Bug#874017: UDD: please import data on debug packages

On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Stuart Prescott wrote: > As a future extension, importing the data out of the "Build-Ids" field might > also be useful, providing a service to figure out the package name that has > the debug symbols based on build-id. (The space-separated format of Build-Ids >

Bug#873627: udisks2 in sid apparently left me with a borked system in plasma(?))

I can confirm that udisks2 2.7.2-2 fixes the thunar problems that I reported above: I see only the "usual" filesystems and can mount and unmount removable devices as expected. Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Director Transient Software Limited

Bug#833012: OpenPGP signature mangling rule for auto/default

Hello Osamu, Thank you for working on this bug! In the case there is a query string you have: > + $options{'pgpsigurlmangle'} = [ 's/\?/.' . $suffix . > '?/', ]; And in the case with no query string, you use the old code: > +

Bug#874020: lists.debian.org: Consider disabling/removing the "debian-research" mailing list

Package: lists.debian.org Severity: normal Hi listadmins, I was unaware of the existence of the debian-research mailing list before today. And that's quite odd, as I have followed activities regarding "Debian from an academic perspective" for several years! When I got to the list archives, it

Bug#870069: orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature error breaks rebuilding existing packages and more

Chris, On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 8:11 AM, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Can you think of another way your particular versions could be > detected? Sorry, I don't understand what you mean by "versions". I do use a watch file for Unifont; here is the heart of it:

Bug#874019: Note that the '-e' argument to x-terminal-emulator works like '--'

Package: debian-policy Version: 4.1.0.0 User: debian-pol...@packages.debian.org Usertags: informative proposal X-debbugs-cc: Thorsten Glaser A suggestion from mirabilos: On Thu, Aug 24 2017, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > OK, enough yak shaving and back to your original question.

Bug#873929: gcc7: Enable libgo tests and rebuilds with make -C

On 01.09.2017 23:11, Svante Signell wrote: > On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 13:32 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: >> On 01.09.2017 11:55, Svante Signell wrote: >>> Source: gcc-7 >>> Version: 7.2.0-2 >>> Severity: important >>> Tags: patch >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Currently the libgo tests are not run due to a

Bug#874018: compiz: FTBFS on x32 (time_t vs long confusion)

Package: compiz Version: 1:0.9.13.0+16.10.20160818.2-5.1 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi! Here's a patch that fixes FTBFS on x32. Compiz's code provides *time_t while libstartup-notification wants *long. This will happen a lot more in the future as the y2038 team wants to redefine time_t as

Bug#862875: RFS: libzc/0.3.1-1 [ITP] -- fast zip cracking library

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > Please either add check to B-D to enable tests or explicitly disable them > in debian/rules. > I don't think yazc should be in the libs section. > Explicit Depends: libzc3 in yazc is

Bug#874017: UDD: please import data on debug packages

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: udd As noted in https://bugs.debian.org/873729 UDD could also import dbgsym packages into the database. As a first implementation, they can just be imported as another location for Sources and Packages

Bug#381040: There is no excuse for this not being fixed

the upstream has had the fix for this for a long time.

Bug#872299: gnome-orca: Orca segfaults on startup

I don't have braille that I know of. Output of "make check -k" is below. Regards, Tim - ./check gtk2 got :1.0 at /org/a11y/atspi/accessible/root end of list got :1.2 at /org/a11y/atspi/accessible/root end of list got :1.3 at /org/a11y/atspi/accessible/root end of list got :1.4 at

Bug#871348: Pending fixes for bugs in the robocode package

tag 871348 + pending thanks Some bugs in the robocode package are closed in revision c2f125d7105546b5d3dde983a3bc6721d48fc4c3 in branch 'master' by Markus Koschany The full diff can be seen at https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/robocode.git/commit/?id=c2f125d Commit message: Ignore

Bug#873807: ssh-askpass FTCBFS: xmkmf is unfixable

Helmut Grohne writes: > Source: ssh-askpass > Version: 1:1.2.4.1-9 > Tags: patch upstream > User: helm...@debian.org > Usertags: rebootstrap > Control: block 873764 by -1 > > ssh-askpass fails to cross build from source, because ... it uses xmkmf. > I looked at xmkmf hard and

Bug#794692: pulseaudio: please build pulseaudio-module-dev

Package: pulseaudio Version: 10.0-1+deb9u1 Followup-For: Bug #794692 Why does the API being unstable matter? Debian isn't going to move to the next integer version of PulseAudio within a release. Please consider packaging this or at the very least making the xrdp module a separate package for

Bug#871956: lintian: false positive: binary-file-built-without-LFS-support on x32

On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 12:18:59AM +0200, Boud Roukema wrote: > On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Adam Borowski wrote: > > And what AC_SYS_LARGEFILE does, at least on Linux, is to return a hardcoded > > setting so programs switch from off_t to off64_t whether they need to or > > not. This does the right thing

Bug#860268: .desktop files can hide malware in Nautilus

On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 21:53 +0200, intrigeri wrote: > Hi! > > Micah Lee: > > The upstream nautilus issue [1] has already been resolved, and will be > > released in nautilus 3.24. But since this is an important security > > issue, I think this patch should be backported so that it's fixed in > >

Bug#874016: synaptic: can't launch synaptic from non-root user

Package: synaptic Version: 0.84.2 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, * Installed Debian and synaptic was working fine at first, but when I installed Xfce instead of Gnome it stopped working. * Tried reinstalling synaptic, nothing happened. -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.1

Bug#853831: libqt5gui5: font rendering broken

Package: libqt5gui5 Version: 5.9.1+dfsg-9 Followup-For: Bug #853831 Dear Maintainer, I think my problem is related. I initially thought the problem was with qjackctl specifically, but I realized that many qt5 applications would not start that depended on libqt5gui5, such as virtualbox. This

Bug#873508: sparse test failures on ppc32le (and other not so common archs)

On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 09:57:09AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 12:02:12AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 08:47:55PM -0400, Christopher Li wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Uwe Kleine-König Yes > > > that works. So to

Bug#873822: RFS: achilles/2-9 [QA]

It was with compat level 10. On 01/09/17 23:28, Tobias Frost wrote: > Am Freitag, den 01.09.2017, 23:01 +0100 schrieb David William Richmond > Davies-Jones: >> I did do an upload here I dropped the build-dep, but it threw up a >> warning about outdated config.{sub|guess}. Should I ignore this? >

Bug#832176: Ping

Ping ? Any progress ?

Bug#873822: RFS: achilles/2-9 [QA]

Am Freitag, den 01.09.2017, 23:01 +0100 schrieb David William Richmond Davies-Jones: > I did do an upload here I dropped the build-dep, but it threw up a > warning about outdated config.{sub|guess}. Should I ignore this? This was probably before setting compat level 10? (As said, d/compat == 10

Bug#872544: dbusada: Please update for gnat-7

hello! welcome back :) dcut ssh-upload cancel -f dbusada_0.4.0-0.1_amd64.changes Uploading commands file to ssh.upload.debian.org (incoming: /srv/upload.debian.org/UploadQueue/) SCP is deprecated. Please consider upgrading to SFTP. Uploading locutus-1504304589.commands to ssh-upload please

Bug#874015: aptitude: forgets selection state for package downgrade

Package: aptitude Version: 0.8.7-1 Severity: normal Let's choose a package tha is a candidate for upgrade (previous testing version is installed, and more recent than current stable version). If I select it for upgrade to testing and quit aptitude, the selected version is still selected when I

Bug#874014: base-installer: Please use common kernel for all subarchitectures on m68k

Source: base-installer Version: 1.171 Severity: normal Tags: patch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: m68k Hello! base-installer currently fails to find a suitable kernel on any m68k system during install because it tries to install different kernels depending on the subarchitecture.

Bug#871956: lintian: false positive: binary-file-built-without-LFS-support on x32

On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Adam Borowski wrote: And what AC_SYS_LARGEFILE does, at least on Linux, is to return a hardcoded setting so programs switch from off_t to off64_t whether they need to or not. This does the right thing on old 32-bit archs and is harmless on 64-bit and new 32-bit.

Bug#874013: libgl1-mesa-glx: transitional library package should not be Arch: all

Package: libgl1-mesa-glx Version: 17.2.0~rc6-1 Severity: important The libgl1-mesa-glx transitional package that exists after the libglvnd transition is Architecture: all, but this is not appropriate when a foreign-architecture package like Steam might depend on it. On an amd64 system: *

Bug#873822: RFS: achilles/2-9 [QA]

Am Freitag, den 01.09.2017, 21:14 +0100 schrieb David William Richmond Davies-Jones: > Hello > > I have fixed the problems with the copyright file, deleted the stray > file, and fixed the lintian warnings about encoding in desktop file > and > description started with synopsis. OK > I also

Bug#873822: RFS: achilles/2-9 [QA]

I did do an upload where I dropped the build-dep, but it threw up a warning about outdated config.{sub|guess}. Should I ignore this? On 01/09/17 22:59, Tobias Frost wrote: > Am Freitag, den 01.09.2017, 21:14 +0100 schrieb David William Richmond > Davies-Jones: >> Hello >> >> I have fixed the

Bug#874012: aptitude: "Internal Error, No file name" on reinstall request

Package: aptitude Version: 0.8.7-1 Severity: normal texlive-htmlxml is in unconfigured state and postinst will not complete without a reinstall (files got missing after downgrade due to Replaces issue). But aptitude would not reinstall it: root@home:~# aptitude reinstall texlive-htmlxml The

Bug#861937: preload fails due to missing preload.state file

severity 861937 serious thanks $ sudo apt install preload […] $ sudo tail -f /var/log/preload.log [Fri Sep 1 22:41:49 2017] loading conf from /etc/preload.conf [Fri Sep 1 22:41:49 2017] loading state from /var/lib/preload/preload.state [Fri Sep 1 22:41:49 2017] cannot open

Bug#874011: ITP: core-moos -- Mission Oriented Operating Suite

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Kyle Fazzari * Package name: core-moos Version : 10.0.2.a Upstream Author : Paul Michael Newman * URL : http://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~mobile/MOOS/wiki/pmwiki.php/Main/HomePage *

Bug#874000: Acknowledgement (sudo -A does not run the command)

I forgot to mention that reverting to the version in testing, 1.8.20p2-1, solves the problem.

Bug#820904: ssh-askpass: cannot control position of ssh-askpass window

Tony Finch writes: > Package: ssh-askpass > Version: 1:1.2.4.1-9 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: upstream patch > > Dear Philip, > > I am using i3-wm with two monitors and Xrandr. > > In this setup, ssh-askpass plonks itself over the crack between the screens. > It doesn't have any

Bug#869926: RFS: oprofile/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

Hi Andrey, On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 22:52:12 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Please upgrade to the current Standards-Version. Fixed. > Why do you use "rm `find . -name "*.la"`" instead of "find . -name "*.la" > -delete"? Fixed > Why do you ship static versions of the plugins?

Bug#873929: gcc7: Enable libgo tests and rebuilds with make -C

On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 13:32 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 01.09.2017 11:55, Svante Signell wrote: > > Source: gcc-7 > > Version: 7.2.0-2 > > Severity: important > > Tags: patch > > > > Hello, > > > > Currently the libgo tests are not run due to a bug in > > libgo/Makefile.am > > (and

Bug#874010: libzip: CVE-2017-14107: memory allocation failure in _zip_cdir_grow (zip_dirent.c)

Source: libzip Version: 0.11.2-1.2 Severity: important Tags: security upstream patch fixed-upstream Hi, the following vulnerability was published for libzip. CVE-2017-14107[0]: | The _zip_read_eocd64 function in zip_open.c in libzip before 1.3.0 | mishandles EOCD records, which allows remote

Bug#874008: firejail: Steam doesn't start using upstream config

Hi Martin, On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 10:43:59PM +0200, Martin Dosch wrote: > Version: 0.9.48-2 [...] > when I tried starting steam using the upstream profile I got following error: > > > Error: line 32 in /home/martin/.config/firejail/steam.profile is invalid > > After commenting the line 32 I

Bug#873890: ansible: enabling systemd service fails in chroot

tag 873890 +pending +upstream +fixed-upstream forwarded 873890 https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/21026 thanks Thanks for the report! I'll cherry pick this patch in tonight.

Bug#874009: rkt FTBFS: cannot find package "github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go/private/signer/v4"

Source: rkt Version: 1.21.0+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Some recent change in unstable makes rkt FTBFS: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/rkt.html https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/rkt.html ... /usr/bin/make -C _build/src/github.com/coreos/rkt

Bug#779675: lintian: Add flag --list-tags that will list all tags Lintian knows about

tags 779675 + pending thanks Fixed in Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=63f08a23a545b54f75e3687413012b3c9806aa55 Stuart Prescott wrote: > perhaps lintian-info -t could take a glob or regex I tried this but I felt it made the argument too "magic" especially

Bug#873822: RFS: achilles/2-9 [QA]

Hello I have fixed the problems with the copyright file, deleted the stray file, and fixed the lintian warnings about encoding in desktop file and description started with synopsis. I also *think* that I've got everything sorted with autoreconf etc, but to be honest I always seem to have trouble

Bug#874007: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only (weird)

Source: uima-addons Version: 2.3.1 Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An automated

Bug#874008: firejail: Steam doesn't start using upstream config

Package: firejail Version: 0.9.48-2 Severity: normal Dear Reiner, when I tried starting steam using the upstream profile I got following error: > Error: line 32 in /home/martin/.config/firejail/steam.profile is invalid After commenting the line 32 I got this: > Error: line 36 in

Bug#874006: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: salliere Version: 0.10 Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An automated tool

Bug#874005: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: pescetti Version: 0.5 Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An automated tool

Bug#874003: nautilus: Nautilus does not launch applications

Package: nautilus Version: 3.25.90-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, Nautilus is not launching applications when document files double-clicked or right-clicked and 'Open with ' selected. Other right-click actions work. When launching is attempted, either the window redraws with the

Bug#874004: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: ssvnc Version: 1.0.29 Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An automated tool

Bug#874001: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: sonic Version: 0.2.0 Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An automated tool has

Bug#874000: sudo -A does not run the command

Package: sudo Version: 1.8.21-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, When using the option -A, sudo does not run the command after prompting for the password. I tried the following: $ export SUDO_ASKPASS=/usr/bin/ssh-askpass $ sudo -A echo a $ where I get the last prompt after

Bug#874002: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: sacjava Version: 1.3+dfsg Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An automated

Bug#873998: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: plplot Version: 5.10.0+dfsg2 Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An automated

Bug#873996: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#873996: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 21:05:45 +0100, Chris West wrote: > This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. If/when this needs to be patched in unstable, here is the upstream fix that can be cherry-picked: https://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/20c83f619102 --

Bug#873999: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: rxtx Version: 2.2pre2 Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An automated tool

Bug#873997: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: openjpeg2 Version: 2.1.2 Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An automated tool

Bug#873996: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: octave Version: 4.2.1 Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An automated tool

Bug#873995: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: nescc Version: 1.3.5 Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An automated tool has

Bug#873994: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: neobio Version: 0.0.20030929 Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An automated

Bug#873993: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: munin Version: 2.0.33 Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An automated tool

Bug#873992: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: libusb-java Version: 0.8+ztex20090101 Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An

Bug#873990: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: libmecab-java Version: 0.99.6 Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An automated

Bug#873989: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: libmatthew-java Version: 0.8 Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An automated

Bug#873991: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: libreadline-java Version: 0.8.0.1+dfsg Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An

Bug#873987: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: libisrt-java Version: 4.8.20100629 Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An

Bug#873988: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: libjaxp1.3-java Version: 1.3.05 Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An

Bug#860268: .desktop files can hide malware in Nautilus

Hi! Micah Lee: > The upstream nautilus issue [1] has already been resolved, and will be > released in nautilus 3.24. But since this is an important security > issue, I think this patch should be backported so that it's fixed in > older versions of Debian. Thanks for raising this issue in Debian!

Bug#873986: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: junit Version: 3.8.2 Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An automated tool has

Bug#873985: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: jtb Version: 1.4.4 Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An automated tool has

Bug#873983: ITP: nanook -- pre- and post-alignment analysis of nanopore sequencing data

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andreas Tille * Package name: nanook Version : 1.26+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Richard M. Leggett * URL : https://documentation.tgac.ac.uk/display/NANOOK/NanoOK * License :

Bug#873984: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: jnlp-servlet Version: 20120126 Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An

Bug#873981: [xpad] ** (xpad:776): WARNING **: There is a problem in the program Xpad. In function 'xpad_pad_toolbar_size_allocate' the variable 'event->height' is not a positive number.

Package: xpad Version: 4.8.0-1 Severity: normal --- Please enter the report below this line. --- --- System information. --- Architecture: Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-3-686-pae Debian Release: 9.1 500 stable security.debian.org 500 stable ftp.us.debian.org 500

Bug#873982: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: jlapack Version: 0.8~dfsg Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An automated

Bug#873980: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: isorelax Version: 2004 Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An automated

Bug#873979: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: f2j Version: 0.8.1+dfsg Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An automated tool

Bug#873978: sendmail-base: Please check for /usr/share/sendmail/dynamic before sourcing it

Package: sendmail-base Version: 8.15.2-8 Severity: serious I had sendmail installed. Then I removed it including sendmail-base. I used "apt-get remove" instead of "purge" and this did not end well. The log was quickly filled with this: |Sep 1 21:28:02 debbuildd dhclient[3221]: DHCPREQUEST of

Bug#873977: Please override

Package: ant Version: 1.9.9-4 Severity: wishlist User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 ant is upgrading the -source and -target options passed to javac, such that they are a minimum of 1.6, to fix projects compiling with Java 9. However, as we still have this crazy notion

Bug#873975: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: cvc3 Version: 2.4.1 Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An automated tool has

Bug#873976: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: db5.3 Version: 5.3.28 Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An automated tool

Bug#873974: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: colorpicker Version: 1.0.0 Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An automated

Bug#873973: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: coco-java Version: 20110419 Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An automated

Bug#873972: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: cadencii Version: 3.3.9+svn20110818.r1732 Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls

Bug#871956: lintian: false positive: binary-file-built-without-LFS-support on x32

On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 08:50:05PM +0200, Boud Roukema wrote: > On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Adam Borowski wrote: > > Also, the vast majority of packages don't trigger this warning as they > > request LFS unconditionally instead of trying to autodetect it. > > The lintian warning here: >

Bug#873971: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

Source: antlr Version: 2.7.7+dfsg-7 Severity: normal User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk. The wiki has some common problems and their solutions: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls An automated

Bug#873969: -source upgrade to 1.6 breaks if ant.build.javac.source is set

Source: ant Version: 1.9.9-4 Severity: wishlist User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java9 ant has been taught to upgrade the -source and -target versions to 1.6, to support Java 9. However, if a package specifies: -Dant.build.javac.source=1.5 ... then this override is skipped.

Bug#873970: ITP: gtksourceview4: GTK+ syntax highlighting widget

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Owner: jbi...@ubuntu.com Package Name: gtksourceview4 Version: 3.99.4 Upstream Author : Ignacio Casal Quinteiro, Jesse van den Kieboom, Paolo Borelli, Sébastien Wilmet and others License : LGPL-2.1+ except for a few

Bug#841796: Orphaning Package (Was: Re: Updating the ibus-table-extraphrase Uploaders list)

Control: reassign -1 wnpp Control: retitle -1 O: ibus-table-extraphrase -- Extra phrase for table engine of ibus The only uploader of this package has asked to be removed from this package. This makes the package technially orphaned, as it requires at least one human uploader. This had not been

Bug#856277: partially solved

Hello Dtux, On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 12:25:31AM +0100, Dtux wrote: > partially solved => no more crash, but same debug message (and more) > > issue= remove all personal libraries added in config/kicad/fp-lib-table > and re-add this personal libraries with "libraries wizard" > > new

Bug#873968: openvas-scanner: previous changelog history of package not provided

Package: openvas-scanner Version:5.1.1-2 Priority: wishlist Dear colleagues, Many years ago I maintained first openvas-server (from 2009 to 2010) and then openvas-scanner package (and other related openvas-xxx packages) in Debian. IIRC, Openvas-scanner was provided in experimental for 2 years

Bug#873746: crash backtrace

For the reference, this bug has been reported originally at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484290. Thomas said he could not reproduce it, but the crash happens with the current version in unstable. Here is a backtrace from "infotocap POC12" after rebuilding tic with -O0, so that

Bug#841793: Orphaning Package (Was: Re: Updating the zinnia Uploaders list)

Control: reassign -1 wnpp Control: retitle -1 O: zinnia -- online handwriting recognition system with machine learning The only uploader of this package has asked to be removed from this package. This makes the package technially orphaned, as it requires at least one human uploader. This had not

Bug#873966: config-package-dev: transform operation error

On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Bruno Maitre wrote: Dear Maintainer, When using the transform operation dh_configpackage will output that kind of error: Can't use string ("/ARRAY(0x55f37e2c3080)") as an ARRAY ref while "strict refs" in use at /usr/bin/dh_configpackage line 394. This error has been

Bug#841807: Orphaning Package (Was: Re: Updating the debian-zh-faq Uploaders list)

Package: src:debian-zh-faq Followup-For: Bug #841807 Control: reassign -1 wnpp Control: retitle -1 O: debian-zh-faq -- Debian Chinese FAQ (Chinese GB) Control: severity -1 normal The only uploader of this package has asked to be removed from this package. This makes the package technially

Bug#871956: lintian: false positive: binary-file-built-without-LFS-support on x32

On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Adam Borowski wrote: Also, the vast majority of packages don't trigger this warning as they request LFS unconditionally instead of trying to autodetect it. The lintian warning here: https://lintian.debian.org/tags/binary-file-built-without-LFS-support.html says "This can

Bug#873967: openvas-manager: No record of previous changelog history of Debian package

Package: openvas-manager Version: 4.0.0 Priority: wishlist Dear colleagues, Many years ago I maintained openvas-manager in experimental, as reflected in the PTS. However, upon review of the latest's package changelog [0] I do not see any reference to this. There are, however, many references to

Bug#873919: make dpkg-buildpackage default locale UTF-8

> Hans-Christoph Steiner writes: > Package: dpkg-dev > More and more packages are adding unicode files I assume you mean “UTF-8 filenames” here (per below), right? > as unicode support has become more reliable and available. What are the use cases for

Bug#873962: sweethome3d: Random crash when opening/manipulating a file

Control: severity -1 important Am 01.09.2017 um 17:19 schrieb Ludovic Lebègue: > Package: sweethome3d > Version: 5.4+dfsg-2 > Severity: grave > Tags: upstream > Justification: causes non-serious data loss > > Hi, > > On Debian testing sweethome3D now crashes randomly when opening or >

Bug#872482: why the further fixup is not needed

On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 15:05:30 +0100 Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 07:35:20 +0200 Christian Ehrhardt d...@canonical.com> wrote: > > For a grain of confidence and background - Upstream there is also a > follow > > up fix [1], but that is not needed for your package. >

Bug#754462: Bug#862051: nodejs (6.11.2~dfsg-1) experimental; urgency=medium

]] Didier 'OdyX' Raboud > There are _plenty_ of changes that one needs to care about in a stable > upgrade: things like mandatory postfixing of Apache configuration files, > removal > of specific Python3 versions, removal of upstart, etc. Having to change a > shebang isn't a big deal given

Bug#873722: mirror.upb.edu.co permission issues

Control: reopen -1 Control: retitle -1 mirror submission for mirror.upb.edu.co [permission issues] Control: tag -1 +moreinfo On Wed, 30 Aug 2017, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > o we recommend mirrors not sync directly from service aliases such as > > ftp..debian.org (only http is guaranteed to be

  1   2   3   >