).
+
+ -- Cédric Boutillier Wed, 06 Mar 2013 15:02:31 +0100
+
libopenid-ruby (2.1.8debian-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Lucas Nussbaum ]
diff -Nru libopenid-ruby-2.1.8debian/debian/patches/fix_CVE-2013-1812
libopenid-ruby-2.1.8debian/debian/patches/fix_CVE-2013-1812
--- libopenid-ruby-2.1.8debian
02-13 16:30:04.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+ruby1.9.1 (1.9.3.194-7) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * debian/patches/CVE-2013-0269.patch: fix possible denial of service and
+unsafe object creation vulnerability in JSON (Closes: #700471)
+
+ -- Cédric Boutillier Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:56:19 +
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 ruby1.9.1
Hi!
Reading the description given in
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/rubyonrails-security/4_YvCpLzL58
I notice that the bug is affecting the version of JSON distributed with
ruby1.9.1. I am therefore duplicating this bug acco
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-zoom, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
To
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package
ruby-validatable, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-uuidtools,
due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-usb, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
To
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-twitter4r,
due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-snmp, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
To
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-sdl, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
To
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package
ruby-rubytorrent, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package
ruby-rb-inotify, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-prawn, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
T
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-openid, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-opengl, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-odbc, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
To
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-net-ssh,
due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-net-sftp,
due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
-
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-narray, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-moneta, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package
ruby-mixlib-authentication, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-metaid, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package
ruby-merb-param-protection, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package
ruby-merb-helpers, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-merb-haml,
due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-merb-core,
due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package
ruby-merb-assets, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-mathml, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-krb5-auth,
due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-locale, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-kakasi, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-innate, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-gsl, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
To
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-ihelp, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
T
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-hmac, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
To
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-heckle, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package
ruby-googlecharts, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-gnome2, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package
ruby-gettext-activerecord, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-gd, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
To U
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-fusefs, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-fssm, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
To
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-feedtools,
due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-facets, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-extlib, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-eb, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
To U
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-builder,
due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package
ruby-amazon-ec2, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package
ruby-activeldap, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package rttool, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
To UN
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package coderay, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
To U
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ohai, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
To UNSU
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package chef, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
To UNSU
Hi,
I can confirm that the command 'yard server' is not working as expected.
The webrick server throws a lot of 404 errors on the command line.
However, if using the '--docroot doc/' options, everything seems to work
as expected, with all the interactivity JavaScript libraries could
offer.
(the w
Control: severity -1 minor
Control: retitle -1 ruby-diff-lcs needs to be rebuilt against gem2deb>=0.3.0
Hi!
Thanks for your report.
Integration of Ruby Debian packages with rubygems arrived late in the
release cycle for Wheezy, but it requires rebuilding the packages with
newer gem2deb (>= 0.3.0
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Cédric Boutillier"
* Package name: libm4rie
Version : 20120613
Upstream Author : Martin Albrecht
* URL : http://m4ri.sagemath.org
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C
Description : extended Method o
Hi!
I wanted to mention that when preparing a new version of libm4ri, I also
hit this bug: lintian outputs
W: libm4ri-0.0.20120613: dev-pkg-without-shlib-symlink
usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm4ri-0.0.20120613.so
usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm4ri-0.0.20120613.so
whereas the -dev package has (as i
Hi!
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:12:45AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 04:09:00PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Daniel Martí wrote:
> > > Is there any packaging team I should contact? Should I start using
> > > collab-maint on anonscm.debian.org fo
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 11:20:55PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 13:07:21 +0100
> Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> > I would also be nice to have tests enabled at build time, but this would
> > require the packaging of jnunemaker-matchy. They could be enabled
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Cédric Boutillier"
* Package name: ruby-distribution
Version :
Upstream Author : Claudio Bustos
* URL : https://github.com/clbustos/distribution
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Cédric Boutillier"
* Package name: ruby-minimization
Version : 0.2.1
Upstream Author : Claudio Bustos
* URL : https://github.com/clbustos/minimization
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Cédric Boutillier"
* Package name: ruby-text-table
Version : 1.2.2
Upstream Author : Aaron Tinio
* URL : https://github.com/aptinio/text-table
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : fe
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 05:43:36PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi Cédric
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 11:36:14 +0100
> Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> > The packaging of dependencies (ruby-jwt and ruby-crack) is currently in
> > progress
> ruby-crack seems to be not progressed s
Control: unblock -1 by 695059
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 11:49:43AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 11:36:14 +0100
> Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> > The packaging of dependencies (ruby-jwt and ruby-crack) is currently in
> > progress, as a part of the effort of
. (Closes: #677650)
++ add debian/patches/use_ruby18.patch, changing the shebang of unhide.rb
+ to /usr/bin/ruby1.8 as it contains code not compatible with Ruby 1.9,
++ Depends on ruby1.8 instead of ruby.
