On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 08:41:43PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote: > > > 68k seems to have elected to skip official etch, but also seems to > > > have met the requirements. Some of the non-dd porters still want > > > an official etch release. > > > > (They met the requirements after the architecture freeze, and only using > > emulated buildds, which needs some more discussion before being suitable > > for release.) > > This should be discussed then. The consensus I've been reading on > debian-68k is that emulated buildds produce better code than real > hardware.
Actually, no, the consensus is that it's a good idea because it's faster in some cases. It doesn't produce "better" code, since the compiler is (presumably) the same. -- <Lo-lan-do> Home is where you have to wash the dishes. -- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
