Bug#896816: ITP: lowdown -- Simple markdown translator

On Fri, Jan 8, 2021, at 4:44 PM, Faidon Liambotis wrote: > owner 896816 ! > thanks > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:24:06AM -0400, Jon Bernard wrote: > > * Package name: lowdown > > It seems this ITP has been pending for 2½ years, and looks abandoned. > > I was

Bug#896816: lowdown ITP: how does it go?

* Adam Borowski wrote: > > [snip] > > So, I'm hereby dropping you an email. You filed the ITP in April, how > far did you get? > > Recently, lowdown got a new dependency: libdiff, but as that's a > library whose (trivial) build system is static-only, has the same > upstream as lowdown, and is

Bug#896816: ITP: lowdown -- Simple markdown translator

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jon Bernard <jbern...@debian.org> * Package name: lowdown Version : 0.3.2 Upstream Author : Kristaps Dzonsons <krist...@bsd.lv> * URL : https://kristaps.bsd.lv/lowdown/ * License : ISC Programming Lang: C

Bug#821795: lttng-modules-dkms: module FTBFS in jessie against Linux 3.16: error: conflicting types for 'trace_mm_page_alloc_extfrag'

* Michael Jeanson wrote: > Hi Jon, > > Here is an updated debdiff, it works on a fully updated jessie. Should > we track these updates in a branch of the collab-maint repo? Excellent, thanks. This patch works and I've put it into a dedicated stable branch 'jessie' so this

Bug#821795: lttng-modules-dkms: module FTBFS in jessie against Linux 3.16: error: conflicting types for 'trace_mm_page_alloc_extfrag'

* Michael Jeanson wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a debdiff against the current package fixing the build > failure, I'll ask Jon to make a new upload. Hey Michael, I just attempted a build with your diff and I'm seeing the attached errors. It looks like the debian-specific

Bug#826755: [PATCH] Add Lua 5.3 support

* Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <asbj...@asbjorn.st> wrote: > Hi Jon, > > On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 14:11:42 -0400, Jon Bernard <jbern...@debian.org> wrote: > > Can you try building this? > > Builds fine with dh-lua 23, based on the changelog I guess 21+ should do. > h

Bug#826755: [PATCH] Add Lua 5.3 support

* Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen wrote: > --- > debian/lua5.3.dh-lua.conf | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > create mode 12 debian/lua5.3.dh-lua.conf > > diff --git a/debian/lua5.3.dh-lua.conf b/debian/lua5.3.dh-lua.conf > new file mode 12 > index 000..ba875b6 >

Bug#821795: lttng-modules-dkms: module FTBFS in jessie against Linux 3.16: error: conflicting types for 'trace_mm_page_alloc_extfrag'

* Michael Jeanson wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a debdiff against the current package fixing the build > failure, I'll ask Jon to make a new upload. Thanks Michael, I'm traveling this week and next, I'll try to get to this as soon as I can but it may be a week or two before I

Bug#801601: libgrss: Please update to 0.7.0

* Hideki Yamane wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not maintainer but prepared it to git. > git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/libgrss.git > Could you check it, please? > > Jon, if you don't have any objection, I'll upload it to experimental > (since it changes library name to

Bug#783259: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: Indicating ABI changes from upstream

Package: src:linux Version: 3.16.7-ckt9-2 Severity: normal In looking into the cause of a recent build failure in the lttng-modules-dkms package, I noticed that an incompatible ABI change was made at some point. The kmem.h header differs from the upstream 3.16.7 version. Specifically, the

Bug#771935: unblock: ltt-control/2.5.2-1

/changelog 2014-12-03 01:33:21.0 + @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +ltt-control (2.5.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * [8304e3f] New upstream version 2.5.2 + + -- Jon Bernard jbern...@debian.org Wed, 03 Dec 2014 01:32:33 + + ltt-control (2.5.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium * [8385f65] New

Bug#767632: ust: FTBFS on most architectures

* Ivo De Decker iv...@debian.org wrote: package: ust severity: serious version: 2.5.1-1 Hi, The latest upload of ust fails on most architectures, but built fine in the past. This prevents migration to testing. https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ust Thanks, this is my

Bug#749478: please enable support for python3 bindings

* Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote: This is pretty awesome, thanks for making a patch for this. I will try it on my next babeltrace iteration. not included in 1.2.3 :-/ Working on it now, at the moment I'm seeing these lintian errors: E: python3-babeltrace:

Bug#753832: Fwd: Re: udt_4.11+dfsg-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

- Forwarded message from Jon Bernard - Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 11:42:49 -0400 From: Jon Bernard To: Debian FTP Masters ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org Subject: Re: udt_4.11+dfsg-2_amd64.changes REJECTED * Debian FTP Masters ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org wrote: udt_4.11

Bug#751336: babeltrace: FTBFS on armel (test failure)

* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior sebast...@breakpoint.cc wrote: tags 751336 + patch upstream fixed-upstream thanks. On 2014-06-11 22:29:48 [+0200], Julien Cristau wrote: See the build log at https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=babeltracearch=armelver=1.2.1-2stamp=1395846913

Bug#751337: [PATCH] tests: test_ctf_writer: replace HOST_NAME_MAX

* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior sebast...@breakpoint.cc wrote: This patch replaces HOST_NAME_MAX by xgethostname() which is a wrapper around malloc() + gethostname() to get a large enough buffer to fit the hostname. xgethostname.c was stolen from coreutils and slightly changed so it works without

Bug#754403: liburcu: tests enabled in liburcu test almost nothing

* Steve Langasek steve.langa...@canonical.com wrote: Package: liburcu Version: 0.8.4-6 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu utopic ubuntu-patch Hi Jon, I see that with the new upstream version of liburcu, you've re-enabled the

Bug#749926: liburcu: add ppc64el support

* Breno Leitao bren...@br.ibm.com wrote: Package: liburcu Version: 0.8.4-2.1 Severity: normal Tags: patch User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ppc64el Dear Maintainer, liburcu is not able to be built on a ppc64el machine because the architecture is not part of the

Bug#749478: please enable support for python3 bindings

* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior sebast...@breakpoint.cc wrote: Package: src:babeltrace Version: 1.2.1-2 Tags: patch Severity: wishlist Please enable python3 bindings in the babeltrace package. Patch attached. This is pretty awesome, thanks for making a patch for this. I will try it on my

Bug#747083: ITP: xcape -- use a modifier key as another key

* KAction kact...@gnu.org wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: KAction kact...@gnu.org * Package name: xcape Version : 1.1 Upstream Author : Albin Olsson albin.ols...@gmail.com * URL : https://github.com/alols/xcape * License : GPL

Bug#745891: ltt-control: FTBFS on armel (selected processor does not support ARM mode `dmb')

* Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: Source: ltt-control Version: 2.4.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Hi, your package no longer builds on the armel buildds:

Bug#741687: ust: FTBFS: error: no suitable Python interpreter found

* Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote: Source: ust Version: 2.4.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source ust FTBFS on some architectures: | dh build-arch |dh_testdir -a |debian/rules override_dh_auto_configure | make[1]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»'

Bug#734305: lttng-modules-dkms: building lttng-modules fails

* Tomasz Buchert tomasz.buch...@inria.fr wrote: Hi, same here, but if you install the version from experimental (2.4.0-rc3-1) it does compile and seems to work. My guess is, that the maintainer will release 2.4.0 into unstable when it's no longer RC. Yes, this is correct. If for some

Bug#739005: ITP: xcape -- Configure modifier keys to act as other keys when pressed and released

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jon Bernard jbern...@debian.org * Package name: xcape Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Albin Olsson albin.ols...@gmail.com * URL : https://github.com/alols/xcape * License : GPLv3 Programming Lang: C Description

Bug#731696: RM: ltt-control [sparc ia64] -- RoM; ANAIS due to upstream changes

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Dear ftp team, One of ltt-control's dependencies (ust) saw an architecture restriction recently and ltt-control should be removed from sparc and ia64. I believe this removal will allow migration to testing. The specific packages are: liblttctl-dev

Bug#726999: lttng-modules-2.3.2: 2.3.2 version does not compile properly

* Matthieu CASTET matthieu.cas...@parrot.com wrote: Package: lttng-modules-dkms Version: 2.3.2-1 Severity: normal File: lttng-modules-2.3.2 Hi, building lttng-modules-dkms fails with this log : DKMS make.log for lttng-modules-2.3.2 for kernel 3.10-3-amd64 (x86_64) lundi 21 octobre

Bug#728256: liblttng-ust2: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/man/man3/lttng-ust.3.gz

* Ralf Treinen trei...@free.fr wrote: Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblttng-ust-fork.so.0

Bug#726999: lttng-modules-2.3.2: 2.3.2 version does not compile properly

* Matthieu CASTET matthieu.cas...@parrot.com wrote: Package: lttng-modules-dkms Version: 2.3.2-1 Severity: normal File: lttng-modules-2.3.2 Hi, building lttng-modules-dkms fails with this log : DKMS make.log for lttng-modules-2.3.2 for kernel 3.10-3-amd64 (x86_64) lundi 21 octobre

Bug#726999: lttng-modules-2.3.2: 2.3.2 version does not compile properly

* Matthieu CASTET matthieu.cas...@parrot.com wrote: Package: lttng-modules-dkms Version: 2.3.2-1 Severity: normal File: lttng-modules-2.3.2 Hi, building lttng-modules-dkms fails with this log : DKMS make.log for lttng-modules-2.3.2 for kernel 3.10-3-amd64 (x86_64) lundi 21 octobre

Bug#709496: lttng-tools: needs tightened dependency on liblttng-ust0 (= 2.1.1-2)

* Florian Schlichting f...@debian.org wrote: Package: lttng-tools Version: 2.1.1-2 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, installing lttng-tools on a mixed testing/unstable system fails, as lttng-sessiond fails to start: ... Setting up lttng-tools (2.1.1-2) ... /usr/sbin/addgroup

Bug#723850: 2.3.0 version does not compile properly

* Vincent Bernat ber...@debian.org wrote: Package: lttng-modules-dkms Version: 2.3.0-1 Followup-For: Bug #723850 Hi! I have added this at the end of the dkms file to solve this issue: if [ $KCONFIG = true ] [ -n $CONFIG_KPROBES ]; then BUILT_MODULE_NAME[$i]=lttng-kretprobes

Bug#714385: lttng-tools should only recommand or suggest lttng-module-dkms, not depend on it

* Yannick Brosseau yannick.bross...@gmail.com wrote: Package: lttng-tools Version: lttng-tools Severity: normal We can use lttng-tools without the kernel tracer (lttng-modules), so we should not depend on it. I was about to change it to Suggests, but thought I would ask your opinion.

Bug#721757: O: libcgroup -- library and tools to control and monitor linux control groups

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I have been trying to find time to adequately maintain this package for far too long and I have come to accept that I will likely never have this time without letting my other packages suffer. Please accept my apology, I know the package could be in much better

Bug#718409: Enable tests

* Yannick Brosseau yannick.bross...@polymtl.ca wrote: On 2013-07-31 17:40, Jon Bernard wrote: * Yannick Brosseau yannick.bross...@polymtl.ca wrote: Yes, you are right on this. If they were closer to unit tests then it would make sense. My guess is this may be on the TODO list for some

Bug#718409: Enable tests

from running, target is broken -- Jon Bernard jbern...@debian.org Thu, 20 May 2010 22:21:00 -0400 They seem to run fine now - can they be re-enabled? If that's the case then absolutely yes. -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Bug#718409: Enable tests

* Yannick Brosseau yannick.bross...@polymtl.ca wrote: On 2013-07-31 08:40, Jon Bernard wrote: * Robert Ancell robert.anc...@canonical.com wrote: Package: liburcu Version: 0.7.6-2 Tests were disabled in 0.0.4-1: liburcu (0.4.4-1) unstable; urgency=low * [8f2038] Add Vcs fields

Bug#709157: python2.7-minimal: fails to configure: ENOENT /usr/lib/python2.7/sitecustomize.py

I reproduced this with the following: 1. Uninstall python2.7-minimal 2. If /etc/python2.7/sitecustomize.py is still there, remove it. It belongs to the python2.7-minimal package so I assume reinstallation will sort it. 3. Install python2.7-minimal -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#687460: liblttng-ust-dev: arch-dependent file in Multi-Arch: same package

* Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote: * Jon Bernard jbern...@debian.org, 2012-09-14, 08:42: liblttng-ust-dev is marked as Multi-Arch: same, but the following file is architecture-dependent: /usr/include/lttng/ust-config.h An example diff between i386 and armel is attached. Thanks

Bug#687460: liblttng-ust-dev: arch-dependent file in Multi-Arch: same package

* Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote: Jon, the point about an M-A:same library is that I should be able to install the i386 and armhf (for example) versions at the same time. For that to work, any file which is different between liblttng-ust-dev:i386 and liblttng-ust-dev:armhf must be moved

Bug#663055: (no subject)

* j...@jbdenis.net j...@jbdenis.net wrote: Any advance on this subject ? Since the initscripts are no longer installed by default, I supposed you could consider it fixed. I'm working through my backlog slowly, one of the items on my list is to re-introduce an initscript that will at least mount

Bug#646778: reconsideration

Ok, why not. I've got a new upstream release to do anyway, I'll give this patch a try as well. -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#688779: (no subject)

notfound 688779 liburcu/0.7.4-1 found 688779 ltt-control/2.1.0~rc4-1 thanks -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#707582: Request to remove not-for-us status for liburcu

This packages builds successfully on mipsel and I would like to have the 'not-for-us' status [1] reconsidered. A bug was filed [2] by Aron who confirms the successful build. Is this the correct point of contact for these sorts of issues? [1]:

Bug#707582: Request to remove not-for-us status for liburcu

* Andreas Barth a...@ayous.org wrote: * Jon Bernard (jbern...@debian.org) [130511 23:58]: This packages builds successfully on mipsel and I would like to have the 'not-for-us' status [1] reconsidered. A bug was filed [2] by Aron who confirms the successful build. Is this the correct

Bug#688779: liburcu1: shlibs too weak

* Faidon Liambotis parav...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:04:59PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: Package: liburcu1 Version: 0.7.4-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 8.6 This is a bug report against liburcu/0.7.4-1 but you seem to have closed it in an ltt-control

Bug#707582: not build on mipsel?

* Aron Xu happyaron...@gmail.com wrote: Package: src:liburcu Hi, It appears that liburcu isn't being tried to build on mipsel after 0.4.6-2, which lead to packages depending on it gets an out-of-date status because of unsatisfiable build dependencies on the arch (e.g. sheepdog). Is there

Bug#705827: babeltrace: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

* Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz wrote: Package: babeltrace Version: 1.1.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd Hi, the current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD. The value ENODATA is linux specific, please use some

Bug#705037: FTBFS on sparc

* Faidon Liambotis parav...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 03:47:19PM -0400, Jon Bernard wrote: I suspect the buildd (schroeder in this case) has a 32bit userland and thus has a HOSTTYPE of sparc instead of sparc64. I should be a one-line patch, but the only available

Bug#705037: FTBFS on sparc

* Faidon Liambotis parav...@debian.org wrote: Package: liburcu Version: 0.7.6-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package seems to be marked Architecture: any but seems to FTBFS on multiple architectures, some of them even release architectures. mipsel has already been marked as Not-For-Us.

Bug#701779: Clarification

* Glenn McGrath glenn.l.mcgr...@gmail.com wrote: The previous fix was fro the debian files in ust-2.1.1 source package, then you can rebuild ltt-control (unchanged) and all the debs install. Yep, you're right. UST's install file is incorrect. I'm not sure how this one slipped by me, I test the

Bug#695231: ITA: libcgroup -- Library to control and monitor control

* Tomasz Buchert tomasz.buch...@inria.fr wrote: retitle 695231 ITA: libcgroup -- Library to control and monitor control groups owner 695231 ! Hi Jon, I'm intending to take libcgroup over. Recently I have a lot of work, so I will be able to work on this only around Xmas. Will you sponsor

Bug#695231: RFA: libcgroup -- Library to control and monitor control groups

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I would really like to have the necessary time to work on this package, but unfortunately I can't do everything. If you're interested in adopting this package, please do so. I'm also happy to co-work on the package or accept contributions in any form. Mostly, I

Bug#694566: O: libfam-ruby -- Ruby Extension for the FAM C library

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I no longer use this package, nor do I have the required time to maintain it properly. Therefore I orphan this package now. -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#694567: O: libimlib2-ruby -- Ruby Extension for the Imlib2 C library

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I no longer use this package, nor do I have the required time to maintain it properly. Therefore I orphan this package now. -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#688779: liburcu1: shlibs too weak

* Jon Bernard jbern...@debian.org wrote: * Aaron M. Ucko u...@debian.org wrote: Jon Bernard jbern...@debian.org writes: Is there an easier way of doing this without searching through the source to find all liburcu calls and then pinning them to a specific version in the symbols

Bug#688779: liburcu1: shlibs too weak

* Aaron M. Ucko a...@alum.mit.edu wrote: 3 would have been in lieu of 2, which is in retrospect a better choice in this case, and will give you the opportunity to tighten liblttng-ctl0's own shlibs while you're at it. Please take care to have ltt-control build-depend on a version of

Bug#688779: liburcu1: shlibs too weak

* Aaron M. Ucko u...@debian.org wrote: Jon Bernard jbern...@debian.org writes: Is there an easier way of doing this without searching through the source to find all liburcu calls and then pinning them to a specific version in the symbols file? - or is that how it's done? You can run

Bug#688779: liburcu1: shlibs too weak

* Aaron M. Ucko u...@debian.org wrote: Package: liburcu1 Version: 0.7.4-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 8.6 lttng-tools's postinst fails on my system, which still has liburcu1 0.6.7-2 (from testing), demonstrating that liblttng-ctl0 needs a versioned dependency on liburcu1. I

Bug#688730: lttng-tools: lttng-sessiond init script not working

* Michael Lundkvist brels.deb...@solske.net wrote: Package: lttng-tools Version: 2.1.0~rc3-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, I just tried installing lttng-tools, but the installation hangs when trying to start lttng-sessiond. It seems like the

Bug#687460: liblttng-ust-dev: arch-dependent file in Multi-Arch: same package

* Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote: Package: liblttng-ust-dev Version: 2.1.0~rc1-1 Severity: important User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: multiarch liblttng-ust-dev is marked as Multi-Arch: same, but the following file is architecture-dependent:

Bug#681633: cgroup-bin: obsolete init scripts not removed

* Christoph Anton Mitterer cales...@scientia.net wrote: On Sat, 2012-07-14 at 17:55 -0400, Jon Bernard wrote: Can you make sure the package is purged, with one of: $ dpkg purge cgroup-bin or $ apt-get remove --purge cgroup-bin It's certainly possible that I made

Bug#681633: cgroup-bin: obsolete init scripts not removed

* Christoph Anton Mitterer cales...@scientia.net wrote: On Sun, 2012-07-15 at 09:36 -0400, Jon Bernard wrote: I suppose in many cases the executables are gone, rendering the initscripts broken. But in this case they happily continue to function. Yeah,... I noted

Bug#609004: cgroup-bin: the kernel configuration file haven't changed yet

* Alexander V. Kudrevatykh kudrevat...@gmail.com wrote: Any news? Bug is still present in testing/sid. I've not heard anything. I think the right thing to do is file a bug against the kernel, or perhaps reassign this bug to the linux-image package. I'll look into that this week, if you don't get

Bug#681633: cgroup-bin: obsolete init scripts not removed

* Christoph Anton Mitterer cales...@scientia.net wrote: Package: cgroup-bin Version: 0.38-1 Severity: normal Hi. The initscripts cgred and cgconfig seem to be no longer part of the package. However, they are still there and were not correctly removed on upgrade. Can you make sure the

Bug#680788: ITP: lttng-modules-dkms -- Kernel modules for LTTng (DKMS)

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jon Bernard jbern...@debian.org * Package name: lttng-modules-dkms Version : 2.0.2 Upstream Author : Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com * URL : http://lttng.org/ * License : LGPL Programming Lang: C

Bug#680789: ITP: babeltrace -- Trace conversion program

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jon Bernard jbern...@debian.org * Package name: babeltrace Version : 1.0.0 Upstream Author : Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com * URL : http://www.efficios.com/files/babeltrace/ * License : MIT Programming

Bug#654819: Please enabled hardened build flags

* Moritz Mühlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote: On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 11:18:09PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Source: libcgroup Severity: important Tags: patch Please enable hardened build flags for your package. Since your package has already been converted to dh, setting

Bug#664886: libcgroup: Please upgrade to 0.38

* Laurent Bigonville bi...@debian.org wrote: Source: libcgroup Version: 0.37.1-1 Severity: wishlist Hi, Could you please upgrade to 0.38. Yes, I'm working on it now. I'm hoping to get the new version uploaded along with some of the more annoying debian bugs fixed as well. The release

Bug#652252: ust: diff for NMU version 0.15-3.1

* gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org wrote: tags 652252 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for ust (versioned as 0.15-3.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Would you mind delaying this one day longer? I'm right now

Bug#652252: ust: diff for NMU version 0.15-3.1

* gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:11:34 -0500, Jon Bernard wrote: I've prepared an NMU for ust (versioned as 0.15-3.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Would you mind delaying this one day longer

Bug#646777: libudt-dev: Installs generically named headers into /usr/include

* Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org wrote: Package: libudt-dev Version: 4.8-1 Severity: important Hi! This packages installs header files with extremely generic file names directly under /usr/include/. Given the namepsace polluting nature of the bug I'd even say this might be serious

Bug#646778: udt: Unneedingly restriced Architecture field

* Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org wrote: Source: udt Version: 4.8-2 Severity: important Tags: patch Hi! This package got restricted to just i386 and amd64 due to FTBFS on every other architecture. The issue here was not that the source does not support other architectures, rather that

Bug#637636: fixed in ust 0.15-2

* Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: found 637636 0.15-2 kthxbye On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 15:10:35 +, Jon Bernard wrote: ust (0.15-2) unstable; urgency=low . * [0fb2d5c] Update liburcu version dependency (Closes: #637636) So you changed it to: Depends

Bug#639685: O: e16keyedit

Package: wnpp Severity: normal e16 was replaced by e17, making this package obsolete. -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#639686: O: e16menuedit2

Package: wnpp Severity: normal e16 was replaced by e17, making this package obsolete. -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#639685: O: e16keyedit

* Alexander Reichle-Schmehl alexan...@schmehl.info wrote: Hi! Am 29.08.2011 14:07, schrieb Jon Bernard: e16 was replaced by e17, making this package obsolete. Shouldn't they then be removed from the archive? I considered that, but I found e16 is still available in sid, so I wasn't sure

Bug#639685: O: e16keyedit

* Alexander Reichle-Schmehl alexan...@schmehl.info wrote: Hi! Am 29.08.2011 14:57, schrieb Jon Bernard: e16 was replaced by e17, making this package obsolete. Shouldn't they then be removed from the archive? I considered that, but I found e16 is still available in sid, so I wasn't

Bug#639759: RM: e16menuedit2 -- ROM; obsolete, missing dependency

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please remove e16menuedit2. It depends on e16, which was removed in March. -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#639760: RM: e16keyedit -- ROM; obsolete, missing dependency

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please remove e16keyedit. It depends on e16, which was removed in March. -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#609004: any plans to change kernel configuration?

* Pedro Bulach Gapski pbgap...@gmail.com wrote: I am interested in this feature, but as I see from this bug, this will not work in squeeze. Is there some work in progress to change debian default kernel config as described here so that rules can be applied at runtime with standard kernels

Bug#639603: O: xfonts-knickers

Package: wnpp Severity: normal This package contains an old fixed-width font that I doubt anyone is still using. As I no longer use it, it seems appropriate to orphan this package. -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe.

Bug#639654: O: e16keyedit2

Package: wnpp Severity: normal e16 was replaced by e17, making this package obsolete. -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#612544: ITP: udt -- UDP based Data Transfer Protocol

* Giovanni Funchal gafunc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, What is the status of this issue? Will the package libudt get included sometime soon or is the .deb available somewhere already? I'm working on it right now, quite possible I'll be able to upload by the end of the weekend. Should be soon.

Bug#612544: ITP: udt -- UDP based Data Transfer Protocol

* Konstantin Khomoutov flatw...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 07:54:04PM -0500, Jon Bernard wrote: * Package name: udt [...] I think the package name should be libudt or may be libnet-udt. Also supposedly there should be libudt-dev or something like

Bug#612544: ITP: udt -- UDP based Data Transfer Protocol

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jon Bernard jbern...@debian.org * Package name: udt Version : 4.8 Upstream Author : Yunhong Gu yunhong...@gmail.com * URL : http://udt.sourceforge.net/ * License : BSD Programming Lang: C++ Description : UDP-based

Bug#554312: FTBFS with binutils-gold

* Ilya Barygin bary...@gmail.com wrote: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 15:16:40 -0500 Jon Bernard jbern...@debian.org: I just tried building this package in sid with a current toolchain and gold is able to link without error. -lX11 is added to $LIBS in configure and so all needed libs are defined

Bug#554312: FTBFS with binutils-gold

* Ilya Barygin bary...@gmail.com wrote: tags 554312 patch thanks Hello, The following patch was applied in Ubuntu to fix this problem. Actually, this is only a quick fix; check for X11 should be added to configure.ac, but this is probably something that should be done upstream. I just

Bug#555711: Reopening

* Dhaval Giani dhaval.gi...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 8:53 AM, MT mt_v...@warpmail.net wrote: Hi, I installed cgroup-bin on my system (Ubuntu 10.10, kernel 2.6.36), and experienced similar problems as the original bug reporter, so I'm reopening this bug. My system would

Bug#604955:

* Angel Abad angela...@gmail.com wrote: I forgot to say that the 0.9-1 revision still FTBFS with binutils-gold. No problem, I'm building now and should have this uploaded in just a sec. Thanks! -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#598309: Security unblock requests (ust/0.7-2.1)

* Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote: On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 05:13:22PM -0500, Jon Bernard wrote: * Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote: On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:06:24AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted

Bug#598309: Security unblock requests (ust/0.7-2.1)

* Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:52:00 -0500, Jon Bernard wrote: diff -Nru ust-0.5/debian/changelog ust-0.5/debian/changelog --- ust-0.5/debian/changelog2010-07-02 11:34:52.0 -0400 +++ ust-0.5/debian/changelog2010-11-30 21:23

Bug#598309: Security unblock requests (ust/0.7-2.1)

* Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote: On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:06:24AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.release as well. Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes: | Newsgroups:

Bug#598309: Security unblock requests (ust/0.7-2.1)

* Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote: On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:06:24AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.release as well. Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes: | Newsgroups:

Bug#598309: ust: NMU diff for 0.7-2.1 (Intent to NMU)

* jari.aa...@cante.net jari.aa...@cante.net wrote: Dear maintainer, Here is the NMU diff according to DevRef 5.11.1[1][2] for bug: #598309. See the debian/patches directory for the important fixes. Excellent, thank you. Please let me know if it's ok to proceed with the NMU. Yes, please

Bug#595964: Please cherry-pick patch to mount cgroupfs at /sys/fs/cgroup

* Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote: CCing Jon, as maintainer of libcgroup he might be interested in this discussion. Am 07.09.2010 23:12, schrieb Bastian Blank: On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 10:54:04PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: On 07.09.2010 22:41, Bastian Blank wrote: And what does

Bug#588494: cgroup-bin: Wrong filenames used in /etc/init.d/cg* scripts.

* Taisuke Yamada t...@rakugaki.org wrote: Thanks for the reply. Regarding this fix, I have another suggestion so it can co-exist with LXC (LinuX Container)and other cgroups usage. If you're going to include /etc/default/cgconfig, please consider adding CREATE_DEFAULT=no to

Bug#588494: cgroup-bin: Wrong filenames used in /etc/init.d/cg* scripts.

* Taisuke Yamada t...@rakugaki.org wrote: Package: cgroup-bin Version: 0.36.2-1 Severity: minor In /etc/init.d/cgconfig and /etc/init.d/cgred, external configuration files are referenced in wrong filenames (RedHat-ism?). currently used filename should be changed to

Bug#555711: Quick update

tags 555711 moreinfo unreproducible stop I have had a chance to test this on a machine that suspends and everything works fine for me, I cannot reproduce this bug at the moment. I have pinged the submitter a few times with no response. Without additional information (a configuration file at the

Bug#584917: ITP: python-opster -- a python command line parsing speedster

Package: wnpp Owner: Jon Bernard jbern...@debian.org Severity: wishlist * Package name: python-opster Version : 0.9.9 Upstream Author : Alexander Solovyov pira...@piranha.org.ua * URL : http://hg.piranha.org.ua/opster/ * License : BSD Programming Lang: Python

Bug#579753: No pkg-config config available for libcgroup-dev

* Tom Parker palf...@tevp.net wrote: Package: libcgroup-dev Version: 0.35-2 Severity: normal libcgroup-dev doesn't provide a pkg-config config file. There's one available upstream at http://libcg.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=libcg/libcg;a=blob;f=libcgroup.pc.in;hb=HEAD but it's

  1   2   >