On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:32:08PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi Ansgar,
>
> Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> > however with the kFreeBSD buildds gone, we would also need at least some
> > people willing to maintain buildds (this is limited to Debian Developers
> > as long as the port lives on ft
(sorry for jumping in late here)
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 07:51:55AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 01:37 +0300, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>
> > At the openmainframeproject EU meetup, it was indicated that SUSE
> > joined with indication that Open Build Service might be able to u
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 07:16:54PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Jan Henke wrote:
> > the strange thing is, the buildds continue trying to install
> > openjdk-8-jdk instead to satisfy the build dependency, which naturally
> > fails. I assume, because the package exists for most other
Hi,
(haven't seen the original mail, so replying to this one)
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 01:40:20PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:51:29PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 07:01:00PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> >>Alexander Wirt dixit:
> >>
> >>>C
> Hi,
>
> On 20/05/14 19:18, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > root@samba:~# zfs set sharenfs=on samba/root/home/wouter
> > warning: mountd isn't supported in Debian GNU/kFreeBSD yet
>
> sharenfs is old Solaris syntax for an nfsd implementation that I think
> was en
Hi,
At a customer, I'm currently evaluating options for a new fileserver. Since
this needs to be a fast fast fast fileserver, one of the options I'm
evaluating is running kFreeBSD on ZFS. As such, I installed kFreeBSD on some
old hardware (the new server hasn't arrived yet), and started doing s
On 14-06-13 21:11, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Wouter, Mikael: input on switching C/C++ to 4.8?
We don't have much data either way, do we?
I suppose it shouldn't be too much of a problem, but I can't be sure. In
the past we've usually taken the plunge, and filed bugs if things go
really bad.
--
Th
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 01:11:40AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>ntfs-3g
I was under the impression that ntfs-3g was a FUSE implementation, which
should in theory work on kFreeBSD too. But don't take my word for it :-)
--
The volume of a pizza of thickness a and radius z can be described by
Hi folks,
FOSDEM preparations are firing up again; I've just requested a stand for
the project at the next edition (5th and 6th of February, 2011).
During previous years, we've always had some merchandise available for
sale, and also had some machine that would demo something interesting
Debian-r
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 03:13:53PM +0700, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 08:58 +0100, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
>
> > Concerning povray, I had forgotten (or did not realize)
> > that it is non-free. I am aware that there are some
> > licensing issues with the beta version, but did not
> > imag
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:25:46AM +0100, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
> Some applications are simply missing and compile (and run)
> seemingly without problems from Debian sources. One such
> example that I have found is povray. Why is this so?
povray is in non-free; it is very much possible that there si
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 11:22:19AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Mar 2009, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> >The format, suggested by Steve Langasek, was to use the
> > porters mailinglist as the user, and the architecture name as the
> >
Hi,
I've often thought that it would be useful to have tags in the BTS so
that users or maintainers could mark a bug as specific to a particular
architecture. This way, when I have some spare time, I could go to the
BTS, fetch a list of bugs that are specific to an architecture I care
about, and s
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 08:41:43PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> > > 68k seems to have elected to skip official etch, but also seems to
> > > have met the requirements. Some of the non-dd porters still want
> > > an official etch release.
> >
> > (They met the requirements after the architect
14 matches
Mail list logo
