added to linux only later on. Result is the buildfailure of hubicfuse. Christoph

Re: Log for attempted build of ldb_2:1.1.20-0+deb8u1 on kfreebsd-i386 (dist=jessie-kfreebsd-security)

Steven Chamberlain writes: > Hi Christoph, > > Do you have some way to re-trigger this on kfreebsd-i386? Or will it > happen automatically? > > And then once this is built, please trigger the samba security update to > build again on kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386. On it.

Re: Bug#815231: cmake: FTBFS on kfreebsd, hurd: 2 tests fail: BuildDepends, RunCMake.Configure

Steven Chamberlain writes: > Steven Chamberlain wrote: >> Could someone with access to the hurd-i386 or kfreebsd porter boxes >> try the attached patch please? > > Here's how to run that test on its own, verbosely, in an already-built > Debian build tree: > > $

Re: Bug#815231: cmake: FTBFS on kfreebsd, hurd: 2 tests fail: BuildDepends, RunCMake.Configure

Hi FWIW on the 3.2 build (with the patch) I started untill I noticed it wasn't quite the right version Steven Chamberlain writes: > Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> 292 - RunCMake.Configure (Failed) > > Could someone with access to the hurd-i386 or kfreebsd porter boxes > try

Bug#818627: src:git: FTBFS on kfreebsd

Package: src:git Severity: important Version: 1:2.8.0~rc3-1 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Usertag: kfreebsd Hi! git fails the testsuite on kfreebsd currently. This seems to be reproducible with sid chroots on my stable/ufs system but not on my

Re: Please update glibc on k-i buildds

Steven Chamberlain writes: > Steven Chamberlain wrote: >> (I think this is causing the failure to install build-deps of >> kfreebsd-10 in experimental, and it might affect other packages). > > Although on kfreebsd-amd64, where glibc is up-to-date in the buildd > chroots, there

Re: Please update glibc on k-i buildds

Hi! Steven Chamberlain writes: > This happens on Sunday and Wednesday evenings (21:13): > > 13 21 * * 0,3 root > PATH=/sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin > setup-all-dchroots buildd > > but the binNMUs for glibc/2.22 on kfreebsd-i386 didn't

Re: kfreebsd-10_10.3~svn296373-1_multi.changes REJECTED

Hi! Steven Chamberlain writes: > If you ever have time, please could you upload this for me (to > experimental) since the new "10.3" binary packages must go through the > NEW queue. It is staged as revision 5929 at: > svn://anonscm.debian.org/glibc-bsd/trunk/kfreebsd-10 > >

dpkg-dev / squeeze

Hi! I'm seeing this on my notebook since upgrading dpkg-dev to unstable's version: new debian package, version 2.0. size 15442 bytes: control archive=1046 bytes. tar: .: Cannot change mode to rwxr-sr-x: Operation not permitted tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors dpkg-deb:

Re: krb5 in 'Uploaded' state for 7d+

Hi! Cyril Brulebois writes: > Steven Chamberlain (2016-03-02): >> Hi Christoph, >> >> Please could you check why krb5 has stayed 'Uploaded' for 7d+ >> and now 'Installed' yet? >> >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=krb5 > > It's in now. Jep

grub2/jessie-kfreebsd and elfutils/sid

Hi! Some reports from IRC helmut | hi, I noticed that: debhelper runtime depends on groff, groff build-depends on libxt, libxt build-depends on glib2.0, glib2.0 bulild-depends on elfutils, elfutils | ftbfs on kfreebsd-any helmut | the last cause for this change is glib2.0 moving from

Re: jessie-kfreebsd builds of glibc_2.19-18+deb8u3?

Hi! Steven Chamberlain writes: > Steven Chamberlain wrote: >> graphite2 packages are there already. > > Actually, only the wheezy ones. The jessie-kfreebsd ones haven't > appeared yet. I think it may just take a few more hours for something > to happen. Turns out a

Re: jessie-kfreebsd builds of glibc_2.19-18+deb8u3?

Hi! Steven Chamberlain writes: > It has been a few hours since DSA 3481-1, but I've not seen any buildd > mails about glibc_2.19-18+deb8u3 being built yet on jessie-kfreebsd. > Are you able to see if it was triggered at all, and if it is building > currently? Seems maybe the

Re: Log for attempted build of perl_5.20.2-3+deb8u2 on kfreebsd-amd64 (dist=jessie-kfreebsd-security)

Hi! Steven Chamberlain writes: >> Any idea what's wrong with the perl testsuite in >> jessie-kfreebsd-security? > > It's the same thing we saw in sid recently until they added a workaround > (https://bugs.debian.org/796798). Oh great we know the actual problem? :-) > It

Add that patch to stable also? [perl: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: t/op/stat.t]

Hi! Maybe this patch could also be applied to stable (as all buildds have been updated to freebsd-10 and it'd be great to be able to build proposed-updates and security without additional work ;-) FWIW I'll take care of the current version in -p-u for jessie-kfreebsd-p-u so no need to hurry

Bug#807611: kfreebsd-kernel-headers: vm/vm.h not usable

Steven Chamberlain writes: > kfreebsd-kernel-headers/10.1~8 should have fixed vm/vm.h, but it > has not been installed on the buildds yet. It must be done manually, > and it may be a few days before Christoph can do that. FWIW this happens automatically these days 13 21 * *

Re: Packages not staying in BD-Uninstallable state?

Hi! Steven Chamberlain writes: > Steven Chamberlain wrote: >> Some packages had build attempts, and went into Failed state rather than >> BD-Uninstallabe; and were retried hundreds of times, e.g. >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=freecad=sid > > The problem

Re: Please give back mesa on kfreebsd-*

Hi! Steven Chamberlain writes: > Please could you give back mesa on kfreebsd-*. It had failed with > > | ../../../../src/egl/drivers/dri2/platform_drm.c:641:42: error: > | 'F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC' undeclared (first use in this function) > > whereas libc0.1-dev >> 2.21~ now provides

Re: d-i is BD-Uninstallable, package missing

Hi ftp-masters! Steven Chamberlain <ste...@pyro.eu.org> writes: > Christoph Egger wrote: >> Steven Chamberlain <ste...@pyro.eu.org> writes: >> > Is it possible Ansgar could copy gdk-pixbuf/2.31.1-2+deb8u3 into >> > jessie-kfreebsd-proposed-updates? Could

Re: Please give back some packages

Hi! Steven Chamberlain writes: > I've checked through old build logs and found some issues that > affected multiple packages. Should all be on the way! Thanks Christoph -- signature.asc Description: PGP signature

all of KDE FTBFS in unstable currently

Hi! Currently the whole KDE5 transition thing is stuck in unstable unbuildable. Reason is the dependency chain kde -> phonon4qt4 -> vlc-nox where the vlc BinNMU for newer libx265 hasn't been built because samba FTBFS (removes non-created manpage during the build process). Christoph -- 9FED

Re: all of KDE FTBFS in unstable currently

Christoph Egger <christ...@debian.org> writes: > Currently the whole KDE5 transition thing is stuck in unstable > unbuildable. Reason is the dependency chain kde -> phonon4qt4 -> vlc-nox > where the vlc BinNMU for newer libx265 hasn't been built because samba > FTBFS (rem

Re: d-i is BD-Uninstallable, package missing

Steven Chamberlain writes: > Is it possible Ansgar could copy gdk-pixbuf/2.31.1-2+deb8u3 into > jessie-kfreebsd-proposed-updates? The step from security to -p-u should be automatic. How old is the security build? Christoph

Re: jessie-kfreebsd package in Uploaded, not Installed state?

Hi! Steven Chamberlain <ste...@pyro.eu.org> writes: > Christoph Egger wrote: >> Afair I can loginto the buildd, rename the changes file there and >> upload. > > It still hasn't installed. Shall I just upload a new version? Seems I need to refresh the signature as well

Re: jessie-kfreebsd package in Uploaded, not Installed state?

