On 05/03/13 20:31, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Want me to commit your patch to git, and upload that?
Yes, please! I almost forgot about this...
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
On 05/03/13 20:51, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> If the changelog message looks OK to you, I'll upload that later
> tonight.
Yep, it makes sense. Thank you.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
uld be fixed now). Haven't tried KDE at all...
> Lightdm is utilizing one of my cores at 100%.
Actually I saw this too, but didn't get around to debugging it. I think
it tries to repeatedly do something via DBus. Seemed to be still
functional, but obviously this is not ideal.
Regard
I don't understand why the bug only happens on GNU/kFreeBSD, but the
changes in the attached patch appear to fix it.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
Index: freebsd-utils-9.0+ds1/usr.sbin/rpc.lockd/lo
On 10/02/13 14:27, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> I noticed some initscripts are running twice at startup. The
> Default-Start flag should usually choose either runlevel S, or one/more
> from [2345], but not both!
Actually no... that is correct/valid, but the initscript 'start'
On 10/02/13 15:15, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> The rpc.statd initscript always hangs for 30 seconds at shutdown.
I'll commit fixes for this soon. It just needs to omit the --pidfile
which isn't really there.
Also when rpc.lockd is fixed its initscript may have the same probl
0 * * 0 root zpool list -H -o name | xargs zpool scrub
Maybe we could add a (commented out) example of that to make it just a
little bit easier to change. (Some users will not understand the
existing cron entry which is a bit of a hack).
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
T
pstream
version fixed it but the diff seems way too big for freeze exception
taxbird - probably has to be updated each financial year, was unsuitable
for wheezy because of this but maybe a backport is useful.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Christoph,
On 27/03/13 13:41, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Modified:
>trunk/freebsd-utils/debian/changelog
>trunk/freebsd-utils/debian/freebsd-nfs-common.rpc.lockd.init
>trunk/freebsd-utils/debian/freebsd-nfs-common.rpc.statd.init
>trunk/freebsd-utils/deb
FTBFS
In experimental:
geany (18d 7h 6m, fils) - should build OK
Thanks!
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debi
believe.
This has been fixed in sid for some time but we absolutely must see it
fixed in wheezy.
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.
en for us that xfce was
chosen as a default for new installs. Multiple show-stopper issues got
fixed during the freeze though. At this point I believe it 'should
work' but so few people have probably tried a full GNU/kFreeBSD Wheezy
GNOME desktop yet, and neither have I...
Regards,
--
Source: kfreebsd-9
Version: 9.0-10
Severity: important
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
After a burst of sshd bruteforce login attempts, kfreebsd's maxproc is
exhausted and now I'm unable to log in! I only know the reason because
the machine had remote syslog set up:
> A
n unstable that compile as C89.
Maintaining compatibility with FreeBSD ports seems like a good enough
reason so we should see what we can do about this.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscrib
Debian servers. So mainly I want to thank to the
> maintainers and give this feedback.
Wonderful! Thanks a lot for your feedback.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
built okay on kfreebsd-i386?
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=librevisa&arch=kfreebsd-i386&ver=0.0.20130412-1&stamp=1365803225
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubsc
her kernel header.
Could we likewise change u_long -> unsigned long? Doing so would revert
part of 'style bug' commit by upstream to its previous form.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
is installing Gnome on the
> kFreeBSD port..:-)
Nobody has a choice currently :P
And there would likely be some kFreeBSD GNOME users upgrading from
squeeze to wheezy...
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
(on GNU/Linux) should not pick up network-manager as a
dependency? Is that would what happen if they have task-gnome-desktop
installed and it Depends now on network-manager-gnome?
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.or
lepathy) as I've just explained here (with screenshot) :
https://wiki.debian.org/Debian_GNU/kFreeBSD_Desktop#Wheezy_GNOME
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/516b2a9f.2050...@pyro.eu.org
not available).
I noticed during testiong that `pstree $(which gnome-session)` showed a
single pulseaudio child process; for some reason it may hang (AFAIK I
have no working sound devices, if that makes any difference) and after
some timeout either gdm3 or gnome-session would otherwise show the
a
task, a whole desktop environment became uninstallable on two release
architectures. We still have a tasksel option for GNOME (fails with apt
error 100 due to this) and CD's are being built with its packages.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
2=2541
Thank you,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/516bd50d.4080...@pyro.eu.org
's threads implementation, or may happen if a signal
is being masked that should not be.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
s already an improvement) - I'm
not sure yet what causes this.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
Index: pulseaudio-2.0/src/pulsecore/core-util.c
===
--- pulseaudio-2.0.orig/src/pulsecore/core-util.c 2012-05-13 14:
s.
Thank you,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
Index: pulseaudio-2.0/src/daemon/main.c
===
--- pulseaudio-2.0.orig/src/daemon/main.c 2012-05-13 14:26:37.0 +0100
+++ pulseaudio-2.0/src/daemon/main.c 201
d post-wheezy?
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/516d1ead.8070...@pyro.eu.org
d be really helpful if you are able to test again with pulseaudio
(+ libpulse0) patched with:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=20;filename=kfreebsd-bug705435.patch;att=1;bug=705435
For me, it fixes all of the issues above.
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro
Source: kfreebsd-9
Version: 9.0-10
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Forwarded: http://security.freebsd.org/patches/SA-03:05/nfsserver.patch
Upstream published a security advisory for the nfsserver implementation
as shipped by kfreebsd-9 packages. (See above URL for reference).
Insufficien
On 29/04/13 22:46, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Upstream published a security advisory for the nfsserver implementation
> as shipped by kfreebsd-9 packages. (See above URL for reference).
Correction for security advisory URL:
http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-13:05.nfsserv
clone 706414 -1
reassign -1 src:kfreebsd-8
found -1 8.3-6
severity -1 important
This bug also affects kfreebsd-8, but the vulnerable NFS implementation
is not the one used by default in 8.x kernels.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ
tags 706414 + pending
thanks
I've applied upstream's patch in SVN, I'm running it now on my NFS
server and seems okay.
Christoph, would you be able to do an upload of this to unstable please?
Many thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
the extra
underscore is being prepended from the setting of __USER_LABEL_PREFIX__
(not sure where that is set...).
Adding "-D__USER_LABEL_PREFIX__= " to CFLAGS works around that issue.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
Index: debian/control.in
===
ink the 8.1 kernel also has the vulnerable code, but
NFS wasn't even supported in that release.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list
Is that the correct version number for a security upload? (9.0-10+deb70.1)
I'm more used to seeing something like +wheezy1
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
t; please see bug690319-amend-2.diff if that is preferred.
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--- nss-pam-ldapd-0.7.15+squeeze3/common/tio.c.orig 2013-02-12 21:03:06.0 +
+++ nss-pam-ldapd-0.7.15+squeeze3/common/tio.c 2013-05-01 22:45:22.752734366 +0100
hecking for sem_open... yes
> checking for sem_timedwait... yes
> checking for sem_getvalue... yes
> checking for sem_unlink... yes
[...]
> checking whether POSIX semaphores are enabled... no
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-r
ed/awk script does this.
It is easily worked around with the attached patch (which avoids
re-defining CC, which is already properly set).
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
Index: ibm-3270-3.3.10ga4/x3270/Imakefile.in
Control: tags -1 + patch
Should be safe to change this to use regular C99 types post-wheezy.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
Index: kfreebsd-9-9.0/sys/sys/filedesc.h
===
--- kfreebsd-9-9.0.orig/sys/sys/filedesc.h
the system hangs?
How are you testing this? Some kind of VM? If so, which?
Which compiler did you build with? Still using gcc-4.6?
Thanks!
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubsc
in kfreebsd-specific
bits of code, not noticed by rebuilds on linux, but should be easy to
deal with.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debi
I've checked that those patches fix the FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64 too.
Thanks, Pino!
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or
Hi,
This went into sid with version 9.0+ds1-11 and has migrated to jessie.
For a pu upload, would the version number have to be 9.0+ds1-11+deb7u1 ?
The debdiff would be otherwise the same as proposed in
http://bugs.debian.org/704227#5
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
r 6.
But really it should have looked at /dev/ada0p4 first (or whatever the
last partition is called). The end sector is the same, but the start
sector will be somewhere else.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@li
Hi Guillem!
This sounds like a good idea. Git would seem easier to work with, for
exactly the things you mentioned.
I still think it is best to fetch upstream source using Subversion; but
certainly we are free to choose something else for the packaging.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste
doesn't become last minute for no reason ;-)
We still need an ACK from the release team. If/when that happens please
upload from the wheezy branch where this has already been staged as r4468:
svn://svn.debian.org/svn/glibc-bsd/branches/wheezy/freebsd-utils
Thanks!
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberl
every commit
message with "freebsd-utils: " for example, but that doesn't seem fun.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...
On 20/05/13 17:54, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 20/05/13 07:56, Petr Salinger wrote:
>> - one common repository x repository per package
>> I slightly prefer one common.
> And I think the commit log of Git works globally, [...]
Also I think it would be near impossibl
8.1.
Not sure if unmounting/remounting /tmp would fix it or if a reboot is
necessary. But please give back wmnd to rebuild sometime (was okay on
kfreebsd-i386).
Thanks!
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Also package bzr had the same failure:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=bzr&suite=sid
> bzrlib/_dirstate_helpers_pyx.c:22535:1: fatal error: error writing to
> /tmp/ccK9s805.s: No space left on device
> compilation terminated.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste..
Package: librep
Version: 0.90.2-1.3
Tags: patch
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi,
librep failed to build on kfreebsd-amd64 due to:
htt
Okay, thanks!
Also libssh2 failed to build due to this (for sid).
Regards
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.
with lightdm?
Someone reported this as a problem when testing kfreebsd-i386 install
media virtual machine. I tested it myself on real hardware though and
it seemed okay.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
here in your queue now
Was the upload (src:kfreebsd-9) okay? Do you need anything further from us?
I fear it may have gone missing with the wheezy release happening soon
afterward...
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.d
Hi,
The reason I was not able to reproduce this before is that I didn't have
python-gtk2 installed. Uninstall it and reportbug works just fine.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "u
debian.org
> /kfreebsd-9_9.0-10+deb70.1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes couldn't be processed for
> 48 hours and is now deleted
> All files it mentions are also removed:
src:kfreebsd-9 and binary packages are also missing from
http://release.debian.org/proposed-updates/stable.html
Thank
there a problem, or does this need to be copied again somehow?
Thank you,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/519fcdbd.6020...@pyro.eu.org
librsvg (15h 3m, fasch), x11vnc (14h 58m, fasch), bc (14h 42m, fasch),
gpe-soundserver (14h 33m, fasch), daisy-player (14h 28m, fasch), ghc
(14h 13m, fasch), acl2 (14h 3m, fasch), aspcud (13h 43m, fasch)
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
one) :
http://wiki.debian.org/Debian_GNU/kFreeBSD_FAQ#Q._How_to_use_the_rescue_mode_of_the_installer
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debia
resides on
logical partition[s]. But again - not sure, and if I find the answer to
this I will update the FAQ.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listma
Package: gambas3
Version: 3.1.1-2
Tags: patch
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
The attached patches allow gambas3 to build on GNU/kFreeBSD (aside from
bug #701393). These have been tested on kfreebsd-amd64 and r
Hi Christoph,
I don't see that buildd fasch has built anything in the past couple of
days, and the build queue is getting quite big. Did you know of this?
Thank you,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
,
such as src:gluegen2
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51a73aeb.3010...@pyro.eu.org
large queue due to the haskell rebuilds.
Although... buildd fasch seems to have resumed building now.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
[wheezy-ki-sbuild]: A chroot or alias ‘chroot:wheezy-ki-sbuild’ already
> exists with this name
> I: Duplicate names are not allowed
> chmod g+w /«BUILDDIR» failed.
Please could haskell-csv be given back on kfreebsd-i386?
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UN
On 01/06/13 21:11, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Done.
Thanks! Successfully built already.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: iproute2
Version: 3.9.0-2
Severity: serious
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 debootstrap
Hi,
The transitional package iproute is provided for kfreebsd and hurd
arches, but its dependency iproute2 is not sat
couple of minor changes I got pflogd built on a
Wheezy system. And it seems to be functioning.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list
und for a little longer, only for non-linux arches (and
potentially other ports).
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51b65146.9030...@pyro.eu.org
REQUEST CHALLENGE NTLM_RESPONSE -> OK
> ERROR: Not using built-in NTLM support, but authenticate signal was emitted
> Round 3: NTLM Connection, user=bob
> (S:sent) (S:bob) /noauth-> REQUEST CHALLENGE NTLM_RESPONSE -> OK
> ERROR: Not using built-in NTLM support, but a
Hi,
On 11/06/13 18:53, Petr Salinger wrote:
> please could some DD upload kfreebsd-kernel-headers from current SVN.
I also committed a small fix for #686402 as r4516, if it's not too late
to include that too.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
list of them e.g.:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?pf=d-i
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?pf=debian-science
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..
orts: alpha hppa* m68k powerpcspe ppc64 sh4* sparc64*
* these ports don't appear to have successfully built GCC 4.8 yet.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
e version (>= 4.8.1-2) whereas m68k still has only the 4.8.0-7 you
uploaded.
You will also first need newer binutils (>= 2.23.52) which is still in
the build queue.
(This applies to ppc64 as well).
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
d-i386.
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51ba52f2.2070...@pyro.eu.org
Version: 9.0-3
On 14/06/13 01:03, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Steven Chamberlain writes:
>> Now that this happened, could you please give back cmor for a rebuild on
>> kfreebsd-amd64? AFAIK it is still not expected to build on kfreebsd-i386.
>
> Done, let's see
Thanks
experimental. We could have choices of a kfreebsd-9 and kfreebsd-10
for Jessie release.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian
d?
Or is it adequate to just file an RC bug "do not release with jessie"
and keep it in testing up until freeze time?
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
d have the same
security support. Upstream support for 8.3 ends April 2014; after that
we can backport fixes from 8-STABLE, which is basically 8.4, supported
upstream until June 2015.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debi
Hi Java maintainers,
Please could kfreebsd-amd64 be added to the list of openjdk-7 arches on
the next upload of java-common? (patch attached)
kfreebsd-i386 may follow in the future but it is not ready yet.
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--- java-common/debian/rules
> both switched or none of both..
I thought it might give us a head-start porting new Java apps to
kfreebsd-*, but yes it would be nice to keep kfreebsd-i386 in sync.
The problem seen during libreoffice build might even be related to the
openjdk-7 build issue on kfreebsd-i386.
Regard
Source: kfreebsd-9
Version: 9.0-11
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Control: found -1 kfreebsd-9/9.0~svn223109-0.1
Privilege escalation via mmap:
http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-13:06.mmap.asc
This was introduced by r199819 when FreeBSD 9 was the SVN head. As such
it aff
7;t see any SVN commit mails from Alioth, I wonder if
something there is broken...
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive
»/debian/usr/bin:/usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin:$PATH; \
> export TMPDIR=$t; \
> export HOME=$t; \
> export SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN="svp"; \
> if [ -x /usr/bin/gdb ]; then ulimit -c unlimited; fi && \
> /usr/bin/make -k c
)
# cat /etc/foo
steven:x::1000:,,,:/home/steven:/bin/bash
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
#include
#include
#include
#include
int main() {
FILE *fp = fopen("/etc/foo", "r");
int fd = fileno (fp);
unsigned char *ptr = mmap (N
, proposing a different form.
Please could someone with the necessary access, open a security.d.o RT
ticket asking permission to upload whichever one of these, and for a DSA
to be issued?
Thanks!
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
diff -Nru kfreebsd-9-9.0/debian/changelog kfreebsd-9-9.0
st, where did you get the version scheme "+deb70.1" from? I
> don't think I've seen that one before (our suggested version would have
> been +deb7u1, as per dev-ref).
It was probably based on the last kfreebsd-9 security upload
(9.0-10+deb70.1). Not sure where that o
more 'weaponised' PoC
was posted to a public forum on 2013-06-18.
[1]: http://bugs.debian.org/712664#24
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
diff -Nru kfreebsd-9-9.0/debian/changelog kfreebsd-9-9.0/debian/changelog
--- kfreebsd-9-9.0/debian/changelog 2013-05-01 13:
A suggested workaround on vulnerable systems is:
sysctl security.bsd.unprivileged_proc_debug=0
(which works by disabling some functionality of GDB to non-root users)
Also the use of jails or securelevel could reduce the potential damage.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
sion 4.11
> .OOoRunner Main() version from 20101118 (mmdd)
> ERROR: not supported platform: gnu/kfreebsd
> to rerun just this failed test without all others, run:
>
> make JunitTest_chart2_unoapi
>
> cd into the module dir to run the tests faster
> Or to do interactive de
664: kfreebsd-9:
CVE-2013-2171: Privilege escalation
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 05:59:59 +
From: Salvatore Bonaccorso via RT
Reply-To: r...@rt.debian.org
To: ste...@pyro.eu.org
Hi Steven
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 02:56:57PM +0000, Steven Chamberlain via RT wrote:
> Thu Jun 20 14:56:57 2013: R
On 21/06/13 09:56, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Steven Chamberlain writes:
>> Please could you do an upload of SVN r4525 to unstable?
>
> I guess you mean 4523? or some special branch?
Actually yes I meant r4523, although the more recent commits didn't
change anything in /trunk/
ything else.
It could perhaps be automated `head -n1 changelog | grep experimental`
so there are no mistakes.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@
egards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51c6df54.3030...@pyro.eu.org
ed
an experimental kernel with debug options for a while is better than
risk a kernel going through experimental/unstable without having done
this at all. There is still time to fix something or file RC bugs
before it transitions to jessie.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.
On 23/06/13 13:00, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2013/6/23 Steven Chamberlain :
>> so it may be more advantageous to instead try to make
>> 9.1 available through wheezy-backports.
>
> You mean the kernel only? In my experience this is not as easy as it
> looks. A new kernel of
initially use gcc-4.6? The result should probably not be
allowed to migrate to jessie.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debia
disclosure
and it was a pretty serious bug.
On 21/06/13 09:22, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Please could you upload 9.0-10+deb70.2 to security-master to match the
> attached debdiff.
>
> [...]
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [rt.debian.org #4503] Bug#712664: k
anyone object to using clang-3.2 for kfreebsd-9?
>
> Step 1 is to get buildable sources.
> Later we can test whether it boots/works.
>
> The options for compiler are
> * gcc-4.7 - already in stable - easier upload into backports
> * gcc-4.8 - already in jessie
> * clang-
Do our initscripts already launch whatever type of fsck / background
fsck is needed to properly repair a filesystem after a crash? (I
suspect not, and some unused blocks will go missing at each crash.)
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@li
501 - 600 of 1969 matches
Mail list logo
