Re: A request from the NetBSD folks [ please discuss ]

On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 06:46:05PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote: Untill we resolve this, please take into consideration to avoid filing patches that use netbsd-i386 in a way that breaks the other port. I've been careful to keep such incompatible patches without submitting, since I

Re: A request from the NetBSD folks [ please discuss ]

On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 01:28:03PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 06:46:05PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote: Untill we resolve this, please take into consideration to avoid filing patches that use netbsd-i386 in a way that breaks the other port. I've been careful

GNU/KNetBSD self-hosting

Hi! The (Glibc-based) GNU/KNetBSD system is now self-hosting. You can swap an existing NetBSD system with it and it may be boot via GRUB (kernel --type=netbsd (hdX,a)/boot/knetbsd.gz) Again, due to the crack incident I've had to re-generate the GNU/KNetBSD tarball and upload it to gnuab. The

Re: installation problems (was: mount bsd partition)

Thank you for information. My story continues... I was start by my firts step after the reading of the ansfer. I reinstalled of the FreeBSD. Now, I have only one large slice and a swap on my BSD partition. The file system is UFS1 (the details about UFS1 and UFS2 are described in instalation

Re: GNU/KNetBSD self-hosting

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Robert Millan wrote: The (Glibc-based) GNU/KNetBSD system is now self-hosting. You can swap an existing NetBSD system with it and it may be boot via GRUB (kernel --type=netbsd (hdX,a)/boot/knetbsd.gz) Again, due to the crack incident I've had to re-generate the