Source: rust-gtk-layer-shell-sys
Version: 0.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: python-pint
Version: 0.19.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
Source: liblc3
Version: 1.0.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc
Source: gap-polymaking
Version: 0.8.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: cachy
Version: 0.3.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
> dh
Source: topal
Version: 81-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules clean
> dh
Source: scons
Version: 4.5.2+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: lsh-utils
Version: 2.1-14
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Trying seed 18
> Trying
Source: gnucash-docs
Version: 5.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Entering
Source: matplotlib
Version: 3.6.3-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: rust-gdkx11-sys
Version: 0.18.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: spirv-tools
Version: 2023.6~rc1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd
Source: ipywidgets
Version: 8.1.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: tomahawk
Version: 0.7.1-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
>
Source: xerces-c
Version: 3.2.4+debian-1.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: python-meshplex
Version: 0.17.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: node-lezer
Version: 1.4.11+~cs14.19.46-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: rust-gdkx11
Version: 0.18.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: trash-cli
Version: 0.23.11.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: libjson-schema-modern-perl
Version: 0.582-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Test
Source: compyle
Version: 0.8.1-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
> dh
Source: gmsh
Version: 4.12.1+ds1-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: rust-gobject-sys
Version: 0.18.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: borgmatic
Version: 1.8.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
>
Source: taskw
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
> dh
Source: pynormaliz
Version: 2.19+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: ada-reference-manual
Version: 1:2020.1commit85143dcb-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: neo
Version: 0.12.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory
Source: gap-hapcryst
Version: 0.1.15-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: singular
Version: 1:4.3.2-p10+ds-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/bash
Source: prometheus-sql-exporter
Version: 0.4.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: gcc-14-cross-ports
Version: 4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
Source: pymeeus
Version: 0.5.11+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: node-xterm
Version: 5.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: lnav
Version: 0.11.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering directory
Source: sen
Version: 0.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory
Source: msolve
Version: 0.6.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: whitakers-words
Version: 0.2020.10.27-1.3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: eztrace
Version: 2.1-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering directory
Source: node-yarnpkg
Version: 4.0.2+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]:
Source: symfit
Version: 0.5.6-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: rust-gdk4-sys
Version: 0.7.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: rust-gdk-pixbuf-sys
Version: 0.18.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: golang-github-prometheus-community-pgbouncer-exporter
Version: 0.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant
Source: proxycheck
Version: 0.49a-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules clean
>
Source: seaborn
Version: 0.13.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules clean
> dh
Source: freebayes
Version: 1.3.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: normaliz
Version: 3.10.2+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld:
Source: prometheus-process-exporter
Version: 0.7.10-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: ixo-usb-jtag
Version: 0.0.1-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: python-numpysane
Version: 0.40-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc -g -O2
Source: haskell-gi-glib
Version: 2.0.29-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: python-bonsai
Version: 1.5.0+ds-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: node-react-toastify
Version: 9.1.2+~1.2.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: node-vega-tooltip
Version: 0.33.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: coq-deriving
Version: 0.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: select2.js
Version: 4.0.13+dfsg1-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: node-grunt-sass
Version: 3.1.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw
Version: 0.1.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: python-wsme
Version: 0.11.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: e-antic
Version: 2.0.2+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering
Source: rust-atk
Version: 0.18.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: astroml
Version: 1.0.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> dh
Source: jabberd2
Version: 2.7.0-4.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering
Source: xphyle
Version: 4.4.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: mplcursors
Version: 0.5.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
>
Source: rust-atk-sys
Version: 0.18.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: node-gulp-sass
Version: 5.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Sean Whitton writes:
> control: tag -1 + pending
> control: close 1067133
>
> Hello,
>
> On Wed 20 Mar 2024 at 12:06am -07, Xiyue Deng wrote:
>
>> Found the upstream fix for the test failures[1]. I have backported the
>> patch in [2]
>
> In the future, especially with dgit-maint-merge(7), it's
Control: retitle -1 RFS: streamlink/6.7.1-1 -- CLI for extracting video streams
from various websites to a video player
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "streamlink" for a new
upstream version 6.7.1.
* Package name:
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 15:47:02 +0200 Dominik George wrote:
This bug is a real blocker for unrar-free's usability as a replacement
for unrar-nonfree. Is there any progress? Is unrar-free even still
maintained?
After almost 20 years, version 0.3.0 is available
Control: reopen -1
On 20.03.24 21:48, Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi
Not a single piece of evidence of a breakage showed up within the last
weeks. I'm therefor closing this bug report.
Bastian,
sorry for being quiet in the time of the time_t64 transitions.
I am re-opening, and CCing
Hello,
I think this is fixed in glslang/14.0.0-2:
pkg-config --libs glslang
-lglslang -lMachineIndependent -lOSDependent -lSPVRemapper -lpthread
Also based on what is in changelog of this last version of glslang-dev.
Philippe.
Control: unmerge 1059786
Control: reassign 1059786 cross-toolchain-base
Hi
I'm going forward with the provided plan and will add Breaks with Linux
6.8.
Regards,
Bastian
--
Insults are effective only where emotion is present.
-- Spock, "Who Mourns for Adonais?" stardate 3468.1
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "obconf":
* Package name : obconf
Version : 1:2.0.4+git20150213-3
Upstream contact :open...@icculus.org
* URL :https://github.com/danakj/obconf
* License
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "evilwm":
* Package name : evilwm
Version : 1.4.3-1
Upstream contact :https://www.6809.org.uk/ciaran/
* URL :https://www.6809.org.uk/evilwm/
* License
Package: librust-isahc-dev
Severity: grave
Justification: not installable
X-Debbugs-Cc: werdah...@riseup.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
librust-isahc-dev is uninstallable because of the polling update:
sudo apt install librust-isahc-dev
Reading package lists... Done
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 02:26:34PM +, Amr Ibrahim wrote:
> Package: jupyter-server
>
> Hello,
>
> Please update jupyter-server to 1.23.5 if the jump to version 2.2.1 is
> not appropriate.
