Bug#935529: linkchecker: Uses non-standard itemizers and indentation in package description

2019-08-23 Thread Guillem Jover
Source: linkchecker Source-Version: 9.4.0-2 Severity: minor Hi! This package uses «^ o » to itemize the list in the package description, this is both a non-standard itemizer and indentation that is not recognized by aptitude, which would otherwise be able to reflow the text in the items. Please

Bug#935138: closed by Chris Lamb (Bug#935138: fixed in lintian 2.19.0)

2019-08-21 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Wed, 2019-08-21 at 17:27:17 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Changes: > lintian (2.19.0) unstable; urgency=medium > . […] >[ Chris Lamb ] […] >* Also check for "${source:Upstream:Version}" etc. in the > version-substvar-for-external-package tag, not just >

Bug#935217: buildd.debian.org: Giveback service complains about version mismatch

2019-08-20 Thread Guillem Jover
Package: buildd.debian.org Hi! Just tried the new giveback service (which looks great, thanks!) for attr on sh4, and I got this error message: URL:https://buildd.debian.org/auth/giveback.cgi?pkg=attr=sid=sh4 ,--- You are authenticated as guillem. ✓ Working on package attr, suite sid and

Bug#934470: arj FTCBFS: typo in gnu/makefile.in

2019-08-12 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sun, 2019-08-11 at 13:08:49 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > Source: arj > Version: 3.10.22-21 > Tags: patch upstream > User: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: ftcbfs > The last arj upload moves arj a lot closer to cross building. > Unfortunately, there is a little typo that makes it

Bug#934135: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#934135: aptitude: depends on libparse-debianchangelog-perl that has no upstream maintainer

2019-08-08 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Thu, 2019-08-08 at 01:49:24 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > Guillem Jover wrote: > > I'm attaching an old patch I had around, which I thought I had sent > > out, but apparently not (perhaps only on IRC), to switch to > > libdpkg-perl's parser which is the successor of t

Bug#933128: Would you be willing to pass Parse::DebianChangelog upstream development to someone else?

2019-08-08 Thread Guillem Jover
On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 16:19:30 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > Guillem Jover wrote: > > Some of the features got removed, to trim down dependencies, and the > > API adapted to match the rest of the libdpkg-perl codebase, but if > > the removed output formats are needed, o

Bug#933134: lintian: depends on libparse-debianchangelog-perl that has no upstream maintainer

2019-08-07 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Wed, 2019-07-31 at 09:56:31 -0700, Felix Lechner wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 8:29 AM intrigeri wrote: > > - Your MR introduces yet another debian/changelog parser. > > > > Given the trouble we had with keeping Parse::DebianChangelog somewhat > > working and up-to-date so far, I

Bug#933128: Would you be willing to pass Parse::DebianChangelog upstream development to someone else?

2019-08-07 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sun, 2019-07-28 at 22:38:29 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > the Debian Perl Team maintained libparse-debianchangelog-perl for > quite some years now using debian-specific patches against your > upstream version 1.2.0 from http://www.djpig.de/software/. > > Being sick of doing upstream work

Bug#933128: libparse-debianchangelog-perl: Unsuitable for Bullseye unless someone becomes upstream

2019-08-07 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sat, 2019-07-27 at 12:20:00 -0300, intrigeri wrote: > gregor herrmann: > > In dpt-new-upstream we're using Dpkg::Changelog::Debian from > > libdpkg-perl, which might help here as well. > Oh, this is very interesting, thanks! I had taken a look at that > module, but from the documentation

Bug#934135: aptitude: depends on libparse-debianchangelog-perl that has no upstream maintainer

2019-08-07 Thread Guillem Jover
any work duplication. Thanks, Guillem From a1c7206ecdae8e3b33eef406be3ac9b44190b0d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillem Jover Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 23:55:28 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Switch from libparse-debianchangelog-perl to libdpkg-perl The former was merged into the latter some time ago

Bug#933962: dpkg --force-confold, does not say anywhere in it's cmdline output why it's overriding --force-confold

2019-08-06 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Mon, 2019-08-05 at 15:53:08 +0100, Dreamcat4 wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.19.6 > If I specify --force-confold option to dpkg -i while upgrading / > reinstalling. Then I get the following output: > > $ sudo DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive dpkg -D200 --force-confold -i >

Bug#933609: How hard it is to find the Date of a package

2019-07-31 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! I don't think there's any bug here, TBH. And if there was this would be the wrong package to assign to. On Thu, 2019-08-01 at 09:22:29 +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: > Package: www.debian.org > Let's examine how extremely hard it is for a user to squeeze update date > of a package he is

Bug#933152: dpkg-dev: DEP3 spam with single-debian-patch

2019-07-29 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sat, 2019-07-27 at 03:28:23 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > Package: dpkg-dev > Version: 1.19.7 > Severity: normal > If a package has single-debian-patch in debian/source/options, quilt is not > supposed to be used (it is technically still used because there's no > quilt-less non-native

Bug#933335: dpkg: error: dpkg frontend lock is locked by another process

2019-07-29 Thread Guillem Jover
Control: reassign -1 aptitude Control: severity -1 important Control: retitle -1 aptitude: Please add support for dpkg frontend lock Hi! On Mon, 2019-07-29 at 13:47:05 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.19.7 > Severity: serious > I wanted to upgrade with aptitude, but it

Bug#933015: libssh FTBFS on hurd: unconditional usage of PATH_MAX

2019-07-29 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Thu, 2019-07-25 at 20:36:31 +0200, Paul Sonnenschein wrote: > Package: src:libssh > Severity: Important > Version: 0.9.0-1 > Tags: patch > User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: hurd > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org > the package libssh fails to build from source on

Bug#933336: lxqt-config: FTBFS on hurd-i386: udev not available

2019-07-29 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Mon, 2019-07-29 at 13:49:45 +0200, Paul Sonnenschein wrote: > Package: lxqt-config > Severity: important > Version: 0.14.1-2 > Tags: patch > User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: hurd > > the package lxqt-config fails to build from source on hurd-i386 because > udev is not

Bug#932841: libdpkg-perl: Dpkg::Source::Package installs a permanent SIGINT handler

2019-07-23 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Tue, 2019-07-23 at 20:44:35 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Package: libdpkg-perl > Version: 1.18.25 > Severity: normal > $ perl -we 'use Data::Dumper; print Dumper($SIG{INT})' > $VAR1 = undef; > $ perl -we 'use Data::Dumper; use Dpkg::Source::Package; print > Dumper($SIG{INT})' > $VAR1 =

Bug#932258: console-setup-freebsd: missing dependency

2019-07-19 Thread Guillem Jover
On Wed, 2019-07-17 at 18:06:00 +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 04:15:51PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > this seems like a problem with console-setup-freebsd being arch:all > > and depending on kFreeBSD-specific packages which will not be > >

Bug#932258: console-setup-freebsd: missing dependency

2019-07-17 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! [ I'm not sure this bug closure is entirely correct? See below. ] On Wed, 2019-07-17 at 13:25:50 +0100, James Clarke wrote: > On 17 Jul 2019, at 10:55, Holger Wansing wrote: > > Héctor Orón Martínez (2019-07-17): > > > Package: console-setup-freebsd > > > Version: 1.191 > > > Severity:

Bug#932283: RM: libpmount -- ROM; inadequate API, no known users, abandoned

2019-07-17 Thread Guillem Jover
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi! I request the removal of libpmount from Debian, for which I'm also upstream, and just marked it as abandoned there [A] due to it having an inadequate API, no known users, and not being as portable as it is claimed to be. [A]

Bug#931135: German translation made me laugh during a meeting

2019-07-16 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Wed, 2019-06-26 at 21:06:19 +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote: > Package: dpkg-dev > Version: 1.19.6 > Severity: minor > Tags: l10n > the following translation in the "FEATURE AREAS" -> "qa" might need some > improvement: > > LANG=C man dpkg-buildflags > ___snip___ >canary This setting

Bug#932152: debhelper: Make commands use pkgname.name.fragment automatically?

2019-07-15 Thread Guillem Jover
Source: debhelper Source-Version: 12.2 Severity: wishlist Hi! I've noticed when using the dh sequencer, one of the common reasons to override targets is to pass --name arguments to debhelper commands. It would be nice if the name arguments would be inferred from the presence of the filenames

Bug#931975: dpkg-checkbuilddeps don't allow multiple Vcs-Git statements

2019-07-15 Thread Guillem Jover
On Sun, 2019-07-14 at 15:03:28 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > In that case, should we increase the strength of this by changing the > first sentence? I'm not seeing much purpose served by developer > discretion here, and this clarifies matters for tool developers. Sure. > diff --git

Bug#218581: debhelper: please switch to debian/*.$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE)

2019-07-15 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 13:47:30 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > Package: debhelper > Version: 4.1.77 > Severity: wishlist > I'm working on the Glibc-based GNU/KNetBSD port, and have some problems with > the way debhelper determines its arch-specific files in debian/ directory. > > Due to

Bug#931975: dpkg-checkbuilddeps don't allow multiple Vcs-Git statements

2019-07-14 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sun, 2019-07-14 at 09:31:16 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Yeah, this just seems generally wrong to me. I assume the idea was that a > package may have mirrors of its packaging repository in multiple VCS > systems and list all of them, but I'm dubious there's much point. My > leaning is to

Bug#931975: dpkg-checkbuilddeps don't allow multiple Vcs-Git statements

2019-07-14 Thread Guillem Jover
Control: reassign -1 debian-policy Hi! On Sat, 2019-07-13 at 10:27:24 +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: > Package: dpkg-dev > Version: 1.19.7 > Severity: important > With two Vsc-Git statements in debian/control I get: > > dpkg-checkbuilddeps: error: syntax error in debian/control at line 14: >

Bug#802100: gnupg should fetch keys using hkps by default

2019-07-12 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sat, 2015-10-17 at 15:31:22 +0100, Antoine Amarilli wrote: > Package: gnupg > Version: 1.4.19-5 > Severity: wishlist > By default, gpg requests keys using HKP server . This allows a > passive attacker to obtain information about the keys requested by the user, > which may be harmful in

Bug#931339: gnupg: Change default keyserver?

2019-07-12 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Tue, 2019-07-02 at 15:55:32 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Package: dirmngr > Version: 2.2.16-2 > Severity: wishlist > According to the dirmngr(8) man page, the default built-in server is > «hkps://hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net». Given the recent attacks, and > the

Bug#931339: gnupg: Change default keyserver?

2019-07-02 Thread Guillem Jover
Package: dirmngr Version: 2.2.16-2 Severity: wishlist Hi! According to the dirmngr(8) man page, the default built-in server is «hkps://hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net». Given the recent attacks, and the problems inherent in that network, could we just change the default to be

Bug#926228: update-alternatives: spurious warnings with --remove

2019-07-02 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Mon, 2019-07-01 at 11:19:59 +0200, Marketa Calabkova wrote: > I am afraid this bug got forgotten somehow... could you please look at > it and give some answers? Ah, sorry, this was filed against a non-existent package, and when reassigned, it was not CCed. On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 12:40:57

Bug#931225: Please make Classic style the default

2019-07-01 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Fri, 2019-06-28 at 15:50:19 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Package: wiki.debian.org > Control: block 864925 by -1 > Control: block 931224 by -1 > The default style has two bugs, at least one of which is IMO fairly > serious and has gone unfixed for 2 years now: > | #864925 wiki.debian.org:

Bug#930788: creating /var/lib/dpkg/cmethopt

2019-06-27 Thread Guillem Jover
On Sun, 2019-06-23 at 21:32:19 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2019-06-20 18:19 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > > Package: apt,dselect > > Severity: normal > > today I learned that debootstrap as special code to create the file > > /var/lib/dpkg/cmethopt (contents: "apt apt"); this is the

Bug#931094: $DPKG_PAGER doesn't override $PAGER

2019-06-27 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Wed, 2019-06-26 at 08:24:10 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.19.7 > Obviously > > export DPKG_PAGER="" > > doesn't work as expected (overriding $PAGER, as promised by the man page). Hmm, I guess I could change it to treat "" the same as "cat", even though

Bug#931135: German translation made me laugh during a meeting

2019-06-27 Thread Guillem Jover
On Thu, 2019-06-27 at 11:52:05 +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:57:42AM +0200, Martin Bagge / brother wrote: > > On 2019-06-26 21:06, Stefan Potyra wrote: > > > the following translation in the "FEATURE AREAS" -> "qa" might need > > > some improvement: > > > > > > LANG=C

Bug#930587: release-notes: fails to build for jessie and stretch

2019-06-16 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sun, 2019-06-16 at 14:40:53 +0800, Wenbin Lv wrote: > Package: release-notes > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) > Recent transition from .dbk to .po for the ca language leaves some > untracked .dbk files in

Bug#930072: dctrl-tools: join-dctrl segfaults

2019-06-14 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Fri, 2019-06-14 at 12:17:27 +0200, Rhonda D'Vine wrote: > severity 930072 important > thanks > On 6/12/19 10:35 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 04:04:39PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > >> Package: dctrl-tools > >> Version: 2.24-3 >

Bug#930469: chromium: Insta-segfault on start

2019-06-13 Thread Guillem Jover
Package: chromium Version: 75.0.3770.80-1 Severity: serious Hi! I was using 73.0.3683.75-1, held due to the problems with later version. Upgraded to the latest version in unstable, and now I'm getting insta-segfaults on startup. The output when running normally (first without --debug) is not

Bug#926387: oxygen-icons5: FTBFS randomly (Directory renamed before its status could be extracted)

2019-06-06 Thread Guillem Jover
Control: reassign -1 fuse-overlayfs [ Please check the bug report for the original problem. ] Hi! On Tue, 2019-04-09 at 10:02:25 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > Hmm, I said: > > Is dpkg in buster calling tar with any options that makes this > > behaviour to happen more easily? Is tar in buster

Bug#930072: dctrl-tools: join-dctrl segfaults

2019-06-06 Thread Guillem Jover
Package: dctrl-tools Version: 2.24-3 Severity: serious Hi! The join-dctrl command segfaults with the attached files. ,--- $ join-dctrl Packages-A Packages-B Segmentation fault (core dumped) `--- Thanks, Guillem Package: aaa Version: 1.0 Package: bbb Version: 1.1 Package: zzz Version:

Bug#930071: dctrl-tools: join-dctrl «-a 2» does not work

2019-06-06 Thread Guillem Jover
Source: dctrl-tools Source-Version: 2.24-3 Severity: important Tags: patch Hi! The -a option in join-dctrl does not work when passing it a 2 argument. The attached patch should fix it. Thanks, Guillem diff --git i/join-dctrl/join-dctrl.c w/join-dctrl/join-dctrl.c index f3856ac..056a5aa 100644

Bug#928429: dpkg: trigger cycle postgresql-common -> sgml-base while upgrading from stretch to buster

2019-05-31 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Fri, 2019-05-17 at 21:12:28 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 2019-05-14 02:35, Guillem Jover wrote: > > setup some chroot somewhere to do that. > > > > I'm attaching the patch. Otherwise already built (and signed) binary > > packages can be temporarily

Bug#929671: mozjs60: Broken (cross-)building support

2019-05-28 Thread Guillem Jover
Source: mozjs60 Source-Version: 60.2.3-3 Severity: important User: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftcbfs Hi! The cross-compilation support in this package seems to be broken. The debian/rules file contains some confused logic: * DEB_BUILD_ARCH is not defined, so it will not build

Bug#929601: dpkg-dev: README in dpkg-dev git repo incomplete (?)

2019-05-26 Thread Guillem Jover
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi! On Sun, 2019-05-26 at 16:37:01 -0400, Gerard Weatherby wrote: > Package: dpkg-dev > Version: 1.18.4ubuntu1.5 > Severity: minor > Tags: newcomer > I cloned https://git.dpkg.org/git/dpkg/dpkg.git. When I went to build it I > found I had to install autopoint along

Bug#929432: dpkg-source -b . command does not identify a module when it contains "."

2019-05-23 Thread Guillem Jover
Control: severity -1 wishlist Hi! On Thu, 2019-05-23 at 18:20:05 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > package: dpkg > severity: important > version: 1.19.6 > For example node-gulp package depend on "object.defaults" node module. > But when running dpkg-source -b . with

Bug#929429: lintian: Please check for bogus upstream .asc files

2019-05-23 Thread Guillem Jover
Package: lintian Version: 2.14.0 Severity: wishlist Hi! The mk-origtargz program from devscripts was producing bogus upstream tarball .asc files. It would be nice if this could be warned, so that people know this is the case and so that they have sufficient data to decide whether to fix it right

Bug#929428: lintian: Please add references to debian-policy about R³

2019-05-23 Thread Guillem Jover
Package: lintian Version: 2.14.0 Severity: wishlist Hi! It would be nice if the various checks that involve R³ and currently reference the dpkg-dev rootless-builds.txt spec, would also get refs to policy §4.9.2 and §5.6.31. Thanks, Guillem

Bug#929019: dpkg-dev: How to use Rules-Requires-Root without debhelper

2019-05-22 Thread Guillem Jover
On Wed, 2019-05-15 at 14:42:53 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 02:21:49PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > > To be precise, if I apply the patch below to hello-traditional_2.10-5 > > > and do "dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us -b" in a sid chroot, I ge

Bug#929019: dpkg-dev: How to use Rules-Requires-Root without debhelper

2019-05-15 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Wed, 2019-05-15 at 13:40:19 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > Package: dpkg-dev > Version: 1.19.6 > I don't fully understand how Rules-Requires-Root is supposed to work > when not using dh or debhelper. > > To be precise, if I apply the patch below to hello-traditional_2.10-5 > and do

Bug#923091: That merged-usr is mandatory is RC

2019-05-15 Thread Guillem Jover
On Mon, 2019-05-13 at 17:24:55 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 11:22:35AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > In #923091, Guillem (with dpkg maintainer hat on) asks for a > > base-installer option to allow installing buster without merged-usr. > > No, he did not mention dpkg.

Bug#928968: debian-security-support: cleanup cruft in check-support-status.hook after the buster release

2019-05-14 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Tue, 2019-05-14 at 11:29:04 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > Package: debian-security-support > Version: 2019.02.02 > Severity: minor > check-support-status.hook contains code (copied from postinst) to create > the d-s-s user, which (I believe) is useless as the user is created in >

Bug#928429: dpkg: trigger cycle postgresql-common -> sgml-base while upgrading from stretch to buster

2019-05-13 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Fri, 2019-05-10 at 21:45:09 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 2019-05-09 06:00, Guillem Jover wrote: > > awaiting trigger does not help matters, I'm not entirely sure this > > might not be still a problem with dpkg itself. :/ > > I can also reproduce the prob

Bug#927471: curl: Regression that fails to exhaust socket data

2019-05-12 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Tue, 2019-05-07 at 14:57:53 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Thanks! I tried yesterday and today to get a deterministic reproducer > with the version from unstable, but I'm not sure what's the trigger, > perhaps the torrent peers or the chunk arrival order or something. In >

Bug#928429: dpkg: trigger cycle postgresql-common -> sgml-base while upgrading from stretch to buster

2019-05-08 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sat, 2019-05-04 at 15:13:58 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.19.6 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: piuparts > Control: affects -1 + education-desktop-gnome education-desktop-mate > education-desktop-xfce education-main-server

Bug#927471: curl: Regression that fails to exhaust socket data

2019-05-07 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sat, 2019-05-04 at 13:02:13 +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 01:39:36PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Source: curl > > Source-Version: 7.64.0-2 > > Severity: serious > > Control: affects -1 rtorrent > > I've started noticing rto

Bug#825022: man pages for *xattr syscalls are missing from manpages-dev

2019-05-03 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 05:37:26 -0500, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > Note that around May 2015, by mutual agreement between the man-pages > and libattr projects (which hitherto had both carried versions of the > *xattr(2) pages), man-pages became the canonical home for these pages, >

Bug#927725: Please build with --enable-mmdblookup

2019-04-24 Thread Guillem Jover
On Tue, 2019-04-23 at 19:35:50 -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23 2019, Michael Biebl wrote: > > Am 23.04.19 um 11:12 schrieb Michael Biebl: > >> But splitting each tiny module into a separate package adds significant > >> overhead packaging-wise. > > > > (not to forget NEW round trips) >

Bug#927725: Please build with --enable-mmdblookup

2019-04-24 Thread Guillem Jover
On Wed, 2019-04-24 at 04:39:50 -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > On 4/23/19 5:12 AM, Michael Biebl wrote: > > My main concern is to keep the rsyslog core package reasonably small > > (dependency wise). I think either a new package for this plugin or a conglomerate package with extra stuff sound

Bug#927265: dpkg-dev: dpkg-buildpackage -F does not generate a source.changes files

2019-04-22 Thread Guillem Jover
Control: severity -1 minor Hi! On Wed, 2019-04-17 at 12:03:34 +0800, Drew Parsons wrote: > Package: dpkg-dev > Version: 1.19.6 > Severity: normal > dpkg-buildpackage -F is supposed to be equivalent to > dpkg-buildpackage --build=source,binary > > The dpkg-buildpackage manpage tells us that if

Bug#927752: Mention --clear-selections actually also grows selections

2019-04-22 Thread Guillem Jover
Control: severity -1 minor Control: retitle -1 dpkg: --clear-selections marks unknown packages for deinstall Hi! On Tue, 2019-04-23 at 01:55:17 +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.19.6 > Severity: wishlist > File: /usr/share/man/man1/dpkg.1.gz > Man page says > >

Bug#927471: curl: Regression that fails to exhaust socket data

2019-04-20 Thread Guillem Jover
Source: curl Source-Version: 7.64.0-2 Severity: serious Control: affects -1 rtorrent Hi! I've started noticing rtorrent busy-looping at some points after finishing a torrent. stracing and gdb'ing the process it was doing that in its main loop, spamming on gettimeofday() and epoll_wait().

Bug#927151: mmdebstrap: Does not properly cleanup auxfiles directory

2019-04-15 Thread Guillem Jover
Package: mmdebstrap Version: 0.4.1-2 Severity: important Hi! The fix in 0.4.0-1 to cleanup aufxiles does not seem entirely effective, as there's subsequent «apt-get update» which will regenerate the directory. I was a bit confused about this when we found the stretch-based VMs we are produced

Bug#919377: mysql++: FTBFS with mariadb-10.3: dbdriver.cpp:260:10: error: 'CLIENT_LONG_PASSWORD' was not declared in this scope

2019-04-11 Thread Guillem Jover
kly shows this is still the case. The attached patch makes this package build again for me, and removes a warning from using an internal header. Thanks, Guillem Author: Guillem Jover Description: Update code against latest mariadb libraries - Do not include internal header which emits warnings now. - D

Bug#518750: pommed: cannot mmap memory for GMA950/GMA965

2019-04-09 Thread Guillem Jover
Control: reassign -1 pommed Hi! On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 20:40:13 +0200, Martin Mares wrote: > > This bug is not present in version 3.0.3 (Lenny), it's in 3.1.2 as > > explained above by Julien. > > This is not a bug in libpci, but rather a deficiency in its documentation > leading to improper

Bug#923423: dpkg: Hangs for 19 mins installing texlive-fonts-extra

2019-04-08 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Tue, 2019-03-05 at 15:43:05 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > I've done a test with "iozone -a -e", and with this -e option > (to include fsync), the operations are much slower than on the > other machine. > > zira:~> iozone -a -e > [...] >

Bug#926387: oxygen-icons5: FTBFS randomly (Directory renamed before its status could be extracted)

2019-04-08 Thread Guillem Jover
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi! On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 10:27:29 +, Santiago Vila wrote: > Package: src:oxygen-icons5,dpkg-dev,tar > Tags: ftbfs > I tried to build "oxygen-icons5" in buster but it failed: > This happens randomly. Sometimes it fails, sometimes it does not. It > happens in other

Bug#926472: dpkg(1) man page: should document that putting a package on hold will require to process triggers manually

2019-04-08 Thread Guillem Jover
Control: retitle -1 dpkg: --pending should enqueue packages in hold state Control: severity -1 normal Hi! On Fri, 2019-04-05 at 19:29:28 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.19.6 > Severity: wishlist > When a package is on hold, its triggers are not processed >

Bug#847531: Bug #847531: Update for new programming language sections

2019-03-23 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Wed, 2018-04-25 at 14:05:12 +0200, Laura Arjona Reina wrote: > Guillem, I didn't commit your patch for 2 reasons: > > * The debian/changelog file in https://salsa.debian.org/l10n-team/dl10n/ has > evolved since you sent your patch (as well as the dl10n codebase) and I'm not > sure how to

Bug#925360: pcre2: Uses SSE2 unconditionally on i386

2019-03-23 Thread Guillem Jover
maintainer upload. + * Do not unconditionally use SSE2 instructions on i386, as some processors +that conform to the architecture ISA baseline, do not support that +instruction set. + + -- Guillem Jover Sat, 23 Mar 2019 19:24:32 +0100 + pcre2 (10.32-4) unstable; urgency=medium * Take

Bug#924659: ITP: fossology -- FOSSology is an open source license compliance software system and toolkit.

2019-03-15 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Fri, 2019-03-15 at 20:27:57 +0530, Gaurav Mishra wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Gaurav Mishra > Package name : fossology > Version : 3.4.0 > Upstream Author : Michael Jaeger > URL : https://www.fossology.org/ > License : GPL-2.0-only, LGPL-2.1-only >

Bug#914515: dpkg: please provide an interface to bootstrap dpkg from zero

2019-03-14 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sat, 2018-11-24 at 10:24:09 +0100, Johannes 'josch' Schauer wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.19.2 > Severity: wishlist > lintian recently tagged mmdebstrap with uses-dpkg-database-directly > because mmdebstrap contains the string "/var/lib/dpkg" in several > places. Instead of

Bug#924401: base-files fails postinst when base-passwd is unpacked

2019-03-14 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Fri, 2019-03-15 at 00:37:33 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > Maybe, but this is neither a new miscellaneous file nor a new > bootstrapping action. This is yet another bootstrapping tool > forgetting the lessons learned from the other bootstrapping tools. My impression though is that the

Bug#924401: base-files fails postinst when base-passwd is unpacked

2019-03-12 Thread Guillem Jover
om the packages themselves into external bootstrapping tools is bogus IMO, and something we should try to fix. > Maybe the rule should be to retry configuration of each unconfigured > package until either they all succeed, or forward progress stops being > made? Pythonesque pseudocode: I

Bug#923799: ITS: pciutils

2019-03-05 Thread Guillem Jover
Source: pciutils Source-Version: 1:3.5.2-1 Severity: important Hi! This package needs some attention, and looks like a candidate for salvaging. Anibal is already being tracked by the MIA team, and it's just a matter of days until he gets an orphaning pass. I'd like to get updated packages

Bug#923423: dpkg: Hangs for 19 mins installing texlive-fonts-extra

2019-03-05 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sun, 2019-03-03 at 02:38:10 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2019-03-03 00:15:13 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Did this start happening due to the new kernel version? > > In March 2018, this was already slow, but much less: > > [...] > 2018-03-08 00:55:55

Bug#923423: dpkg: Hangs for 19 mins installing texlive-fonts-extra

2019-03-02 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Thu, 2019-02-28 at 01:06:28 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Package: texlive-fonts-extra > Version: 2018.20190227-1 > Severity: serious > Installation of texlive-fonts-extra 2018.20190227-1 hangs. > 17m01s ago dpkg was started, at 2019-02-28T00:48:45+01:00. > 1.5% has been its average

Bug#233723: dpkg: it leaves xfonts-base.alias.dpkg-new file.

2019-03-02 Thread Guillem Jover
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi! On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 09:14:40 +0300, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 18:22:20 +0100, Michele Mencacci wrote: > > Package: dpkg > > Version: 1.10.18 > > Severity: minor > > Upgrading from 4.2.1-15, ( working system) to

Bug#222047: --configure should process essential packages first

2019-03-02 Thread Guillem Jover
Control: retitle -1 dpkg: Provide an interface for bootstrapping an installation Hi! On Sun, 2003-11-23 at 16:44:37 +0100, Koblinger Egmont wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.10.18 > Currently if more unconfigured packages are being configured, their > ordered is determined by the Depends

Bug#343578: dpkg: delete available-new when 'No space left on device'

2019-03-02 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 11:42:02 +0100, A Mennucc wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.13.11.0.1 > Severity: normal > did you ever ran out of disk space while installing/upgrading packages? > When the dreaded message "dpkg: . No space left on device" appears, > you readily know it is time

Bug#687179: dak: Please ignore packages with empty arch keys from Package-List

2019-03-02 Thread Guillem Jover
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Control: retitle -1 dak: Please ignore packages with empty arch keys from Package-List Hi! [ Leaving enough context for the reassign. ] On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 17:46:26 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: dpkg-dev > Version: 1.16.8 > Severity: normal >

Bug#923470: acl fails it's autopkg tests

2019-02-28 Thread Guillem Jover
On Thu, 2019-02-28 at 17:22:53 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: src:acl > Version: 2.2.52-5 > Severity: important > Tags: sid buster > > acl fails it's autopkg tests, missing some of the build dependencies in the > tests. However even with that, some root test fail, seen at >

Bug#923277: libaio1: failed to load wifi firmware after libaio1 update

2019-02-25 Thread Guillem Jover
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi! On Mon, 2019-02-25 at 20:21:01 +0100, definetti wrote: > Package: libaio1 > Version: 0.3.111-1 > Severity: important > after updating libaio1 to version 0.3.112-1 the system does not detect the > wireless network card after reboot. Dmesg shows the following error: >

Bug#923290: ddpo: Please distinguish reproduible state between sid/testing

2019-02-25 Thread Guillem Jover
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: ddpo X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! The reproducible build state is currently only provided for «testing», because «sid» contains additional checks that are deemed would annoy

Bug#410419: confile prompts should use debconf

2019-02-24 Thread Guillem Jover
Control: retitle -1 dpkg: conffile prompts should use debconf Hi! I was asked by Julian Andres Klode on IRC about the status of this, so let's update the bug too. On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 15:16:30 -, peter green wrote: > in situations where a user cannot interact directly with dpkg >

Bug#923091: base-installer: Allow installing w/o the broken merged-usr-via-symlinks

2019-02-23 Thread Guillem Jover
Package: base-installer Version: 1.187 Severity: wishlist Hi! The current base-installer uses the default debootstrap settings which end up unconditionally installing systems with the merged-usr-via-symlinks deployment method which is broken by design, please see:

Bug#923090: reportbug: Please add information about systems tainted due to merged-usr-via-symlinks

2019-02-23 Thread Guillem Jover
Package: reportbug Version: 7.5.2 Severity: wishlist Hi! The merged-/usr deployment method of using directory symlinks, instead of properly moving the files or symlinking the contents of these directories is broken by design. Please see

Bug#922643: ITP: build-alternative -- helper to build Debian package with diet libc

2019-02-20 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Mon, 2019-02-18 at 19:37:38 +, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Dmitry Bogatov > > * Package name : build-alternative > Version : 0.0.1 > Upstream Author : Dmitry Bogatov > * Url :

Bug#921031: Processed: severity of 921031 is grave

2019-02-19 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Tue, 2019-02-12 at 17:33:03 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > > # Breaks autopkgtests and is therefore a migration blocker > > severity 921031 grave > Bug #921031 [libdpkg-perl] Dpkg::Source::Package missing use of ::Format >

Bug#879935: closed by Chris Lamb (Bug#879935: fixed in lintian 2.5.56)

2019-02-19 Thread Guillem Jover
Control: retitle -1 Please warn on packages using getconf(1), except to get PATH, _NPROCESSORS_{CONF,ONLN} On Mon, 2017-10-30 at 09:05:46 +, Chris Lamb wrote: > retitle 879935 Please warn on packages using getconf(1) to get PATH, > _NPROCESSORS_{CONF,ONLN} etc. > thanks > > Well this only

Bug#922531: lintian: Please make package-uses-vendor-specific-patch-series Debian-archive specific

2019-02-19 Thread Guillem Jover
On Mon, 2019-02-18 at 14:16:56 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > > The problem with emitting this tag unconditionally, even within the > > Debian-vendor realm, is that people create local packages for their > > own, or for $work, etc. > > Hmm. Emitting such a tag here still seems right to me, or at

Bug#922557: lintian: Make orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature a "dsc" check (was: "Re: Bug#922557: lintian: Please check whether there's an expected orig tarball signature")

2019-02-19 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Mon, 2019-02-18 at 14:51:42 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > > There is already such a tag, orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature. > > That's a .changes checks, not a .dsc one, so it would be emitted only > > for -1. Right, had seen it but from a very quick skim got the impression it was for

Bug#922544: lintian: Mass tag rename to unify naming convention

2019-02-19 Thread Guillem Jover
On Sun, 2019-02-17 at 23:45:37 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Do others have thoughts before I apply this patch? As I mentioned initially, I don't think the patch is ready as is, it even has syntax errors (at least one ‘?‘ :). It would probably need a new pass over the newly created tags, a review of

Bug#922691: influxdb: init script restart action always returns an error code

2019-02-19 Thread Guillem Jover
to it. Attached patch should fix this. Thanks, Guillem From 5aa9e83baf01384ddd5a5d10ef3ab29d67360dc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillem Jover Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 15:17:52 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] debian: Fix init script return code on restart action The errcode is only assigned conditionally when

Bug#922557: lintian: Please check whether there's an expected orig tarball signature

2019-02-17 Thread Guillem Jover
Package: lintian Version: 2.7.0 Severity: wishlist Hi! I just noticed that I've sometimes been failing to include the orig tarball signature file for some of the uploads after the first new upstream release. Let me clarify with an example: - Fetch upstream xfstt 1.9.3 orig.tar.xz and

Bug#922531: lintian: Please make package-uses-vendor-specific-patch-series Debian-archive specific

2019-02-17 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sun, 2019-02-17 at 22:41:19 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > > So, I'd appreciate very much to see this tag emitted exclusively when > > running lintian on lintian.d.o and Debian's ftp-master […] but not when > > running locally > Whilst I have not seen Ubuntu folks complain about this tag

Bug#922544: lintian: Mass tag rename to unify naming convention

2019-02-17 Thread Guillem Jover
On Sun, 2019-02-17 at 23:07:50 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > > I'd request that no more such tag names be added, and ideally the > > current ones be renamed, although the longer they stay the more > > overrides they might accumulate. :/ > > That's my only concern at this point. I mean, there's

Bug#922544: lintian: Mass tag rename to unify naming convention

2019-02-17 Thread Guillem Jover
should-be-oldlibs-extra Thanks, Guillem From b094a6099aaeba702d3d88cca6da88494ce48297 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillem Jover Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 20:43:53 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] RFC: Mass tag rename to try to unify naming conventions --- data/override/renamed-tag

Bug#922534: lintian: Typo fixes

2019-02-17 Thread Guillem Jover
Package: lintian Version: 2.7.0 Severity: minor Hi! Here's a couple of patches I had sitting on my local lintian tree. Thanks, Guillem From af1af30e9973e7da6f59fec405611392d1bf2aaf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillem Jover Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 20:28:53 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] c/deb

Bug#922531: lintian: Please make package-uses-vendor-specific-patch-series Debian-archive specific

2019-02-17 Thread Guillem Jover
Package: lintian Version: 2.7.0 Severity: wishlist Hi! As the maintainer of dpkg, I do not agree at all (well I'd go as far as to consider them to be just bogus :) with the rationale and conclusions that were arrived to get the package-uses-vendor-specific-patch-series tag implemented. But the

Bug#922530: lintian: False positive uses-dpkg-database-directly for dpkg and base-files

2019-02-17 Thread Guillem Jover
Package: lintian Version: 2.7.0 Severity: normal Hi! The uses-dpkg-database-directly tag is emitted for both dpkg and base-files, even though the code tried to avoid doing that. :) Thanks, Guillem

Bug#922529: libtool: Emits warnings in very alarming bold red color

2019-02-17 Thread Guillem Jover
Package: libtool Version: 2.4.6-9 Severity: normal Hi! The libtool program emits warnings in bold red which is a very unexpected and confusing color for a warning (in contrast to an error), and it always triggers alarms when I see it scroll by, for example for: ,--- libtool: warning:

<    6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   >