+
+ -- Cédric Boutillier Tue, 04 Dec 2012 12:58:03 +0100
+
unhide.rb (13-1) unstable
Hi!
Axel Beckert wrote:
> Launchy did not built out of the box, symlink some files from
> ruby-launchy/spec/*.rb to ruby-launchy/ helped. I also had to remove
> the yaml file from debian/ruby-test-files.yaml.
>
> Additionally two suspicious tests are failing:
>
> # Running tests:
>
> ..
Control: block -1 by 693813
Control: block -1 by 693819
Hi Axel,
I've made some progress in the packaging of mdpress. The source contains
two javascript libraries that could be useful in themselves. So I am
starting with those.
On the other hand, I think there is a way around ruby-launchy, by us
Hi!
Instead of requiring rubygems, wouldn't be better to circumvent rubygems
instructions in config/boot? All the dependencies are already ensured to
be installed thanks to APT, so there is no need for extra checks to be
sure that rails is installed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Cédric Boutillier"
* Package name: highlight.js
Version : 7.3
Upstream Author : Ivan Sagalaev
* URL : http://softwaremaniacs.org/soft/highlight/en/
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: JavaScript
D
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Cédric Boutillier"
* Package name: impress.js
Version : 0.5.3
Upstream Author : Bartek Szopka
* URL : https://github.com/bartaz/impress.js
* License : Expat or GPL-2+
Programming Lang: JavaScript
D
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Cédric Boutillier"
* Package name: ruby-integration
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Ben Gimpert, Claudio Bustos
* URL : https://github.com/clbustos/integration
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: Ruby
D
+ set priority of transitional packages to extra
+
+ -- Cédric Boutillier Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:16:06 +0200
+
ruby-net-sftp (1:2.0.5-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Add epoch to version in order to properly override the previous
diff -Nru ruby-net-sftp-2.0.5/debian/control ruby-net-sftp-2.0.5/de
Package: ruby-net-sftp
Followup-For: Bug #674324
Control: clone 674324 -1
Control: reassign -1 ruby-mocha
Control: affects -1 ruby-net-sftp
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/freerange/mocha/issues/99
Hi!
This turns out to be a variant of a problem in ruby-mocha,
Package: ruby-net-sftp
Followup-For: Bug #674324
Hi!
I investigated this a little bit further. Here are my findings so far.
There is a kind of conflict between two tests:
- test_from_buffer_should_correctly_parse_buffer_and_return_attribute_object
from test/protocol/04/test_attributes.rb
- test
Package: ruby-libxml
Version: 2.3.2-1
Followup-For: Bug #676210
Control: reassign -1 libxml2 2.8.0+dfsg1-5
Control: affects -1 ruby-libxml
Control: retitle -1 xmlreader fails to report parsing failures, causing
ruby-libxml test failure
Control: tag -1 patch
Hi!
As documented in the upstream bug
Package: vim-scripts
Version: 20110813
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
When I try vcscommand from within vim in a file tracked by subversion, I
get the following error:
VCSCommand: no suitable plugin.
According to the changelog, vim-scripts ships vcscommand 1.99.35, which
does not seem to w
,
Cédric
# French translations for byobu package.
# Copyright (C) 2012 Debian French l10n team
# This file is distributed under the same license as the byobu package.
#
# Cédric Boutillier , 2012.
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: byobu\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To
Hi!
This package is to be removed from unstable, since it has been renamed
in ruby-zoom. The removal is requested in Bug 687790.
Cheers,
Cédric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
.8 is used in the configuration
+ process. (Closes: #676113)
++ gonzui,the only reverse dependency, will only work with Ruby 1.8 anyway
+ because of other depencies.
+ * Set urgency to medium, as a RC bug is fixed.
+
+ -- Cédric Boutillier Mon, 03 Sep 2012 22:38:55 +0200
+
lan
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
As part of the Ruby Packaging Team maintaining libzoom-ruby/ruby-zoom, I
am requesting the removal from unstable of the source package
libzoom-ruby 0.4.1-2 and all the binaries built from it.
Indeed, the source package has been renamed into ruby-zoom,
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 10:12:31PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Indeed. It fails with ruby-mocha 0.11.3, but works with 0.10.3 and
> 0.10.5.
> I'm not very familiar with ruby-mocha, so I don't know if the package is
> actually doing something wrong. Could someone in debian-ruby@ take a
> closer
atch to restore
+loading of minitest/unit conditional to the definition of MiniTest.
+Loading minitest/unit before Minitest is defined screens the definition of
+TestUnitResult, causing tests to fail (Closes: #684860).
+
+ -- Cédric Boutillier Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:41:26 +0200
+
rub
g tests to fail (Closes: #684860).
+
+ -- Cédric Boutillier Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:29:15 +0200
+
ruby-mocha (0.11.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Bump the build-dependency on gem2deb to >= 0.3.0~ (closes: #674388).
diff -Nru ruby-mocha-0.11.3/debian/patches/remove_rubygems_stuff_in_minitest_tes
Y variable instead of hardcoded name 'ruby' for
+ the Ruby binary to ensure that Ruby 1.8 is used in the configuration
+ process. (Closes: #676106)
+ * Set urgency to medium, as a RC bug is fixed.
+
+ -- Cédric Boutillier Tue, 04 Sep 2012 10:23:01 +0200
+
gonzui (1.2+cvs20070129-
Closes: #676113)
++ gonzui,the only reverse dependency, will only work with Ruby 1.8 anyway
+ because of other depencies.
+ * Set urgency to medium, as a RC bug is fixed.
+
+ -- Cédric Boutillier Mon, 03 Sep 2012 22:38:55 +0200
+
langscan (1.2+cvs20070125-1) unstable; urgency=low
Hi,
I would suggest another approach to solve this bug: liblangscan-ruby,
the only binary package built by this source package has only one
reverse dependency, gonzui, which is condemned to work only with
Ruby1.8, since it depends on libdb-ruby1.8/ruby-bdb which does not
provide a library for Ruby
Package: tty-clock
Version: 1.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
Please find attached tty-clock.1, a manual page for tty-clock, written
in roff format. You can include it into your package by copying it to
the debian/ directory, and writing "debian/tty-clock.1" into the
debian/tt
package ruby-gettext
tag 682543 pending
thanks
Hi!
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 05:56:00PM +0100, Justin B Rye wrote:
> So how about:
> Description: gettext for Ruby
> This Ruby package is a localization library and toolset modeled after
> GNU gettext, and with a similar simple API.
> .
> I
is the
+ case in the test suite (Closes:#676206)
+
+ -- Cédric Boutillier Fri, 06 Jul 2012 06:03:30 +0200
+
ruby-gruff (0.3.6-5) unstable; urgency=low
* Added missing dependency and build-dependency on ruby-rmagick
diff -Nru ruby-gruff-0.3.6/debian/patches/fix_division_by_0 ruby-gruff-0.3.6/debian/pat
Hi!
The French translation of the page for the Technical Committee is being
updated. While still in the review process, a newer version has just
been uploaded addressing your concern: the sentence
Lors de la discussion technique avec d'autres développeurs, vous
devez être prêt à être défié et
orrectly with the various Ruby interpreter.
+ * Add 9900_debug_test_failures.patch
+ Make the test suite output more verbose, to get enough info if something
+ goes wrong during the build.
+ * Bump Standards-Version: to 3.9.3 (no changes needed)
+
+ -- Cédric Boutillier Wed, 04 Jul 2012 13:34
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
Please remove libsdl-ruby source package from unstable. It is obsoleted by
ruby-sdl, which provides transitional packages for all binary packaged
built from it. libsdl-ruby is preventing the migration of ruby-sdl into
testing.
Thanks!
Cédric
signat
Source: ruby-image-science
Version: 1.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
Attempts to build the package from source yield an error message and the
build fails.
Here is the relevant part of the build:
Rewriting shebang line of
/tmp/buildd/ruby-image-science-1.2.2/debian/ru
reassign 673738 ruby-validatable
affects 673738 ruby-dust
tag 673738 pending
thanks
Hi!
I am moving, in the ruby-validatable package, the file causing problems,
as well as other secondary Ruby files in the
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/validatable
subdirectory to solve this name clash.
The same pro
reassign 672714 ruby-dataobjects
thanks
Please read ruby-dataobjects instead of ruby-datamapper in the previous
message...
Cédric
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
reassign 672714 ruby-datamapper
tag 672714 pending
thanks
Hi!
The problem comes from a little bit further in the building process. One
of the tests run during build time, and using files from ruby-datamapper
fails because it takes more than 2 seconds on these architectures to run
some commands.
reopen 670826
thanks
Hi again!
It seems I closed this bug too quickly. Even though the name matches the
requirements of the new policy, the Ruby files are still installed in
the wrong location. It should use rubyvendordir variable, instead of
rubylibdir. So this package still needs to complete it
tags 665251 fixed-upstream pending
thanks
Hi!
This bug is due to some internal changes in RSpec >= 2.8.0.
Upstream already fixed this [0]. The patch has been imported in the team
repository.
0:
https://github.com/jasonwebster/treetop/commit/754aa988cf3a16cbb5606fffa1b1ea42c2d3e1a4
signature
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-wirble, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-xmlparser,
due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
301 - 400 of 595 matches
Mail list logo
