On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 12:36:14PM +1000, matthew green wrote:
1) FreeBSD 5.0 pre-release... does anyone know if it's GCC 3.x clean? If
so, I might futz with trying to do up a chroot based on that, at some point
here... unless someone else desperately wants to do it or something.
* Joel Baker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020409 03:11]:
2) pmake (aka /usr/src/usr.bin/make) - the source tree for this on the
various BSD flavors differ significantly, but all appear to share some
basic level of functionality. How similar are they? I'm looking at taking
over the pmake package, and
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 10:37:41PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 10:11:46PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 06:54:29PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
Two main things:
1) FreeBSD 5.0 pre-release... does anyone know if it's GCC 3.x clean? If
so, I
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:15:46PM +0100, Tony Finch wrote:
1) FreeBSD 5.0 pre-release... does anyone know if it's GCC 3.x clean?
How clean do you mean? The standard compiler in -CURRENT is a gcc 3.1
snapshot.
Oh, that's probably clean enough to start working with. It definitely says
to me
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:47:10AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I ran into with 5.0 was that there was a define that you set to
enable compiling with gcc 3.x, and there were some #ifdef's to make it
work. However, that define also enabled building gcc 3.x from the
FreeBSD source
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 06:54:29PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
Two main things:
1) FreeBSD 5.0 pre-release... does anyone know if it's GCC 3.x clean? If
so, I might futz with trying to do up a chroot based on that, at some point
here... unless someone else desperately wants to do it or
1) FreeBSD 5.0 pre-release... does anyone know if it's GCC 3.x clean? If
so, I might futz with trying to do up a chroot based on that, at some point
here... unless someone else desperately wants to do it or something.
2) pmake (aka /usr/src/usr.bin/make) - the source tree for
7 matches
Mail list logo
