Bug#1070654: xfsprogs: Build with PAC/BTI support on arm64

2024-05-06 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: xfsprogs Version: 6.6.0-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pac-bti Hi, Pointer Authentication (PAC) and Branch Target Identification (BTI) are two security features available on arm64. [1] Please consider building xfsprogs with PAC/BTI support

Bug#1070653: cdparanoia: Please build with hardening flags

2024-05-06 Thread Emanuele Rocca
+debian/debian/changelog 2024-02-28 10:55:16.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +cdparanoia (3.10.2+debian-15) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Build with hardening flags, except for format. + + -- Emanuele Rocca Mon, 06 May 2024 17:42:04 +0200 + cdparanoia (3.10.2

Bug#1070651: apg: fix setting CFLAGS and LDFLAGS

2024-05-06 Thread Emanuele Rocca
:54.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +apg (2.2.3.dfsg.1-5.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fix dpkg-buildflags invocation in debian/patches/Makefile to properly set +CFLAGS and LDFLAGS. + + -- Emanuele Rocca Mon, 06 May 2024 17:40:04 +0200 + apg (2.2.3.dfsg.1-5

Bug#1055711: Bug#1057469: gcc-13: Please build gcc with -mbranch-protection=standard to fix PAC/BTI support on arm64

2024-05-02 Thread Emanuele Rocca
On 2023-12-31 10:32, Matthias Klose wrote: > please also check > > - that a cross compiler with this patch has these enabled > > - that a cross build of gcc-13 targeting arm64 with this >patch has these enabled There have been a few gcc-12 and gcc-13 updates since I initially sent my

Bug#1060075: gcc-13 FTCBFS: target system type set to nvptx-unknown-none

2024-04-30 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Control: retitle -1 gcc-13 FTCBFS: nvptx does not cross compile On 2024-01-06 01:10, Matthias Klose wrote: > no, the target is always nvptx-unknown-none. Ack, but in order to cross build nvptx we probably have to set build and host? I tried cross building gcc 13.2.0-23 on a x86 system with:

Bug#1068665: cfengine3: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: 1 of 60 tests failed

2024-04-18 Thread Emanuele Rocca
angelog 2024-03-12 12:14:12.0 +0100 +++ cfengine3-3.21.4/debian/changelog 2024-04-18 11:32:38.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +cfengine3 (3.21.4-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * d/patches/time-t-long-long.patch: coerce time_t to long long (closes: #1068665) + + -- Eman

Bug#1063631: closing 1063631

2024-04-17 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi Roland, On 2024-03-05 03:15, Roland Mas wrote: > close 1063631 5.0.0.3381-2 The version of hkl currently in unstable, 5.0.0.3381-1, fails to build. Would it be possible to upload 5.0.0.3381-2 to unstable? Emanuele

Bug#1064531: src:amberol: unsatisfied build dependency in testing: librust-lofty-0.17-dev

2024-04-12 Thread Emanuele Rocca
@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +amberol (0.10.3-2.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Update build dependencies: librust-lofty-0.18-dev, +librust-mpris-server-0.7-dev. (Closes: #1064531) + + -- Emanuele Rocca Fri, 12 Apr 2024 12:23:35 +0200 + amberol (0.10.3-2) unstable; u

Bug#1063599: More info (Was: mathgl: FTBFS on amd64: tests seg fault)

2024-04-11 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hello Sebastian and Andreas, On 2024-02-15 09:14, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2024-02-15 08:30:37 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > the package builds nicely in my local pbuilder, in Salsa CI as well as > > in the autobuilders. Thus I'm tagging the bug moreinfo and set severity > > to

Bug#1067367: mathgl: FTBFS: debian/tests/run-tests: 37: python3.12: not found

2024-04-11 Thread Emanuele Rocca
+0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +mathgl (8.0.1-8) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Build-depend on python3-all to ensure all supported python versions are +installed when running debian/tests/run-tests. (Closes: #1067367) + + -- Emanuele Rocca Thu, 11 Apr 2024 15:00:39 +0200 + mathgl (8.0.1-7) un

Bug#1068749: onednn: please enable Arm Compute Library integration on arm64

2024-04-10 Thread Emanuele Rocca
; urgency=medium + + * d/patches/arm64-use-acl.patch: Use Arm Compute Library on arm64. + * d/patches/acl-no-core.patch: Do not search for obsolete library +libarm_compute_core. + + -- Emanuele Rocca Wed, 10 Apr 2024 10:44:19 +0200 + onednn (3.1.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Upload

Bug#1067829: nfs-utils: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: export-cache.c:110:51: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘time_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=]

2024-03-28 Thread Emanuele Rocca
. + * Apply upstream patch to fix FTBFS on armhf/armel (Closes: #1067829) + + -- Emanuele Rocca Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:56:19 +0100 + nfs-utils (1:2.6.4-3) unstable; urgency=medium [ Salvatore Bonaccorso ] diff -Nru nfs-utils-2.6.4/debian/patches/flushtime-long-long-int.patch nfs-utils-

Bug#1067147: dcmtk: diff for NMU version 3.6.7-9.2

2024-03-22 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi Aurelien and Michael, On 2024-03-21 08:54, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2024-03-19 11:54, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > > diff -Nru dcmtk-3.6.7/debian/control dcmtk-3.6.7/debian/control > > --- dcmtk-3.6.7/debian/control 2024-02-28 02:17:02.0 +0100 > > +++ dcmtk

Bug#1067213: git: please consider temporarily disabling subversion/libsvn-perl build-dependencies on armhf and armel

2024-03-20 Thread Emanuele Rocca
, temporarily drop the subversion and libsvn-perl +build-deps. The packages are currently not installable on those arches due +to the ongoing t64 transition and are only needed by git-svn. + + -- Emanuele Rocca Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:10:32 +0100 + git (1:2.43.0-1) unstable; urgency=low

Bug#1060104: dcmtk: FTBFS on armel: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4100)

2024-03-19 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi Andreas, On 2024-03-19 10:40, Andreas Tille wrote: > Since you all pinged that bug we now have another 4 weeks of time before > anything gets removed from testing. So we just need to bear the noise > from testing removal warnings of quite some packages (which I'd love to > get rid of thus

Bug#1067147: dcmtk: diff for NMU version 3.6.7-9.2

2024-03-19 Thread Emanuele Rocca
#1060104. + * Do not build-depend on graphviz on armhf and armel. The package is +currently not installable on those arches due to the ongoing t64 +transition. + + -- Emanuele Rocca Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:08:29 +0100 + dcmtk (3.6.7-9.1) unstable; urgency=medium * Non-maintainer upload

Bug#1060104: dcmtk: FTBFS on armel: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4100)

2024-03-19 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi, On 2024-03-19 06:24, Sébastien Jodogne wrote: > Because of bug #1060104, a large majority of the packages related to > medical imaging have just disappeared from Debian Unstable. > > But, if I correctly understand #1060104, it is specific to one single > platform (armel). Indeed, and

Bug#1067109: rustc: Please remove cmake3 from build-depends

2024-03-18 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: rustc Version: 1.70.0+dfsg1-6 Severity: minor Hi! While looking at the rustc build-deps still missing due to the time64 transition, I noticed that rustc build depends on cmake | cmake3. The latter does not exist, so it should be removed. Thanks, Emanuele

Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t

2024-03-18 Thread Emanuele Rocca
On 2024-03-13 02:08, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > When it comes to actually satisfying build-depends properly it seems > that as of right now the missing ones are libcurl4-gnutls-dev and > libgit2-dev. Cargo is now done. With libcurl4-gnutls-dev and libgit2-dev available I could bootstrap it

Bug#1065787: 64-bit time_t transition: cargo needs manual intervention

2024-03-16 Thread Emanuele Rocca
On 2024-03-16 04:21, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > With libcurl3t64-gnutls cargo can now be rebootstrapped on armhf And on armel too. Fixed armhf/armel packages uploaded. > Fabian: it seems that cargo's build-depend on git can be dropped? The > package builds fine without, tests included.

Bug#1065787: 64-bit time_t transition: cargo needs manual intervention

2024-03-16 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi! On 2024-03-16 02:29, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 at 22:03:57 -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > > For example curl isn't building on armel/armhf now and numerous packages > > that > > depend of curl are not building on armel/armhf. > > I believe a maintainer upload or NMU of

Bug#1066049: stunnel4: please consider temporarily disabling tests on arm to unblock the t64 transition

2024-03-13 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi! On 2024-03-12 10:46, Simon McVittie wrote: > I think this change might be a pragmatic way to shorten the critical > path for the time64 transition. The patch works fine indeed, and stunnel4 can be built successfully on armhf with it. I agree that it should be applied. It seems however that

Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t

2024-03-13 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi, On 2024-03-12 05:55, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > I did manage to get cargo to build in a armhf chroot by manually > installing the various deps When it comes to actually satisfying build-depends properly it seems that as of right now the missing ones are libcurl4-gnutls-dev and libgit2-dev

Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t

2024-03-12 Thread Emanuele Rocca
[ debian-rust added to CC ] Hi, On 2024-03-12 11:03, Simon McVittie wrote: > In the medium term, cargo needs re-bootstrapping on the affected > architectures (armel and armhf, plus a bunch of -ports architectures > where as far as I can see cargo was never available in the past) - > that's

Bug#1065556: grok: FTBFS on armhf and armel: implicit declaration of function ‘asprintf’

2024-03-06 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: grok Version: 1.20110708.1-7.1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Hi, grok fails to build from source if -Werror=implicit-function-declaration is on. The flag was added to the default ones on armhf and armel to help with the ongoing time64

