Package: src:circuslinux
Version: 1.0.3-32
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:cupt
Version: 2.9.3
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:c2050
Version: 0.3b-5
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:apt-setup
Version: 1:0.102
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:db5.3
Version: 5.3.28-11
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:direwolf
Version: 1.2-2
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:cython
Version: 0.23.2+git16-ga8fbae1-1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:defendguin
Version: 0.0.12-5
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:distorm3
Version: 3.3.0-3
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:docbook-xsl-saxon
Version: 1.00.dfsg.1-5
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:djvulibre
Version: 3.5.27.1-4
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:exim4
Version: 4.86-6
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:fwknop
Version: 2.6.0-2.1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:emboss
Version: 6.6.0+dfsg-1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:ekg2
Version: 1:0.4~pre+20120506.1-10
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:fprintd
Version: 0.6.0-1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:fontforge
Version: 20120731.b-5
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:ecj
Version: 3.10.1-2
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:gem
Version: 1:0.93.3-9
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:galax
Version: 1.1-13
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:gmpc
Version: 11.8.16-9
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:gnumail
Version: 1.2.2-1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:gnumeric
Version: 1.12.24-1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:gnuplot5
Version: 5.0.1+dfsg1-3
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:gnome-commander
Version: 1.4.7-1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: nsis
Version: 2.46-10
Installers generated by NSIS 2.46 are vulnerable to attacks that can lead to
code execution and privilege escalation (if the installer is running with
elevated privileges).
This has been reported to us at Gpg4win (www.gpg4win.org) which is built under
Debian
Package: src:gfarm
Version: 2.6.6+dfsg-1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:gftp
Version: 2.0.19-4
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:gmime
Version: 2.6.20-1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:gforth
Version: 0.7.2+dfsg1-1.1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:pidgin-hotkeys
Version: 0.2.4-1.2
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:toilet
Version: 0.3-1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:zipios++
Version: 0.1.5.9+cvs.2007.04.28-5.2
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:witty
Version: 3.3.4+dfsg-6
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:ocp
Version: 1:0.1.21-1.2
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Harald,
2011-09-25 06:54 Harald Dunkel:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.6.4-1
If there is a conflict on upgrade, then the bottom half
window shows something like
package-a depends on package-b (>= 1.23)
This
Package: src:cafeobj
Version: 1.5.4-2
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:mysqmail
Version: 0.4.9-10.1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: libpcre2-dev
Version: 10.20-1
Severity: important
User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: multiarch
libpcre2-dev is marked as "Multi-Arch: same", but the following file is
architecture-dependent:
/usr/bin/pcre2-config
An example diff between i386 and amd64 is
Package: src:noiz2sa
Version: 0.51a-9
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:silly
Version: 0.1.0-3.2
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:python-gmpy2
Version: 2.0.7-1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:libapreq2
Version: 2.13-4
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:ledger
Version: 3.1+dfsg1-6
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:linux-tools
Version: 4.2-2
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:music
Version: 1.0.7-1.2
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:jzmq
Version: 3.1.0-7
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:libsyncml
Version: 0.5.4-2.2
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:hocr
Version: 0.10.17-2
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:libforms
Version: 1.2.3-1.2
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:pcp
Version: 3.10.8
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:pidgin-blinklight
Version: 0.11.1-2
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:rplay
Version: 3.3.2-15
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Source: libmath-derivative-perl
Version: 0.04-1
Severity: serious
Justification: will FTBFS with upcoming transition
User: debian-p...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: perl-5.22-transition
Tags: sid stretch
This package FTBFS with perl 5.22, which is in experimental and due
to transition to unstable
Package: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64
Version: 3.16.7-ckt11-1+deb8u6
Severity: important
Hi!
Inside a Xen domU, with the combination of
* latest kernel of jessie (3.16.7-ckt11-1+deb8u6)
or related kernel from wheezy-backports (3.16.7-ckt11-1+deb8u6~bpo70+1) and
* 2 network interfaces and
Hi,
On 24/11/15 11:17, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> libpcre2-dev is marked as "Multi-Arch: same", but the following file is
> architecture-dependent:
>
> /usr/bin/pcre2-config
Thanks for the bug report. I think this means libpcre2-dev should be
marked as Multi-Arch: no?
Regards,
Matthew
Thanks Fabian. I will try tomorrow.
Hamish
Sent from my android device.
-Original Message-
From: Fabian Greffrath
To: 740...@bugs.debian.org, Hamish Moffatt
Sent: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 22:32
Subject: Re: Bug#740710: problem with SF3 playback
Package: ulogd2
Version: 2.0.4-2+deb8u1
Severity: normal
Dear maintainer,
thanks for your work in the ulogs2 package, it's really appreciated.