Steven Chamberlain writes: > Pretty smart! That's exactly what I did. I often build with > `dpkg-buildpackage -g` but somehow never saw this problem before, > in sid for example. Maybe it is only an issue in -proposed-updates. > > Is it something easily fixed without doing

Re: blkid for ufs partitions

Forgot to add the comandline: ./vmdebootstrap --grub --sparse --image jessie-kfreebsd-vm.raw --roottype ufs --distribution jessie-kfreebsd --no-acpi --kernel-package=kfreebsd-image-10-amd64 --mirror http://ftp.fau.de/debian/ --serial-console -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A

Re: blkid for ufs partitions

Hi! Steven Chamberlain writes: > Does sysctl kern.geom.confxml maybe give this info? Perhaps the ufsid > is listed as a child node of the geom device providing it. Thanks! This does indeed contain the right information Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655

Re: blkid for ufs partitions

have a VBox / VMWare image soon. The vmdebootstrap patches have been sent to the upstream mailnglist, we'll see what happens Christoph Christoph Egger <christ...@christoph-egger.org> writes: > [0] https://git.siccegge.de/?p=forks/vmdebootstrap.git;a=summary [1] https://people.d

blkid for ufs partitions

Hi all! As discussed, I'm trying to create a patchset for vmdebootsstrap[0] so it works on kfreebsd. Currently things are mostly going well but I'm struggling to find a proper replacement for the linux blkid/UUID mechanism for the rootfs. /dev/ufsid/* does seem to be the right place but I can't

Re: blkid for ufs partitions

Hi! Christoph Egger <christ...@christoph-egger.org> writes: > As discussed, I'm trying to create a patchset for vmdebootsstrap[0] so > it works on kfreebsd. Currently things are mostly going well but I'm > struggling to find a proper replacement for the linux blkid/UUID > mechan

Re: kfreebsd IRC meeting?

Steven Chamberlain writes: > It would be nice to get a written record, if we can try to get > http://meetbot.debian.net/Manual.html working ideally. We now have the MeetBot thanks to Richard Darst Christoph

Re: kfreebsd IRC meeting?

Christoph Egger <christ...@debian.org> writes: > -> http://poll.faui2k9.de/kFreeBSD-2015-10/ This Friday, 18:00 UTC? Later works for me as well. Christoph

Re: kfreebsd IRC meeting?

Steven Chamberlain <ste...@pyro.eu.org> writes: > Christoph Egger wrote: >> Christoph Egger <christ...@debian.org> writes: >> > -> http://poll.faui2k9.de/kFreeBSD-2015-10/ >> >> This Friday, 18:00 UTC? Later works for me as well. > > Friday so

Re: kfreebsd IRC meeting?

Hi all! Steven Chamberlain <ste...@pyro.eu.org> writes: > Hi Christoph, > > Christoph Egger wrote: >> Thursdays in general won't work and during the weekend will be tricky (I >> *can* make it Sunday late evening or Saturday untill late afternoon if >> really nec

Re: kfreebsd IRC meeting?

Hi! Steven Chamberlain writes: > Would you be free in the next few days for an IRC meeting, so we can > figure out remaining issues to be able to release jessie-kfreebsd? Thursdays in general won't work and during the weekend will be tricky (I *can* make it Sunday late

Re: kfreebsd-10_10.2-1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes is NEW

Hi! FWIW I can fully confirm this makes 802.11n WIFI with intel cards work decently compared to 10.1. 10.2 also reduces power consumption on my notebook by something like 30% in idle. I'd stack update to 10.2 in experimental as I find time and put it to unstable once everythings there

ITP: bhyve -- hypervisor/virtual machine manager for FreeBSD

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Christoph Egger <christ...@debian.org> * Package name: bhyve Version : 10.2 Upstream Author : FreeBSD Foundation * URL : http://bhyve.org/ * License : BSD Programming Lang: C / ASM Description : hypervisor/v

Newcommer bugs

Hi! I was talking to Helmut during debconf and the idea came up to keep (a few) easy porting bugs around for newcommers. These tends to be FTBFS bugs but as we're no longer blocking migration it doesn't really hurt to keep some of them around and just tag them newcommer. Christoph

Bug#796000: Please add jessie-kfreebsd to tracker.d.o

Package: tracker.debian.org Severity: wishlist Hi! Would it be possible to have jessie-kfreebsd on tracker.debian.org? I was trying to add a patch but I don't totally understand the fields in [0] yet. Thanks Christoph [0] distro_tracker/core/fixtures/debian-repositories.xml -- System

mount failure messages

Hi all! Some note, from DSA: oh btw: when mounting stuff fails at boot, you get a shell with / mounted ro. then you try to remount it rw (so you can fix fstab), but that fails silently if you don't fsck first. it'd be nice to have some kind of message from mount or the kernel when it

Re: jessie-kfreebsd upload acl

Hi! On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 03:45:05PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: I'll need to upload a busybox (udeb) fix to jessie-proposed-updates. Would you be able to enable me to do that please? Should be on it's way .. if the network here decides to work Christoph

debootstrap needs fix?

Hi! Just noticed and should probably look at it later: # debootstrap jessie-kfreebsd jessie http://debian.netcologne.de/debian/ E: No such script: /usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/jessie-kfreebsd Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Re: debootstrap needs fix?

Hi! Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org writes: Christoph Egger wrote: # debootstrap jessie-kfreebsd jessie http://debian.netcologne.de/debian/ E: No such script: /usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/jessie-kfreebsd That should be fixed already in debootstrap/1.0.67+kbsd8u1, in jessie-kfreebsd

Re: jessie-kfreebsd release preparations

Hi! Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org writes: Steven Chamberlain wrote: There some packages in the queue, not actually building them yet: https://buildd.debian.org/status/architecture.php?a=kfreebsd-amd64suite=jessie-kfreebsd

Re: iceweasel jessie-kfreebsd-security builds missing

Ahoi! Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org writes: The idea was to directly upload to jessie-kfreebsd (which is, unlike jessie, unstantly visible). This also means the `normal` DM rules apply (which they don't for secuity-master). Needs properly setup autobuilding for jessie-kfreebsd (non

Re: iceweasel jessie-kfreebsd-security builds missing

Hi! Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org writes: Christoph Egger wrote: There is no jessie-kfreebsd security building at all currently. Was waiting on aba who knows that code but am trying to hack there myself nowadays. jessie-kfreebsd-security just started building thanks to Kurt Roeckx

openjdk-8

Hi! I've just killed openjdk-8 builds for now. It needs itself to build (might just need bootstrapping using openjdk-7 -- not sure) Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: openjdk-8

Hi! Jan Henke jan.he...@taujhe.de writes: Am 22.06.2015 um 09:07 schrieb Christoph Egger: I've just killed openjdk-8 builds for now. It needs itself to build (might just need bootstrapping using openjdk-7 -- not sure) as far as I recall OpenJDK-7 would work for bootstrapping. It seems we

Re: Bug#788709: FTBFS on kfreebsd-* open.c:46:28: error: '__FreeBSD_version' undeclared (first use in this function)

Hi folks! Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org writes: open.c: In function 'glibtop_open_s': open.c:46:28: error: '__FreeBSD_version' undeclared (first use in this function) server-os_version_code = __FreeBSD_version; Do we have some concept on how to handle those? In cases where it's a simple

Re: Bug#788709: FTBFS on kfreebsd-* open.c:46:28: error: '__FreeBSD_version' undeclared (first use in this function)

Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org writes: __FreeBSD_kernel_version I guess I knew once about this one, thanks! Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Bug#705126: kfreebsd-10: maxproc limit exceeded, caused by sshd

Hi! I have had success with logging in + out again which seems to recover the machine -- I always seem to be able to get logged in and to a rootshell and logging out + in again gets rid of the maxproc limit problem Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian

Bug#705126: kfreebsd-10: maxproc limit exceeded, caused by sshd

Christoph Egger christ...@christoph-egger.org writes: I have had success with logging in + out again which seems to recover the machine -- I always seem to be able to get logged in and to a rootshell and logging out + in again gets rid of the maxproc limit problem Logging in using the libvirt

Bug#705126: kfreebsd-10: maxproc limit exceeded, caused by sshd

Christoph Egger christ...@christoph-egger.org writes: I have had success with logging in + out again which seems to recover the machine -- I always seem to be able to get logged in and to a rootshell and logging out + in again gets rid of the maxproc limit problem Interestingly we never had

Re: util-linux taking over eject, kfreebsd concerns.

Hi! Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org writes: As it seems `eject` isn't a POSIX-defined utility, shall we just let Linux provide its own version in util-linux, and kFreeBSD provide a simple camcontrol wrapper within freebsd-utils? (and correspondingly in util-linux-udeb and

Re: Kernel cmdline

Hi! Jan Henke jan.he...@taujhe.de writes: I never tested it with kFreeBSD before, but /etc/default/grub should be a starting point. I know it works with Linux to add values to GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT and/or GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX. I currently have no system at hand to test. I hope that helps.

Re: Kernel cmdline

Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org writes: Christoph Egger wrote: Hm I guess not. What me / DSA is mostly interested in would be having e.g. fsck prompts (during bootup) on the serial line in proper. on linux you can do a 'console=ttyS0 console=tty0' and it just works (tm) If you append

Re: Kernel cmdline

Hi! Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org writes: Christoph Egger wrote: Does anyone know whether there's a way to modify the kernel comandline from grub? The active one looks somewhat magic :-/ | # cat /proc/cmdline | BOOT_IMAGE=/kernel ro root=302 That seems hardcoded: https

Kernel cmdline

Hi! Does anyone know whether there's a way to modify the kernel comandline from grub? The active one looks somewhat magic :-/ | # cat /proc/cmdline | BOOT_IMAGE=/kernel ro root=302 Goal is to get sysvinit's bootlogd use /dev/ttyu0 in the end. Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA

Bug#787136: kfreebsd-10: crashes seen on KVM-based buildds

Hi! Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes: On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 12:45 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: I'll keep this test system busy with package builds and other tasks, but could use more hints on what might trigger the issue seen with falla.debian.org. (And exactly what issue was seen

Re: Bug#787136: kfreebsd-10: crashes seen on KVM-based buildds

Jan Henke jan.he...@taujhe.de writes: Am 30.05.2015 um 18:20 schrieb Steven Chamberlain: Christoph Egger wrote: I have a kfreebsd that boots via virtio. And I'm pretty sute it was created with virtio disks. I'll check once home again. I already found out the following today: grub-probe

Bug#787136: kfreebsd-10: crashes seen on KVM-based buildds

Hi! Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org writes: I've set up a clone of the buildds' KVM setup (without Ganeti), and with emulated IDE disks this is *crazy* slow. Do Linux buildd VMs also use if=ide, or is only kfreebsd using that? Only kfreebsd (Would make sense because, I don't think

Re: kernel on buildd (Re: [Glibc-bsd-commits] r5714 - trunk/glibc-ports/kfreebsd/bits)

debian-adm...@lists.debian.org is the right mailadress for that side Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org writes: Ahoi! Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz writes: what is currently used kernel on buildd for kfreebsd-* ? According to last log of util-linux (22 May 2015/fayrfax.debian.org

Re: kernel on buildd (Re: [Glibc-bsd-commits] r5714 - trunk/glibc-ports/kfreebsd/bits)

Ahoi! Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz writes: what is currently used kernel on buildd for kfreebsd-* ? According to last log of util-linux (22 May 2015/fayrfax.debian.org): Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 9.0-2-amd64 kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64) You are indeed right. All buildds are still running

Re: kernel on buildd (Re: [Glibc-bsd-commits] r5714 - trunk/glibc-ports/kfreebsd/bits)

