Eric Wong wrote:
I agree that error recovery for dcommit sucks right now.
I think Brice's idea (creating a temporary branch to dcommit from)
is easier to implement and less likely to break than automatically
unapplying patches.
Sounds sane to me. Probably that temporary branch could just
Package: alsa-utils
X-debbugs-Cc: debian-eeepc-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Version: 1.0.21-1
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/bin/alsamixer
In alsamixer, on the third ([All])
Card: HDA Intel
Chip: Realtek ALC662 rev1
View: F3: Playback F4: Capture F5:[All]
Item: e-Mic Boost
screen, there
Package: apt
Version: 0.7.25
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/bin/apt-cache
Apt-cache showpkg shows repeated lines
$ apt-cache showpkg iceweasel|sort|uniq -c|sort -n|tail -n 4
2 xul-ext-notify,iceweasel
2 xul-ext-pwdhash,iceweasel
2 xul-ext-webdeveloper,iceweasel
4
X-debbugs-Cc: debian-eeepc-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Package: asterisk
Version: 1:1.6.2.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Using
$ uname -a
Linux jidanni3 2.6.32-trunk-686 #1 SMP Thu Jan 7 05:05:10 UTC 2010 i686
GNU/Linux
on my
$ lshw
product: 702
vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
serial:
Jason Alasola wrote:
Package: libgl1-mesa-dri
Version: 7.7~rc2-1
Severity: normal
I'm having some problems with the r600 driver and Xorg which I believe would
be fixed by using mesa 7.7 however the 7.7 experimental package depends on a
libdrm-intel1 which doesn't exist anywhere.
Package: firmware-linux-nonfree
Severity: normal
Okay, false alarm from me going to linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686 fixed my
problems.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Version: 2:2.9.1-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
When KMS is enabled - which is now the default, I cannot switch VT's.
Once GDM is started, hitting ctrl+alt+[1-6] has no other effect than freezing
my display (no mouse cursor at all but I can see my GNOME desktop as if I
Hi,
After recent upgrade of KDE from 4.3.2 to 4.3.4 (in squeeze) it also hapens
with KDE's panel...
Tried XVideo and OpenGL video output. MPlayer works fine.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
tags 561427 + patch
thanks
Hi everyone,
as discussed in the bug report YOSHINO Yoshihito has provided a patch
that links ptex against libkpathsea5.
According to LowThresholdNmu I have uploaded this package
(versioned as 3.1.10+0.04b-2.2) directly without any DELAYED upload.
Thanks a lot and
dear ricardo
Don't think so, we don't have access to their code, how could
Debian fix Acrobat reader???
by looking at what get's called by acrobat reader? by asking the adobe
crowd how you are supposed to catch the call for a default mail client?
magic?
Ask them to add Claws Mail to
forcemerge 561427 562337
thanks
Hi Lucas,
I am merging your bug since I am uploading an NMU that closes
the 561427 and at the same time closes 562337.
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningprein...@{jaist.ac.jp,
On Sa, Jan 09, 2010 at 09:28:32 (CET), Tomasz Kaźmierczak wrote:
Hi,
After recent upgrade of KDE from 4.3.2 to 4.3.4 (in squeeze) it also
hapens with KDE's panel... Tried XVideo and OpenGL video
output. MPlayer works fine.
what version of vlc did you test?
this should be fixed in vlc
Package: micropolis-activity
Version: 0.0.20071228-4
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Justification: fails to build from source
This package fails to build on sparc in Ubuntu Lucid:
Package: libnfo
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: minor
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
The copyright file refers to LGPL-2, which is the GNU Library General
Public license. The Lesser license used by libnfo started at LGPL-2.1.
Davide
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
alessandro,
Maybe you are overlooking the obvious.
Included with claws-mail-tools is a script called
acroread2claws-mail.pl. Did you try it?
Paul
--
It isn't worth a nickel to two guys like you or me,
but to a collector it is worth a fortune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: opensc
Version : 0.11.9
Severity : grave
OpenSC 0.11.12 released, fixing an important regression:
http://www.opensc-project.org/pipermail/opensc-announce/2009-December/30.html
The problem
---
OpenSC 0.11.4 and earlier did not encode integers properly in ASN.1 structures
Package: udev
Version: 149-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
What:
- inotify(2) (CONFIG_INOTIFY_USER)
- signalfd(2) (CONFIG_SIGNALFD)
It is present:
$ zcat config.gz | egrep -i inotify|signalfd
hi paul
Maybe you are overlooking the obvious.
Included with claws-mail-tools is a script called
acroread2claws-mail.pl. Did you try it?
well, it does not look so obvious to me...
it's a workaround that will probably work... thanks for pointing it to me!
a.l.e
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
vlc 1.0.3 (from squeeze).
Checked 1.0.4 from sid, as you suggested, and the bug is gone, at least for KDE.
Thanks,
Tomek
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: usb-modeswitch
Version: 1.0.5-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
I can confirm that replacing SYSFS with ATTR makes those warnings go away.
I executed this command to make the substitution:
# sed -i 's/SYSFS/ATTR/h' /etc/udev/rules.d/80-usb_modeswitch.rules
Thanks
-- System Information:
Debian
Package: apt-proxy
Version: 1.9.36.4
Priority: wishlist
Tags: l10n patch
# translation of apt-proxy.po to Russian
#
#Translators, if you are not familiar with the PO format, gettext
#documentation is worth reading, especially sections dedicated to
#this format, e.g. by running:
#
severity 564311 minor
reassign 564311 libwebkit-1.0-2
thanks
Le samedi 09 janvier 2010 à 01:35 -0300, Alvaro Herrera a écrit :
I just noticed that for this URL, epiphany-webkit displays an error
page:
http://archives.postgresql.org/msgtxt.php?id=bf7c63b0.3c0f%dp...@vale-housing.co.uk
I
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
Yes, you do. Sorry, I would really prefer you doing this as I'm almost
completely booked for a few weeks in advance = don't have time to
follow up on this :-(
I reported the problem upstream:
http://www.midnight-commander.org/ticket/1946
Kind
Hello,
the following /lib/udev/rules.d/66-xorg-synaptics.rules file resumed left mouse
button one finger tapping in my unstable/amd64 system.
KERNEL!=event*, GOTO=xorg_synaptics_end
ENV{ID_INPUT_TOUCHPAD}!=1, GOTO=xorg_synaptics_end
ENV{x11_driver}=synaptics
ENV{x11_options.TapButton1}=1
#
notfixed 561727 1:1.6.0-1
fixed 561727 1:1.6.5.3-1
tags 561727 + patch lenny upstream fixed-upstream
thanks
Hi,
Thanks for the report.
This bug was introduced by v1.5.5-rc0~137^2~2 (help: use parseopt,
2008-02-24), so it does not apply to etch.
It was fixed by v1.6.5.3~34 (help -a: do not
Le vendredi 08 janvier 2010 à 16:56 -0300, Maximiliano Curia a écrit :
The confirmation dialog presented to the user when the display size has been
changed defaults to OK and should default to CANCEL, to give the user a
simple way to revert the change.
Can’t you already press Escape, or
Package: libexiv2-6
Version: 0.19-1
Severity: minor
Hi!
The long description of the libexiv2-6 package could need a bit
attention. It starts off with a short blurb and then a long list - it is
usually better to have regular text than only lists.
But rather, the sub-list of EXIF
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.7.3.902-1
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
because of a different bug, the first thing I’m doing when starting my
computer is to run
$ setxkbmap ; xmodmap ~/.Xmodmap
After the upgrade to 1.7, I was greeted with
$
Hi,
I may add that the same error appears in .xsession-errors, from when
GNOME tries to apply the .Xmodmap settings.
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim nomeata Breitner
Debian Developer
nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de |
Package: gscan2pdf
Version: 0.9.29-1
Severity: minor
Hi!
Given that you are using the Homepage in the according source control
field already, there is little gain in having it duplicated in the long
description. Please remove it from there. :)
So long, and thanks for your effort for
Package: icc-profiles
Version: 1.0.1-4
Severity: minor
Hi!
It would be nice if the long description of your packages could consist
of full sentences[1], preferably more than just one. Currently it's even
worse: The short description of the package flows over into the long
description.
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 05:12:10PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
If user wants to use highgui, application does not need include cv.h.
user need include highgui.h only.
OK. For correspondence to be possible in Debian side, we provide all
library (libcvaux and libhighgui)
in one package
Package: lprof
Version: 1.11.4.dfsg+1.11.4.1-5
Severity: minor
Hi!
The long description of your package could need some formating
improvements. I guess it was rather by accident that there is an empty
paragraph in your package description - I'd suggest to remove the doted
line at the
Package: xserver-xorg-input-evdev
Version: 1:2.3.2-2
Severity: important
-- Package-specific info:
/var/lib/x11/X.roster does not exist.
/var/lib/x11/X.md5sum does not exist.
X server symlink status:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Feb 15 2009 /etc/X11/X - /usr/bin/Xorg
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root
Package: scribus-template
Version: 1.2.4.1-2
Severity: minor
Hi!
The long description of your package could need some formating
improvements. I guess it was rather by accident that there is an empty
paragraph in your package description - I'd suggest to remove the doted
line at the
Aleksey Cheusov wrote:
With C-x dictem-run RET get in *Message*:
call-interactively: Wrong number of arguments: (lambda (search-fun
optional database query strategy) Creates new *dictem* buffer and
As manual says dictem-run function requires at least one argument. So
this is a documented
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@researchut.com wrote:
Sure. Looks like a good candidate to start a new project with ?
Especially since it contains more than 8 decades of data which can stand of
value even if just archived and maintained.
Probably we just host it on alioth and let
Source: python-myghtyutils
Version: 0.52-3
Severity: minor
Hi!
The long description of your package could need some formating
improvements. Please notice that if you want things like lists to be
preformated you have to indent them with at least two spaces.
Additionally, in the line
The bug is the contradiction between build_aws.gpr (used to build the
library) and aws.gpr (used to build applications against the library).
Support for GNU TLS has been removed upstream; build_aws.gpr builds the
library with the dummy versions of crypto packages, i.e. no SSL
(illegal) and no TLS
Package: python-quixote-doc
Version: 2.5-5
Severity: minor
Hi!
It would be nice if the long description of your packages could consist
of full sentences[1], preferably more than just one. Currently it looks
a bit like a second short description, which isn't the intention of the
long
On Sat, 2010-01-09 02:50:23 +0100, Xavier Grave gr...@ipno.in2p3.fr wrote:
The following C code give different results on kfreebsd amd64 on one side
and sparc/powerpc/ on the other side
for kfreebsd amd64 :
xav...@debian:~$ ./bind_socket_c
sin len 16
res -1
and
for sparc :
Package: scribus-ng-doc
Version: 1.3.5.dfsg~svn20091216-1
Severity: minor
Hi!
The long description of your package could need some formating
improvements. I guess it was rather by accident that there is an empty
paragraph in your package description - I'd suggest to remove the doted
* Konstantin Khomoutov flatw...@users.sourceforge.net [2009-12-13 14:15:49
CET]:
ejabberd wants to install all this unneeded xserver stuff:
xmpp:~# aptitude -Vt unstable install ejabberd
[...]
11 packages upgraded, 102 newly installed, 0 to remove and 168 not
upgraded.
This is due
Package: cameleon
Version: 1.9.19-2
Severity: normal
The configuration files I was using for chamo seem to have been cleared /
purged,
subsequently to an update. It would be nice to check the packaging of cameleon
when
it comes to keeping configuration files between updates. Or at least have a
On 09.01.10 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote:
Hi Norbert,
as discussed in the bug report YOSHINO Yoshihito has provided a patch
that links ptex against libkpathsea5.
According to LowThresholdNmu I have uploaded this package
(versioned as 3.1.10+0.04b-2.2) directly without any
Hi,
Did you mean problems with maximizing windows when composite is on? I had
this problem: there was a lag when i maximized some window. But I managed to
fix this by applying a patch to xserver-xorg. Here you can read some
details: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1175385
Best regards,
Source: octave-tsa
Version: 4.0.1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary
Source: libmiglayout-java
Version: 3.7.1-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies
Source: libhtml-formfu-perl
Version: 0.06000-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
Source: xfce4-clipman-plugin
Version: 2:1.1.3-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot
Package: vim-latexsuite
Version: 20091230-1
Severity: normal
Since this version, vim-latexsuite depends strictly on vim. This inhibit
users to have installed only a vim variant other than the default one (e.g.,
vim-gnome, or vim-full).
Can the dependency be generalized by the means of | on the
Source: xfce4-cpugraph-plugin
Version: 0.4.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot
Source: iotop
Version: 0.3.2-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
rm
Source: zekr
Version: 0.5.1.dfsg-1.1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied
Source: kmymoney2-plugin-aqbanking
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/bin/bash
Source: libhttp-body-perl
Version: 1.05-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
Source: cecil-flowanalysis
Version: 0.1~svn.128879-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot
Source: abraca
Version: 0.4.2-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
gcc -o build/data/abraca_images.o -c -Wall
Source: tomboy-latex
Version: 0.5-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules build
dh build
Source: epsilon
Version: 0.5.12-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary
Source: gdal
Version: 1.6.3-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
Source: libpoe-component-ikc-perl
Version: 0.2200-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: xfce4-diskperf-plugin
Version: 2.2.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot
Source: swftools
Version: 0.8.1-2.1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
Source: agda-bin
Version: 2.2.4-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
Source: podsleuth
Version: 0.6.5-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
Source: gnome-rdp
Version: 0.2.3-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
Source: multiboot
Version: 0.6.96-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering directory
Source: squashfs
Version: 1:2.2r2-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
Source: taoframework
Version: 2.1.svn20090801-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering directory
Source: tuxguitar
Version: 1.2-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied by
Source: python-wsgiref
Version: 0.1.2-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules
Source: libfso-glib
Version: 0.2.1-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC
Source: xfce4-netload-plugin
Version: 0.4.0-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot
Source: monodevelop-vala
Version: 2.1.1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules build
Source: openscenegraph
Version: 2.8.1-1.1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies
Source: polybori
Version: 0.5~rc1-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary
Source: psqlodbc
Version: 1:08.03.0200-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
Source: mnogosearch
Version: 3.3.8-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
Source: yate
Version: 1.3.0-1.dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied
Source: xcb-proto
Version: 1.6-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
Source: xfce4-smartbookmark-plugin
Version: 0.4.2-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot
Source: monodevelop-java
Version: 2.1.1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering directory
Source: wordnet
Version: 1:3.0-21
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering directory
Source: themonospot
Version: 0.7.3.1-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
Source: celementtree
Version: 1.0.5-10
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules
Source: libnet-twitter-perl
Version: 3.10003-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
Source: stx-btree
Version: 0.8.3-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering directory
Source: dico
Version: 2.0-7
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[5]: Entering directory
Source: ipod-sharp
Version: 0.8.3-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
Source: libio-compress-perl
Version: 2.022-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
Source: xsp
Version: 2.4.3-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering directory
Source: jabberd2
Version: 2.2.8-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering directory
Source: giver
Version: 0.1.8-5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
Source: planner
Version: 0.14.4-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied by
Source: sensors-applet
Version: 2.2.5-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering directory
Source: poker-engine
Version: 1.3.4-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering directory
Source: libgdchart-gd2
Version: 0.11.5-6
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
Source: xfce4-weather-plugin
Version: 0.7.3-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot
Source: globus-xio
Version: 2.8-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-01-08 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering directory
1 - 100 of 478 matches
Mail list logo