Bug#998753: libreoffice: Please add support for webp image format

forwarded 998753 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114532 tag 998753 + upstream thanks Hi, Am 07.11.21 um 17:29 schrieb Diederik de Haas: [...] > I was/am creating a document and I wanted to add an image I saved from a > webpage (from 2017( which had the file extension

Bug#998746: marked as done (/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so: undefined symbol: _ZN8MsLangId17getSystemLanguageEv)

reopen 998746 found 998746 1:7.3.0~alpha1-1 thanks Hi, > When you mix (and not match) different versions, problems can easily occur. > After doing "aptitude safe-upgrade ~i~V1:7.2.2-1 -t experimental", I could > successfully launch LO Writer, so closing the bug again. Especially in

Bug#998733: libnss3-dev: please add Breaks: libxmlsec1-dev (<< 1.2.33-1)

Package: libnss3-dev Version: 2:3.72-1 Severity: wishlist Hi, as said in https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2021/11/msg00018.html (#998339) nss 2:3.72-1 removes xulrunner-nss.pc which xmlsec1-nss.pc relied on. This has now been fixed in xmlsec1 1.2.33-1. (Which at the time of this writing

Bug#997089: libreoffice: FTBFS: segfault in '/<>/instdir/sdk/examples/java/Inspector'

severity 997089 minor thanks Am 03.11.21 um 17:27 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > On 03/11/21 at 17:13 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Am 03.11.21 um 08:05 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: >>> If it's truly a random failure, it might be better to downgrade it but >&

Bug#997089: libreoffice: FTBFS: segfault in '/<>/instdir/sdk/examples/java/Inspector'

Hi, Am 03.11.21 um 08:05 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > If it's truly a random failure, it might be better to downgrade it but > keep it open, I don't really like this. I don't like open bugs which definitely will never get attention. > so that another bug does not get opened in future > rebuilds.

Bug#997089: libreoffice: FTBFS: segfault in '/<>/instdir/sdk/examples/java/Inspector'

Hi, Am Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 07:18:19PM +0200 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > And interestingly, (after rm'ing the stale unopkg lockfile..) it passed. > > Also after a new attempt with manual > > $ make clean && make subsequencheck > > in odk worked, too. > > >

Bug#998339: nmu: xmlsec1_1.2.32-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu [ nss maintainer X-Debbugs-Cc'ed ] Hi, nss 2:3.72-1 uploaded this morning did: nss (2:3.72-1) unstable; urgency=medium [...] * debian/libnss3-dev.links.in: Remove xulrunner-nss.pc.

Bug#997089: libreoffice: FTBFS: segfault in '/<>/instdir/sdk/examples/java/Inspector'

Hi again, Am 28.10.21 um 18:11 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > Am 23.10.21 um 18:41 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: >> [...] >> "/<>/instdir/program/unopkg" add -f >> "/<>/workdir/CustomTarget/odk/build-examples_java/out/sdk/LINUXexample.out/bin/Inspector.oxt&q

Bug#997089: libreoffice: FTBFS: segfault in '/<>/instdir/sdk/examples/java/Inspector'

[ sorry for the late answer, needed to get a new laptop as the battery broke badly.. ] Hi, Am 23.10.21 um 18:41 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > make[5]: Entering directory > '/<>/instdir/sdk/examples/java/Inspector' >> mkdir -p >>

Bug#996912: RM: libjuh-java,libjurt-java,libridl-java,libunoil-java -- ROM; NBS

Merge them (and provide them) in(to) liblibreoffice-java. -- Rene Engelhard Tue, 27 Oct 2020 18:04:25 +0100 but not removed by auto-cruft when this was uploaded to sid after the buster release. Note that dak rm might complain about r-deps, but those all are having unversioned dependencies and:

Bug#912178: muttprint: Please add homepage link to d/control

Hi, Am 14.10.21 um 10:38 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen: > [Rene Engelhard] >> There is https://salsa.debian.org/rene/muttprint/-/tree/master > Right. Very good. I notice it is lacking a few of the latest uploads. For some value of "recent" :) Since oldoldstable ;-)

Bug#912178: muttprint: Please add homepage link to d/control

Hi, Am 14.10.21 um 09:30 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen: > I still remember how, and can do it in the next few days. One key > question is if you already have a git repository (or some other VCS) for > the package we should migrate, or if I should rebuild one from scratch > using git-buildpackage?

Bug#912178: muttprint: Please add homepage link to d/control

ebian/control > index 0806f4d..81c84d3 100644 > --- a/debian/control > +++ b/debian/control > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ Priority: optional > Maintainer: Rene Engelhard > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), imagemagick, ghostscript, docbook-utils, > sharutils, dh-autoreconf, automake,

Bug#996016: libreoffice: fails to send email

[ please always keep the Bug in CC so that discussions about it get recorded. Readding. ] Hi. Am 10.10.21 um 20:44 schrieb Alex: > And what is in LO settings? > LO Settings point to /usr/lib/thunderbird OK, as I guessed. Then anything can be in KDEs session doesn't matter. > What if you set

Bug#996016: libreoffice: fails to send email

found 996016 1:7.0.4-4 retitlle 996016 ibreoffice: fails to send email with Thunderbird set as mailer in KDE tag 996016 + moreinfo tag 996016 + unreproducible thanks Hi, Am 10.10.21 um 11:30 schrieb Alex: > Package: libreoffice > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > When I created a

Bug#994757: libgraphite2-dev: no archive files for static compilation are included in the -dev package

tag 994757 + wontfix thanks Hi, Am 22.09.21 um 17:56 schrieb Alfonso Sanchez-Beato: > and that in general having the option to compile statically cannot be harmful. I disagree. It's probably usedul for essential stuff but not for GUI stuff. (and graphite is about fonts, so GUI). There

Bug#994757: libgraphite2-dev: no archive files for static compilation are included in the -dev package

Hi again, Am 22.09.21 um 18:08 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > Hi, >> Do you want me to create a new bug? I was about to do it, but thought >> that would create more noise by now. > > obviously not. if you read the bug you'd have seen that I fixed the > metadata. I am sorry,

Bug#994757: libgraphite2-dev: no archive files for static compilation are included in the -dev package

Hi, > Do you want me to create a new bug? I was about to do it, but thought > that would create more noise by now. obviously not. if you read the bug you'd have seen that I fixed the metadata. Yes,a new bug would be  useless noise. Regards, Rene

Bug#994757: libgraphite2-dev: no archive files for static compilation are included in the -dev package

notfound 994757 1.3.13-11 severity 994757 wishlist thanks Hi, Am 20.09.21 um 16:43 schrieb Alfonso Sanchez-Beato: > Package: libgraphite2-dev > Version: 1.3.13-11build1 There is no such version. You are reporting against Debian, please use proper versions existing there. Also you are

Bug#994698: one more fix for armhf needed

reopen 994698 thanks Hi, Am 20.09.21 um 00:00 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > Am 19.09.21 um 17:28 schrieb Rene Engelhard: >> Whereas LO builds with g++ 11 since 1:7.1.0~rc1-1 in general Rico pointed me >> to >> https://git.launchpad.net/~libreoffice/ubuntu/+source/libreof

Bug#994698: [r...@debian.org: one more fix for armhf needed]

Hi, only appeared in the original bug, fwd... Regards, Rene - Weitergeleitete Nachricht von Rene Engelhard - Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 17:28:52 +0200 From: Rene Engelhard To: 984...@bugs.debian.org, 984204-submit...@bugs.debian.org Cc: cont...@bugs.debian.org Subject: one more fix

Bug#984204: one more fix for armhf needed

severity 984204 important clone 984204 -1 block 984204 by -1 retile -1 FTBFS with g++ 11 on armhf: Error: selected processor does not support `vpush {d0-d7}' in ARM mode tag -1 + pending thanks Hi, Whereas LO builds with g++ 11 since 1:7.1.0~rc1-1 in general Rico pointed me to

Bug#985867: reverted

unarchive 985867 tag 985867 - patch found 985867 1:7.2.1-1 thanks Hi, this was reverted. (There was no actual LTO usage anywyay ttbomk). - It missed a chmod 755 so that clang_wrapper was executable This was fixed in 1:7.2.0-3 - configure doesn't detect any clang and uses g++ (cf.

Bug#994624: libreoffice fail to start with error undefined symbol: _ZNK11LanguageTag20getGlibcLocaleStringESt17basic_string_viewIDsSt11char_traitsIDsEE

tag 994624 - moreinfo retitle 994624 libreoffice fail to start with error undefined symbol: _ZNK11LanguageTag20getGlibcLocaleStringESt17basic_string_viewIDsSt11char_traitsIDsEE after installing 7.2.1-1 on testing severity 994624 serious thanks Hi, Am 19.09.21 um 11:11 schrieb Rene Engelhard

Bug#994624: libreoffice fail to start with error undefined symbol: _ZNK11LanguageTag20getGlibcLocaleStringESt17basic_string_viewIDsSt11char_traitsIDsEE

reopen 994624 thanks Hi, Am 19.09.21 um 12:25 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > OK, looking at a diff between 7.1.5 and 7.2.1 suggests that the UNO > runtime got new LanguageTag-using functions so I did: > - install testing > - install libreoffice from sid > -> run in to the err

Bug#994624: libreoffice fail to start with error undefined symbol: _ZNK11LanguageTag20getGlibcLocaleStringESt17basic_string_viewIDsSt11char_traitsIDsEE

retitle 994624 libreoffice fail to start with error undefined symbol: _ZNK11LanguageTag20getGlibcLocaleStringESt17basic_string_viewIDsSt11char_traitsIDsEE with pre-7.2.0 ure tag 994624 + confirmed thanks Hi, Am 19.09.21 um 11:43 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > - add unstable to sources.list and

Bug#994624: libreoffice fail to start with error undefined symbol: _ZNK11LanguageTag20getGlibcLocaleStringESt17basic_string_viewIDsSt11char_traitsIDsEE

tag 994624 + moreinfo thanks Hi, Am 18.09.21 um 22:40 schrieb Pirate Praveen: > $ libreoffice > /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin: symbol lookup error: > /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so: undefined symbol: >

Bug#994445: Libreoffice suggests wrong KDE package

Hi, Am 16.09.21 um 11:03 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > Though admittedly -plasma misses a Recommends: on libreoffice-kde5: > rene@frodo:~$ apt-cache show libreoffice-plasma | grep Recomm > rene@frodo:~$ apt-cache show libreoffice-gnome | grep Recomm > Recommends: libreoffice-styl

Bug#994445: Libreoffice suggests wrong KDE package

retitle 994445 missing Recommends on libreoffice-kf5 reassign 994445 libreoffice-plasma severity 994445 minor thanks Hi, Am 16.09.21 um 09:16 schrieb karl...@abwesend.de: > Package: libreoffice > Version: 1:7.0.4-4 (no Severity) Sorry, no, IMHO this is a minor bug, not a normal one, but it

Bug#993449: libreoffice-calc: Top level tool menu is missing text labels and icons for most buttons

Hi, Am 14.09.21 um 15:59 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > b) removed the unreproducible tag already. OK, actually I forgot the CC. (This happens if you do it when you actually have more imprtant university stuff to do...) Done manually now. Regards, Rene

Bug#993449: libreoffice-calc: Top level tool menu is missing text labels and icons for most buttons

Hi, Am 14.09.21 um 15:54 schrieb paul deg: > Saying it's "not reproducible" is refusing to accept reality. If you actually have read my mails you would have seen that I a) acknowledged the problem (there's a easy workaround, though) b) removed the unreproducible tag already. Regards, Rene

Bug#993449: libreoffice-calc: Top level tool menu is missing text labels and icons for most buttons

Am 14.09.21 um 15:20 schrieb paul_deg: > What you say makes 0 sense. Helpful. Not. I could have said that for you too, (besides that your "top menu" also didn't make any sense at all given you mean "tool bar".) I didn't, I tried to argue with examples. Like writing black on black. (here it

Bug#993449: libreoffice-calc: Top level tool menu is missing text labels and icons for most buttons

tag 993449 - unreproducible thanks Hi, Am 14.09.21 um 02:29 schrieb paul deg: > Still reproducible on my end. Make sure "icon style" in LibreOffice > options/view is set to� "automatic", which is default. Or default in gnome tweaks. > Then in Gnome tweaks select icon set as

Bug#993449: libreoffice-calc: Top level tool menu is missing text labels and icons for most buttons

Am Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 11:27:07AM +0200 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > See screenshots. Looks OK. And yes, even with Adwaita there is no icons in any menu. The (needed) checkboxes as (as you see in my menu.png) also there. So it's still unreproducible. Regards, Rene

Bug#993449: libreoffice-calc: Top level tool menu is missing text labels and icons for most buttons

retitle 993449 libreoffice-calc: Top level tool menu is missing text labels and icons for most buttons with breeze-dark theme found 993449 1:7.1.5-2 thanks [ sorry for the late answer, never appeared in my mbox, just saew it by chance in the BTS logs ] Hi, Am Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 11:58:54AM

Bug#993710: caveexpress: FTBFS with box2d 2.4: fatal error: Box2D/Box2D.h: No such file or directory

Source: caveexpress Version: 2.5.1-1 Severity: serious Hi, as I said in my post to -release caveexpress doesn't build anymore with the newly unoddinated(!) upload of box2d 2.4: [...] [20%] Building CXX object src/modules/physics/CMakeFiles/physics.dir/DebugRenderer.cpp.o cd

Bug#993449: libreoffice-calc: Top level tool menu is missing text labels and icons for most buttons

severity 993449 important tag 993449 + moreinfo tag 993449 + unreproducible thanks Hi, Am Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 09:56:22AM -0500 schrieb pavel: > Package: libreoffice-calc > Version: 1:7.0.4-4 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks the whole system Bulls*. How does it break booting? How

Bug#992779: libreoffice-gnome: conflicts with libreoffice-gtk3

severity 992779 serious found 992779 1:7.2.0-2 notfound 992779 1:7.1.5-2 tag 992779 + confirmed thanks Hi, Am 23.08.21 um 12:31 schrieb Nicolas Patrois: > Package: libreoffice-gnome > Version: 1:7.1.5-2 Oh, my. obviously not. If at all the bug is in the new package not declaring the

