2013/8/2 Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org:
[Robert - not sure if you saw my last mail, but a new upload of
freebsd-utils should not be needed now.]
Hi Steven,
Yes, I've seen it. Unfortunately I had already uploaded by then. Sorry :-(
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 15:26, Petr Salinger wrote:
[...]
uploaded 9.1-4 have been built against version 2.17-91 of eglibc,
with fbtl switch. It will not migrate without eglibc.
Would be possible to bin-nmu freebsd-utils under kfreebsd-amd64,
given buildd still uses eglibc 2.17-7 ?
I suspect only the release
Meh, looks like something went wrong with the BTS. Not sure what, but
it turns out 9.1-2 migrated to testing today, despite having RC bugs
in it :-(
I'll prepare a new upload with higher urgency...
2013/8/2 Robert Millan r...@debian.org:
Version: 9.1-3
Thanks!
2013/8/2 Lars Lansink
[Cc'ing release team as I have a couple of questions]
On 02/08/13 21:47, Robert Millan wrote:
Meh, looks like something went wrong with the BTS. Not sure what, but
it turns out 9.1-2 migrated to testing today, despite having RC bugs
in it :-(
Yes that's odd, freebsd-utils/9.1-2 was
On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 21:59 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 02/08/13 21:47, Robert Millan wrote:
Meh, looks like something went wrong with the BTS. Not sure what, but
it turns out 9.1-2 migrated to testing today, despite having RC bugs
in it :-(
Yes that's odd, freebsd-utils/9.1-2
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 21:59:01 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
[Cc'ing release team as I have a couple of questions]
On 02/08/13 21:47, Robert Millan wrote:
Meh, looks like something went wrong with the BTS. Not sure what, but
it turns out 9.1-2 migrated to testing today, despite
[Robert - not sure if you saw my last mail, but a new upload of
freebsd-utils should not be needed now.]
On 02/08/13 22:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 21:59 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
http://bugs.debian.org/718490
Essentially, the BTS status file generated at
Package: freebsd-net-tools
Version: 9.1-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
After upgrade to Jessie ifconfig started to segfault.
/sbin/ifconfig segfaults when given no options or just interface as option.
You can however perform options like
# ifconfig vlan20 create
2013/8/1 Lars Lansink cry...@cryptr.net:
# ifconfig
nfe0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu
1500
options=82008VLAN_MTU,WOL_MAGIC,LINKSTATE
Segmentation fault
Probably my mistake. It might be due to some of the implicit
Do correct me if I am doing it wrong now but after reading Robert's mail I
uncommented the -Werror... in debian/rules.
When I started building the package again and it seems that quite a few
files unde sbin/ifconfig/ is missing netinet/ether.h.
sbin/ifconfig/ifbridge.c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 718490 grave
Bug #718490 [freebsd-net-tools] freebsd-net-tools: ifconfig segfaults on Jessie
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
718490:
severity 718490 grave
thanks
2013/8/1 Lars Lansink cry...@cryptr.net:
When I started building the package again and it seems that quite a few
files unde sbin/ifconfig/ is missing netinet/ether.h.
sbin/ifconfig/ifbridge.c
sbin/ifconfig/ifieee80211.c
sbin/ifconfig/af_link.c
Yes, associated
Confirmed, it works now.
PS I just noticed I wrote Jessie but I am of corse running a Sid system,
but seems we all understood that anyway :)
On Aug 1, 2013 9:52 PM, Robert Millan r...@debian.org wrote:
severity 718490 grave
thanks
2013/8/1 Lars Lansink cry...@cryptr.net:
When I started
13 matches
Mail list logo
