Bug#999449: gnome-calculator: libgcalc-dev, libgci-dev packages?

Package: gnome-calculator Version: 1:40.1-1ubuntu2 Severity: wishlist The package gnome-calculator contains two .pc files for the developer tool pkg-config and two shared libraries with a filename ending in '.so'. In Debian based systems, such files usually are content of separate -dev

Bug#998890: liboauth: New Homepage?

Source: liboauth Severity: wishlist The project seems to have moved from SourceForge to GitHub: . There, the source code is newer but without a newer release. What about changing the homepage in debian/control?

Bug#997924: libsrtp2-dev: libnss3-dev really required?

Package: libsrtp2-dev Version: 2.4.2-2 A developer package depends on its runtime library/package. The runtime library in turn depends on other used libraries, which can be checked via ldd. Additionally, the developer package depends on other -dev packages if one of its public headers a

Bug#997879: libsrtp2-dev: pkg-config really required?

Package: libsrtp2-dev Version: 2.4.2-2 The developer package of libsrtp2 declares the tool pkg-config as (required) dependency for years now [0]. I was not able to find the reason for this. Please, elaborate why this was included. There are several voices [1][2] which state that, if pkg-config

Bug#997870: unixodbc-dev: libltdl-dev really required?

Package: unixodbc-dev Version: 2.3.6-0.1build2 In salsa [1], I see that the dependency on libltdl-dev was added to the -dev package in the year 2004 already. On the first glance, I found no use/reference to libltdl-dev (except at build time). Therefore, I am curios why this dependency exists

Bug#996978: libsrtp2-1: OpenSSL

> the only real use back then [...] was for a random number function Sounds like I should have raised this before. libSRTP required a crypto library to support AES-GCM based crypto suites [1]. Actually, I use those suites via Digium Asterisk:

Bug#996979: libsrtp2-dev: libpcap-dev really required?

Package: libsrtp2-dev Version: 2.4.2-1 The -dev package has a dependency on libpcap, even on libpcap-dev. Once [1] you had a -utils package, and libpcap was required for its tool rtp_decoder. As I cannot find the -utils package anymore, is that dependency still required? When I build libsrtp2

Bug#996978: libsrtp2-1: OpenSSL

Package: libsrtp2-1 Version: 2.4.2-1 Severity: wishlist One year ago [1], you enabled NSS as crypto library. With that AES-GCM and AES-NI are possible. However, libSRTP can be built with NSS or OpenSSL. You played around with OpenSSL six years ago [2]. Do you remember why it failed? Curl has

Bug#996942: libglib-perl: pkg-config really required?

Package: libglib-perl Version: 3:1.329.3-1build1 Two years ago [1], the developer-only tool pkg-config was added as dependency. Because of that, every (even a minimal) Ubuntu Desktop contains that tool nowadays, because its Update Manager depends on libgtk3-perl. Does this package really use

Bug#996941: libcairo-gobject-perl: pkg-config really required?

Package: libcairo-gobject-perl Version: 1.005-2build1 Two years ago [1], the developer-only tool pkg-config was added as dependency. Because of that, every (even a minimal) Ubuntu Desktop contains that tool nowadays, because its Update Manager depends on libgtk3-perl. Does this package really

Bug#996940: libcairo-perl: pkg-config really required?

Package: libcairo-perl Version: 1.109-1 Two years ago [1], the developer-only tool pkg-config was added as dependency. Because of that, every (even a minimal) Ubuntu Desktop contains that tool nowadays, because its Update Manager depends on libgtk3-perl. Does this package really use this tool