I've noted this warning when installing the package for the first time:
adduser: Warning: The home directory `/var/log/ulog' does not belong to the
Package: debian-cd
Version: 3.1.17
Severity: important
Dear debian-cd Maintainers,
I recently encountered a problem at the installation of Debian on s390:
The d390.ins specifies where to load the kernel image and the initrd into
memory. The current d390.ins uses:
On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 11:35 +, Craig Small wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 1:21 AM Sam Morris wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vim-command-t"
> I tried building it but it looks like you are missing a dependency.
>
>
> make[1]: Entering directory
Package: pseudo
Version: 1.7.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As discussed on irc, pseudo as packaged now hijacks fakeroot yet does
provide a functional imitation of fakeroot.
Some possible ways to address that:
*
Package: ulogd2
Version: 2.0.4-2+deb8u1
Severity: normal
Dear maintainer,
thanks for your work with this package.
I would expect all things related to ulogd2 to be removed
when the package is purged, however:
% LANG=C sudo aptitude purge ulogd2
The following packages will be REMOVED:
Package: src:brltty
Version: 5.2~20141018-5
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Am Dienstag, den 24.11.2015, 11:09 +0100 schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
> This sure needs further investigation.
Got a bit further:
I forgot to adjust the sample->loopstart and sample->loopend values and
I am not even sure if they make sense at all for compressed samples. If
you wipe away this whole
Source: geographiclib
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
I am using GeographicLib under Python 3 for FFGo[1], and it works fine
for what I ask it to do. It would be nice for users if you could ship a
package for Python 3 in addition to the Python 2 package. Not to mention
that Python 2 is progressively
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 1:21 AM Sam Morris wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vim-command-t"
>
I tried building it but it looks like you are missing a dependency.
make[1]: Entering directory '/build/vim-command-t-1.13'
cd ruby/command-t && ruby extconf.rb
Hello,
Thank you for the report. I will look into this today.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Package: src:witty
> Version: 3.3.4+dfsg-6
> User: sanv...@debian.org
> Usertags: binary-indep
> Severity: important
>
> Dear maintainer:
>
> I tried to
Control: tags -1 + pending
Hi,
2007-10-11 15:35 jack aponte:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.2.15.9-2
Severity: normal
When using aptitude with the -d flag, the text output is confusing because it
doesn't indicate that files will only be downloaded, not removed or installed.
Here's an example
Source: libextutils-cppguess-perl
Version: 0.11-1
Severity: serious
Justification: will FTBFS with upcoming transition
User: debian-p...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: perl-5.22-transition
Tags: sid stretch
This package FTBFS with perl 5.22, which is in experimental and due
to transition to unstable
Source: libmime-lite-tt-html-perl
Version: 0.04-1
Severity: serious
Justification: will FTBFS with upcoming transition
User: debian-p...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: perl-5.22-transition
Tags: sid stretch
This package FTBFS with perl 5.22, which is in experimental and due
to transition to unstable
Source: libtap-parser-sourcehandler-pgtap-perl
Version: 3.29-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: will FTBFS with upcoming transition
User: debian-p...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: perl-5.22-transition
Tags: sid stretch
This package FTBFS with perl 5.22, which is in experimental and due
to
Package: xmlstarlet
Version: 1.6.1-1
Severity: normal
I cannot select with “//elementname” but only with “//*”:
tglaser@iupiter:~ $ http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;>
+http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;>
foo
AFAICT, wheezy and sid are also affected.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.2
Hi,
I would like to add that I have experienced this when renaming single files.
Mostly when copying the file name part from to replace the file name part
of a file with different extension. For instance, when copying the file
name part "graph.pdf" to rename "grap.pdf" into "graph.
When
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #805651
Owner: Tobias Frost
Hi Milan,
if you'd like to have a Co-Maintainer for avrdude, please feel free to ping me.
Tobi
Good day to you. i am Mabella by name 24 years old single. i am contacting you
for an important proposal i would like to share with you. kindly return this
email so that i can give you details. have a nice day.
Sincerely
Mabella
Que tengas un buen día. soy Mabella por su nombre 24 años sola.
Package: apache2-mpm-itk
Version: 2.4.10-10+deb8u3
Severity: normal
Hello,
we have a problem with (not only) phpbb forum freezing for like 2 minutes when
doing file_get_contents (on itself) via https (verified certificate). We found
that this problem occurs when we use apache2-mpm-itk (Jessie
Sorry, I somehow missed this reply...
2015-11-07 23:39 Axel Beckert:
Hi,
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>This has been discussed just recently on the Aptitude mailing list:
>
>http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/aptitude-devel/2012-December/003251.html
>
>It's currently not a
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 12:01:41 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> Source: libextutils-cppguess-perl
> Version: 0.11-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: will FTBFS with upcoming transition
> User: debian-p...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: perl-5.22-transition
> Tags: sid stretch
>
> This package
Hi Sir / Madam
Greetings from Nice
Interactive.,
Nice Interactive a
creative web design studio located in India. We specialize in web design, web
development and User interfaces. Team of our web designers and developers
always strive to get an astonishing websites to our clients around
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.16.4-1
Severity: important
Hi,
X server with a KDE4 session running on a Radeon HD 7450, single DP screen
connected, just crashed. Last few actions done before the crash was
maximizing a urxvt (rxvt-unicode 9.20-1+b1) window that started to show
* Matthew Vernon , 2015-11-24, 12:15:
libpcre2-dev is marked as "Multi-Arch: same", but the following file
is architecture-dependent:
/usr/bin/pcre2-config
Thanks for the bug report. I think this means libpcre2-dev should be
marked as Multi-Arch: no?