Bug#992364: libreoffice: Libreoffice fails to start - can't cd to ../lib/libreoffice/program

Hi, last note. Am 18.08.21 um 07:56 schrieb Rene Engelhard: >> "/usr/local/bin/libreoffice: 52: cd: can't cd to ../lib/libreoffice/program" > And obviously nothing in this package contains any > > /usr/local/bin/libreoffice In fact, anything in /usr/local is a policy

Bug#992364: libreoffice: Libreoffice fails to start - can't cd to ../lib/libreoffice/program

Hi, Am 18.08.21 um 07:56 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > Did you put one there yourself once? You are are not supposed to copy > stuff around... And this fails because it expects to be in /usr (where it's supposed to be) and then does that cd which works becazse LO is in /usr/lib/libreoffice/p

Bug#973517: Fwd: Accepted libreoffice 1:7.1.5-1 (source) into unstable

:7.1.5-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian LibreOffice Maintainers Changed-By: Rene Engelhard Changes: libreoffice (1:7.1.5-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * "New" upstream release . * upload to unstable Checksums-Sha1: a3d30e3388fae6cc641715276abcd8efb26f

Bug#934678: Processed: reopen bug #934678

notfound 934678 7.0.4.2 thanks Am 17.06.21 um 16:21 schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System: >> found #934678 7.0.4.2 And this is smply wrong, there is no  7.0.4.2 in Debian context. Version: is the *package* version here. (and it's not needed since the  version tracking clearly knows 1:7.0.4-4

Bug#988906: unblock: libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4

the symlink in postinst instead. (Closes: #985297) + + -- Rene Engelhard Sat, 01 May 2021 13:50:48 +0200 + libreoffice (1:7.0.4-3) unstable; urgency=medium * debian/tests/control.in: *really* add libreoffice-writer dependency diff -Nru libreoffice-7.0.4/debian/control libreoffice-7.0.4/deb

Bug#985297: libreoffice-common: do not use dir_to_symlink for /usr/lib/libreoffice/share/registry

Hi, Am 30.04.21 um 16:23 schrieb Andreas Beckmann: > I've been experimenting a lot to fix this bug. Thanks very much. > I've running various buster->bullseye upgrade scenarios (with and > without recommends, direct distupgrade vs upgrade && dist-upgrade) > with the patched packages as upgrade

Bug#987552: FTBFS caused by imagemagick

block 987552 by 987504 thanks Hi, Am 25.04.21 um 15:05 schrieb Chris Hofstaedtler: > Caused by #987504, see that bug for further details. Then imagemagick should be fixed. I mean, come on, it's simple image convert... Regards, Rene

Bug#986876: regression: libreoffice can't open filenames containing spaces

severity 986876 minor retitle 986876 libreoffice can't open filenames containing spaces if not properly quoted if started from  terminal thanks Hi, Am 13.04.21 um 12:11 schrieb Sander van Grieken: > Package: libreoffice > Version: 1:7.0.4-3 > Severity: important No, see below. I am not even

Bug#986418: libreoffice-impress: Impress cannot reduce table row size

close 986418 1:7.1.1~rc2-1 thanks Hi, Am 06.04.21 um 22:55 schrieb Drew Parsons: > Anyhow, I converted the "close" tag to "fixed" in 1:7.1.1~rc2-1.  If > you think this bug really does need to be closed and dropped, then I > won't reopen it again. > "closed" is correct. The same would have

Bug#986418: libreoffice-impress: Impress cannot reduce table row size

tag 986418 + fixed-upstream tag 986418 + upstream forwarded 986418  https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139511 close 986418 1:7.1.1~rc2-1 thanks Hi, Am 05.04.21 um 16:45 schrieb Drew Parsons: > Package: libreoffice-impress > Version: 1:7.0.4-3 > Severity: important >

Bug#985867: filter out GCC's lto flags for the skia build

severity 985867  wishlist thanks Hi, Am 25.03.21 um 08:59 schrieb Matthias Klose: > When building LO with lto turned on (https://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/LTO), > the build fails, because one module (skia) is still built with clang, > apparently > for performance reasons. I didn't check if

Bug#985401: dpkg: libreoffice buster->bullseye upgrade failures

Hi again, Am 18.03.21 um 06:53 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > It would be helpful if you actually did your homework. There already was > 985297 so you now caused a bogus addditional RC bug. > > That bug even was marked as blocked by the dpkg bug so being careful > when reassignin

Bug#985297: libreoffice-common: needs Conflicts against all packages shipping files in /usr/lib/libreoffice/share/registry

Am 18.03.21 um 08:32 schrieb Andreas Beckmann: > a clean minimal buster > > apt-get install libreoffice-writer # without --install-recommends enabled > > or > > apt-get install libreoffice-calc # happens both with and without > --install-recommends enabled > Hrm. Indeed. Regards, Rene

Bug#985401: dpkg: libreoffice buster->bullseye upgrade failures

reassign 985401 dpkg thanks Hi Guillem, Am 18.03.21 um 00:02 schrieb Guillem Jover: > Control: reassign -1 libreoffice-common 1:7.0.4-3 It would be helpful if you actually did your homework. There already was 985297 so you now caused a bogus addditional RC bug. That bug even was marked as

Bug#787080: Bug#894119: libreoffice: Please add libreoffice-online to the debian repository.

Hi, Am 16.03.21 um 22:02 schrieb Adi Kriegisch: > thank you very much for the hard work you've put in packaging libreoffice > online. Starting from your salsa repo[1] I was able to successfully build > loolwsd and loleaflet packages with the libreoffice packages from > buster-backports. There

Bug#985297: libreoffice-common: needs Conflicts against all packages shipping files in /usr/lib/libreoffice/share/registry

tag 985297 + moreinfo tag 985297 + unreproducible thanks Hi, Am 15.03.21 um 15:11 schrieb Andreas Beckmann: > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from > 'buster'. In what scenario? - a clean buster debootstrap + apt install libreoffice - a clean buster

Bug#984790: buster-pu: package libreoffice/1:6.1.5-3+deb10u7

Hi, Am 13.03.21 um 19:57 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Mon, 2021-03-08 at 13:26 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: >> +libreoffice (1:6.1.5-3+deb10u7) buster; urgency=medium >> + >> + * debian/patches/fix-PYTHONPATH.diff: backport upstre

Bug#982274: usr.lib.libreoffice.program.soffice.bin: temporary files are not allowed due to length change

Hi, Am 09.03.21 um 19:27 schrieb Vincas Dargis: > Changing rule into this: >>> >>> owner @{libo_user_dirs}/{,**/}lu?{,?,??}.tmp rwk, #Temporary >>> file used when saving >>> >>> Did the trick (needed 9 symbol variant). >> >> As was done. >> >> >> If you would actually have read the bug

Bug#982274: usr.lib.libreoffice.program.soffice.bin: temporary files are not allowed due to length change

Hi, for avoidance of doubt... Am 08.03.21 um 20:51 schrieb Rene Engelhard: >> type=AVC msg=audit(1615225628.771:1363): apparmor="DENIED" >> operation="mknod" profile="libreoffice-soffice" >> name="/home/vincas/Dokumentai/lu4638vdjw1.

Bug#984790: buster-pu: package libreoffice/1:6.1.5-3+deb10u7

=medium + + * debian/patches/fix-PYTHONPATH.diff: backport upstream fix to +not leave a bare trailing : in PYTHONPATH as it causes unconditional +loading of encodings.py from . (closes: #984703) + + -- Rene Engelhard Mon, 08 Mar 2021 13:13:24 +0100 + libreoffice (1:6.1.5-3+deb10u6) buster

Bug#984703: libreoffice-calc: LibreOffice Calc executes code from current dir (encodings.py) when opening a .csv

Hi again, Am 07.03.21 um 23:08 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > Am 07.03.21 um 22:45 schrieb Milko Krachounov: >> After some additional testing, checking my environment and inspecting pyuno/ >> source/loader/pyuno_loader.cxx, I want to amend the report, particularly >>

Bug#984703: libreoffice-calc: LibreOffice Calc executes code from current dir (encodings.py) when opening a .csv

forwarded 984703 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121384 thanks Hi, Am 07.03.21 um 22:45 schrieb Milko Krachounov: > After some additional testing, checking my environment and inspecting pyuno/ > source/loader/pyuno_loader.cxx, I want to amend the report, particularly >

Bug#984703: libreoffice-calc: LibreOffice Calc executes code from current dir (encodings.py) when opening a .csv

tag 984703 + moreinfo tag 984703 + unreproducible thanks Hi, Am 07.03.21 um 13:34 schrieb Milko Krachounov: > When opening any CSV file with LibreOffice Calc, Calc opens and executes > encodings.py from the current working directory. Demonstrably wrong, see below. > That presumably happens

Bug#984703: libreoffice-calc: LibreOffice Calc executes code from current dir (encodings.py) when opening a .csv

Hi again, Am 07.03.21 um 13:34 schrieb Milko Krachounov: > When opening any CSV file with LibreOffice Calc, Calc opens and executes > encodings.py from the current working directory. That presumably happens > because There also is no mention of any "encodings.py" in anything in LibreOffice

Bug#982859: libcmis-dev: allowable-actions.hxx uses non-existing file boost/shared_ptr.hpp

Hi, Am 15.02.21 um 15:56 schrieb Vincent Lefevre: > Now, I don't know whether this file is really needed, in which case > I suppose that there is a missing dependency on libboost1.74-dev > (currently). Hmm, yes. Looks like libcmis-dev needs a Depends: libboost-dev... Regards, Rene

Bug#982562: general: Storing upstream signatures next to upstream tarballs is problematic

Hi, Am 11.02.21 um 21:59 schrieb Raphaël Hertzog: > [1] For details it happened in dbus-glib: > https://snapshot.debian.org/package/dbus-glib/0.110-2/ -> it has .asc file > https://snapshot.debian.org/package/dbus-glib/0.110-3/ -> no .asc > https://snapshot.debian.org/package/dbus-glib/0.110-4/

Bug#982274: usr.lib.libreoffice.program.soffice.bin: temporary files are not allowed due to length change

Hi, Am 08.02.21 um 03:15 schrieb Paul Wise: > Tags: patch No, No patch. patch does not  mean "add a ?" but if at all someting like this $ git diff sysui/desktop/apparmor/program.soffice.bin diff --git a/sysui/desktop/apparmor/program.soffice.bin b/sysui/desktop/apparmor/program.soffice.bin

Bug#979439: hunspell-it: Italian spell check cannot recognize simple words

Hi again, Am 13.01.21 um 20:59 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > Am 13.01.21 um 19:43 schrieb Antonio: >> I solved it by changing this line of the file >> "/usr/share/hunspell/it_IT.aff": >> >> --- it_IT.aff.orig.bad  2021-01-13 19:28:38.184457124 +0100 >&

Bug#979439: hunspell-it: Italian spell check cannot recognize simple words

Hi Antonio, Am 13.01.21 um 19:43 schrieb Antonio: > I solved it by changing this line of the file > "/usr/share/hunspell/it_IT.aff": > > --- it_IT.aff.orig.bad  2021-01-13 19:28:38.184457124 +0100 > +++ it_IT.aff.new.ok   2021-01-13 19:38:06.141194317 +0100 > @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ >  LANG it_IT >  

Bug#979439: hunspell-it: Italian spell check cannot recognize simple words

Hi, Am 13.01.21 um 10:36 schrieb g.l. gragnani: > Package: hunspell-it > Version: 1:7.1.0~rc1-1 > Followup-For: Bug #979439 > > Dear Maintainer, > > I can confirm this bug for both LibreOffice and Thunderbird (1:78.6.0-1) > According to the program isutf8 (package moreutils) > the file

Bug#980013: libreoffice fails throwing com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException

tag 980013 + moreinfo tag 980013 + unreproducible thanks Hi, Am 12.01.21 um 22:54 schrieb Nick Bailey: > access("/tmp", W_OK)= 0 > getuid()= 1000 > socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0) = 3 > fcntl(3, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0 >

Bug#978431: texlive-base: dist-upgrade buster->bullseye fails

Package: texlive-base Version: 2020.20201203-2 Severity: serious Hi, dist-upgrade buster->bullseye which just caused my system to not get out of apt -f install anymore: Entpacken von texlive-base (2020.20201203-2) über (2018.20190227-2) ... dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten des Archivs

Bug#977977: libreoffice: a large part of the window appears off-screen

retitle 977977 libreoffice: a large part of the window might appear off-screen if resultion/monitor config changes Hi, Am 23.12.20 um 20:34 schrieb Vincent Lefevre: > On 2020-12-23 19:53:09 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: >> Am 23.12.20 um 18:59 schrieb Vincent Lefevre: >>

Bug#977857: libreoffice-common: On Wayland, it doesn't work without the xwayland pkg but installation does not pull xwayland as a dependency

Hi, Am 22.12.20 um 01:07 schrieb jman: > In order to make Libreoffice work, the package `xwayland` should be installed > as a dependency. It doesn't scale to add a xwayland dependency on every package doing X operations. > Unless I'm wrong, I believe the real issue is that Libreoffice does not

Bug#977977: libreoffice: a large part of the window appears off-screen

tag 977977 + unreproducible tag 977977 + moreinfo thanks Hi, Am 23.12.20 um 18:59 schrieb Vincent Lefevre: > Severity: important Sigh. > A large part of the window appears off-screen, including the menu > and window controls. Basically, the only thing I can do is to type > Ctrl-Q to quit

Bug#950319: libreoffice: filename replacements in mime entries for mailcap must not be quoted within the given command

Hi, Am 17.12.20 um 00:48 schrieb Marriott NZ: > Unfortunately no progress yet on #928037, but I wanted to add here some info > from related bug reports. > > 1) There is a Lintian test for this specific problem: > https://lintian.debian.org/tags/quoted-placeholder-in-mailcap-entry.html > Package

Bug#976463: Libreoffice translation

Hi, for avoidance of doubt: Am 05.12.20 um 13:47 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > Though Debian does not ship anything which contains this script. We file in a package that is. Of course I could patch this but this would be a no-op in Debian. > same dicts are also used by other applications)

Bug#975951: libreoffice tries to access files of firefox profiles (AppArmor)

Hi, On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 07:25:19PM +0100, Jörg Sommer wrote: > Rene Engelhard schrieb am Fr 27. Nov, 16:48 (+0100): > > > Package: libreoffice > > > > No, libreoffice does not contain anything except dependencies. Do you mean > > libreoffice-core? > >

Bug#975951: libreoffice tries to access files of firefox profiles (AppArmor)

Hi, On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 04:48:22PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > 16:41 < _rene_> is there any plan to be able to use /.pki/nssdb? (see > https://wiki.mozilla.org/NSS_Shared_DB_And_LINUX) > 16:41 < _rene_> instead of the mozilla profile? > 16:42 -!- hallnknight >

Bug#975951: libreoffice tries to access files of firefox profiles (AppArmor)

Hi, On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 02:31:08PM +0100, Jörg Sommer wrote: > How about using ~/.pki/nssdb? https://wiki.mozilla.org/NSS_Shared_DB_And_LINUX Oh, didn't know about that one. The reaction was predictable, though: 16:41 < _rene_> is there any plan to be able to use /.pki/nssdb? (see

Bug#975951: libreoffice tries to access files of firefox profiles (AppArmor)

severity 975951 minor tag 975951 upstream forwarded 975951 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119811 retitle 975951 libreoffice tries to access files of firefox profiles notfound 975951 1:7.0.3-4+b1 thanks Hi, > Package: libreoffice No, libreoffice does not contain anything

Bug#975928: libreoffice: Please reimport the scale option in the view settings

tag 975928 + upstream forwarded 975928 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101646 thanks Hi, Am 26.11.20 um 20:18 schrieb Hans-J. Ullrich: > as there are now screens with high resolutions, the font of the menus are

Bug#975481: Use libmariadb-dev instead of legacy libmariadbclient-dev

severity 975481 wishlist tag 975481 + moreinfo thanks Am 22.11.20 um 19:15 schrieb Otto Kekäläinen: > Package: libreoffice How is this a normal bug? Please a bit more care when reporting bugs. Either it's a wish or libmariadbclient-dev is supposed to be removed soonish at which it would be at

Bug#974220: libreoffice-writer: Double paste in Writer

severity 974220 normal tag 974220 + unreproducble tag 974220 + moreinfo thanks Hi Am 11.11.20 um 15:06 schrieb Claudio Ferreira Filho: > Severity: important As for your other bug,  this is IMHO not "important". > When I copy anything (from browser, terminal or other application) and paste

Bug#974421: Wrong title

retitle 974421 TexMaths 0.48.2 not working in Debian unstable tag  974421 + moreinfo tag 974421 + unreproducible thanks Hi, Am 11.11.20 um 17:27 schrieb g.l. gragnani: > Of course, title should read: > TexMaths 0.48.2 NOT working in Debian unstable > You could have retitled it yourself

Bug#974345: libreoffice-writer: shortcut keys don't work

tag 974345 + moreinfo tag 974345 + unreproducible severity 974345 normal thanks Hi, Am 11.11.20 um 15:17 schrieb Claudio Ferreira Filho: >  Severity: important Sorry, no. |important| a bug which has a major effect on the usability of a package, without rendering it completely

Bug#973909: libreoffice-impress: crash when exiting presentation mode

Hi, Am 08.11.20 um 11:26 schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt: > On 08.11.20 10:20, Rene Engelhard wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Am 07.11.20 um 19:11 schrieb Rene Engelhard: >>> Am 07.11.20 um 10:12 schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt: >>>> Everytime I leave the LibreOf

Bug#973909: libreoffice-impress: crash when exiting presentation mode

Hi, Am 07.11.20 um 19:11 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > Am 07.11.20 um 10:12 schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt: >> Everytime I leave the LibreOffice Impress presentation mode by pressing >> the ESC key the application crashes: > In a just upgraded amd64 testing VM (inside KDE): > >

Bug#973909: libreoffice-impress: crash when exiting presentation mode

tag 973909 + unreproducible tag 973909 + moreinfo thanks Hi, Am 07.11.20 um 10:12 schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt: > Everytime I leave the LibreOffice Impress presentation mode by pressing > the ESC key the application crashes: In a just upgraded amd64 testing VM (inside KDE): 1. Start

Bug#973909: libreoffice-impress: crash when exiting presentation mode

Hi, Am 07.11.20 um 10:39 schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt: > The error does not occur with the LibreOffice 7.0 daily build: You know what "daily builds" mean? Obviously not, it's a build from the current development tree. >

Bug#973682: libreoffice-common: bash-completion for .pdf files

tag 973682 + pending thanks Hi, Am 03.11.20 um 09:34 schrieb Félix Sipma: > As libreoffice-pdfimport functionality has been merged in the main > packages, it would be nice if pdf filenames could be completed with > bash-completion. > > "$ libreoffice " would list .pdf files in addition to

Bug#921178: Re: Bug#940914: uno-libs3: Segfault on launch in cppu::_copyConstructAnyFromData

Hi, Am 03.11.20 um 06:35 schrieb Rene Engelhard: >> As for reproduction, I believe the easiest is to grab the Debian live >> CD image and run it in qemu -kvm, and it will reproduce. It does for >> me. If you can't, please let me know. > Ah, Live? > > Does it only happ

Bug#921178: Re: Bug#940914: uno-libs3: Segfault on launch in cppu::_copyConstructAnyFromData

Hi, Am 02.11.20 um 23:30 schrieb Witold Baryluk: > I did provide stack traces for example in February 2019. > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=921178 > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=940914 True, after which I said I simply can't reproduce it. > There was

Bug#940914: uno-libs3: Segfault on launch in cppu::_copyConstructAnyFromData

Hi, to answer myself: Am 02.11.20 um 12:14 schrieb r...@rene-engelhard.de: > Am 2. November 2020 10:23:49 MEZ schrieb Witold Baryluk > : >> I wasn't able to use libreoffice for almost 2 years on Debian, on >> multiple machines. > Then you should have provided needed info in those 2 years? It's

Bug#973517: libreoffice-canzeley-client: please depend on libreoffice-sdbc-mysql instead of transitional libreoffice-mysql-connector

Package: libreoffice-canzeley-client Version: 0.5.1-4 Severity: wishlist Hi Mechtilde, libreoffice-mysql-connector is (since long) a transitional package for libreoffice-sdbc-mysql (since it's not an extension anymore but integrated into LO proper.): # apt-cache show libreoffice-mysql-connector

Bug#966087: New info

severity 960087 serious retitle 960087 libreoffice-writer: Cannot save file: "General input/output error" due to missing librdf0 thanks Hi, I almost wanted to answer (in a more verbose form) that there is no missing dependency... Am 29. Oktober 2020 01:15:50 MEZ schrieb Emmanuel Oliveros :

Bug#972280: Libreoffice: when adwaita-dark controls used, buttons are not visible anymore

forwarded 972280 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126933 tag 972280 + upstream thanks Hi, On 15.10.20 20:48, Pavlos Ponos wrote: > Package: libreoffice > Version: 1:7.0.2-2 > Severity: important Oh my. My humble

Bug#966087: LO saving failure

[ also sending to the bug ] Hi, Am 13.10.20 um 19:41 schrieb Sulyok Attila: > I prepared a bug report see below. I did not submit it, because I > found the same bug reported under #966087. > > Have you any idea how to get free from this bug ? > As said already, I need info. It works in a i386

Bug#972043: libreoffice: 1:6.1.5-1 -> 1:7.0.2-1 upgrade fails

Hi, Am 11.10.20 um 21:12 schrieb Jessica Clarke: >> Preparing to unpack .../09-libreoffice-common_1%3a7.0.2-1_all.deb ... >> dpkg-maintscript-helper: error: file >> '/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/registry/math.xcd' not owned by package >> 'libreoffice-common:all' >> dpkg-maintscript-helper: error:

Bug#970688: rm: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libtinfo.so.6: version `NCURSES6_TINFO_6.2.current' not found (required by /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libncurses.so.6)

Hi, Am 21.09.20 um 18:34 schrieb Sven Joachim: > Control: reassign -1 cowdancer > Control: forcemerge 970555 -1 > > On 2020-09-21 17:53 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > >> Package: libtinfo6 >> Version: 6.2+20200918-1 >> Severity: serious >> >> Hi, >&

Bug#970688: rm: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libtinfo.so.6: version `NCURSES6_TINFO_6.2.current' not found (required by /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libncurses.so.6)

Package: libtinfo6 Version: 6.2+20200918-1 Severity: serious Hi, in a (dist-|cowbuilder ) upgrade of my i386 chroot: $ sudo cowbuilder --update --basepath /var/cache/pbuilder/base.cow.i386/ --bindmounts /home I: Copying COW directory I: forking: rm -rf /var/cache/pbuilder/build/cow.26407 I:

Bug#964613: liborcus: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 11:44:59AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Nevermind, I just remembered I have those "Debian Janitor" changes > pending. Will do a source upload. Done now. (And a new liborcus with bumped build-dep.) Regards, Rene

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >