Bug#782171: Updates?

Hi, On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 06:48:38AM +, Zhang, Wentao wrote: > I noticed that in the "package info" box of sources.debian.org, the "SLOC" > field > doesn't recognize Rust. Example [1]. > > After doing some research I believe it's because of the somewhat outdated > sloccount program.

Bug#977367: debsources: search results point to not existing sources?

On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 10:40:54PM +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > Yes - clearly. The bug to implement tarballs-in-tarballs unpacking has > > been open forever, so I think it's quite unlikely it's gonna be picked > > up within a reasonable timeframe. I myself won't have time to take > > care

Bug#977367: debsources: search results point to not existing sources?

Hi Michael, On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 10:41:10AM +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > We introduced unpacking tarballs in https://github.com/Debian/dcs/issues/80 > (from 2017!), > but apparently didn’t think it through far enough regarding sources.d.o :) Thanks for your answer! And I think we can

Bug#977367: debsources: search results point to not existing sources?

Control: usertag -1 debsources Control: merge 761077 -1 Hi Tomas, On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 02:13:49PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote: > Go to > https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=Client+sent+an+HTTP+request+to+an+HTTPS+server > select first link >

Bug#928544: debsources: wheezy gone missing

Hi Jakub, On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 09:58:28PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Some (all?) wheezy packages have disappeared from sources.d.o. Thank you for catching that. We failed to take the necessary measures to prevent wheezy from disappearing from debsources after it disappeared from the mirrors.

Bug#818792: qa.debian.org: improve license rendering

Hi Ryan, On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 08:28:22AM +0800, Ryan wrote: > Am I missing something or do the links in the report no longer seem to appear > as > reported.  Could you please provide more details? Are the links missing on a particular URL? Thanks, -- Matthieu

Bug#884341: debsources: Unnecessary vertical scroll bar interferes src view scrolling

Hi, On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:05:28AM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: > See also the attached image (the same). > > The scrollbar will disappear if I set "overflow-y: hidden" to the pre tag > highlighted in the screenshot. Thanks for the screenshot. I failed to reproduce it or understand where the

Bug#890076: PTS: broken "browse source code" links

Hi, On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 09:56:03PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > On , "browse source code" points > to , which is 404. Sounds like a debsources bug, however it doesn't 404 for me, it redirects correctly

Bug#819013: debsources: deduplicate the html setting the background image

Hi, On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 06:43:41PM +0100, pixthor wrote: > i know that this bug is a little bit outdated, but i'd like to tackle it > anyway. You're very welcome to do that! Don't hesitate to join #debian-debsources on irc if you have any question. Cheers, -- Matthieu signature.asc

Bug#884341: debsources: Unnecessary vertical scroll bar interferes src view scrolling

Control: user qa.debian@packages.debian.org Control: usertag -1 debsources signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#884341: debsources: Unnecessary vertical scroll bar interferes src view scrolling

Control: usertags -1 debsources Hi, On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 02:58:28PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: > For any random page that shows the content of source code, there is an > unnecessary vertical scroll bar between the line number and the content of > source code. When the user put focus (e.g., by

Bug#862058: python-debian: required dependency on python-apt

worthwhile. I attached a patch that adds a couple lines of doc. In the process I realised there was a deprecated example with shared_storage in a README, which I took the opportunity to remove. Cheers, -- Matthieu From 86df0a5b86ec44f07e4fa624d33a5a002a479359 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthi

Bug#862058: python-debian: required dependency on python-apt

Package: python-debian Version: 0.1.28 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, python-debian has a Recommends: dependency on python-apt, and a mechanism to import alternatives when it is not present. However, when using Sources.iter_paragraphs(f), with f being a file object of a compressed file (e.g.

Bug#861379: debsources: /patches/api/list/ contains packages with no patches (such as 0xffff)

Hi, On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 03:30:58PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > The debsources patches list API mentions the package 0x but this > package doesn't contain any patches according to the debsources website > and apt-file and downloading the source package. Thanks for the report. I'm not sure

Bug#861168: qa.debian.org: msg parameter inserts extra line numbers

Hi, On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 01:49:13PM -0400, James McCoy wrote: > When I view that URL, it looks as per your expectations. After > disabling Javascript, I see that the line numbers aren't adjusted. Thanks for the report and the additional information! I've dug it a bit, and it indeed comes

Bug#850173: qa.debian.org: debsources: Please provide link from decorated patch view to download/raw view

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: debsources [Forwarding the message below, from Christoph Biedl, to BTS.] -- Matthieu Hello, the patch view at e.g. https://sources.debian.net/patches/vblade/23-1/manpage-escape-dash.patch/ adds

Bug#839773: qa.debian.org: debsources: packages with upstream signature listed in .dsc are not added

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: important User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: debsources debsources fails to unpack source packages, complaining on upstream signatures being listed in the .dsc: dpkg-source: error: unrecognized file for a v2.0 source package:

Bug#835033: debsources: Retain line context on 404s by appending the hash for specific links

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 03:27:28PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Has it been deployed yet? I don't see it on, for example: > > https://sources.debian.net/src/nostalgy/0.2.33-1/build.sh/#L75 It is now! Cheers, -- Matthieu signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#828831: debsources: merge all config files in the repo into an unique one

Hi John! Sorry for late reply. On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 01:07:13PM +0200, John Giannelos wrote: > I was wondering what's your opinion on moving towards a 12factor app > config structure on debsources [1]? In many of the web projects I am > involved we've been using python-decouple [2] for that. >

Bug#828831: debsources: merge all config files in the repo into an unique one

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Usertags: debsources Currently we have many config files around: - etc/config.ini, used for sources.d.n - contrib/docker/config.ini used for docker images - etc/config.travis.ini used for travis - doc/examples/sample-config.local.ini as a documentation

Bug#761083: #761083 - debsources: inject binary packages metadata into the DB

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 04:41:57PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > I don't mind at all you using sources.d.n for that purpose, but why > > not tracker.d.o? > > I thought the same when I saw this report... and the reason is likely that > the tracker has almost no REST API at all right now and

Bug#761083: #761083 - debsources: inject binary packages metadata into the DB

Hi Luciano, On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 12:01:09PM +0200, Luciano Bello wrote: > In the security team we would like to give information about which packages > you should update when we release a DSA (currently, we give to the user the > source package name). It would be easier for us if we have a

Bug#764961: debsources: port to Python 3

On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 17:40:45 +0200 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > As per subject: please port Debsources to Python 3.x. To prevent duplicated efforts: I'm working on this! Cheers, -- Matthieu

Bug#782171: Benchmark of linux and chromium

Hey, On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 07:37:53AM +0200, Orestis Ioannou wrote: > (I had to run latest cloc from github because the one in testing has an > older release that affects chromium :D ) That point makes me feel pretty confident that cloc can be broken for other packages. It would be relevant to

Bug#819861: contributors.debian.org: the From: email header is not in rfc822 format

=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) >From d8b268491422180e06a8ea03c5a3e6745fec1d8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthieu Caneill <matthieu.cane...@imag.fr> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 09:46:45 +0200 Subject: [P

Bug#819013: debsources: deduplicate the html setting the background image

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: minor Tags: newcomer User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: debsources The few lines of html setting the background image on some pages are duplicated many times (try grepping bg_wrapper). It would be nice to see this in a separate file that would be

Bug#783584: debsources: improve webapp 404 handling (e.g. jessie - stretch move)

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Usertags: debsources During the move jessie-stretch, many 404 errors were not logged, and hence more difficult to debug. It would be nice to log the type of errors that lead to massive 404s. Cheers, -- Matthieu -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.8

Bug#782171: debsources: consider using cloc instead of sloccount

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist Usertags: debsources cloc (http://cloc.sourceforge.net/#Languages) supports more languages than sloccount (e.g. Scala, Javascript), and could be used to count the lines of code in every package. This has to be carefully tested, since it needs to run of

Bug#774808: debsources: line number undefined

On 9 January 2015 at 05:05, Jason Pleau ja...@jpleau.ca wrote: I was wrong in my previous email, the code I mentionned is not the cause of the bug in question. It was an error that I did not catch when testing with Firefox. Matthieu, can you test the attached patch and see if it fixes the

Bug#774808: debsources: line number undefined

On 7 January 2015 at 20:43, Reiner Herrmann rei...@reiner-h.de wrote: I'm using Iceweasel 34.0, and when I'm viewing a source file on sources.debian.net and click on a line number, it jumps to the current URL with #Lundefined appended (instead of e.g. #L123). It is working correctly with

Bug#770365: debsources: 403 on /src/beignet/1.0.0-1/README.md/

Hi, Thanks for your report! On 20 November 2014 at 20:05, Jérémy Bobbio lu...@debian.org wrote: When visiting https://sources.debian.net/src/beignet/1.0.0-1/README.md/ I'm told “403 Permission Denied”. This is a bit annoying as the file is listed on

Bug#744818: ITP: adagios -- Adagios is an alternative web configuration (and status) interface to nagios/icinga/shinken

On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 04:14:25PM +0200, Páll Sigurðsson wrote: What does the debian package for shinken do ? If they bundle their javascripts i see no reason for us not to do the same. I don't know how it's done in Shinken, but it doesn't change the fact that having embedded javascript

Bug#744818: ITP: adagios -- Adagios is an alternative web configuration (and status) interface to nagios/icinga/shinken

On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 08:46:15PM +0200, Páll Sigurðsson wrote: Yeah that is a bug which you are more than welcome to fix. Instead of @darkstar i use @opensource.is Does debian specifically oppose bundling javascripts ? What are projects like foreman doing ? Using bower (http://bower.io)

Bug#744818: ITP: adagios -- Adagios is an alternative web configuration (and status) interface to nagios/icinga/shinken

[Adding Tomas in the loop] On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 06:16:16PM +0200, Páll Sigurðsson wrote: to my knowledge no debian/ directory other than the one you mention. That one has the status of: 'works for me'. It also works for me, though lintian reports many errors. * palli@darkstar is used

Bug#744818: ITP: adagios -- Adagios is an alternative web configuration (and status) interface to nagios/icinga/shinken

Hi, On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 18:36:29 +, Pall Sigurdsson: Ok, love the idea of using git. What's the most up-to-date information regarding this debian/ folder? Is there a git repo somewhere else than https://github.com/opinkerfi/adagios ? I'd like to contribute to the packaging. Thanks, --