PS: please excuse me, I meant to say Tobias provided a backtrace. I
must have confused his name when reading from a second bug report.
--
Rafael Giusti
Laboratório de Inteligência Computacional - LABIC
Universidade de São Paulo - USP
Hi Josh
Am 24.11.2015 um 06:53 schrieb Josh Triplett:
> Package: systemd
> Version: 228-2
> Severity: wishlist
>
> /lib/systemd/system/systemd-timesyncd.service.d/disable-with-time-daemon.conf
> disables systemd-timesyncd if /usr/sbin/ntpd (or another NTP daemon)
> exists. However, nothing
Package: gunicorn3
Version: 19.0-7~bpo8+1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
gunicorn3 don't start as it try to run python and not python3 so
I did the following patch
diff
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:38:16PM +0100, Hendrik Brueckner wrote:
>Package: debian-cd
>Version: 3.1.17
>Severity: important
>
>Dear debian-cd Maintainers,
>
>I recently encountered a problem at the installation of Debian on s390:
>
>The d390.ins specifies where to load the kernel image and the
Package: ulogd2
Version: 2.0.4-2+deb8u1
Severity: whislist
Dear maintainer,
thanks for your work with the ulogd2, it's good to see this package in
good shape :-)
Here is a minor thing.
The shipped logrotate configuration file reads like this:
[...]
postrotate
invoke-rc.d
Package: linux-image-amd64
Version: 4.2+68
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
On most reboots ot startup i get this ATA errors:
[
9.787144] ata6.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x220 SErr 0x0 action 0x6
[
9.787191] ata6.00: irq_stat 0x4008
[
9.787219] ata6.00: failed command: READ
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ron
Package name: bit-babbler
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Ron Lee
URL : http://www.bitbabbler.org
License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: C++, with some Perl for munin and example
Package: mirrors
Severity: wishlist
Submission-Type: new
Site: jaran.undip.ac.id
Type: leaf
Archive-architecture: amd64 i386
Archive-ftp: /debian/
Archive-http: /debian/
Archive-rsync: debian/
Backports-ftp: /debian/
Backports-http: /debian/
Backports-rsync: debian/
CDImage-ftp:
Hi Michael,
On Fr, 2015-11-20 at 14:15 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 23.10.2015 um 17:43 schrieb Stephan Sürken:
> > So yes, for a non-existing script, that's (changed behaviour) but
> > correct.
> >
> > For the example wicd service however, it should ignore the call like
> > before, afaiu.
>
Package: bind9
Version: 1:9.9.5.dfsg-9+deb8u2
Severity: wishlist
tag -1 patch
thankyou
As per the following Redhat bug, which includes a patch:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215164
8<--
According to RFC 7208, section 3.1 SPF records need to be TXT records
and not RR SPF
Control: tag -1 pending
Helmut Grohne [2015-11-23 22:25 +0100]:
> Since 228, systemd FTBFS on x32. See
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=systemd=x32=228-2=1447934469
>
> The reason is a wrong assumption on the sizeof(long). I forwarded the
> fix upstream already (see above). Can
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Santiago Vila writes:
>
> I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
> (i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
[snip]
> This usually happens because there is a binary-indep target in debian/rules
> which is
On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 13:18 +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
>
> Viktor Dukhovni published a patch on 2015-09-09 at
> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-users/2015-09/txtbaRgWqxpT4
> .txt ,
> already. His patch also fixes the "only created %d queues" message:
> unpatched it is using
tag 804317 + help
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 07:27:32PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Lets consider the locations
> > ./usr/share/doc/libreoffice-dev-doc/docs
> > ./usr/share/doc/libreoffice-dev/docs
> > as "burned" and recovering them from possible nested symlinks will be
> > nearly
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Jeff,
2013-11-08 23:32 Jeff Harris:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.6.3-3.2+squeeze1
Severity: normal
In my specific example, I am upgrading PHP.
"
A new version of configuration file /etc/php5/apache2/php.ini is available, but
the version installed
currently
Control: tag -1 pending
Le Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:20:09PM +0100, Kwadronaut-debian a écrit :
>
> Given the default of nobootwait in fstab, caused by the upstream
> cc_mounts.py, this should be overridden in the default Debian template
> in /etc/cloud.cfg with a setting like:
Package: src:gumbo-parser
Version: 0.10.1+dfsg-2
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:gworkspace
Version: 0.9.2-1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:libappindicator
Version: 0.4.92-3.1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
201 - 300 of 396 matches
Mail list logo