Ahoi! Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org writes: Ahoi! Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz writes: what is currently used kernel on buildd for kfreebsd-* ? According to last log of util-linux (22 May 2015/fayrfax.debian.org): Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 9.0-2-amd64 kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64

Re: [Glibc-bsd-commits] r5714 - trunk/glibc-ports/kfreebsd/bits

Hi Steven, list! I understand the thing below is the intended fix for util-linux? Is there some planned timeline to get it into unstable? We're not building anything currently for as long as util-linux isn't updated so one might want to push a little Thanks Christoph

Re: failed kfreebsd-amd64 build of openjdk-7 7u75-2.5.4-3

Hi! Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org writes: This is unrelated to any change in openjdk-7, but a regression (#777122) in patch 2.7.4-2, fixed in 2.7.5-1. Please could you update build-essential on kfreebsd buildds? And then give back openjdk-7 for rebuilds. On the way! Christoph

Re: possibility of jessie-kfreebsd suite

Hi! Ansgar and me have been discussing the archive setup for jessie-kfreebsd yesterday. Basically there's going to be a jessie-kfreebsd and jessie-p-u-kfreebsd thing on ftp-master where the jessie-p-u-kfreebsd automatically pulls in new uploads from jessie-p-u via some dak script (allowing

security for jessie-kfreebsd

Hi all! Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org writes: On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 05:36:38PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Hmm, does the security team plan to support kfreebsd? Not specifically, the plan is basically to trigger the builds for kfreebsd-* with the release of the DSA (hence plugging

Planned setup for kfreebsd-jessie

Hi! So the planned setup would consist of 3 -kfreebsd pockets for jessie: on ftp-master: - jessie-kfreebsd - jessie-proposed-updates-kfreebsd on security-master: - updates/jessie-kfreebsd where jessie-proposed-updates-kfreebsd is where our own uploads go. We can put kfreebsd-only

Bug#779201: kfreebsd-{8,9}: CVE-2015-1414: DoS via IGMP packet

(9.0-10+deb70.9) wheezy-security; urgency=medium + + * Upstream patch for FreeBSD-SA-15:04.igmp / CVE-2015-1414 (Closes: #779201) + + -- Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org Wed, 25 Feb 2015 14:08:57 +0100 + kfreebsd-9 (9.0-10+deb70.8) wheezy-security; urgency=high * Team upload. diff -Nru

Bug#779201: kfreebsd-{8,9}: CVE-2015-1414: DoS via IGMP packet

Moritz Mühlenhoff j...@inutil.org writes: For kfreebsd-8 we've skipped previous updates, since it was said -8 were mostly a test kernel. So I don't think it makes sense to start with it now? Or did I miss something? You're right. -9 should be on the way. Christoph signature.asc

Re: possibility of jessie-kfreebsd suite

Hi! Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org writes: Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org writes: I was told you would be supportive of an unofficial kfreebsd jessie release and willing to add a suite for that. Guess I write here what I think would be best from our point of view and you tell me

Bug#772659: kfreebsd-8: build-depends on gcc-4.6

Hi! Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes: Ralf Treinen trei...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr (2014-12-09): Source: kfreebsd-8 Version: 8.3-6+deb7u1 Severity: serious Tags: jessie User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-uninstallable Hi, kfreebsd-8 build-depends on gcc-4.6, which does not

[TODO] Bits from kfreebsd Maintainers

Hi! I'll send a email to debian-devel-announce on monday about kFreeBSD still being alive. I hope we got some of the responses from the teams untill thn so we have a better idea how kFreeBSD/jessie will look like. If someone has some points I want to mention please add them to [0]. Christoph

Re: Plan B for kfreebsd

Hi! Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org writes: DSA can't maintain rolling releases or testing systems for any length of time. I'm not quite sure what you mean; particularly how those involve DSA. What systems would you need to maintain besides the buildds for sid? It means we need a

Re: Plan B for kfreebsd

Hi! Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org writes: Christoph Egger wrote: It means we need a stable release of some sort to keep DSA provided hardware. That's currently buildds and porterboxes. That's annoying. To provide stable/security support ourselves, it seemed we'd need an unofficial

possibility of jessie-kfreebsd suite

Hi FTP Masters! Hi BSD! I was told you would be supportive of an unofficial kfreebsd jessie release and willing to add a suite for that. Guess I write here what I think would be best from our point of view and you tell me if I'm crazy or not: + There would be a jessie-kfreebsd thing next to

Handling security in a unofficial kFreeBSD release

Hi! We are evaluation options for an unofficial kFreeBSD release alongside jessie. I'm rather worried about security updates there. My Idea so far is to keep the security wanna-build trigger active so packages in security still get built automatically for the unofficial kfreebsd release also. We

Re: Final kfreebsd-10 upload before freeze?

Hi! Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org writes: Christoph Egger wrote: Uploading kfreebsd-10 10.1-RC4 in a minute and I guess see for -final Final release has been tagged. After the setlogin security fix, there was only one more change - but it's kind of odd: http://freshbsd.org/commit

Re: Plan B for kfreebsd

Hi all! First, I do not really know enough about release workflow I guess to know what -release@ does not want to do for kfreebsd apart from stamping it as an official release so some of my whishes may be totally reasonable or way of -- please tell me! Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org

Re: Final kfreebsd-10 upload before freeze?

Hi! Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org writes: I don't see any downside to it being in sid: I think the changes are careful enough to not get in the way of a future unblock, so isn't likely to force some future fix to go through t-p-u instead. How is the release doing? Which channels do

Re: kfreebsd-9: 9.0-10+deb70.8 wheezy-security upload

Moritz Mühlenhoff j...@inutil.org writes: On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 01:07:34AM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: Dear Security Team, Please could we upload to wheezy-security with the attached debdiff to fix issues in kfreebsd-9 (kernel). This disables support for SCTP as previously

Bug#767583: kfreebsd-10: ar9300_devid.h license restricts modification

Hi! Riley bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch writes: After reading a discussion on the gnu-linux-libre mailing list [1], I found that the two files named ar9300_devid.h have a license that restricts modification: Quoting that file: #ifndef __AR9300_DEVID_H__ #define

Re: Final kfreebsd-10 upload before freeze?

Hi Steven, hi release@ Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes: On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:43:36 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: kfreebsd-10 migrated last night; is there a chance another upload of the kernel could go into sid and be aged in before the freeze starts? Leaving aside the

Re: Final kfreebsd-10 upload before freeze?

Ahoi! Christoph Egger christ...@christoph-egger.org writes: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org writes: On 31/10/14 12:43, Steven Chamberlain wrote: kfreebsd-10 migrated last night; is there a chance another upload of the kernel could go into sid and be aged in before the freeze starts

Re: [Glibc-bsd-commits] r5670 - trunk/kfreebsd-10/debian

Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org writes: Cyril Brulebois wrote: Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-10-26): Hi Christoph, Please could you make this final upload this to unstable, if you have time before midnight UTC? If you're trying to beat the clock, make that 1952Z.

uint8_t not exportet by sys/types.h

Hi! As Ian reported in the context of #766913, freebsd documentation[0] suggests using sys/types.h to get uint8_t and friends. However your advice for sys/param.h seems to be necessary on kFreeBSD. Is that on purpose? Christoph [0]

Re: Please give back yade, matplotlib

Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org writes: Please give back: * yade on kfreebsd-amd64 https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=yadearch=kfreebsd-amd64ver=1.12.0-2stamp=1414299101 * matplotlib on kfreebsd-i386

Re: Bug#740719: xserver-xorg-video-intel: requires KMS but loads non-KMS i915.ko on kfreebsd

Control: -1 fixed 2:2.21.15-2+b2 Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org writes: Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org writes: I assume this patch to xserver-xorg-video-intel is still needed, in order to autoload i915kms+drm2 instead of i915? I'm pretty sure I'm running a unmodified xorg stack

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >