Hi,
this seems to be due to a change in the dependency netcdf4-python that
has been updated 4 days ago. I tracked down the problem and am working
on a patch.
Cheers
Klaus
Am 03.12.2016 um 08:44 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> Source: cf-python
> Version: 1.3.2+dfsg1-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags:
Hi,
this looks like an interesting project indeed.
As a first step I went through the list of dependencies that Kristian provided.
The situation might not be so grim.
Unfortunately, there is no information about the actually required versions,
but for a number of packages a manual update over the
Hi Gianfranco,
Am 11.10.2016 um 08:25 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna:
>>> $(LDFLAGS)<-- this should be at the end of the line, not at the begin,
>>> otherwise
>>> you might see some libraries stripped just because the .o files needing them
>>> are put after (this happens when wl-asneeded is
Hi Guys,
one more thing:
In a private exchange Ross agreed to me taking over.
Thanks
Klaus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Gianfranco, hi Bas,
Am 01.10.2016 um 20:35 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna:
> (additional review, on top of Sebastiaan's one)
> * Requires a python version from 2.6 up to, but not including, 3.0.
>
> Sebastiaan, I'm not sure we can build Python3 version, but I leave this
> check to the
Hi Gianfranco,
Am 30.09.2016 um 14:46 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna:
>> Since the package has been moved to the Python Modules team, finding a
>> sponsor within the team is your best option. Please contact
>> debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org as documented in the Python Modules Team
>> policy:
>>
>
G'day,
I incorporated the suggestions by Ben as per my previous email.
Also now the test handling has been improved, removing the binary file
test_file.nc
that was previously packaged.
Furthermore, I received some comments from Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri) via irc.
In detail:
* d/control:
** please
Hi Francesco, hi everybody,
I had a quick look and it seems upstream doesn't prepare releases
anymore, offering simply the latest github master as a tarball to the users.
Is this correct?
Should we still package something?
What do more experienced packagers than me think about it?
Best
Klaus
Hey Ben,
thanks for your help!
On 14/09/2016 03:17, Ben Finney wrote:
> * When removing code, just remove it. You are tracking the work in a
> VCS, there is generally no reason to commit changes that comments out
> lines of code.
>
> So, in ‘debian/patches/’, the
>
On 14/09/2016 04:51, Ben Finney wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-09-14 11:17 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
>> Here are some comments I have for improving the packaging work:
>
> Further:
>
> * The source package should ideally not contain non-source forms of the
> work.
>
> I see that
/Unidata/UDUNITS-2/commit/b362869285b629fa52b3fc464c58d74b9d6e362b
The new license is very close to a 3-clause bsd license, but adds a
fourth clause; therefore discussion on debian-legal might be indicated.
Regards,
Klaus Zimmermann
can be obtained from https://www.example.com.
Changes since the last upload:
cf-python (1.3.1-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
* Initial release (Closes: #777315)
-- Klaus Zimmermann <klaus_zimmerm...@gmx.de> Fri, 09 Sep 2016 17:31:55 +0200
Regards,
Klaus Zimmermann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
sorry, I don't know how to do this properly, so I am simply writing to
you:
I believe in menulibre also the second line has a typo:
- - dh_installchangeslogs NEWS
+ dh_installchangelogs NEWS
Cheers
Klaus
Am 17.08.2016 um 22:26 schrieb Chris
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Klaus Zimmermann <klaus_zimmerm...@gmx.de>
* Package name: kyklop
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Author : Klaus Zimmermann <klaus_zimmerm...@gmx.de>
* URL : https://github.com/fuentesfranco/kyklop
* License : MIT
14 matches
Mail list logo