On Thu 21 Sep 2006, Andy Spiegl wrote:
Hm, actually I wonder whether the patch even made it into sid yet.
A 2.6.9 version of rsync is imminent, and should have that fix (and a couple
of other important fixes) in it, so I prefer to wait a bit for that.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
, or perhaps even making an
alias or wrapper shell script. I don't want to be confronted with bug
reports that e.g. it doesn't backup everything, hence I will not be
changing this.
There simply are tools that are not for everybody, ifconfig, lsof
comes to mind.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
of a modern rsync release that's suitable for your stable
system.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
changelog...)
If it's not there, then upstream probably forgot to mention it. As shown
in http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2005-April/012338.html upstream
(that's Wayne) had fixed it, and I would be most surprised if that fix
hadn't gone into the official source.
Paul Slootman
problem on alpha, I haven't seen any since I
installed that version 4 days ago.
Now if the zombie processes could be reaped... (different problem,
perhaps related to a bug in glibc, I'll open a separate bug if it seems
to be in clamav).
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
mean that
uncompressed files may be larger than 2GB; my problem (for which I
opened the bug report) was a *ZIP* file larger than 2GB (containing many
files of e.g. 50MB).
So IMHO closing the bugreport is not correct.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
: falling back to starting all of them...
Starting MD monitoring service: mdadm --monitor.
Assembling MD arrays...done (disabled in /etc/default/mdadm).
As the assembling is disabled, why first say you're going to assemble...
and then say done.
Thanks,
Paul Slootman
-- Package-specific
that want to do
stuff get those groups' privileges? That's a bit different from the
text.
Thanks,
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
(Another reason to always run chown -R upon upgrade :-P )
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/log/wwwoffle-upgrade.log ?
thanks,
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to deal with
that? shouldn't debconf check the file's checksum and warn the admin
before resetting the parameters?
No. it should handle this case (it did previously at least).
This is what I wanted to know, thanks.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
with it's absolute pathname.
Hmm, another regression in the NMU version :-(
Thanks for this info, I'll upload a fixed version soon.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed 19 Jul 2006, Dave Carrigan wrote:
On Wednesday 19 July 2006 09:34, Paul Slootman wrote:
--- /tmp/dirvish-expire 2006-07-19 08:59:01.0 -0700
+++ /usr/sbin/dirvish-expire 2006-07-19 08:58:31.0 -0700
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@
qw(VAULT:BRANCH IMAGE
-expire works just
fine there. I'd like to see what determines whether it works or not...
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bugs filled on dirvish package.
Yes, thats' fine.
Thanks for the work.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
are typecast
using those typedefs, which will guarantee that gcc won't complain.
Anyhow, it's been _quite_ some time since I looked at the unzip sources.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
file if the value is zero
or if it is at least 30? That means that I can't set it to 20 via
debconf, doesn't it?
You seriously need to study debconf the value is in $RET;
here $rc contains the status, not the debconf value.
30 == question not asked.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Fri 02 Jun 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Paul, what is the status with this package ?
As a result of this problem, wwwoffle has been removed from testing.
Unfortunately real life got into the way.
I hope to upload a fixed version within 10 days.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
looked at what -H means now in rsync? Have you considered the
consequences of changing such an important option?
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ever to work (this is on a fresh amd64 install).
The logic needs to be improved somewhat...
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OR accessed in 3 days.
That would be interesting :)
I know I should stop complaining and write some code, and I may do
that. I post it here for tracking.
Cool.
thanks,
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
arbitrary code via crafted extended attributes that trigger a
buffer overflow.
Do you have reason to believe that Debian's rsync 2.6.4-6 has that patch
applied?
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in
/usr/bin/updatedb :
... -prune -o -name *
* -o -print
Perhaps -print0 should be used, with appropriate changes to the sort and
frcode stuff :-)
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a
/etc/cron.d/wwwoffle file, and the user runs dpkg-reconfigure and
enters a fetch frequency.
- wwwoffle was already installed, there was a fetch frequency defined,
but now the user has removed the /etc/cron.d/wwwoffle file and now
re-runs dpkg-reconfigure.
Thanks,
Paul Slootman
On Wed 05 Apr 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you enter a value via the debconf dialog that indicates that wwwoffle
should regularly fetch its list, then why remove the cron.d entry...
Because debconf is not a registry. It's a frontend for maintainer
On Wed 05 Apr 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed 05 Apr 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you enter a value via the debconf dialog that indicates that wwwoffle
should regularly fetch its list, then why remove
that does make more sense to me, because with --progress you
indicate you want up to date info, and hence output buffering then
doesn't make much sense. If you could knock up a patch for that (against
2.6.7-1 please!) then I'd be much more prone to add that.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
be to export the NICE value as something
unique like FINDUTILS_NICE (to avoid unfortunate conflicts with other
things), and then modify /usr/bin/updatedb to add nice -n
$FINDUTILS_NICE in the su -c parameter.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
faster to retransmit the whole
thing instead of checksumming everything (typically useful when the IO
is slower than the network).
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
inefficent the
rolling checksum is...
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was
looking in the wrong direction.
Sorry to have occupied your time.
No problem, also refreshed my knowledge of rsync a bit :)
OK to close this bug then?
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun 19 Mar 2006, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.03.19.1444 +0100]:
It needs not use all metadata at all times. If I don't requiest
e.g. permissions to be synchronised, it should not compare
permissions. Or from a different angle: if two files
released very soon, so I wanted to wait for that.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
like By the way, to get the popups That sense was
not my intention. Then again, I don't speak english daily since moving
to the Netherlands when I was 18...
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reopen 322009
thanks
On Thu 09 Mar 2006, Paul Slootman wrote:
* add alternate dependency debconf-2.0.
closes:#322009
Aaargh, should be 332009.
Reopening now.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
: 405.34
Also the vertical label on the left runs off the graph, i.e. the text is
incomplete.
I can give an example .png and/or data if necessary.
It would be great if there's some fix for this.
Thanks,
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
the restart!
If you simply want to go offline: wwwoffle -offline
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... (the manpage says ,, so I'll trust that :-)
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of the file to be sent. This
file must be an SSF-File as generated by gs -sDevice=cfax. At least, this
works for me :)
I've sent this to the Debian bug tracking system so that it's not
forgotten :-)
Thanks,
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
On 10556 March 1977, Paul Slootman wrote:
The problem lies within the lines:
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/nagios-plugins-basic_1.4.2-6_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_disk', which is also in
package netsaint-plugins
dpkg
file
/etc/MailScanner/reports/pt_br.old/deleted.virus.message.txt with new version
...
These en.old and pt_br.old directories sound like some leftovers.
Paul Slootman
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing
/lib/nagios/plugins/check_disk', which is also in
package netsaint-plugins
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/nagios-plugins-standard_1.4.2-6_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_breeze', which is also in
package netsaint-plugins
Thanks,
Paul
?
Paul Slootman
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.4
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968
On Sun 05 Feb 2006, Marc Haber wrote:
We are still trying to reproduce the bug, as the patch listed in
#351480 doesn't seem to help :-(
One thing that I noticed: after gid 101, I have 1000 in my /etc/group.
102 comes later.
And group id 102 isn't used in /etc/passwd.
Paul Slootman
).
In the meantime I've downgraded to 3.0.14a-sarge1; up to now no
problems.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri 03 Feb 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 01:03:07PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
I did an upgrade yesterday, and since then I'm being bombarded with
Segfault in Samba email messages.
Did those emails not include a usable backtrace? (Possibly not, since I'm
told
Hi,
sorry for the delay...
On Thu 29 Sep 2005, Benoît Dejean wrote:
it would nice if tmpreaper could ignore *.lock (such as bonobo
activation .lock) by default.
Can you give an example of such a file? Are these in /tmp? If not, in
what directory?
Thanks,
Paul Slootman
to be 1.6.6)
should have no problems with large files.
Can you confirm this? If I hear nothing within a week, I'll close the
bug report.
Thanks,
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri 05 Mar 2004, Mike Fedyk wrote:
Paul Slootman wrote:
On Fri 05 Mar 2004, Mike Fedyk wrote:
The error message[1] below wouldn't be seen unless you browsed through the
entire output of tmpreaper mailed to you daily.
Hmm, tmpreaper is always silent by default. Do you have --verbose
--test nothing is really
done, --showdeleted doesn't show anything either.
I'll change the behaviour of --showdeleted in combination with --test.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu 02 Feb 2006, Benoît Dejean wrote:
Le jeudi 02 février 2006 à 12:59 +0100, Paul Slootman a écrit :
Can you give an example of such a file? Are these in /tmp? If not, in
what directory?
sudo find /tmp -name '*.lock*'
Password:
/tmp/orbit-benoit/bonobo-activation-register.lock
0x705639a8 in _nss_files_endhostent () from /lib/libnss_files.so.2
HTH,
Paul Slootman
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: sparc (sparc64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1
only use it if you need it.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed 04 Jan 2006, Michael Biebl wrote:
Paul Slootman wrote:
On Mon 02 Jan 2006, Michael Biebl wrote:
I can confirm this bug.
Did you confirm it with version 3.8.2005-12-06-2 ?
Unfortunately 3.8.2005-12-06-2 doesn't fix the problem. libcapi20-3 is
still missing the so files.
Hmm
effort (although I confess I need to get a bit more involved...)
Feel free to help ;-)
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
) isn't affected AFAIK.
I'll leave this bug as-is until a new stable version of Debian is
released; there's no way of getting a fix for something like this into a
point release.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Tue 20 Dec 2005, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Please rebuild pppdcapiplugin for ppp 2.4.4b1.
Expect a NMU if this will not be fixed soon, because it's blocking ppp
from entering testing.
Go ahead, I'm a bit out of the ISDN stuff at the moment due to
circumstances :-(
thanks,
Paul
--
To
it so it uses a buffer size of 50k, which should be enough
for the time being :-) It's running now, no error messages yet.
Please consider adding this patch.
Paul Slootman
diff -ru net-snmp-5.2.1.2/agent/mibgroup/mibII/ifTable.c
net-snmp-5.2.1.2.fix/agent/mibgroup/mibII/ifTable.c
--- net-snmp
Hmm, hold off on any action here, it looks like something may still need
to be tweaked.
I'll let you know :)
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
://paul.gps.nl/pcextreme/indexok.html
thanks,
Paul Slootman
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.4
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages mozilla
, The specified disk did not finis..., 46) = 46
The second open() fails, as it's opened with O_EXCL...
Seems like a very silly bug. Has no one ever tried this?
Note that this is on an amd64 system.
Running a plain jfs_mkfs on this device works.
Thanks,
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Wed 21 Sep 2005, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
I'm 98% sure that you forgot to install postgresql-contrib. That
package ships pg_autovacuum. After installing it, the daemon should
be started automatically.
I finally had a time window to install it:
...
Selecting previously deselected
, the binary /usr/lib/postgresql/bin/pg_autovacuum
seems to be missing completely from the package, although the init.d
script still tries to find it.
What's going on?!
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
still consider the init.d script saying started when
nothing at all has been started, to be a bug.
Thanks,
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it on another machine.
apt-get install dpkg-repack
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the upstream author.
Thanks!
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, I'll investigate.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu 15 Sep 2005, Paul Slootman wrote:
OK, thanks, I'll investigate.
Could you try http://paul.gps.nl/rsync_2.6.6-1pre2_i386.deb ?
At least for me that version works, with your example.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
On Wed 31 Aug 2005, Jan Eringa wrote:
Sorry bout the version mixup
It seems I didn't read carefully enough
2.5.6 2.6.5 parsed the as the same to me :(
in too much of a hurry I guess
My apologies
No problem :)
Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
--
rsync --version
rsync version 2.5.6 protocol version 26
Not quite the same version :-)
Debian 2.6.4 didn't have this problem either, BTW (just checked).
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:-(
Thanks,
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 237074 patch
thanks
On Tue 09 Mar 2004, Paul Slootman wrote:
I think it's a good idea if a couple of versions of /var/log/dmesg are
saved, so that e.g. if a new kernel is installed and say the printer
stops working, it's easy to compare the current kernel bootup output
of
version 1.0RC3 (all users should upgrade).
If I don't see any response from the maintainer within a couple of days,
I will NMU version 1.0.0.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: mdadm
Version: 1.9.0-4.1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
While experimenting a bit, I ran into this:
# mdadm --create --level=0 --raid-devices=2 /dev/md11 /dev/sd[cd]
mdadm: /dev/sdc appears to contain a reiserfs file system
size = -388827136K
The check for a reiserfs file system is
On Wed 13 Jul 2005, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 08:21:46PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
Please, *please* look at existing bugs before sending in a bug report.
E.g. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=32379
I did look at the existing reports
On Wed 13 Jul 2005, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 09:54:26AM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
It would be nice if rsync linked against the shared zlib instead of
linking in its own static copy.
This to me implies that that bug report is also concerned about rsync
using its own
and config.sub in their next release.
Will do!
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
As this will lead to loss of (logging) data which at times could be
pretty important (e.g. no logging of hardware failures or iptables
firewall messages), I've raised the priority to grave. Such a trivial
thing should have been fixed before the release of sarge :-(
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
root at the time?
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun 29 May 2005, Tomas Kuliavas wrote:
I have seen rsync port assigned to rpc.statd. rsync --daemon fails to bind
to ipv4 port and binds only to ipv6 port.
Hmm, true, that can happen.
fuser 873/tcp (or netstat -anp | grep 873) should then show what is
using port 873.
I hate portmap.
Paul
11:02 0:00
/usr/bin/rsync --no-detach --daemon --config/etc/rsyncd.conf -4
I hope it's a cut paste error, but I miss a space between --config and
/etc/rsyncd.conf .
Could you do an lsof -p 8349, to see what rsync is listening to?
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
?
PS: I couldn't find any reference to this added dependency in the
changelog.
Thanks,
Paul Slootman
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11ac6
Locale: LANG=C
functionality
internally; is that true? In that case, it's probably useless to run
spamd as well (for normal usage). If so, perhaps a note in README.Debian
could be useful.
Thanks,
Paul Slootman
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500
On Mon 25 Apr 2005, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2005-04-25 14:59:46 +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
Of course, if you did not specify -r or --recursive (you don't show how
you invoked rsync), then it is a bug.
This is the case. FYI, the command was:
svn list -R | rsync --files-from=- -zuv
filesystem, leading to duplicate
inode numbers that aren't linked).
I don't expect ever to see an ls-lR file being used, hence tagging this
bug wontfix.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/squirrelmail/data/default_pref;
it had removed that file during the first preinst run.
I recommend checking whether /var/lib/squirrelmail/data/default_pref
exists before trying to run md5sum on it; assume that absence means that
it doesn't need to be preserved...
Thanks,
Paul Slootman
]+$
with:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ rsyncd\[[0-9]+\]: sent [0-9]+ bytes
received [0-9]+ bytes total size [0-9]+$
Alternatively you could just add the new line...
Thanks,
Paul Slootman (rsync maintainer :-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
should be used for this data, instead
of it being compiled in?)
BTW, _why_ is mkpasswd part of the whois package? What possible relation
do those have with each other? I couldn't find any explanation in e.g.
the README.
Paul Slootman
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT
. At least, I'm assuming
you're using an rsync daemon; you give very little information on how
rsync is being used.
If that fixes it, please let me know ASAP so I can upload a fix for your
problem.
Thanks,
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
On Tue 10 May 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
Paul Slootman wrote:
I'm guessing this is related to #307923. Please add a line
log file = /var/log/rsyncd.log
to the top of /etc/rsyncd.conf, and try it again. At least, I'm assuming
you're using an rsync daemon; you give very little
is being used.
If you could clarify, should there be a space between log and file?
Yes. (Exactly as shown above.) It should be outside any module
definitions, i.e. at the top of the file.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
the log file could not be written to), and
some other upstream patches... I have now simply taken the upstream
logging code in its entirety from CVS, as upstream has fixed the logging
problems in a different but also good way.
I'll be doing an upload soon.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
/wwwoffle-upgrade.log, and
/etc/wwwoffle/wwwoffle.conf and /etc/wwwoffle/wwwoffle.conf.bak (i.e.
the config file before the upgrade). Please also show the output of
debconf-show wwwoffle
I'll try to reproduce it then.
Thanks,
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
anyway.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to bug #242300, see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=242300
I'll look in to an extra format option for --log-format that will give
the raw filename, as I don't expect a 2.6.5 that soon.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
copy should be left in the client
I've confirmed this, and have filed a bug against the upstream source.
Upstream is usually very quick with fixes for these matters. I'll upload
a fixed version as soon as the fix is available.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here is the reply from upstream:
On Tue 26 Apr 2005, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 10:25:14AM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
I wouldn't have expected 2.6.4 to refuse to talk to even a 2.6.2 in
this way...
It shouldn't, and (interestingly) it wouldn't have if --delete had
401 - 500 of 547 matches
Mail list logo