Bug#1065552: fakeroot: FTBFS on armhf and armel: symbol `__lstat64_time64' is already defined

2024-03-06 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: fakeroot Version: 1.34-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Hi, fakeroot fails to build on armhf and armel when compiled with the time64 flags: -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64

Bug#1065489: mongo-c-driver: FTBFS on armhf: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘__suseconds64_t’ {aka ‘long long int’}

2024-03-05 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: mongo-c-driver Version: 1.26.0-1.1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear Maintainer, mongo-c-driver fails to build from source on armhf. The failure may be explained with the build flags introduced for the time64 migration, which are on by

Bug#1065173: udns: FTBFS on armhf/armel: configure: fatal: cannot find libraries needed for sockets

2024-03-01 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi Michael, On 2024-03-01 09:13, Michael Tokarev wrote: > This has nothing to do with time64. Yes and no. :-) > The prob here is -Werror=implicit-function-declaration > > Where that flag is coming from?

Bug#1065173: udns: FTBFS on armhf/armel: configure: fatal: cannot find libraries needed for sockets

2024-03-01 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: udns Version: 0.4-1.1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time64 Dear Maintainer, udns fails to build on both armhf and armel with the time64 build flags, which are on by default. It builds fine without. Specifically, the following flags cause a

Bug#1065167: google-perftools: FTBFS on armhf/armel: static_assert(sizeof(int32_t) == sizeof(off_t), "")

2024-03-01 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: google-perftools Version: 2.15-1.1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertag: time64 Dear Maintainer, google-perftools fails to build from source when building with -D_TIME_BITS=64 on armhf and armel with the following error: src/mmap_hook.cc:309:31: error:

Bug#1065153: v4l-utils: FTBFS on armhf/armel: _TIME_BITS=64 is allowed only with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64

2024-03-01 Thread Emanuele Rocca
On 2024-03-01 10:28, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > /usr/include/features-time64.h:26:5: error: #error "_TIME_BITS=64 is allowed > only with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64" >26 | # error "_TIME_BITS=64 is allowed only with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64" > | ^ The build

Bug#1065153: v4l-utils: FTBFS on armhf/armel: _TIME_BITS=64 is allowed only with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64

2024-03-01 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: v4l-utils Version: 1.26.1-3.1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertag: time64 Dear Maintainer, v4l-utils fails to build from source on armhf and armel with the following error: In file included from /usr/include/features.h:393, from

Bug#1055711: gcc-13: Please build gcc with -mbranch-protection=standard to fix PAC/BTI support on arm64

2024-02-29 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi Matthias, On 2023-11-28 05:00, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > Let me know if this is what you were looking for. Both #1055711 and #1057469 have been open for several months now, and they are blocking progress on enabling BTI in Debian (and Ubuntu). See https://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/PAC

Bug#1064907: firebird3.0: overrides CXXFLAGS when building on arm64

2024-02-27 Thread Emanuele Rocca
On 2024-02-27 04:39, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > Whilst trying to figure out why a rebuild of firebird3.0 on arm64 does > not fully enable BTI [1] And the mysterious link is: [1] https://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/PACBTI

Bug#1064907: firebird3.0: overrides CXXFLAGS when building on arm64

2024-02-27 Thread Emanuele Rocca
d3.0 (3.0.11.33703.ds4-2.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Do not override CXXFLAGS on arm64. (Closes: #-1) + + -- Emanuele Rocca Tue, 27 Feb 2024 16:31:04 +0100 + firebird3.0 (3.0.11.33703.ds4-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Bump policy-compliance version to 4.6.2

Bug#1063774: xfsprogs: please increase default build verbosity (make V=1)

2024-02-12 Thread Emanuele Rocca
+0200 +++ xfsprogs-6.5.0/debian/changelog 2024-02-12 16:09:51.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +xfsprogs (6.5.0-1.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * Increase build verbosity, and add support for the "terse" +DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS tag. + + -- Emanuele Rocca Mon, 12 Feb 2024 16:09:

Bug#1063444: psmisc: FTBFS due to unexpected failures running tests

2024-02-12 Thread Emanuele Rocca
On 2024-02-12 09:43, Craig Small wrote: > Upstream fix is > https://gitlab.com/psmisc/psmisc/-/commit/8fa115138f79f807d2f07e578f9a40c38c228c0b > If you can confirm it is the same issue then I've got the fix. That's it, the above patch fixes the issue here.

Bug#1061496: valgrind: Segmentation fault on armhf checking programs built with -fstack-clash-protection or -fstack-check

2024-02-10 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi Petter, On 2024-02-10 06:04, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > This issue cause a failing autopkgtest with libvorbis. I would much > prefer a fix in valgrind instead of disabling a autopkgtest check. As an alternative to disabling the test, you could consider disabling stack-clash-protection on

Bug#1063587: bpftrace: Fails to find individual uprobes with 'No probes to attach'

2024-02-09 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Package: bpftrace Version: 0.20.1-1 Severity: important Hi, bpftrace in sid fails to find individual uprobes, but strangely manages to find them if using a wildcard. The uprobe then seems to behave as expected, it can print arguments and such. root@testvm:~# bpftrace -e

Bug#1063515: glibc: Please build with -mbranch-protection=standard on arm64 to enable PAC/BTI support

2024-02-09 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: glibc Version: 2.37-15 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: arm64 Control: block -1 by 1057469 Hi, As discussed on the debian-glibc mailing list [1], please consider building glibc on arm64 with -mbranch-protection=standard to enable support for the

Bug#1063413: FTBFS: cannot open /<>/Keyboard/pc105.ekbd: No such file

2024-02-08 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi, On 2024-02-08 02:06, Colin Watson wrote: > On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 11:13:01PM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote: > > Am 7. Februar 2024 21:55:05 MEZ schrieb Emanuele Rocca : > > >Perhaps this is related to the fact that 1.224 dropped the binary > > >package console-s

Bug#1063462: pycurl: FTBFS during tests: GnuTLS recv error (-110): The TLS connection was non-properly terminated

2024-02-08 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: pycurl Version: 7.45.2-7 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Tags: sid trixie ftbfs Dear Maintainer, pycurl currently fails to build from source on amd64 and arm64 with the following error: ===

Bug#1063461: lsof: FTBFS during tests: LTlock ... lock mismatch: expected W, got " "

2024-02-08 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: lsof Version: 4.95.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Tags: sid trixie ftbfs Dear Maintainer, lsof currently fails to build from source on amd64 and arm64 with the following error: Optional tests: LTbigf ... OK

Bug#1063444: psmisc: FTBFS due to unexpected failures running tests

2024-02-08 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: psmisc Version: 23.6-2 Dear Maintainer, psmisc 23.6-2 fails to build from source with sbuild in a schroot on at least amd64 and arm64 with the following error: Running target unix Using /usr/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for target. Using

Bug#1063413: FTBFS: cannot open /<>/Keyboard/pc105.ekbd: No such file

2024-02-07 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: console-setup Version: 1.224 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Tags: sid trixie ftbfs Dear Maintainer, console-setup 1.224 fails to build from source with the following error: Dumping the encoded keymaps for pc105...

Bug#1063398: FTBFS: src/capng_swig.i:33: Error: Unknown directive '%except'

2024-02-07 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: libcap-ng Version: 0.8.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid trixie ftbfs Hi, libcap-ng currently FTBFS with the following error: make[6]: Entering directory '/<>/build-py3.11/bindings/python3' cat /usr/include/linux/capability.h | grep '^#define CAP' | grep -v '[()]' > caps.h cat

Bug#1063061: mosquitto: autopkgtest needs update for new version of gcc-defaults on armel: max_connections exceeded

2024-02-07 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi, On 2024-02-04 08:47, Paul Gevers wrote: > With a recent upload of gcc-defaults the autopkgtest of mosquitto fails in > testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of > gcc-defaults from unstable on armel. It passes when run with only packages > from testing. In tabular form:

Bug#1063359: gdb-mingw-w64: FTBFS on arm64 due to arch-specific build flag: -mbranch-protection=standard

2024-02-06 Thread Emanuele Rocca
. +Closes: -1. + + -- Emanuele Rocca Tue, 06 Feb 2024 20:23:38 +0100 + gdb-mingw-w64 (13) unstable; urgency=medium * Switch from the obsolete libncurses5-dev build-dependency to diff -Nru gdb-mingw-w64-13/debian/rules gdb-mingw-w64-13+nmu1/debian/rules --- gdb-mingw-w64-13/debian/rules 2023-09-29

Bug#1062535: gcc-14: FTBFS on arm64: ICE in decompose, at wide-int.h:1049

2024-02-01 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: gcc-14 Version: 14-20240201-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid ftbfs User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: arm64 gcc-14 currently FTBFS on arm64 due to an upstream regression. Last known working version was 20240131. during GIMPLE pass: widening_mul ../../src/gcc/value-range-storage.cc:

Bug#1016041: libasan8: Should link to libatomic on armel

2024-02-01 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi, On 2022-07-26 12:07, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > (sid_armel-dchroot)mitya57@amdahl:~$ gcc -fsanitize=address test.c > /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/12/libasan.so: undefined > reference to `__atomic_store_8' > /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/12/libasan.so: undefined >

Bug#1061370: gcc-14 ftbfs on armel

2024-01-29 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Control: tags -1 patch On 2024-01-29 10:23, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > Upstream proposed two patches though, the one I tried is: > > libatomic_la_LIBADD += $(addsuffix _8_2_.lo,$(SIZEOBJS)) > +libatomic_la_LIBADD += tas_1_2_.lo The problem was not the patch, but the fact that it did

Bug#1061370: gcc-14 ftbfs on armel

2024-01-29 Thread Emanuele Rocca
On 2024-01-29 09:04, Luca Boccassi wrote: > Guess that doesn't solve it them, as it's the same problem, the meson > build tests are failing, all of these should be 'YES': Upstream proposed two patches though, the one I tried is: libatomic_la_LIBADD += $(addsuffix _8_2_.lo,$(SIZEOBJS))

Bug#1061370: gcc-14 ftbfs on armel

2024-01-29 Thread Emanuele Rocca
40127/debian/changelog --- gcc-14-14-20240127/debian/changelog 2024-01-27 09:51:04.0 +0100 +++ gcc-14-14-20240127/debian/changelog 2024-01-29 19:55:54.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +gcc-14 (14-20240127-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Add upstream patch libatomic-armel.diff. + + -- Em

Bug#1061370: gcc-14 ftbfs on armel

2024-01-29 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi Luca, On 2024-01-29 01:33, Luca Boccassi wrote: > This causes systemd to FTBFS on armel since the new upload of > libatomic-14. No other architecture is affected. > > cc -o systemd-cryptsetup > systemd-cryptsetup.p/src_cryptsetup_cryptsetup-keyfile.c.o >

Bug#1061551: sndfile-tools: Please disable autopkgtest on armhf

2024-01-26 Thread Emanuele Rocca
load. + * Don't run autopkgtests on armhf due to valgrind bug #1061496. (Closes: #XXX) + + -- Emanuele Rocca Fri, 26 Jan 2024 11:02:37 +0100 + sndfile-tools (1.5-2) unstable; urgency=medium [ Debian Janitor ] diff -Nru sndfile-tools-1.5/debian/tests/control sndfile-tools-1.5/debian/tests/contr

Bug#1061501: libvorbis: Please disable test-coupling-segfault autopkgtest on armhf

2024-01-25 Thread Emanuele Rocca
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +libvorbis (1.3.7-1.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Disable test-coupling-segfault on armhf due to valgrind bug #1061496. +(Closes: #XXX) + + -- Emanuele Rocca Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:25:09 +0100 + libvorbis (1.3.7-1) unstable; urgency=medium

Bug#1061499: libgssglue: disable gsasl-dovecot-gssapi-heimdal autopkgtests on armhf, re-enable them on i386

2024-01-25 Thread Emanuele Rocca
now that #1057693 is fixed. + + -- Emanuele Rocca Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:29:55 +0100 + libgssglue (0.8-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Disable valgrind in i386 due to #1057693. diff -Nru libgssglue-0.8/debian/tests/control libgssglue-0.8/debian/tests/control --- libgssglue-0.8/debian/tests

Bug#1061496: valgrind: Segmentation fault on armhf checking programs built with -fstack-clash-protection or -fstack-check

2024-01-25 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Package: valgrind Version: 1:3.20.0-2.1 Severity: important User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: 32bit-stackclash Tags: upstream On armhf, valgrind dies with a SIGSEGV when checking certain programs built with either -fstack-clash-protection or -fstack-check. The following example is a

Bug#1061370: gcc-14 ftbfs on armel

2024-01-24 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi Matthias, On 2024-01-23 09:01, Matthias Klose wrote: > This is a long standing, re-occurring issue which never has been > forwarded and committed by the armel ports to GCC upstream. You seem to be aware of previous occurrences of this issue. Please share the details you have available such as

Bug#1061076: kbtin: FTBFS with stack-clash-protection on armhf due to valgrind segfault

2024-01-17 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: kbtin Version: 2.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: 32bit-stackclash Hi, kbtin currently fails to build from source on armhf. The failure is due to an incompatibility between valgrind and stack-clash-protection on 32bit arm reported upstream at:

Bug#1055228: Bug#1055750: Bug#1055228: plplot: FTBFS on armhf (test segfault)

2024-01-17 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi Rafael, as a workaround for this issue, you could disable stack-clash-protection when building for armhf. The following snippet in debian/rules should do the trick: ifeq ($(DEB_TARGET_ARCH),armhf) DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all,-stackclash else DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS =

Bug#1060850: jtdx: FTBFS on armel: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4096)

2024-01-15 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: jtdx Version: 2.2.159-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs, patch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: 32bit-stackclash Dear Maintainer, jtdx currently fails to build from source on armel. To address the immediate issue, please disable stack-clash-protection with the following snippet

Bug#1060104: dcmtk: FTBFS on armel: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4100)

2024-01-15 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi Mathieu, On 2024-01-14 11:24, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 9:42 PM Emanuele Rocca wrote: > > We should downgrade the severity to minor once the fix enters unstable, but > > keep the bug open as this seems to be an interesting case of > > s

Bug#1060104: dcmtk: FTBFS on armel: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4100)

2024-01-13 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Control: user -1 debian-...@lists.debian.org Control: usertag -1 + 32bit-stackclash Hi, On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 11:45:28PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > /tmp/ccm0eYhx.s: Assembler messages: > /tmp/ccm0eYhx.s:537: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4100) This is caused by

Bug#1060766: dumpasn1: FTBFS with stack-clash-protection on armhf due to valgrind segfault

2024-01-13 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: dumpasn1 Version: 20210212-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: 32bit-stackclash Hi, dumpasn1 currently fails to build from source on armhf. The failure is due to an incompatibility between valgrind and stack-clash-protection on 32bit arm reported

Bug#1060732: abinit: FTBFS with stack-clash-protection on armhf

2024-01-13 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: abinit Version: 9.10.4-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: 32bit-stackclash Dear Maintainer, abinit currently fails to build from source on armhf. To address the immediate issue, please disable stack-clash-protection with the following snippet in

Bug#1057040: firmware-qcom-soc: please add qcom/sc8280xp/LENOVO/21BX/audioreach-tplg.bin and symlink

2024-01-13 Thread Emanuele Rocca
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 02:29:28PM +0100, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > The file qcom/sc8280xp/LENOVO/21BX/audioreach-tplg.bin and its symlink > qcom/sc8280xp/SC8280XP-LENOVO-X13S-tplg.bin are needed by the Lenovo > Thinkpad X13s. Please consider adding them to firmware-qcom-soc. >

Bug#1060251: Bug#1059352: src:apt: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regression on armhf

2024-01-12 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi Julian! On 2024-01-12 01:47, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > Either way, these are harmless I'm not saying they're harmful, what I'm saying is: 1) the errors you see on armhf when building apt without stack-clash-protection are the same valgrind reports on amd64 as well. Hence, you could

Bug#1060251: Bug#1059352: src:apt: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regression on armhf

2024-01-11 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi Julian, On 2024-01-11 05:46, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > And there aren't any hard errors. We could zero initialize > those or add supressions to make things look nicer I suppose. Mmmh no, they are all actual errors as far as valgrind is concerned. The thing is, you're running valgrind

Bug#1060251: Bug#1059352: src:apt: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regression on armhf

2024-01-11 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi Julian, On 2024-01-08 10:28, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > (in Ubuntu we have partially recovered by disabling stack clash > protection but it crashes on invalid writes there, I suppose we need > to rebuild some more apt dependencies without the flag...). The 'invalid writes' issue seems

Bug#1060251: valgrind: apt autopkgtests on armhf fail with: Access not within mapped region

2024-01-08 Thread Emanuele Rocca
I've added more context to https://bugs.debian.org/1059352#38, but just to have some info here too this is the error: 722s ==221367== Copyright (C) 2002-2022, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. 722s ==221367== Using Valgrind-3.20.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info 722s ==221367==

Bug#1059352: src:apt: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regression on armhf

2024-01-08 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Control: retitle -1 valgrind: Access not within mapped region on armhf Hello Paul and Julian, On 2023-12-24 07:31, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 23-12-2023 20:40, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > the logs for well known bugs so that you don't end up filing bugs > > against every package broken by

Bug#1057469: gcc-13: Please build gcc with -mbranch-protection=standard to fix PAC/BTI support on arm64

2024-01-05 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi Matthias, On 2023-12-31 10:32, Matthias Klose wrote: > please also check > > - that a cross compiler with this patch has these enabled > > - that a cross build of gcc-13 targeting arm64 with this >patch has these enabled Very good point, indeed the original patch I sent did not

Bug#1060075: gcc-13 FTCBFS: target system type set to nvptx-unknown-none

2024-01-05 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: gcc-13 Version: 13.2.0-9 User: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftcbfs X-Debbugs-CC: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org Hi, cross-building the native compiler (build_type = cross-build-native) fails due to (1) an issue with m2, and (2) nvptx being confused about the host/target system.

Bug#1053789: sbuild: should support --env=VAR=VALUE command line option like autopkgtest

2024-01-05 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi! On 2023-10-11 11:08, Raphaël Hertzog wrote: > it would be nice if sbuild supported the --env=VAR=VALUE command line > option like autopkgtest: > >--env=VAR=value > Set arbitrary environment variable in the build and test. > Can be specified multiple times. As

Bug#1059858: debian-cd: Missing firmware packages due to usr-move

2024-01-03 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi Steve and Helmut, On 2024-01-02 05:30, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Already fixed in git, along with another usr-merge issue I found. The > next regular build should be fine. It is. Thank you! $ curl -s

Bug#1059858: debian-cd: Missing firmware packages due to usr-move

2024-01-02 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Package: debian-cd Version: 3.2.1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, quite a few firmware packages are missing from today's debian-installer ISOs. Among the missing ones: firmware-atheros, firmware-realtek, and many others. Some firmware packages such as firmware-ath9k-htc and

Bug#1057693: valgrind: i386 vex x86->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x2E 0x8D 0xB4 0x26

2023-12-08 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi Simon, On 2023-12-07 08:39, Simon Josefsson wrote: > During debci autopkgtest of a new version of libgssglue on i386 I got > a failure like this, which is fatal and execution halts. > > 117s vex x86->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x2E 0x8D 0xB4 0x26 The problem can be reproduced with

Bug#1057282: linux-image-6.5.0-0.deb12.1-arm64: arm64 kernel upgrade makes systems unresponsive

2023-12-07 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi, On 2023-12-04 03:10, Ben Hutchings wrote: > The D and W flags mean there were prior BUG and WARN errors logged. > Please send those as well. Here is the very first warning: Nov 30 17:16:45 ci-worker-armhf-03 kernel: WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 1592 at fs/dcache.c:365 dentry_free+0x98/0xd0

Bug#1057649: sane-backends FTCBFS: confuses build/host compiler flags

2023-12-06 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: sane-backends Version: 1.2.1-6 Tags: patch User: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftcbfs X-Debbugs-CC: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org Dear Maintainer, some compiler flags are architecture specific and should not leak when cross-building. As an example, -fcf-protection is

Bug#1057469: gcc-12: Please build with -mbranch-protection=standard to enable PAC/BTI support on arm64

2023-12-05 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Package: gcc-12 Version: 12.3.0-12 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org, debian-gl...@lists.debian.org Dear Maintainer, PAC/BTI is a useful Arm security feature, see this recent presentation at the Cambridge Mini Debconf for all details: [0] In order to properly support PAC/BTI in Debian

Bug#1053503: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Bastian Blank ) (Bug#1053503: fixed in linux 6.6.3-1~exp1)

2023-12-05 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi John, On 2023-12-04 09:48, John Vincent wrote: > I tested today's daily installer (2023-12-04 10:14) but the changes > are seeming to be not included in this installer. Indeed, 6.6.3-1~exp1 is in experimental. The changes will be included in the daily installer build once the relevant kernel

Bug#1057385: lighttpd FTCBFS: host CFLAGS leak into build compiler invocation

2023-12-04 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: lighttpd Version: 1.4.73-1 User: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftcbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org Dear Maintainer, some compiler flags are architecture specific and should not leak when cross-building. As an example, -fcf-protection is x86-specific, and the

Bug#1057205: systemtap: version 5.0-1 FTBFS on i386, ppc64el, riscv64

2023-12-03 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Control: retitle -1 systemtap: FTBFS with g++-13 on i386, ppc64el, riscv64 On 2023-12-01 04:53, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > In constructor ‘symresolution_info::symresolution_info(systemtap_session&, > bool)’, > inlined from ‘int semantic_pass_symbols(systemtap_session&)’ at >

Bug#1057205: systemtap: version 5.0-1 FTBFS on i386, ppc64el, riscv64

2023-12-01 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Package: systemtap Version: 5.0-1 Severity: serious g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -DBINDIR='"/usr/bin"' -DSYSCONFDIR='"/etc"' -DPKGDATADIR='"/usr/share/systemtap"' -DPKGLIBDIR='"/usr/lib/systemtap"' -DLOCALEDIR='"/usr/share/locale"' -DDOCDIR='"/usr/share/doc/systemtap"' -DPYEXECDIR='""'

Bug#1055711: gcc-13: Please build gcc with -mbranch-protection=standard to fix PAC/BTI support on arm64

2023-11-28 Thread Emanuele Rocca
ses: #1055711) + + -- Emanuele Rocca Mon, 27 Nov 2023 17:22:11 +0100 + gcc-13 (13.2.0-7) unstable; urgency=medium * Update to git 20231124 from the gcc-13 branch. diff -Nru gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/rules2 gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/rules2 --- gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/rules2 2023-10-24 14:39:05.0 +0

Bug#1057040: firmware-qcom-soc: please add qcom/sc8280xp/LENOVO/21BX/audioreach-tplg.bin and symlink

2023-11-28 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Package: firmware-qcom-soc Version: 20230515-3 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, The file qcom/sc8280xp/LENOVO/21BX/audioreach-tplg.bin and its symlink qcom/sc8280xp/SC8280XP-LENOVO-X13S-tplg.bin are needed by the Lenovo Thinkpad X13s. Please consider adding them to firmware-qcom-soc. File:

Bug#1057039: firmware-atheros: please ship qca/hpbtfw21.tlv and qca/hpnv21.bin

2023-11-28 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Package: firmware-atheros Version: 20230515-3 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, The files qca/hpbtfw21.tlv and qca/hpnv21.bin are needed by the Lenovo Thinkpad X13s. Please consider adding them to firmware-atheros. Thanks, Emanuele

Bug#1056057: bumps-private-libs: please add arm64 to the list of supported architectures

2023-11-16 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Package: bumps-private-libs Severity: wishlist User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: arm64 Hi! bumps-private-libs builds fine on arm64. Please add arm64 to the Architecture field in debian/control. Thanks, Emanuele

Bug#1055750: Bug#1055228: plplot: FTBFS on armhf (test segfault)

2023-11-16 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi Rafael, On 2023-11-16 08:42, Rafael Laboissière wrote: > Control: forwarded -1 https://sourceforge.net/p/plplot/bugs/206/ > > * Rafael Laboissière [2023-11-16 07:51]: > > > My guess is that the bug is in PLplot and not in gfortran, but this is > > just a guess. I will eventually inform the

Bug#1055750: Bug#1055228: plplot: FTBFS on armhf (test segfault)

2023-11-15 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hello Rafael! On 2023-11-15 06:47, Rafael Laboissière wrote: > Does this mean that the origin of the bug is upstream or that it still may > be a bug in gfortran? At this point we know for sure that the issue is not armhf-specific, and also that it is not caused by stack-clash-protection. On the

Bug#1055228: plplot: FTBFS on armhf (test segfault)

2023-11-15 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi! On 2023-11-09 05:11, Rafael Laboissière wrote: > The Fortran example x09f.f90, which is exercised during the building of > plplot, now fails on armhf, due to the use of the compiler option > -fstack-clash-protection. The problem seems unrelated to stach-clash-protection I think, enabling the

Bug#1055750: gfortran: [armhf] Yield SIGBUS when compiling with -fstack-clash-protection

2023-11-14 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi Rafael, On 2023-11-13 05:13, Rafael Laboissière wrote: > The attached file bug-1055750.tgz contains a minimal code that > triggers the bug on an armhf system Thanks! For the record I can reproduce the issue in a armhf chroot, but *not* on armel and arm64. The only thing to change in the

Bug#1055711: gcc-13: Please build gcc with -mbranch-protection=standard to fix PAC/BTI support on arm64

2023-11-10 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Package: gcc-13 Version: 13.2.0-6 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, On arm64 dpkg-dev adds -mbranch-protection=standard to the default build flags since version 1.22.0. However, the flag is not used in Debian and Ubuntu when building GCC. This means that the feature does not work as intended

Bug#1053457: More info needed, cannot reproduce

2023-11-08 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi Roland! On 2023-11-08 06:50, Roland Clobus wrote: > I've run the commands that you have provided, and am unable to reproduce > your case. > > lb config --distribution sid --updates false --archive-areas 'main > non-free-firmware' --bootloaders grub-efi > echo live-task-lxde >

Bug#1053457: live-build: Building live image fails when unmounting /sys: 'target is busy'

2023-11-08 Thread Emanuele Rocca
On 2023-10-04 03:10, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > P: Begin unmounting /sys... > umount: /tmp/sid-image/chroot/sys: target is busy. > E: An unexpected failure occurred, exiting... The reason why /sys is busy is that efivarfs is mounted under /sys/firmware/efi/efivars. It seems that efiv

Bug#1053503: Enable support for Renesas RZ/V2L, RZ/G2UL, and RZ/V2M

2023-11-05 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi Salvatore, On 2023-11-04 09:57, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > I'm not sure this is really that urgent, 6.5.10 will be EOL upstream > at some point and in master branch Bastian et all are prearing the 6.6 > based once. After an extra round in experimental I would expect it > will now not take

Bug#1053503: Enable support for Renesas RZ/V2L, RZ/G2UL, and RZ/V2M

2023-11-03 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi! On 2023-10-05 10:05, John wrote: > CONFIG_ARCH_R9A07G054=y > CONFIG_ARCH_R9A07G043=y > CONFIG_ARCH_R9A09G011=y The changes have been merged into master some time ago already: https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/867 Salvatore: what is the best way to ensure this makes

Bug#1055211: bookworm-pu: package gcc-12/12.2.0-14+deb12u1 (CVE-2023-4039)

2023-11-02 Thread Emanuele Rocca
2023-10-09 11:45:48.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +gcc-12 (12.2.0-14+deb12u1) bookworm; urgency=medium + + * Fix -fstack-protector handling of overflows on AArch64 (CVE-2023-4039). + + -- Emanuele Rocca Mon, 09 Oct 2023 11:45:48 +0200 + gcc-12 (12.2.0-14) unstable; urgency=medium

Bug#1055069: please enable SC8280XP sound modules

2023-10-31 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi Dmitry! On 2023-10-31 02:17, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > BTW, Emanuele, are you by chance responsible for the X13s wiki page? I started it, but most of the useful content has been provided by someone else. :-) See https://wiki.debian.org/InstallingDebianOn/Thinkpad/X13s?action=info > There

  1   2   3   4   5   >