could print a name or ID that is neither
real nor effective.
However this appears to not be the case for id in jessie. If it is
called after only calling setuid(), and not assigning any supplementary
groups or calling setgid(), then it reports something like:
uid=1000(ron) gid=0(root) groups
this problem.
If you like this version, it probably also wants a oneliner in the
sample debarchiver.conf too to note @vrfycmd can be an array now.
Cheers,
Ron
--- /usr/bin/debarchiver2014-07-21 06:05:08.059769856 +0930
+++ debarchiver 2014-07-21 07:22:11.316828267 +0930
@@ -96,6 +96,7
Hi Stephen,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 07:59:50AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
Hi Ron,
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:12:10 +0100, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com
wrote:
A conclusion of the short discussion is probably that both mingw32 and
gcc-mingw32 packages (and their corresponding
:)
Cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[] a second time, right
after --buildresult.
One of those can probably go away :)
Cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Just a heads up that the patch I sent upstream to fix this has
now been accepted and can be found here:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/virt-manager.git/commit/?id=ea1d973957ce3662c7fb22046c34b62f72f0e624
Cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ
would be reasonably trivial too.
Just grep for O_CREAT, and in the 4 places it is found add ', 0640'
to the open() call. The disk images shouldn't need any more generous
permission than that.
Cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
this.
Ideally it would be nice if it still worked without needing that
(I really do like that mate mostly still lets me install only what
I actually need on a particular system without dozens of apps that
I absolutely don't), but as-is it's just a missing dep.
Thanks!
Ron
information on that.
Cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:27:20PM -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
Hi Ron,
On 06/18/2014 11:17 AM, Ron wrote:
Hi Breno,
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:29:37AM -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
Package: opus
Version: 1.1-1
The package opus fails to build on ppc64el, as on new architectures
above where
this needed to be fixed that I've attached a patch for too)
Thanks for maintaining this!
Cheers,
Ron
From 751276835e0f808edfcb1e3d54ed4cbb86a7d1ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ron r...@debian.org
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 03:45:43 +0930
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Don't create a Toolbar
are shipping patched versions that do not
have this problem, and I can't find any reports of regressions or
other problems they have seen, so could we please not be the only
distro where DHCP fails if you have hardware that does checksum
offloading ...
Thanks! :)
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
of the conflicting names, it would be
problematic. Ron, will you agree if someone packaged global6 without the
CGI stuff and use of the alternative system to let people choose between
global and global6 for gtags and other commands?
That sounds a lot like taking a horrible mess, and making it even more
/
parse_option_param: Bad format a
Listening on LPF/eth0
...
Thanks!
Ron
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.15-rc7-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG
severity 725256 minor
thanks
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 04:11:44PM +0400, Sergei Golovan wrote:
Hi Ron,
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Ron r...@debian.org wrote:
Ok, so it looks like wavesurfer isn't actually a problem here, but you'll
need to point out to ftpmaster that tcl-snack does
to report the problem from #749593, which I ran into
when swapping marco for sawfish, but I see that's already fixed now and
just waiting to hit jessie :)
Cheers,
Ron
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental
in an increasingly
hysterical tone of voice. So please, give me some actual relevant facts
about how this breaks on your port, or just give it a rest.
Is that really too much to ask?
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:29:20PM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
2014-05-26 20:09 GMT+01:00 Ron r...@debian.org:
Well it's certainly always going to take much longer for upstream to
do that if nobody ever tells them about it ...
But that is kind of exactly my point
if nothing else catches fire first).
I'm still looking into plans for the others.
Cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
a distro
than it seems to build from source. ship it.
Cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 05:12:48PM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
2014-05-26 15:14 GMT+01:00 Ron r...@debian.org:
Hi Manuel,
Can you confirm which of these ports are currently actually in progress
for Debian, and whether or not they all already have the necessary
support
for This will never happen, so I will strongly object to any upload
that does this.
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:50:57PM +0100, Punit Agrawal wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Ron r...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 09:38:54AM +0100, Punit Agrawal wrote:
Ok. Am I correct in understanding that the actual system cgi script is
not provided by global
change to the config, and it all then works as expected.
Cheers,
Ron
--- /boot/config-3.2.0-4-amd64 2014-02-02 11:46:29.0 +1030
+++ .config 2014-04-08 22:45:10.0 +0930
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
#
# Automatically generated file; DO NOT EDIT.
-# Linux/x86 3.2.54 Kernel Configuration
.
--
Ron Murray r...@rjmx.net
PGP Fingerprint: 0ED0 C1D1 615C FCCE 7424 9B27 31D8 AED5 AF6D 0D4A
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: reportbug
Version: 6.5.0
Severity: minor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Trying to use the '--bugnumber' option:
ron@tinkerbell:~$ reportbug --bugnumber=739581
Unrecognized token: no-ldap
Usage: reportbug [options] package | filename
reportbug: error: --bugnumber
Package: init-select
Version: 1.20140301
Followup-For: Bug #739581
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
H. Close, but no banana.
* Problem still exists in version 1.20140301. grub.cfg cuts off
immediately after the ### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/30_init-select ###
line.
*
Package: abiword
Version: 3.0.0-4+b1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.12-1-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8
Package: abiword
Version: 3.0.0-4+b1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.12-1-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8
Package maintainer,
My error in reporting the bug. It was actually a bug in my printer ink
delivery system, not a software bug. It was solved by removing the
print head and soaking it in hot water.
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Package: abiword
Version: 3.0.0-4+b1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.12-1-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8
Package: grub2-common
Version: 2.00-22
Severity: important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Since the last grub update in testing, update-grub appears to fail
during 30_init-select and doesn't include Windows partitions in
grub.cfg, although it sees them:
khufu:~# update-grub
with rather than actually
use in anything larger than a single user embedded device.
That might have been ok a few years ago, but it seems to fall a bit
short of what is really needed today now ...
Cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:59:21AM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
reassign 699103 telepathy-rakia 0.7.4-1
tags 699103 + upstream
thanks
On 28/01/14 20:06, Ron wrote:
Yes, I think I'm a bit leery about unilaterally (and otherwise silently)
changing the trust path of all applications using
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 06:27:27PM +, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 07:25:30AM +1030, Ron wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 09:36:28AM +, Steve Langasek wrote:
The speex package in Debian currently does a fixed point build, instead of
a floating point build, on all
and symlinked ~/.sip/auth to /etc/ssl/certs. In a test
set of once, it worked without selecting ignore TLS errors.
It looks like that path comes from sofia-sip.
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/ron/sofia-sip.git;a=blob;f=libsofia-sip-ua/tport/tport_type_tls.c
Would it be wrong
of the damage/benefit spectrum we might be looking at.
Cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
repos
and I'm definitely sure there's more than I've so far imagined :).
Cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
, but someone will just open another one, so it's
probably best to keep this recorded on the off chance they might see
it and be enlightened. You should consider it flagged Don't fix :)
hth,
Ron
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/434935
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
Hi Gerardo,
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 02:59:54AM -0400, Gerardo Malazdrewicz wrote:
Ron:
Please consider this patch, or a polished version of it makefiles
are not my forte)
It generates, for me, correct packages in both squeeze and
experimental.
Thanks for taking a crack
.
Cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Colin,
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:43:37PM +1030, Ron wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:48:46AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 08:46:27PM +1030, Ron wrote:
Lintian does already have a too old check -- but it doesn't
actually bark about what would _really_ break
still actually a problem. I can get a new package out
quickly if there is, but afaics, we're already fine.
Cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:48:46AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 08:46:27PM +1030, Ron wrote:
I'm not unsympathetic to the work and pain of porters bootstrapping a new
arch, but any 'solution' that is Debian-specific, isn't really a solution
at all, it's just an SEP
the bug. Please, feel free to reopen it
if you think the bug is still there, or fill a new bug.
Yeah, if you think it's fixed, that's fine with me. I don't use
gnuplot all that often, but when I do it's invaluable, so thanks
for looking after it.
Cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Package: udev
Version: 204-5
Followup-For: Bug #655924
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have the same kind of problem. I have four Debian machines, and on
three of them the only symlink created is /dev/cdrom (linked to sr0).
The fourth machine (the one I'm submitting this on, and
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 08:47:59AM +0400, Sergei Golovan wrote:
Hi Ron,
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Ron r...@debian.org wrote:
Ah, I just looked at the new package contents, and I see what you've done.
That makes sense. I guess my question then is does anything break with
your new
had with -alsa).
The rename of the snack packages doesn't bother me otherwise, but is
there some reason that old plan really isn't the best plan anymore?
Cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 05:20:25PM +0400, Sergei Golovan wrote:
Hi Ron,
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Ron r...@debian.org wrote:
I thought the plan was that we'd just depend on libsnack2 (or whatever)
so that if you ever ended up adding tcl-snack-pulse (or whatever), then
people
this is a real pain with i386 audio
dependencies! Dear Ron, please don't stay silent on this issue. It has
been going on for a very long time now! The bug was initially reported
almost one and a half year ago. What is there against applying the small
patch? I don't understand your reasoning
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:51:52PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 08:42:47PM +0930, Ron wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:45:12AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
Ron - would you have any objections to this?
Yes, I do, for the same reason I've already said
. But that is a moving equilibrium,
which eventually will tip. It's just moving painfully slowly still :)
As these things often do.
Cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 01:12:50PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Ron r...@debian.org [2013.09.07.1709 +0200]:
Dovecot 2.1.17 is now in Debian experimental, thanks to jaldhar.
As it'll invariably migrate to unstable and eventually stable,
this is an important bug report
Package: calendarserver
Version: 3.2+dfsg-5
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
When trying to start calendarserver:
# /etc/init.d/calendarserver start
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/twistd, line 14, in module
run()
File
to break, or is this really
a bug that the tk folk need to fix?
Cheers,
Ron
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:58:21PM +0200, Giulio Paci wrote:
Package: wavesurfer
Version: 1.8.8p4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Ron,
recently I upgraded tcl/tk 8.5 to the latest
. For now tcl-snack |
tcl-snack-alsa seems good enough for me.
It seems not for me and apparently it seems not for Ron Lee as well (See
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=659974#37).
Moreover in that thread you proposed to use dependency on the unversioned
libsnack2 in order
reassign 719109 tk8.5
thanks
Hi Sergei,
I'm going to punt this one to you, since I can reproduce it too.
It appears something incompatible has changed in recent tk8.5.
Cheers,
Ron
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 09:03:38PM +0200, Martin Hradil wrote:
Yeah, this seems unlikely to be a bug
narrow down which.
Cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
low for people to update their backports at least until we get one
that's less important for them to update as updates come. That should be
the 1.1 formal release, which should be Coming Soon.
Cheers,
Ron
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:23:06AM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
Hi,
attached
Package: gnome-online-accounts
Version: 3.4.2-2
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
For some time now, whenever I log in to Gnome, the display locks up
solid for around 30 seconds. The mouse cursor is visible and moveable,
but anything on the display (like gkrellm's
Package: krb5-auth-dialog
Followup-For: Bug #714815
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ah yes. I must admit that I hadn't realised there were menu items
under those. Sorry for taking up your time.
You may close this bug if you want.
Thanks,
.Ron
- -- System Information
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 03:30:51AM +0200, Robin Gareus wrote:
On 07/01/2013 05:59 PM, Ron wrote:
[..]
So I'm still not really sure what
showstopper complexity you are worried about there.
Sample accurate alignment of buffered netjack streams with the rest of
jack. updating port-latencies
Package: krb5-auth-dialog
Version: 3.8.0-2
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sometime recently, krb5-auth-dialog lost its 'preferences' function,
leaving no way to set the login primcipal (among other things). It
used to be in the context menu, but it's no longer
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 11:15:10AM +0200, Robin Gareus wrote:
On 06/30/2013 03:11 AM, Ron wrote:
My understanding of the background prior to that is that Robin had some
discussion with some of the developers at FOMS, who at the time suggested
the custom modes probably would be appropriate
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 04:40:19PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
On 06/30/2013 03:11 AM, Ron wrote:
Hi!
I'll limit my response to the aspect of symbols, since Robin has already
answered the other questions.
Just sketching now:
libopus0 will provide /usr/lib/libopus.so.0 (business
there will be no
turning back from it, or second thoughts, or regrets over mistakes
that could be remedied now in better ways instead.
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 07:36:57PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
Ron, what do you think about the following?
Instead of using embedded copies in jackd1/2, let's
Package: gdm3
Version: 3.4.1-8
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Just loaded the latest stable release. I have a Geforce4 GPU.
ok if I use Gnome classic
* What exactly did you do (or
Hi Shigio,
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:29:54AM +0900, Shigio YAMAGUCHI wrote:
Hi Ron,
If you believe there is an serious problem which prevents you
from updating the package, would you please point it out on the
GLOBAL Bug mailing list (bug-glo...@gnu.org)?
Let's argue about it in the public
and we fixed it upstream a few weeks back.
There should be a new release going to unstable soon now.
Cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
out with that shortly too.
Cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
this disagreement than
people continually lobbying for change for change sake, without ever
changing the actual problems over which there is disagreement.
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
can.
Cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
seem helpful for either of those goals at this stage of the freeze.
If there were proven vectors for any of these things, including this one,
we'd have rushed out urgent fixes last year, when they were patched.
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
a whole bunch of other
potentially serious bugs in that app too would be my first bet ... which
would still be a better use of time than blind patching without any real
testing ever being done)
Cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
?
If you do I will be glad to consider it for the next release, but so far you
have mentioned nothing further to me about resolving this issue, and you tie
my hands somewhat if you insist this is suitable when it fairly clearly is not.
Sorry,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist
you did that
actually demonstrates this improves performance in speex, since I don't
see any indication of that being done in the LP achievement you refer to?
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
. No.
Why did you send this to a bug report about multi-arch support?
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
package shortly.
Cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
passing it
to snack for processing.
So I guess we can close this one and just track it against snack?
Cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:58:44PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Nov 21, Ron r...@debian.org wrote:
Do the package directives actually cause udev any harm? Just moving
Probably not.
Would it be better to delete it if unchanged, but otherwise leave it
alone if it is modified? How
,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 05:29:03PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Nov 21, Ron r...@debian.org wrote:
So after an update to current Wheezy a few days back, I was surprised
to notice today that my module blacklist was no longer being honoured.
It appears the file was silently moved
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ron r...@debian.org
* Package name: opusfile
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Xiph.Org
* URL : http://www.opus-codec.org
* License : 3-clause BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : High-level API for basic
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 02:42:45PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 15:31:53 +1030, Ron wrote:
Does glxgears actually run for you without the mumble preload?
Yup, sorry for not mentioning this yesterday.
Ok, so it's reasonably certain to be something mumble is trying
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 05:39:31PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 01:08:19 +1030, Ron wrote:
Does glxgears actually run for you without the mumble preload?
Yup, sorry for not mentioning this yesterday.
Ok, so it's reasonably certain to be something mumble is trying
severity 691535 serious
thanks
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 01:28:28PM +1030, Ron wrote:
So I guess the two interesting questions remaining now are:
- Does it actually work!
- and when do we want to upload it if it does ...
And as for the second, the best plan for -release at present would
for that, since the RC
fix will flag it already).
Many thanks again!
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 11:33:09PM -0500, Chris Knadle wrote:
it's hard to say that the lack of 3D overlay functionality is RC.
This bug isn't reporting the lack of that functionality, it's reporting
clear evidence of a fundamentally broken build in a library we are shipping.
That library build
doesn't really make a lot of sense, the mailbox_equals
symbol is definitely present in dovecot 2.1.7-2 that your report says you
are running, and nobody else seems to be seeing this problem -- so you'll
need to give us some clue about what is special about your system here ...
Cheers,
Ron
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 02:30:03AM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Fri, 09 Nov 2012 09:51:05 +1030, Ron wrote:
My impression at the moment is:
- There's a bug but mumble still works, as confirmed by the submitter
And the fix should be trivial. libmumble uses symbols from libGL
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 01:28:28PM +1030, Ron wrote:
So I guess the two interesting questions remaining now are:
- Does it actually work!
- and when do we want to upload it if it does ...
Ok, so I just knocked up a quick and dirty test jig here for what
libmumble is doing, and it looks
of the actual
bug behind the one lesser symptom of it first reported here).
- The bug is not new but, as Ron implied, newly reported.
Is this correct?
I think so, we can add this to the growing list of things it's been
shipping for some time that nobody apparently ever used or tested
it is new and who it effects. So yes,
you will need to investigate that further. It's most certainly not
expected behaviour for a Debian package.
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
at what the choke points really are on this
particular arch. There isn't a magic knob we can just flip in speex
to fix that for it more than we already are ...
Sorry,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
to sign off on the proposed
update patches I have queued now, and then I'll push it out.
Cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 08:22:01AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
Hi Ron,
On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 05:10:11 +1030
Ron r...@debian.org wrote:
As libsnack2 maintainer suggested, just will solve this problem.
So I'll put fixed version to 10-days delay queue. Ron, if you don't want
it, please
Hi Hideki,
Hi,
As libsnack2 maintainer suggested, just will solve this problem.
So I'll put fixed version to 10-days delay queue. Ron, if you don't want
it, please tell me to cancel it. For detail, see attached patch.
I think I'd have preferred this to go to experimental if people
need in the pipeline then that adds some
concrete to making that decision.
I'll check on the timeline for the next tag to go down (which should be
soon), but if that looks like being a while away still then I'll push
1.0.1 to experimental to unblock you on this in the meantime.
Cheers,
Ron
I second the motion. I do not need xul-ext-adblock-plus. Especially
since it forces installation of iceweasel, which I most emphatically do
_not_ need. I'll stick with manually installing the *real* firefox,
thank you very much.
As the original submitter says, please move the dependency to
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:33:21AM +0200, Catherine Lowenstein wrote:
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Ron r...@debian.org wrote:
Can you tell me more about the actual symptoms you were hearing with pulse?
I've installed pulseaudio since bluetooth audio headsets doesn't work
anymore
301 - 400 of 1289 matches
Mail list logo