> [...]
Hi Amr and Julien, et al,
I just took a look at 2.13.0 to see what would be needed. Here's my
Source: r-cran-blme
Version: 1.0-5-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: timeout
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails on i386 since
November 2022. What's worse, it fails because it seems to hang and
eventually times out due
Source: r-cran-bayestestr
Version: 0.13.0-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: timeout
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails on i386.
What's worse, it fails because it seems to hang and eventually times out
due to
[Salvatore Bonaccorso]
> Usually you would choose for this update 3.3.0-1.3+deb12u1, but given
> 3.3.0-2 was never present in unstable and the version later moved on,
> this is in theory possible.
That reasoning is the same as mine. I also wanted to drop the NMU
version number part, to make it
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Gilbey
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: pytest-jupyter
Version : 0.9.1
* URL : https://github.com/jupyter-server/pytest-jupyter
* License : BSD-3-clause and
Source: pulseaudio
Version: 16.1+dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de
Unfortunately, as with umockdev, I have no idea what is going on
here… does it #undef _FILE_OFFSET_BITS or something?
Hi
[disclaimer, not an authoritative answer as not part of the stable
release managers]
On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 09:09:05AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> Package: release.debian.org
>
> The https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/newlib > package got an open
> security problem with malloc and
Package: librust-event-listener-dev
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: werdah...@riseup.net, plugw...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
The newer async-broadcast (needed for a newer zbus) will require a newer
librust-event-listener-dev.
Affected packages:
Package: minder
Version: 1.16.2-1
Severity: minor
Hi maintainer,
I've installed minder but seems typing "minder" in the terminal doesn't
launch the program. Had to dpkg -L the package to find it's installed as
"/usr/bin/com.github.phase1geo.minder", which is not very intuitive.
Would be nice if
Source: click
Version: 0.5.2-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
It turns out the old python3-mock build dependency is
now also extraneous and should be removed from d/control.
This software will prefer the newer unittest.mock
from the standard library.
Greetings
(I didn't knew about this
Source: openssh
Version: 1:9.7p1-2
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS on d-ports arch
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de, debian-...@lists.debian.org
On m68k, gcc-13 currently ICEs when -fzero-call-used-regs=used is
used (see #1066891) in moduli.c, packet.c, etc. but the configury
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 11:59:31PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
>Hi!
>
>On Wed, 2023-12-20 at 15:30:24 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> Package: debsig-verify
>> Version: 0.23+b2
>> Severity: important
>> Tags: patch
>
>> Updating our derived distro from bullseye to bookworm, we've moved on
>> from
Control: reopen 1051098
Control: tags 1051098 -patch
On 2024-03-19, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2024-02-29, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
>> diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
>> index 7a6bbc31cc..c6aec92cf6 100644
>> --- a/debian/control
>> +++ b/debian/control
>> @@ -186,7 +187,8 @@
Package: dh-builtusing
Version: 0.0.5
Severity: normal
Control: affects -1 u-boot
X-Debbugs-Cc: vagr...@debian.org
u-boot recently switched to dh-builtusing, but it fails with
architecture-specific Built-Using entries in packages that do not have
the same Built-Using dependencies across
Package: perl
Version: 5.38.2-3.2
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
X-Debbugs-Cc: Steve Langasek
[ Steve: I'm sure you have bigger fish to fry but FYI anyway.
Apologies for the imbalance between verbosity and importance.
Comments welcome of course. ]
On the
> --overwrite does not trust debian/changelog
Looking at this bug (after much time, sorry) I am confused. I think
what --overwrite does is precisely to trust the changelog. Maybe you
meant to say "dgit does not trust ..." which is accurate. Then the
rest of your message makes sense. So, let
Package: digikam
Followup-For: Bug #1042376
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of this
Control: severity -1 important
Having thought about it, I propose the following changes to try to
help with this:
1. Provide an alias for --overwrite (without version) called
something like --trust-changelog, and make that be the primary name.
That's really what --overwrite (without
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 05:18:08PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>Hi Guillem,
>
>Sorry, I've been swamped with other stuff then ill for the last week
>or so. Looking now...
And I can confirm that your changes work here for our system too.
Thanks!
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 03:08:58PM +1300, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> It's hard to see from the log but the failures that are causing issues are
> the "path_info" gitweb tests such as
>
> expecting success of 9500.70 'path_info: project': gitweb_run "" "/.git"
> not ok 70 - path_info: project
>
Hi Guillem,
Sorry, I've been swamped with other stuff then ill for the last week
or so. Looking now...
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 04:22:08AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
>Hi!
>
>On Wed, 2023-12-20 at 23:59:31 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> On Wed, 2023-12-20 at 15:30:24 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.134
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: frank.guthausen.2...@gmail.com
file
/usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/ceres
contains wrong keyring line
keyring /usr/share/keyrings/debian-archive-keyring.gpg
which should be
keyring
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 04:31:22PM +, James Addison wrote:
> > or maybe even simpler: first run diffoscope normally, then if that runs
> > into a timeout,
> > run with --max-container-depth=3 (or 5).
It also occured to me that we then could diffoscope with a (way) lower timeout,
eg 60min
101 - 200 of 261 matches
Mail list logo