Bug#897973: r-cran-rcpp: should depend on r-cran-littler (not transitional littler)

On 5 May 2018 at 12:43, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: | Package: r-cran-rcpp | Version: 0.12.16-1 | Severity: normal | | littler is - according to its short description - a transitional package. | | Please therefore depend on r-cran-littler and not littler. Agreed, and I noticed that the other day to

Bug#897254: CVE-2018-9060

On 3 May 2018 at 13:41, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: | On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 06:33:50AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > They aren't quite sure how to get back CVE/Mitre now. Do you have any tips / | > suggestions / HOWTOs ? | | Best to use the https://cveform.mitre.org/ form:

Bug#897238: Re: Bits about Intel MKL packaging -- Higher Priority than OpenBLAS

On 2 May 2018 at 14:41, Lumin wrote: | Seems that things are getting more complicated. Recall that here we'are | going to prevent users from GPL violation in situations such as this | one: | | debootstrap; apt install libmkl-rt; apt install octave; octave ... (1) Are you sure? I do not think t

Bug#897319: please remove (build) dependencies on OpenJDK 9

On 1 May 2018 at 13:51, Matthias Klose wrote: | Package: src:r-base | Version: 3.4.4-1 | Severity: serious | Tags: sid buster | | please remove (build) dependencies on OpenJDK 9, which is end of live now and | should be removed from the archive as soon as possible. R 3.5.0 is in experimental and

Bug#897262: dh-r problem with higher-priority R packages

Package: dh-r Severity: important As discussed on the debian-r list in this message https://lists.debian.org/debian-r/2018/04/msg00062.html for R packages with (upstream) 'Priority: recommended' (as in all the package our virtual package r-recommended depends upon), the ${R:Depends} and other

Bug#897254: CVE-2018-9060

On 30 April 2018 at 23:54, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: | Hi Dirk, | | On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 04:33:48PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > There is no GUI in R on | > Linux (there used to be a Gnome1/Gtk one a lng time ago). | | Ah, ok. I wasn't aware of that. | | Even if we&#

Bug#897254: CVE-2018-9060

On 30 April 2018 at 23:18, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: | Source: r-base | Severity: grave | Tags: security | | Please see https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-9060 | | I'm not sure whether this has been properly reported to the upstream | developers. The timeline of the Github l

Bug#896882: r-cran-rcmdrmisc: suggested R packages: rmarkdown, nortest, leaps, aplpack

On 25 April 2018 at 12:44, wim wrote: | Package: r-cran-rcmdrmisc | Version: 1.0-5-1 | Severity: minor | | Hallo, | | R commander asks for the following packages at startup to installed: | rmarkdown, nortest, leaps, aplpack | These packages are not requested, recommended or suggested with

Bug#896283: python-rpy: rpy fails to import

retitle 896283 RM: rpy -- ROM; use rpy2 severity 896283 normal reassign 896283 ftp.debian.org thanks On 21 April 2018 at 07:42, Helmut Grohne wrote: | On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 04:31:14PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > rpy was abandonded upstream maybe a decade ago, maybe longer. It ne

Bug#896283: python-rpy: rpy fails to import

Hallo Helmut, On 20 April 2018 at 22:01, Helmut Grohne wrote: | Package: python-rpy | Version: 1.0.3-30+b3 | Severity: serious | User: helm...@debian.org | Usertags: python-import | | After installing python-rpy importing the module rpy | into a python interpreter fails with the following error:

Bug#895879: quantlib: enable parallel builds

On 17 April 2018 at 08:44, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: | Source: quantlib | Version: 1.12.1-1 | Severity: wishlist | | Hi, | | Your package takes a significant time to build. Enabling parallel builds | could significantly reduce the build time, which goes up to 20 hours in | some buildds. Tha

Bug#895564: CVE-2017-2896 CVE-2017-2897 CVE-2017-2919

On 13 April 2018 at 15:33, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: | On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 08:29:31AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > Ok, I got something. Do you want me to put it on my webserver here for you to | > fetch and inspect (or I could even email a tarball) or should I upload? |

Bug#895564: CVE-2017-2896 CVE-2017-2897 CVE-2017-2919

Distribution: stretch-security Urgency: high Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel Changed-By: Dirk Eddelbuettel Description: r-cran-readxl - GNU R package to read Excel files Closes: 895564 Changes: r-cran-readxl (0.1.1-1+deb9u1) stretch-security; urgency=high . * src/endian.c: Updated from libxls

Bug#895564: CVE-2017-2896 CVE-2017-2897 CVE-2017-2919

On 13 April 2018 at 14:43, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: | On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 07:38:51AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > On 13 April 2018 at 11:51, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: | > | On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:14:18PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > | > | > F

Bug#895564: CVE-2017-2896 CVE-2017-2897 CVE-2017-2919

On 13 April 2018 at 11:51, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: | On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:14:18PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > Further update. I took some files from the new (in-progress, unfinished it | > seems) upstream of libxls at https://github.com/evanmiller/libxls/, and got

Bug#895564: CVE-2017-2896 CVE-2017-2897 CVE-2017-2919

Further update. I took some files from the new (in-progress, unfinished it seems) upstream of libxls at https://github.com/evanmiller/libxls/, and got some advice from the libxls maintainer. He also put new issue tickets up, one per CVE: https://github.com/evanmiller/libxls/issues And that build

Bug#895564: CVE-2017-2896 CVE-2017-2897 CVE-2017-2919

I am in contact with upstream for readxl; upstream for readxl is trying to get hold off a new (tentative) upstream for libxls. I will follow-up here as I learn more. Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

Bug#895564: CVE-2017-2896 CVE-2017-2897 CVE-2017-2919

On 12 April 2018 at 20:42, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: | Package: r-cran-readxl | Severity: grave | Tags: security | | r-cran-readxl bundles libxls which is affected by a number of security vulnerabilities: | | https://www.talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2017-0426 | https://www.

Bug#894887: r-cran-matrix: new version installs in different directory and breaks R CMD check

On 5 April 2018 at 05:36, Ben Goodrich wrote: | Package: r-cran-matrix | Version: 1.2-13-1 | Severity: normal | | Hi Dirk, | | When I install r-cran-matrix version 1.2-13-1 from unstable, it puts it under /usr/lib/R/site-library , I am aware. I switched to the newer/better build system dh-r, a

Bug#894633: ITP: r-cran-openxlsx -- GNU R package for XLSX files

Package: wnpp Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel Severity: wishlist * Package name: r-cran-openxlsx Version : 4.0.17 Upstream Author : Alexander Walker * URL or Web page : https://github.com/awalker89/openxlsx * License : GPL-3 Description : GNU R package for XLSX files

Bug#894304: ITP: r-cran-manipulatewidgets -- GNU R package for more interactivity in interactive charts

Package: wnpp Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel Severity: wishlist * Package name: r-cran-manipulatewidgets Version : 0.9.0 Upstream Author : Jalal-Edine Zawam, Francois Guillem, JJ Allaire, Marion Praz, Benoit Thieurmel, Titouan Robert and Duncan Murdoch * URL or Web page : https

Bug#893985: libvw-dev: Header files missing

Package: libvw-dev Version: 8.5.0.dfsg1-1 I recently tried to build something against contributed; this failed when headers array_parameters.h array_parameters_dense.h where missing. Even though they are referenced by other files: edd@rob:/usr/include/vowpalwabbit$ grep array_parameters

Bug#892653: gretl FTBFS with glibc 2.27

On 11 March 2018 at 21:31, Adrian Bunk wrote: | Source: gretl | Version: 2017d-3 | Severity: serious | Tags: fixed-upstream patch | | https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/gretl.html | | ... | ../cephes/iv.c: In function 'cephes_bessel_Iv': | ../cephes/iv.c:70:19: er

Bug#892437: rgl: Please use 'pkg-config' to find FreeType 2

Hugh, On 8 March 2018 at 22:52, hugh.mcmas...@outlook.com wrote: | Source: rgl | Severity: important | | Dear Maintainer, | | The next release of libfreetype6-dev will *not* ship | `freetype-config', as the script has now been deprecated in favour of | `pkg-config'. It's sort of a false alarm.

Bug#884134: python-rpy: Incompatible with the version of R in stretch

On 25 February 2018 at 17:22, Andreas Beckmann wrote: | Control: tag -1 = sid buster | Control: retitle -1 rpy: do not ship with buster | | On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 12:46:14 -0600 Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > Sorry for causing you extra work with the binNMU. If you prefer, we can wait | > and

Bug#882305: libfinance-yahooquote-perl: yahooquote (and smtm) stopped working.

On 24 February 2018 at 20:27, Adrian Bunk wrote: | On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 06:11:46AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > On 21 November 2017 at 10:49, Ivan Rossi wrote: | > | Package: libfinance-yahooquote-perl | > | Version: 0.25 | > | Severity: grave | > | Justificatio

Bug#890290: rmysql: Please build-depend on default-libmysqlclient-dev, not libmariadb-dev

On 12 February 2018 at 17:53, Steve Langasek wrote: | > Coincidentally, doesn't Ubuntu also default to MariaDB? Who doesn't, | > these days? | | No, Ubuntu defaults to MySQL. I mostly deploy on Ubuntu too (eg at work) and had issues with MySQL. I tend to just build R package of the CRAN repo th

Bug#890290: rmysql: Please build-depend on default-libmysqlclient-dev, not libmariadb-dev

On 12 February 2018 at 16:22, Steve Langasek wrote: | Package: rmysql | Version: 0.10.13-1 | Severity: wishlist | Tags: patch | User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com | Usertags: origin-ubuntu bionic ubuntu-patch | | Hi Dirk, | | As discussed at |

Bug#888399: r-base-core: [m68k] bogus "missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed" errors

severity 888399 normal quit On 24 January 2018 at 20:54, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: | Package: r-base-core | Version: 3.4.3-1 | Severity: important | Tags: upstream | User: debian-...@lists.debian.org | Usertags: m68k | Control: affects -1 src:r-cran-git2 src:r-cran-utf8 src:r-cran-wordcloud | | Build

Bug#888399: r-base-core: [m68k] bogus "missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed" errors

Severity: normal quit On 24 January 2018 at 20:54, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: | Package: r-base-core | Version: 3.4.3-1 | Severity: important | Tags: upstream | User: debian-...@lists.debian.org | Usertags: m68k | Control: affects -1 src:r-cran-git2 src:r-cran-utf8 src:r-cran-wordcloud | | Builds of R

Bug#886815: r-cran-git2r uses private header files of libgit2 (Was: Help with libgit2 needed to strip code copy from r-cran-git2r)

I had some friendly emails with Stefan (git2r upstream) when he started the R package git2r (as I needed some features in my drat R package) and he expressed quite some frustration at working with libgit2 as it changed so much upstream. I know we collectively really hate embedding copies, but r-c

Bug#886436: Rscript doesn't appear in package descriptions

On 5 January 2018 at 23:42, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: | Package: r-base-core | Version: 3.4.3-1 | Severity: wishlist | | A student just sent me a script that used the Rscript command. Since I'm | not an R programmer, I thought, no problem, | | apt-cache search Rscript | | which gave me nothi

Bug#885680: gretl: Depends on unmaintained gtksourceview2 (fwd)

22:17:12 -0500 | From: Jeremy Bicha | To: sub...@bugs.debian.org | Subject: Bug#885680: gretl: Depends on unmaintained gtksourceview2 | Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 03:21:02 + | Resent-From: Jeremy Bicha | Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org | Resent-cc: Dirk Eddelbuettel | | So

Bug#884134: python-rpy: Incompatible with the version of R in stretch

On 12 December 2017 at 18:55, Andreas Beckmann wrote: | Followup-For: Bug #884134 | | Hi, | | binNMUs requested for stretch and sid: #884209 | | To ensure this but doe snot show up again, python-rpy should get a | proper dependency on r-api-X.Y in sid (or be removed in favor of rpy2). I think

Bug#884221: r-cran-tidyr: Outdated version blocking another package

Package: r-cran-tidyr Version: 0.7.1-2 Severity: important I am trying to update my package htmlTable (ie r-cran-htmltable) to its current version. It has Imports: stringr, knitr (≥ 1.6), magrittr (≥ 1.5), methods, checkmate, htmlwidgets, htmltools, rstudioapi (≥ 0.6), tidyr (≥ 0.7.2), dply

Bug#884134: python-rpy: Incompatible with the version of R in stretch

On 11 December 2017 at 19:37, Matthew Woodcraft wrote: | Package: python-rpy | Version: 1.0.3-30 | Severity: grave | | Installing and importing the stretch version of python-rpy fails with the | stretch version of R: | | « | apt install python-rpy | python | Python 2.7.13 (default, Nov 24 2017,

Bug#883484: ITP: r-cran-rstudioapi -- GNU R package to access the RStudio API

Package: wnpp Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel Severity: wishlist * Package name: r-cran-rstudioapi Version : 0.7 Upstream Author : JJ Allaire, Hadley Wickham, Kevin Ushey and Gary Ritchie * URL or Web page : https://github.com/rstudio/rstudioapi * License : MIT Description

Bug#874153: FTBFS with Java 9: jre/bin/java

On 24 November 2017 at 23:15, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: | Le 24/11/2017 à 20:10, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit : | | > I may do another RC build before R 3.4.3 is out later next week. Not | > entirely sure how to test it because actual Depends: result from this. So if | > I start with java

Bug#874153: FTBFS with Java 9: jre/bin/java

Simon, On 24 November 2017 at 13:56, Simon Urbanek wrote: | Emmanuel, | | | > On Nov 24, 2017, at 11:02 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: | > | > Le 24/11/2017 à 16:30, Simon Urbanek a écrit : | >> Absolutely - mixing jre and non-jre paths doesn't sound like a good idea. It was somewhat odd idiosyn

Bug#874153: FTBFS with Java 9: jre/bin/java

AVA_HOME)/include/linux JNI linker flags : -L$(JAVA_HOME)/lib/server -ljvm Updating Java configuration in /build/r-base-3.4.2.20171123 Done. Any concrete tips as to what we should try instead? Dirk | Cheers, | Simon | | | | > On Nov 24, 2017, at 9:03 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | >

Bug#874153: FTBFS with Java 9: jre/bin/java

Hi Emmanuel, On 24 November 2017 at 14:40, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: | Hi Dirk, | | Is it possible to simply use the /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/bin/java path | instead of /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/jre/bin/java? Historically jre/bin/ | contained only the JRE executables, and bin/ contained the JDK too

Bug#882321: rjava fails to build

On 21 November 2017 at 14:37, Matthias Klose wrote: | so you have the change in the build dependency, which ships some configuration | file now referencing openjdk-9, but every package using that changed | configuration has to explicitly change there build and runtime dependencies? We can take th

Bug#882305: libfinance-yahooquote-perl: yahooquote (and smtm) stopped working.

On 21 November 2017 at 10:49, Ivan Rossi wrote: | Package: libfinance-yahooquote-perl | Version: 0.25 | Severity: grave | Justification: renders package unusable | | Dear Maintainer, | | yahooquote (and smtm) stopped working. It seems that yahoo does not allow queries anymore. That is the back

Bug#877288: r-base: Rebuilding r-bioc-biocgenerics with new R changes behaviour

Hi Graham, On 20 November 2017 at 17:06, Graham Inggs wrote: | Hi Dirk | | On 19/11/2017 18:08, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > Am I correct in assuming that it addresses this issue for BioConductor? | | I had a look at what I assumed is the first beta [1] for 3.4.3. I see I am actua

Bug#882042: ess: nil ess-etc-directory causing error upon Emacs startup

Yuri, On 20 November 2017 at 15:57, Yuri D'Elia wrote: | Package: ess | Version: 17.11-1 | Followup-For: Bug #882042 | | Looks like ess doesn't play well with emacsen-common. | | ess-lisp-directory is initialized to /usr/share/emacs25/site-lisp/ess/ | in ess-utils.el:46. The ess-etc-directory-l

Bug#877288: r-base: Rebuilding r-bioc-biocgenerics with new R changes behaviour

Graham, Charles, R 3.4.3 is scheduled for Nov 30. Am I correct in assuming that it addresses this issue for BioConductor? Thanks, Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

Bug#882035: ITP: r-cran-fastica -- GNU R package for ICA and Projection Pursuit

Package: wnpp Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel Severity: wishlist * Package name: r-cran-fastica Version : 1.2-1 Upstream Author : J L Marchin, C Heaton and B D Ripley * URL or Web page : https://cran.r-project.org/package=fastICA * License : GPL (>= 2) Description : GN

Bug#881411: quantlib-examples cannot be installed

On 11 November 2017 at 14:54, Adrian Bunk wrote: | Package: quantlib-examples | Version: 1.11-3 | Severity: serious | | The following packages have unmet dependencies: | quantlib-examples : Depends: libquantlib0v5 (= 1.11-3) but it is not going to be installed | | | Package: quantlib-examples

Bug#881354: beancounter: Updates fail since 2017-11-01

On 10 November 2017 at 19:02, Lars Bensmann wrote: | Package: beancounter | Version: 0.8.10 | Severity: important | | On November 11, 2017 beancounter quote updates stopped working and have | not been working since. Yes. Yahoo! stopped providing data in the format / as the service which the Fin

Bug#880404: quantlib-examples: fails to upgrade from 'stretch' - trying to overwrite /usr/bin/CVAIRS

On 31 October 2017 at 10:20, Andreas Beckmann wrote: | Package: quantlib-examples | Version: 1.11-2 | Severity: serious | User: debian...@lists.debian.org | Usertags: piuparts | | Hi, | | during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from | 'stretch'. | It installed fine in

Bug#880939: ITP: r-cran-haven -- GNU R package to import/export SPSS, Stata and SAS files

Package: wnpp Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel Severity: wishlist * Package name: r-cran-haven Version : 1.1.0-1 Upstream Author : Hadley Wickham and Evan Miller * URL or Web page : https://github.com/tidyverse/haven * License : MIT Description : GNU R package to import

Bug#810145: Pbuilder and /run/shm

I may have found the culprit. In my (rather old and carried forward from prior versions) file /etc/pbuilderrc I still had BINDMOUNTS="/run/shm" and commenting it out worked! Yay. Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

Bug#810145: Pbuilder and /run/shm

Any news on that /run/shm issue for pbuilder? It is currently blocking me from building packages as I can't upgrade my pbuilder tarball (as easily at least). I tried Jo's "proof of concept" patch, but no luck either. Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

Bug#879242: ITP: r-cran-nortest -- GNU R package with five tests for normality

Package: wnpp Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel Severity: wishlist * Package name: r-cran-nortest Version : 1.0-4 Upstream Author : Juergen Gross and Uwe Ligges * URL or Web page : https://cran.r-project.org/package=nortest * License : GPL (>= 2) Description : GNU R pack

Bug#874153: FTBFS with Java 9: jre/bin/java

o fix a (rather complicated) package so unless you can aid me here I fear the worst case of a "fails to build from source package" being auto-removed will kick in. (Partial) log is below. Dirk | | Thanks, | Simon | | | | | | > On Oct 19, 2017, at 9:34 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel

Bug#874153: FTBFS with Java 9: jre/bin/java

equent javareconf? If so, where? When I glance at your configure.ac I see several ... And the Makefile structure is not exactly trivial or standard either. Dirk | Cheers, | Simon | | | > On Oct 19, 2017, at 4:56 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > | > O

Bug#874153: FTBFS with Java 9: jre/bin/java

On 19 October 2017 at 16:31, Simon Urbanek wrote: | | > On Oct 19, 2017, at 4:12 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > | > On 19 October 2017 at 15:47, Simon Urbanek wrote: | > | R CMD javareconf is always needed to register Java support with R (on all unix platforms). |

Bug#874153: FTBFS with Java 9: jre/bin/java

ib/R/bin/javareconf: cannot create /usr/lib/R/etc/Makeconf.new: Permission denied *** cannot create /usr/lib/R/etc/Makeconf.new *** Please run as root if required. [...] --- All this is running as root. But /usr may be mounted read-only. Dirk | | Cheers, | Simon | | | > On Oct 18,

Bug#874153: FTBFS with Java 9: jre/bin/java

R CMD javareconf' ? Dirk | Cheers, | Simon | | | > On Oct 17, 2017, at 10:24 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > | > Simon, | > | > With your new rJava_0.9-9 I tried this against Debian's openjdk-9-jdk -- but | > with R 3.4.2 as built against openjdk-7 --

Bug#878957: ITP: r-cran-cardata -- GNU R package for datasets for Companion to Applied Regression

Package: wnpp Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel Severity: wishlist * Package name: r-cran-cardata Version : 3.0-0 Upstream Author : John Fox, Sanford Weisberg and Brad Price * URL or Web page : https://cran.r-project.org/package=carData * License : GPL (>= 2) Descript

Bug#874153: FTBFS with Java 9: jre/bin/java

Simon, With your new rJava_0.9-9 I tried this against Debian's openjdk-9-jdk -- but with R 3.4.2 as built against openjdk-7 -- and it still fails: checking whether setjmp.h is POSIX.1 compatible... yes checking whether sigsetjmp is declared... yes checking whether siglongjmp is declared... yes c

Bug#878676: ITP: r-cran-forcats -- GNU R package for working with categorical variables (factors)

Package: wnpp Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel Severity: wishlist * Package name: r-cran-forcats Version : 0.2.0 Upstream Author : Hadley Wickham * URL or Web page : https://github.com/tidyverse/forcats * License : GPL-3 Description : GNU R package for working with

Bug#878675: ITP: r-cran-readr -- GNU R package to read rectangular text data

Package: wnpp Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel Severity: wishlist * Package name: r-cran-readr Version : 1.1.1 Upstream Author : Hadley Wickham, Jim Hester, Romain Francois * URL or Web page : https://github.com/tidyverse/readr * License : GPL (>= 2) Description : GN

Bug#877288: r-base: fix calling methods on dots generics

On 13 October 2017 at 06:24, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | On 13 October 2017 at 10:47, Graham Inggs wrote: | | Control: reassign -1 src:r-base 3.4.1.20170921-1 | | Control: affects -1 = | | Control: retitle -1 r-base: fix calling methods on dots generics | | | | Hi Dirk | | | | r-bioc

Bug#877288: r-base: fix calling methods on dots generics

On 13 October 2017 at 10:47, Graham Inggs wrote: | Control: reassign -1 src:r-base 3.4.1.20170921-1 | Control: affects -1 = | Control: retitle -1 r-base: fix calling methods on dots generics | | Hi Dirk | | r-bioc-biocgenerics, r-bioc-s4vectors and r-bioc-iranges all got | workarounds for this

Bug#868558: Would you please not upload new r-* packages until transition is finalised (Re: r-api-3.4)

On 12 October 2017 at 22:32, Johannes Ranke wrote: | Am Donnerstag, 12. Oktober 2017, 12:01:14 CEST schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel: | | > So we did this 71 times, but stopped 4+ years ago. Not sure what got the | > toolchain coughing, but I guess we could try again. | | texi2dvi used to tri

Bug#868558: Would you please not upload new r-* packages until transition is finalised (Re: r-api-3.4)

On 12 October 2017 at 17:45, Graham Inggs wrote: | Hi Dirk | | On 12/10/2017 16:37, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > And yes, the hint re 3.5 being shaky leads itself to uploading to experimental. | | Would you please consider versioning such uploads as 3.5~something | instead of 3.4.someth

Bug#868558: Would you please not upload new r-* packages until transition is finalised (Re: r-api-3.4)

On 12 October 2017 at 16:18, Sébastien Villemot wrote: | On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 09:13:54AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > On 12 October 2017 at 15:58, Sébastien Villemot wrote: | > | Thanks Charles for explaining this. | > | | > | Actually the migration has already happ

Bug#868558: Would you please not upload new r-* packages until transition is finalised (Re: r-api-3.4)

On 12 October 2017 at 15:58, Sébastien Villemot wrote: | Thanks Charles for explaining this. | | Actually the migration has already happened, thanks to the Release Team that | took appropriate action to mitigate the impact of the most recent uploads. | | This will soon be reflected in the tracke

Bug#868558: Would you please not upload new r-* packages until transition is finalised (Re: r-api-3.4)

On 12 October 2017 at 14:26, Andreas Tille wrote: | On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 07:06:33AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > On 12 October 2017 at 11:36, Andreas Tille wrote: | > | yesterday you uploaded | > | | > | r-cran-rcpparmadillo 0.8.100.1.0-1 | > | | >

Bug#868558: Would you please not upload new r-* packages until transition is finalised (Re: r-api-3.4)

transition at all. Dirk | it would be helpful if you would not upload r-* packages as long as the | testing migration has not happened. | | Thank you | | Andreas. | | On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 11:58:20AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > See below for upcoming R 3.4.2 "pre-rele

Bug#877288: r-base: Rebuilding r-bioc-biocgenerics with new R changes behaviour

On 30 September 2017 at 09:13, Graham Inggs wrote: | Source: r-base | Version: 3.4.1.20170921-1 Out of date. We have 3.4.2 now. | Affects: r-bioc-biocgenerics r-bioc-iranges r-bioc-variantannotation | User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com | Usertags: origin-ubuntu artful autopkgtest Also wrong pa

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

On 29 September 2017 at 16:23, Andreas Tille wrote: | On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 09:11:41AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > | rebuild against r-api-3.4 to upload r-cran-dplyr. | > | > It so happens that I (as upstream) got Rcpp 0.12.13 onto CRAN yesterday too, | > so I owe

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

On 29 September 2017 at 15:11, Graham Inggs wrote: | On 29 September 2017 at 12:59, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > On 29 September 2017 at 07:36, Graham Inggs wrote: | > | rgtk2 and rggobi now FTBFS on s390x, they also fail in a Buster chroot | > | on zelenka.debian.org so I don't b

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

On 29 September 2017 at 15:24, Andreas Tille wrote: | On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 02:37:19PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: | > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 05:59:54AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > > | > > dplyr just had a new upstream CRAN release 0.7.4 yesterday. Don't know ab

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

On 29 September 2017 at 07:36, Graham Inggs wrote: | I've been working on this transition in Ubuntu and here are some of my notes: | | rgtk2 and rggobi now FTBFS on s390x, they also fail in a Buster chroot | on zelenka.debian.org so I don't believe it is a regression in R, but | the binaries will

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

On 28 September 2017 at 22:22, Andreas Tille wrote: | I wonder if we could teach dh-r to make sure that is added to arch:all | packages. I'm converting all packages I'm touching to dh-r anyway. | | At least a lintian warning might help. | | Kind regards | | Andreas (after having uploaded

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

On 28 September 2017 at 18:53, Sébastien Villemot wrote: | On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 07:04:51AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > On 28 September 2017 at 13:20, Sébastien Villemot wrote: | > | On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:53:10PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: | > | > On 2

Bug#877072: quantlib: build with -g to get debug information in the -dbgsym packages

On 28 September 2017 at 15:38, Adrian Bunk wrote: | Source: quantlib | Version: 1.10.1-2 | Severity: normal | Tags: patch | | The -dbgsym packages are currently empty due to building with -g0. Won't fix. A certain Adrian Bunk just made me override compilerflags, you may want to talk to him ;-)

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

On 28 September 2017 at 13:20, Sébastien Villemot wrote: | On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:53:10PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: | > On 28/09/2017 12:28, Sébastien Villemot wrote: | > > Note that there are many arch:all R packages that will need sourceful upload | > > (they are easy to identify on the tr

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

On 24 September 2017 at 15:36, Sébastien Villemot wrote: | Control: reopen -1 | Control: retitle -1 transition: r-api-3.4 | Control: user release.debian@packages.debian.org | Control: usertags -1 = transition | | On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 04:15:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote: | | > To be perf

Bug#876569: quantlib FTBFS with debhelper 10.9: Unknown package -Nquantlib-examples given via -N/--no-package

severity 876569 normal thanks On 24 September 2017 at 00:02, Adrian Bunk wrote: | Source: quantlib | Version: 1.10.1-1 | Severity: serious | | https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/quantlib.html | | ... | rm -vf /build/1st/quantlib-1.10.1/debian/libquantlib

Bug#875896: python3-rpy2: Missing dependency to python3-jinja2

On 15 September 2017 at 18:59, Celelibi wrote: | Package: python3-rpy2 | Version: 2.9.0-1 | Severity: normal | | Dear Maintainer, | | It looks like the module jinja2 is imported by rpy2. It thus should be | marked as a dependency. Will do. Thanks for the heads-up. Dirk | | Best regards, | Ce

Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages

On 11 September 2017 at 18:00, Andreas Tille wrote: | On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 08:55:58AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > On 11 September 2017 at 15:36, Andreas Tille wrote: | > | IMHO the best way to deal with this would have been by doing a mass bug | > | filing against th

Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages

On 11 September 2017 at 15:36, Andreas Tille wrote: | IMHO the best way to deal with this would have been by doing a mass bug | filing against those packages which were in need of an upgrade. This | would have attracted the attention of the according maintainers directly | and would have led to a

Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages

On 10 September 2017 at 16:15, Niels Thykier wrote: | To be perfectly, honest, I would prefer if you did a proper ABI-like | transition over the Breaks. At this scale, Breaks seems too fragile and | too likely for people to get wrong. I *am* -- all packages (currently) get have r-api-3: edd@b

Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages

On 10 September 2017 at 11:20, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: | On 09/09/17 13:48, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > On 9 September 2017 at 06:44, Niels Thykier wrote: | > | Thanks to Sébastien and Andreas for explaining the issue. | > | > Well, was it "explained" ? They

Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages

On 9 September 2017 at 16:18, Sébastien Villemot wrote: | But since I do not want to waste my time, I first need to be sure that you would | accept such a patch. Re-read http://eddelbuettel.github.io/rcppapt/binnmuAfterR340.html and construct (using R and my RcppAPT packages) the set of packa

Bug#868558: All affected packages are manually uloaded

On 9 September 2017 at 15:38, Andreas Tille wrote: | I hereby closing this bug since all affected packages were | manually uploaded. I really, really appreciate that. In your view, can we / shall we also close the underlying https://bugs.debian.org/861333 which started this? As I underst

Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages

On 9 September 2017 at 14:12, Sébastien Villemot wrote: | On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 06:48:12AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > On 9 September 2017 at 06:44, Niels Thykier wrote: | > | Thanks to Sébastien and Andreas for explaining the issue. | > | > Well, was it "exp

Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages

On 9 September 2017 at 06:44, Niels Thykier wrote: | Thanks to Sébastien and Andreas for explaining the issue. Well, was it "explained" ? They both raised and stressed a hypothetical issue: That "there might be siutations where a partial upgrade breaks" We don't actually know whether this holds

Bug#874730: piuparts-reports needs to be ported to python3 as python-rpy2 is gone (or another graphing solution is needed)

On 9 September 2017 at 10:50, Holger Levsen wrote: | package: piuparts-master | version: 0.81 | severity: important | x-debbugs-cc: e...@debian.org | | On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 09:54:33AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: | > rpy2 (2.9.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium | > . | >* New upstream relea

Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages

On 9 September 2017 at 01:31, Andreas Beckmann wrote: | On 2017-09-08 22:49, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > I still maintain that this is a useless "academic" consideration. If users | > want to corrupt their systems by only upgrading one package I will not stop | > them. They

Bug#861333: Why does r-cran-rcppgsl not migrate to testing?

On 8 September 2017 at 22:47, Andreas Tille wrote: | Hi Dirk, | | On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 02:46:04PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > On 7 September 2017 at 21:20, Andreas Tille wrote: | > | Hi Dirk, | > | | > | On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 04:22:33PM -0500, Dirk Edd

Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages

On 8 September 2017 at 20:01, Sébastien Villemot wrote: | Hi Dirk and others, | | On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 12:29:25PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | > | The problem is that you can end up with r-bioc-makecdfenv_1.50.0-1 (i.e. before | > | the rebuild) and r-base_3.4.1-2, because n

Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages

On 8 September 2017 at 17:23, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: | On 01/09/17 14:28, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > On 1 September 2017 at 13:52, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: | > | On 01/09/17 13:25, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > | > | > Emilio, | > | > | > | &

Bug#861333: Why does r-cran-rcppgsl not migrate to testing?

Hi Andreas, On 7 September 2017 at 21:20, Andreas Tille wrote: | Hi Dirk, | | On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 04:22:33PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > On 6 September 2017 at 22:48, Andreas Tille wrote: | > | [Chris, I took the freedom to move r-cran-mcmc to Debian Science | > | team si

Bug#874079: ITP: r-cran-readstata13 -- Functions to read and write 'Stata' files

Package: wnpp Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel Severity: wishlist * Package name: r-cran-readstata13 Version : 0.9.0-1 Upstream Author : Jan Marvin Garbuszus, Sebastian Jeworutzki * URL or Web page : https://github.com/sjewo/readstata13 * License : GPL-2 Description : R

Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages

On 2 September 2017 at 19:23, Steve Cotton wrote: | If I may ask, "why do you want to spend the developer time to rebuild only 46 | packages, when there's already an infrastructure that does it for you, at the | cost of rebuilding all 516"? Because in my 20+ years with Debian, we generally opted

Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages

On 2 September 2017 at 14:57, Steve Cotton wrote: | On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:03:06PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > But the whole point of my bug report, and write up, is that | > | >46 | > | > out of 516 package need a rebuild. | > | > So I continue to arg

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >