Bug#953774: texlive-bin: FTBFS on various arches

Am 15.03.2020 um 09:58 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit: > The patch has been submitted to git, build fails later on s390x & ppc64el: > > libtool: link: s390x-linux-gnu-gcc -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -g -O2 > -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat > -Werror=f

Bug#953774: texlive-bin: FTBFS on various arches

Am 13.03.2020 um 14:30 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit: Hi, > I suspect that the following code in debian/rules needs to be expanded: > > # for whitelisting good archs > ifeq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH), $(LUAJIT_GOOD_ARCHS))) > # it is not in the list of good archs ->

Bug#930780: ITS: pssh

Am 14.03.2020 um 01:29 teilte Sandro Tosi mit: > On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 06:24:13 -0700 Mo Zhou wrote: >> I plan to salvage pssh and fix at least the following bug: >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=891340 > > Not sure if Mo is still interested in salvaging this package, other >

Bug#953774: texlive-bin: FTBFS on various arches

Am 13.03.2020 um 12:42 teilte Hilmar Preusse mit: > Upload of TL 2020 to experimental > >* What was the outcome of this action? > > We FTBFS on a few arches. Until now this phenomenon is known for ppc64el, > s390x, ia64, m68k, ppc64 & riscv64. The build fails w/: > > checking for library

Bug#952557: proftpd-dfsg: Followup fix for CVE-2020-9273

found -1 1.3.5b-4+deb9u3 found -1 1.3.6-4+deb10u3 On 2/25/20 8:39 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > As per https://github.com/proftpd/proftpd/issues/903 there was a > follow-up fix for upstream issue #903, CVE-2020-9273. > Found in stable and oldstable too. H. -- sigfault #206401

Bug#952749: texlive-extra-utils: bibtexu segfault

Control: reassign -1 libicu63 On 2/28/20 3:04 PM, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote: Hi all, > bibtexu segfaults for me (bibtex works for the same files): > > (gdb) run > Starting program: /usr/bin/bibtexu zshg > [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] > Using host libthread_db library

Bug#952961: RFS: netsend/0.0~svnr250-1.3 [NMU, RC] -- a speedy filetransfer and network diagnostic program

On 3/2/20 1:05 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "netsend" > > * Package name: netsend >Version : 0.0~svnr250-1.3 >Upstream Author : Hagen Paul Pfeifer, Florian Westphal > * URL : http://netsend.berlios.de/ > I have doubt,

Bug#951916: proftpd-mod-vroot: proftpd cannot load mod_vroot

On 2/29/20 8:58 AM, Nikolai Lusan wrote: Hi, > Sorry I haven't gotten back to you yet. I have a number of projects > on the go, and since this is only impacting a small number of users > on my home system it has fallen lower on my priority list - I was > also trying to find solutions myself.

Bug#951916: proftpd-mod-vroot: proftpd cannot load mod_vroot

On 2/23/20 4:27 AM, Nikolai Lusan wrote: Hi Nikolai, > Trying to run proftpd with mod_vroot. The following error causes > hosts using vroot to not be loaded: > I've built a package for proftpd-mod-vroot, which have a dep on proftpd-abi-1.3.6c [1]. Let me know if it solves your issue, then I'll

Bug#951800: CVE-2020-9273: buster affected

On 2/22/20 10:58 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 09:29:34PM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote: Hi Salvatore, >> The fix for this issue (+ patch for two other issues) is already in the >> buster branch on salsa. I planned to upload that ASAP. Not sure if it >&

Bug#870624: hanged APT during update

On 2/24/20 5:01 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: Hi, > I have tested upgrade from jessie 1.3.5-1.1+deb8u2 (my vmware installation) > > - to 1.3.5b-4+deb9u3 (in stretch) hanged. > - to 1.3.5b-4+deb9u1 from the page above worked fine. > > I assume your patch works fine. > Patch has been

Bug#951916: proftpd-mod-vroot: proftpd cannot load mod_vroot

On 2/23/20 2:55 PM, Nikolai Lusan wrote: > On Sun, 2020-02-23 at 14:49 +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote: Hi Nikolai, >> Severity grave to make sure it doesn't enter testing. > > Wouldn't that be better applied to proftpd-basic - since it was the update > there that broke this? I po

Bug#951916: proftpd-mod-vroot: proftpd cannot load mod_vroot

Control: severity -1 grave On 2/23/20 4:27 AM, Nikolai Lusan wrote: > Trying to run proftpd with mod_vroot. The following error causes hosts using > vroot to not be loaded: > > # service proftpd check-config > 2020-02-23 13:19:36,841 kiev proftpd[537394]: mod_dso/0.5: unable to >

Bug#951800: CVE-2020-9273: buster affected

On 2/22/20 5:52 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 10:07:42PM +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote: Hi Salvatore, >> Package: proftpd-basic >> Version: 1.3.6-4+deb10u3 >> Severity: important >> Tags: upstream >> >> This is to track CVE-2020-9273. >> >> I'm not 100% sure if jessie

Bug#951412: proftpd-basic: segfault when logging in through sftp

Control: severity -1 important On 2/16/20 9:34 AM, Tomas Janousek wrote: > Package: proftpd-basic > Version: 1.3.6-4+deb10u3 > Severity: normal > > It appears bug #839880 reappeared in current Debian stable: > Set that to important. H. -- sigfault #206401 http://counter.li.org

Bug#951671: pdfannotator not yet fixed

Control: tags -1 + pending Am 20.02.2020 um 05:56 teilte Norbert Preining mit: > Hi Bastien, > >> Could you please replace the previous patch with this one ? > > Updated in git, thanks. > Tag pending. H. -- sigfault #206401 http://counter.li.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Bug#932373: proftpd error reading passphrase for SFTPHostKey

Control: tags -1 + pending Am 18.07.2019 um 16:14 teilte Markus Raps mit: Hi, > I think there is something wrong with the sftp module in buster > because proftpd cant read ssh Host keys > > i also tried to recreate the keys with dpkg-reconfigure openssh-server > or manually by ssh-keygen -t

Bug#870624: proftpd postinst hangs

Control: severity -1 important Am 03.08.2017 um 16:12 teilte Matus UHLAR - fantomas mit: > Package: proftpd-basic > Version: 1.3.5b-4 > > installation of proftpd hangs immediately after starting proftpd > proces: > Raising to sev important for now, else we won't get a fix into oldstable.

Bug#870624: hanged APT during update

Am 08.11.2019 um 10:08 teilte Matus UHLAR - fantomas mit: Hi Matus, > This bug just caused unattended-upgrades for two days until I noticed it. > > Please, if possible, push fixed version to oldstable so this does not > happen > again. > I February 2018 I gave you test packages and told you to

Bug#951412: proftpd-basic: segfault when logging in through sftp

Am 16.02.2020 um 21:38 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit: > Am 16.02.2020 um 09:34 teilte Tomas Janousek mit: Hi Tomas, >> It appears bug #839880 reappeared in current Debian stable: >> > I'm unable to reproduce the issue, but it looks similar to > > https://github.com/pr

Bug#951412: proftpd-basic: segfault when logging in through sftp

Am 16.02.2020 um 09:34 teilte Tomas Janousek mit: Hi Tomas, > It appears bug #839880 reappeared in current Debian stable: > I'm unable to reproduce the issue, but it looks similar to https://github.com/proftpd/proftpd/issues/656 Please read through the issue and report back if it describe

Bug#951381: pdftex ignores tl-paper setting

Am 16.02.2020 um 19:01 teilte Ted To mit: Hi Ted, > Ah, yes, you are correct.  Doh! > > Thank you! > Can we close? Hilmar -- sigfault #206401 http://counter.li.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#950720: FTBFS: error: conflicting declaration ‘typedef long long unsigned int __u64’

Control: tags 950720 - patch + pending Am 05.02.2020 um 12:11 teilte Hilmar Preusse mit: > the package FTBFS on s390x & arm64. > > ./atoms/include/typedfs.h:73:14: note: previous declaration as ‘typedef long > int __s64’ >73 | typedef int __s64 __attribute__((mode(DI))); > |

Bug#949622: patch for 1.3.5

Am 13.02.2020 um 15:54 teilte Ghislain Adnet mit: Hi Ghislain, >  Tj was kind enough to make a patch for the 1.3.5 unsupported branch ! > = > > This is for: >   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=949622 > > See attached patch, generated against

Bug#949622: proftpd-basic: SSH authentication fails for many clients due to receiving of SSH_MSG_IGNORE packet

Am 11.02.2020 um 08:58 teilte Ghislain Adnet mit: Hi Ghislain, > the problem still exist for debian 9 and debian 8, is it possible to > backport the patch for those versions? > I'm aware of the issue. However I did not considered yet to fix the issue for oldstable (Debian 9). I had a look at

Bug#950720: FTBFS: error: conflicting declaration ‘typedef long long unsigned int __u64’

Control: reopen 950720 Control: found 950720 3.86-3 Am 05.02.2020 um 12:11 teilte Hilmar Preusse mit: > Package: wp2latex > Version: 3.86-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch upstream > Justification: 4. > > Dear Maintainer, > > the package FTBFS on s390x & arm64. > Still build issues on both

Bug#938656: texlive-extra: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

Am 31.01.2020 um 11:21 teilte Norbert Preining mit: Hi Norbert, >> could you please have a look at this bug soon? texlive-science is the > > Well, I will upload some packages at some point in the future, which > simply upgrades all py2 to py3 deps, not taking into consideration > whether the

Bug#950201: Processed: Re: Bug#950201: texlive-pictures-doc: pgfmanual.pdf has incorrect page numbers

Control: tags 950201 + pending stop Am 30.01.2020 um 06:48 teilte Debian Bug Tracking System mit: > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > >> tag 950201 + fixed-upstream > Bug #950201 [texlive-pictures-doc] texlive-pictures-doc: pgfmanual.pdf has > incorrect page numbers > Added

Bug#949622: proftpd-basic: SSH authentication fails for many clients due to receiving of SSH_MSG_IGNORE packet

Control: found -1 1.3.6-4+deb10u3 Control: found -1 1.3.5b-4+deb9u2 Am 22.01.2020 um 22:15 teilte Hilmar Preusse mit: > the issue is already known in upstream and a patch is available:> > http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4385> Hits stable and oldstable too. H. -- sigfault #206401

Bug#548825: texlive-latex-base: \pdfinfo with hyperref should not have undefined behavior

Control: tags -1 - fixed-upstream Am 29.09.2009 um 01:37 teilte Vincent Lefevre mit: Hi, the issue has been forwarded upstream and the issue been closed w/ the following comment: I think I'll close here, interaction with direct use of the primitives is largely undefined and this whole area is

Bug#548825: texlive-latex-base: \pdfinfo with hyperref should not have undefined behavior

Control: -1 tags - fixed-upstream Am 29.09.2009 um 01:37 teilte Vincent Lefevre mit: Hi, the issue has been forwarded upstream and the issue been closed w/ the following comment: I think I'll close here, interaction with direct use of the primitives is largely undefined and this whole area is

Bug#905961: unbound: FTBFS on non-linux systems

Am 12.08.2018 um 14:14 teilte Svante Signell mit: Hi Svante, > Currently unbound FTBFS on GNU/Hurd and GNU/kFreeBSD-any due to a > dependency on libsystemd-dev. As is well known that library does not > exist on non-linux systems. Attached are two patches for debian/rules > and debian/control to

Bug#946560: stretch-pu: package proftpd-dfsg/1.3.5b-4+deb9u3

Am 30.12.2019 um 22:21 teilte Adam D. Barratt mit: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > The distribution for a stretch-pu upload should simply be "stretch". > > + * Cherry pick patch from upstream: > + - for upstream 861 (CVE-2019-19269) (Closes: #946345) > +

Bug#946559: buster-pu: package proftpd-dfsg/1.3.6-4+deb10u3

Am 30.12.2019 um 22:23 teilte Adam D. Barratt mit: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > + * Cherry pick patch from upstream: > + - for upstream 861 (CVE-2019-19269) (Closes: #946345) > + - for upstream 859 (CVE-2019-19270) (Closes: #946346) > +

Bug#946560: stretch-pu: package proftpd-dfsg/1.3.5b-4+deb9u3

Am 30.12.2019 um 22:21 teilte Adam D. Barratt mit: > On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 23:51 +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote: Hi Adam, >> #946345 proftpd-dfsg: CVE-2019-19269 >> >> ...for Debian stretch. I built/installed the package an Debian >> oldstable and could login into the server and transfer file. > >

Bug#947064: texlive-fonts-extra: fourier-orns.sty broken, docs using the Fourier font no longer compile

Am 23.12.2019 um 21:36 teilte Seb mit: Hi Seb, >>> ii  texlive-fonts-extra 2018.20190227-2 all  TeX Live: >> This is a quite old version of the package. What happens if you run >> dist-upgrade? > > I'm tempted to say that running dist-upgrade has been a nightmare > sufficiently many

Bug#947064: texlive-fonts-extra: fourier-orns.sty broken, docs using the Fourier font no longer compile

Am 23.12.2019 um 14:14 teilte Seb mit: Hi Seb, > Thanks for looking into this matter and providing two solutions! > >> Search the font via filename >> >> You need to edit fourier-orns.sty (copy it to the current working >> directory) and change the above line to

Bug#947064: texlive-fonts-extra: fourier-orns.sty broken, docs using the Fourier font no longer compile

Am 21.12.2019 um 01:21 teilte Norbert Preining mit: > On Fri, 20 Dec 2019, Hilmar Preuße wrote: Hi, >> I'm able to reproduce: > > Strange, I can ..but I have that file somewhere else ... > > (/usr/local/share/texmf/tex/latex/fourier/fourier-orns.sty))) (./asb.aux) >

Bug#947064: texlive-fonts-extra: fourier-orns.sty broken, docs using the Fourier font no longer compile

Am 20.12.2019 um 12:44 teilte Norbert Preining mit: > On Fri, 20 Dec 2019, Sebastien Desreux wrote: Hi, >> An other way to make the file compile again is to open >> /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/fourier/fourier.sty >> and comment line 52 >> \RequirePackage{fourier-orns} >

Bug#946345: proftpd-dfsg: CVE-2019-19269

Am 09.12.2019 um 14:58 teilte Salvatore Bonaccorso mit: > On Sun, Dec 08, 2019 at 11:52:31PM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote: Hi, >> Please find attached the debdiff patches for buster and stretch. I did >> not test the code at all (except that build runs OK), but the change >&g

Bug#946435: texlive-latex-recommended: Missing Breaks+Replaces texlive-latex-extra 2019.20191112-1

Control: forcemerge -1 946430 Am 08.12.2019 um 23:49 teilte Stuart Prescott mit: > Package: texlive-latex-recommended > Version: 2019.20191208-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: Policy 7.6 overwriting files in other packages > > Dear Maintainer, > > Upgrading texlive packages in sid

Bug#946345: proftpd-dfsg: CVE-2019-19269

Am 07.12.2019 um 16:42 teilte Salvatore Bonaccorso mit: Hi, > The following vulnerability was published for proftpd-dfsg. > The uploads to unstable are made. Please find attached the debdiff patches for buster and stretch. I did not test the code at all (except that build runs OK), but the

Bug#946431: texlive-latex-recommended{,-doc}: missing Breaks+Replaces: texlive-latex-extra{,-doc} (<< 2019.20191208)

Control: merge -1 946429 Am 08.12.2019 um 23:28 teilte Andreas Beckmann mit: > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from > 'testing'. > It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails > because it tries to overwrite other packages files without

Bug#905961: Bug#905963: unbound: FTBFS on hurd-i386 / Bug#905961: unbound: FTBFS on non-linux systems

Am 12.08.2018 um 14:28 teilte Svante Signell mit: Hi, > Currently unbound FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to a dependency on libsystemd- > dev for non-linux systems (see #905961) and a missing function: > compat/getentropy_gnu.c, derived from getentropy_solaris.c. Attached is > hurd.diff defining that

Bug#942831: CVE-2019-18217

Control: notfound -1 1.3.5b-4+deb9u2 Control: notfound -1 1.3.6-4+deb10u2 Am 22.10.2019 um 10:07 teilte Moritz Muehlenhoff mit: > This was assigned CVE-2019-18217: > https://github.com/proftpd/proftpd/commit/13fe9462787b9a551152162f46f1641d65fe4df4 > https://github.com/proftpd/proftpd/issues/846

Bug#940186: [texlive-latex-recommended] Newfloat conflicts wrapfig and rotating

Am 13.09.2019 um 18:13 teilte Спицын Андрей mit: Hi, > --- Please enter the report below this line. --- > Newfloat conflicts with wrapfig and rotating packages. See upstream issues > https://gitlab.com/axelsommerfeldt/caption/issues/60 > https://gitlab.com/axelsommerfeldt/caption/issues/61 > >

Bug#931815: g++: asymptote fails to compile on alpha

Control: reassign -1 asymptote Am 10.07.2019 um 21:24 teilte Hilmar Preusse mit: Hi, > we observe for some versions of asymptote, that the compilation of > the package fails. The build logs tells, that we look at a bug in > gcc. Please be so kind to investigate. > > Here is the rather long

Bug#570376: texdoc barfs if BROWSER has multiple colon-separated commands

Control: tags -1 + pending Am 18.02.2010 um 13:44 teilte Julian Gilbey mit: Hi, > I try running the command "texdoc eqnarray" and I get the error > message: > sh: links:lynx: not found > > This is because my BROWSER environment variable contains "links:lynx", > as allowed in the specification

Bug#922307: proftpd-basic aborting transfer

On 2/14/19 1:55 PM, da...@daveserver.info wrote: Hi, I've uploaded 1.3.6a to unstable. It contains a fix: - Bug 4319 - FTP uploads frequently break due to "Interrupted system call" error. Does the new version solve your issue? Hilmar > Some users (generally a distance away from the server)

Bug#941837: texlive-fonts-extra: file conflice with (older) texlive-fonts-extra-links

On 10/6/19 10:04 AM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Hi Norbert, > when upgrading in Debian testing I saw the following error message: > > +--- > | Unpacking texlive-fonts-extra (2019.20190930-2) over (2019.20190830-1) ... > | dpkg: error processing archive >

Bug#941823: tabu: cell background colours broken

On 10/6/19 2:52 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Hi, > Cell background colours are broken in tabu. When I change > the MWE to use the tabular environment… > > \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} > > … things look as expected. Building on stretch (don’t have > texlive in buster handy) is also expected. > >

Bug#941463: 3dldf: build-depend on texlive-plain-generic, not obsolete texlive-generic-recommended

Am 01.10.2019 um 15:20 teilte Norbert Preining mit: > On Tue, 01 Oct 2019, Jerome BENOIT wrote: Hi, >> Me too. It seems no more maintained upstream while C++ is >> constantly evolving. > > Do you (Hilmar) have any strong interest in keeping this package? > We can wait for upstream's comments,

Bug#941463: 3dldf: build-depend on texlive-plain-generic, not obsolete texlive-generic-recommended

Am 01.10.2019 um 12:41 teilte Norbert Preining mit: Hi, > That needs serious work. I am not sure Jerome is willing to put that > into it. > > I am more and more tempted to request removal of this package. > I had contact w/ LDF in the past, he promised to do some work, but as one can see, this

Bug#941463: 3dldf: build-depend on texlive-plain-generic, not obsolete texlive-generic-recommended

Control: tags 941463 + pending Am 01.10.2019 um 07:27 teilte Steve Langasek mit: > The texlive-generic-recommended transitional package has been dropped from > texlive-base in sid. Please update your build-dependency (and Recommends) > to texlive-plain-generic instead. > Fixed on salsa, tag

Bug#940700: dvisvgm: Please link with libgs (not ghostscript)

Control: tags 940700 + pending Am 19.09.2019 um 09:41 teilte Jonas Smedegaard mit: > Please instead build-depend on libgs-dev to properly link with libgs9. > Patch is on github, tagging. H. -- sigfault #206401 http://counter.li.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#940700: dvisvgm: Please link with libgs (not ghostscript)

Am 20.09.2019 um 11:34 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit: Hi, > OK, I've replaced the BD on ghostscript by libgs-dev. Now I get an > lintian error: > > E: dvisvgm: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl > > Is that a false positive and I should override? > No need to worr

Bug#940700: dvisvgm: Please link with libgs (not ghostscript)

Am 19.09.2019 um 18:56 teilte Jonas Smedegaard mit: > [ sent again - Debian mail servers dislike UTF-8 mail headers from me ] > > [ ...and added an additional note at bottom! ] > > Quoting Hilmar Preuße (2019-09-19 11:14:03) Hi Jonas, >> Am 19.09.2019 um 09:41 teilte

Bug#940700: dvisvgm: Please link with libgs (not ghostscript)

Am 19.09.2019 um 09:41 teilte Jonas Smedegaard mit: Hi, > dvisvgm optionally supports conversion from EPS or PDF (instead of DVI), > by linking with libgs9 or as fallback try load libgs9 with dlopen. > > Current Debian package build-depends on ghostscript which seems is not > enough to proper

Bug#940209: info desktop file is missing the additional category 'ConsoleOnly'

Control: tags 940209 + pending Am 17.09.2019 um 03:09 teilte Norbert Preining mit: > Hi Jörg, > >> Categories=Utility;Documentation;ConsoleOnly; > > Thanks, added to the git repo, will be in the next upload. > > Norbert > Tag pending. H. -- sigfault #206401 http://counter.li.org

Bug#940274: python3-sagetex: update fails due to file conflicts (missing replace)

Am 16.09.2019 um 06:00 teilte Jerome BENOIT mit: Hi, > Hello Nordert, thanks for the report. I will fix it next week-end. > Cheers, Jerome. > I've added a Replaces: python-sagetex Conflicts: python-sagetex at salsa yesterday. Hope this was correct. Hilmar -- sigfault #206401

Bug#940209: info desktop file is missing the additional category 'ConsoleOnly'

Hi Jörg, > The desktop file for Linux (/usr/share/applications/info.desktop) is missing the additional category 'ConsoleOnly' which is a sub-category of 'Utility'. Please see the documentation about desktop files here: > > > This

Bug#940268: dvisvgm: FTBFS on 32bit arches

Control: forwarded 940268 https://github.com/mgieseki/dvisvgm/issues/117 On 14.09.19 22:52, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > Dear Maintainer, > >* What led up to the situation? > > Upload of new package, try to build on 32 bit architectures. The test > suite fails on all 32 bit arc

Bug#940268: dvisvgm: FTBFS on 32bit arches

Package: dvisvgm Version: 2.7.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: upstream ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? Upload of new package, try to build on 32 bit architectures. The test suite fails on all 32 bit architectures, see [1]. FAIL:

Bug#940197: 3dldf-doc: build-depends on cruft packages texlive-generic-recommended texlive-plain-extra

Control: tags 940197 + pending Am 13.09.2019 um 21:44 teilte Andreas Beckmann mit: > Source: 3dldf-doc > Version: 2.0.3+ndfsg-3 > Severity: serious > > 3dldf-doc cannot be built in bullseye any longer since the transitional > texlive packages have been removed. > Fix is on salsa, tag pending.

Bug#940186: [texlive-latex-recommended] Newfloat conflicts wrapfig and rotating

On 13.09.19 18:13, Спицын Андрей wrote: Hello Andrey, > --- Please enter the report below this line. --- > Newfloat conflicts with wrapfig and rotating packages. See upstream issues > https://gitlab.com/axelsommerfeldt/caption/issues/60 > https://gitlab.com/axelsommerfeldt/caption/issues/61 > >

Bug#938429: sagetex: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

Control: block 938429 by 938426 On 30.08.19 09:51, Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: src:sagetex > Version: 3.2+ds-2 > Severity: normal > Tags: sid bullseye > User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: py2removal > > Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove > Python2

Bug#537284: Ligature fi becoming ø in avant garde

On 16.07.09 19:27, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: Hi Anthony, > The following input: > > \documentclass{article} > \usepackage{avant} > \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} > \begin{document} > > first > > \textsf{first} > > \end{document} > > with the following

Bug#881177: closed by Hilmar Preuße (Re: Bug#881177: xdvi does not draw all the symbols properly)

On 02.09.19 20:14, Леон Майер wrote: Hi Леон, > @Hilmar: You are welcome. Do you know what happened on the technical > level when the defect appeared? And when it disappeared? > No, sorry I don't know. And to be honest: I don't really care. The most important information for me is that it is

Bug#939088: Unable to accept TLS connection: system call error: [104]

On 01.09.19 09:58, Frédéric Mathy wrote: > Since update Debian 9 to 10, I can't connect via FTP TLS/SSL > > TLS/TLS-C requested, starting TLS handshake > unable to accept TLS connection: system call error: [104] Connexion > ré-initialisée par le correspondant > Unfortunately I don't speak

Bug#532815: latex-beamer: Please include the "beamerthemeprogressbar"

On 12.06.09 00:20, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: Hi Alexander, > There's a nice theme for Latex beamer. Main advantage of that theme is, that > it has a progress bar showing how far your progressed in your talk. > > It's available from >

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

On 16.08.19 20:11, Hector Oron wrote: Hi Hector, > JFYI, a give back (package rebuild from failed state) has been triggered > per IRC request: > > Day changed to 16 Aug 2019 > 12:08 < gnu_srs1> (11:51:02 PM) srs: Can somebody gb texlive-bin > 2019.20190605.51237-2 on >

Bug#931815: g++: asymptote fails to compile on alpha

Control: reassign 931815 g++-9 Control: found 931815 9.2.1-1 Am 06.08.2019 um 20:56 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit: > Same issue w/ g++-9. > Reassign, as this is now default compiler H. -- sigfault #206401 http://counter.li.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#934571: texlive-binaries: gsftopk fails

Control: reassign 934571 ghostscript Control: found 934571 9.27~dfsg-2 Control: notfound 934571 9.27~dfsg-3 Control: found 934571 9.27~dfsg-2+deb10u1 Am 16.08.2019 um 02:52 teilte Igor Liferenko mit: > Using 9.27~dfsg-3 there are no problems. > Reassign for now. Please discuss w/ ghostscript

Bug#934571: texlive-binaries: gsftopk fails

Am 13.08.2019 um 08:01 teilte Igor Liferenko mit: Hi Igor, >> I'm wondering what gs version you have. your system information shows >> you run unstable, hence I'd expect 9.27~dfsg-3. What does "dpkg -l >> ghostscript" show? > > 9.27~dfsg-2 > Does upgrading to -3.1 solve the issue? It should

Bug#931873: [tlbuild] Core dump with image inclusion inside LuaTeX on Sparc Solaris

Am 15.08.2019 um 02:02 teilte John Paul Adrian Glaubitz mit: Hi Adrian, > @Hilmar: > > If you patch texk/web2c/luatexdir/luapplib/{ppconf.h,ppheap.c,util/utilarm.h} > to > replace "( defined(__sun) && defined(__SVR4))" with "defined __sparc", the > problem > should be fixed on Debian sparc64.

Bug#931873: texlive-bin: FTBFS on sparc64

Am 14.08.2019 um 12:44 teilte John Paul Adrian Glaubitz mit: > On 7/29/19 11:49 PM, Hilmar Preuße wrote: Hi, >> My account was approved today. Logging in into that fine server however >> does not work: shortly after I reached the command prompt the connection >> termi

Bug#598351: texlive-latex-base: Error when using lmodern fonts together with T1 fontenc

Am 13.08.2019 um 18:07 teilte Norbert Preining mit: > On Tue, 13 Aug 2019, Hilmar Preuße wrote: Hi Norbert, >> information that the problem can be avoided as described above. Still >> I'm not sure if it is a bug in fontenc package. > > I guess it is a problem with the defau

Bug#598351: texlive-latex-base: Error when using lmodern fonts together with T1 fontenc

Am 13.08.2019 um 16:45 teilte Eugen Dedu mit: > On 05/08/2019 17:18, Hilmar Preuße wrote: >> Am 04.08.2019 um 21:39 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit: >>> Am 28.09.2010 um 14:30 teilte Eugen Dedu mit: Hi Eugen, >>> Does this address work? >>> >>>> I have an

Bug#934571: texlive-binaries: gsftopk fails

Am 13.08.2019 um 08:01 teilte Igor Liferenko mit: Hi, >> I'm wondering what gs version you have. your system information shows >> you run unstable, hence I'd expect 9.27~dfsg-3. What does "dpkg -l >> ghostscript" show? > > 9.27~dfsg-2 > Does upgrading to -3 solves the issue? >> Well, at least

Bug#934571: texlive-binaries: gsftopk fails

Am 13.08.2019 um 03:25 teilte Igor Liferenko mit: Hi, > 1. $ md5sum /usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/lm/lmr10.pfb > f35b44530a1d90eb90fe15d9cba67ea0 > /usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/lm/lmr10.pfb > Same here. > Recent versions of gs removed a lot of gs extensions to get closer > to

Bug#934633: xindy: Can't be installed: missing Depends

Am 12.08.2019 um 23:39 teilte Norbert Preining mit: Hi, > Be aware that you cannot upload the same package, because dak will > answer that it has already seen this signature. You need to re-sign > it. > OK, you were right. New upload triggered. Hilmar -- sigfault #206401

Bug#934633: xindy: Can't be installed: missing Depends

Am 12.08.2019 um 21:59 teilte Norbert Preining mit: > On Mon, 12 Aug 2019, Hilmar Preuße wrote: Hi Norbert, >> I just noticed that a simply rebuild fixes the issue. I'd do an upload >> and fix the watch file at the same time: > > Thanks, yes, the rebuild is necessary. &g

Bug#934633: xindy: Can't be installed: missing Depends

Am 12.08.2019 um 19:09 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit: Hi Norbert, > Dear Maintainer, > >* What led up to the situation? > > I made a dist-upgrade, which installed a new clisp package. > The old one provided > I just noticed that a simply rebuild fixes the issue. I'd

Bug#934633: xindy: Can't be installed: missing Depends

Source: xindy Version: 2.5.1.20160104-7 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? I made a dist-upgrade, which installed a new clisp package. The old one provided Provides:

Bug#934571: texlive-binaries: gsftopk fails

Am 12.08.2019 um 10:46 teilte Igor Liferenko mit: Hi, > gsftopk(k) 1.19.2 > kpathsea version 6.3.1 > Copyright (C) 1993-1998 Paul Vojta. > Just another 2 questiona: 1. is the file "/usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/lm/lmr10.pfb" present? If yes send me the sha512sum. 2. Could you re-install

Bug#934571: texlive-binaries: gsftopk fails

Am 12.08.2019 um 10:04 teilte Igor Liferenko mit: Hi, > $ gsftopk rm-lmr10 600 > gsftopk(k) version 1.19.2gs: Error: /undefined in shellarguments > gs: Operand stack: > gs: > gs: Execution stack: > Works for me and seems to be rather a problem in ghostscript. Could you post: 1. gsftopk

Bug#670040: pax do not work at all

On 23.04.12 Heiko Oberdiek (heiko.oberd...@googlemail.com) wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 08:05:32AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: Dear Heiko, Reminder for an old issue. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670040 > > we got a bug report in Debian that pax does not work, and

Bug#189616: jadetex: Japanese JadeTeX

Control: tags 189616 - patch Am 19.04.2003 um 01:47 teilte OHURA Makoto mit: Dear OHURA, > The following patch is for Japanese JadeTeX. > > pTeX is a variant of plain TeX, which can handle Japanese. If > you use pTeX instead of Knuth's TeX when making fmt file and > typesetting jadetex

Bug#881177: xdvi does not draw all the symbols properly

Am 09.08.2019 um 23:46 teilte Леон Майер mit: добрый день, > After Debian stable switched to Wayland by default and texlive > evolved from 2016 to 2018.20181218.49446-1, I cannot reproduce this > bug any more with xdvi. Evince also shows all the symbols. If you are > still interested and tell me

Bug#934351: virtualbox-dkms: Fails to build modules

Am 10.08.2019 um 10:42 teilte Gianfranco Costamagna mit: > On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 09:06:32 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?Hilmar_Preu=c3=9fe?= > wrote: Hi Gianfranco, >> Dear Maintainer, >> >> I'm filing that bug as grave as currently the package is in state iF. >> >>* What led up to the situation? >> >> I

Bug#934351: virtualbox-dkms: Fails to build modules

Package: virtualbox-guest-dkms Version: 6.0.10-dfsg-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, I'm filing that bug as grave as currently the package is in state iF. * What led up to the situation? I tried to install the package, compilation of vboxvideo

Bug#550381: tex4ht: Creates invalid html document

Control: forwarded 550381 https://puszcza.gnu.org.ua/bugs/?435 Am 09.10.2009 um 20:14 teilte Andrey mit: > htlatex produces invalid html document if the source contains > \AtBeginDocument directive. Minimal example and result html file > attached. > Forwarded to upstream for now. H. --

Bug#774262: jadetex: Makes loads of duplicate access() calls

Control: retitle 774262 latex: Makes loads of duplicate access() calls Control: reassign 774262 texlive-binaries Am 30.03.2016 um 16:34 teilte Preuße, Hilmar mit: Hi, >> While building the installation-guide package, I noticed that jadetex >> was taking a lot of system time. strace shows me

Bug#917996: texlive-pstricks: gs gives undefined in --execute-- when using color.tex with pstricks on plain tex.

Am 02.01.2019 um 05:24 teilte P V Mathew mit: > Inclusion of color.tex and calling \pscircle. plain tex compiled ok > with > >tex test.tex > and created test.dvi > But running xdvi on generated test.dvi file results in gs error. > If we remove the \input color line, every thing works ok. >

Bug#917996: texlive-pstricks: gs gives undefined in --execute-- when using color.tex with pstricks on plain tex.

Am 02.01.2019 um 05:24 teilte P V Mathew mit: Hi, > Inclusion of color.tex and calling \pscircle. plain tex compiled ok > with > >tex test.tex > and created test.dvi > But running xdvi on generated test.dvi file results in gs error. > If we remove the \input color line, every thing works ok.

Bug#683163: xmlto fail to convert example docbook to PDF (LaTeX Error, missing \item?)

Control: severity 683163 important Control: merge 683163 170477 Am 29.07.2012 um 13:01 teilte Petter Reinholdtsen mit: Hi, > I ran into a problem with the PDF suport in xmlto. I see the problem > with a larger file (the freeculture.xml file available from >

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

Control: block 926701 by 932968 Control: tags 926701 + pending Am 30.07.2019 um 08:20 teilte Norbert Preining mit: > On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, Hilmar Preuße wrote: >> rejected) you have to tag commit > > Thanks for the warning, but I have already tagged, but not pushed ;-) > Bu

Bug#934252: libgl1-mesa-dri: SegFPE in ../src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_tgsi_info.c

Package: libgl1-mesa-dri Version: 19.1.4-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/asymptote/+bug/1470662 I try to process a sample file using asymptote. The binary crashes, generating a core dump. A backtrace (attached) shows that the crash happens in the

Bug#511855: man page translated for latex.1

Control: tags 511855 + wontfix Am 14.01.2009 um 23:43 teilte Oliver Grimm mit: Hi, > I just translated the manual page for "latex" to German. > Please add it to the "texlive-base" package. > I tend to decline the request. People using (La)TeX have to able to speak English anyway, so I don't

Bug#873816: texlive-base: Fonts handling broken in dvips?

Am 31.08.2017 um 14:34 teilte Marc SCHAEFER mit: Hi Marc, > was working correctly with Debian wheezy LTS, for DVI, PS (via dvips) > and PDF (via pdflatex): > >latex demo.tex && dvips demo.dvi -o demo.ps && pdflatex demo.tex >xdvi demo.dvi; gv demo.ps; gv demo.pdf > > With jessie and

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >