--
Sean Whitton
mailscripts_0.7-1.debdiff
Description: Binary data
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
.2-1 history?
That way, eventually, all commits will be marked as untainted and I
won't have to keep passing the option until the end of time.
If not, I think there needs to be some moderately standard way to
request that the whole current history of a package on dgit-repos be
marked as untainted.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
it thinks
are tainted aren't actually tainted?
Total 47 (delta 8), reused 19 (delta 0)
remote: gpgv: Signature made Mon 04 Mar 2019 05:36:37 PM UTC
remote: gpgv:using RSA key
9B917007AE030E36E4FC248B695B7AE4BF066240
remote: gpgv: Good signature from "Sean Whitton "
re
e tree is indeed a bare-debian repo, ie that it
> has no files outside debian/. If there are any I will treat it as a
> snag (and with -f delete them in favour of whatever the upstream tree
> has).
SGTM.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
er that is missing from
>> d/changelog, and output a hint.
>
> Are you volunteering to write the (7) manpage ? :-)
Here is a patch.
This does not completely resolve #898494, as I haven't modified dgit to
output the hint to look at the manpage.
--
Sean Whitton
From 3d3e6c7cf5448ae1c1dd7
this at every sphinx version bump :-)
Once #658238 is resolved, it won't be necessary. See comments in
debian-policy's d/rules.
I've made another upload.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
a
> note of this in release news.
This sounds like a really good idea, assuming you mean NEWS.Debian.
Thank you for your efforts.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ve before
standardising it in Policy. Please consider reassigning the bug back to
the package in which it might be implemented, unless you have some
reason why the Policy change absolutely has to happen first.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
point to section
> 4.9 in the FHS?
>
> In FHS 2.3, this "section 4.5" might have been right. But as said in
> policy 9.1.1:
>
>> The location of all files and directories must comply with the Filesystem
>> Hierarchy Standard (FHS), version 3.0, [...].
>
> N
Hello,
On Fri 15 Feb 2019 at 08:59PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Use of the Build-Conflicts field is currently mostly optional, but Ian
> Jackson and I have been working on text for Debian Policy that would
> require its use in certain cases. See #824495 for the discussion.
>
>
C.
For the purposes of this e-mail, let's assume that we have a good grasp
on what a "reasonable standard development workstation install" means.
Thanks.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ean-mixed
-funclean-ordering make-patches --quiet-would-amend
dgit: error: subprocess failed with error exit status 255
Workaround: `dgit --git-debrebase=true sbuild`.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
cified for the same package.
Seconded and committed, thanks.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
but it doesn't seem like it needs to
block adding the virtual packages to the list.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e not read the whole thread, but a quick scan suggests that all we
are waiting for here is for someone to write a patch against current
Policy's master branch.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Sat 09 Feb 2019 at 08:47PM -06, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> Anyway, do whatever you think best.
Having read it a few more times I think both are valid, and will use
your patch unmodified.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
if not immediately.
Could you file an upstream bug, please?
Uploaded to DELAYED/1.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
clean target does not undo this change, so there will
be issues with producing source packages from the unpacked tree.
Could you fix that, please?
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e shouldn't be in stretch-backports; it was a mistake. I
have requested removal.
It is possible that there is something wrong with your apt config, as
dist-upgrade shouldn't have caused something like this to happen, but I
can't immediately see how it could have happened.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Sun 10 Feb 2019 at 09:51AM +01, Birger Schacht wrote:
> On 2/9/19 9:21 PM, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> Birger, could you add a comment in d/control, saying that the versioned
>> dependency is just a workaround to help users of Debian experimental
>> avoid a
``/run/reboot-required``, at the end
> +of a successful configuration of the package.
> +
> +There are no guarantees provided by the ``/var/reboot-required``
> +convention as to when or whether the requested reboot will occur.
Seconded.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e
> to do the upload for it within the next few days so I'll verify).
Thank you for your response. Please be sure to my -1.2 NMU in your
upload, as it fixes another bug too.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello Berger, Mattia,
On Sat 09 Feb 2019 at 09:30PM +01, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 01:21:36PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> wlroots is only in experimental and is pre-1.0, however. So we probably
>> shouldn't demand proper transitions from
Control: tags 816200 + pending
Control: tags 921895 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for bitlbee (versioned as 3.5.1-1.2) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it
longer.
Regards.
--
Sean Whitton
diff -u bitlbee-3.5.1/debian/bitlbee
which is confusing to people
trying to do NMUs. Perhaps the maintainer will disagree; a downgrade
of the severity of this bug would make sense if it turns out I'm not
aware of some workflow that not building all the binary packages by
default enables.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP
o help users of Debian experimental
avoid a broken window manager, and in the future it will be removed in
favour of relying on dpkg-shlibdeps?
(`dch -r` :))
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
y` didn't show the version for libwlroots0
> either in the Depends. But with listing the version explicitly the
> package also has a dependency on the correct version.
Are you saying that sway would not work at all with the older libwlroots?
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
nstalling and running the package yet, btw, but I guess
that you have done this. I'll give it a try before the upload.
After you've responded to the above, please remember to `dch -r`!
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e reported it in swaylock upstream
> for now (upstreams overlap) and added a workaround.
>
>> - Be sure to `dch -r` when you've fixed these.
> done and pushed.
Uploaded to DELAYED/4. Thanks!
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ile looks like its
> based on Nicolas' work, so i've added them as copyright holders to be
> sure. Pushed to c12f46f
Uploaded to DELAYED/4. Thanks!
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
673b7ecf0951e231dc9e24 looks good to upload, but could
you just confirm that only you have copyright on debian/, please? Did
you do it from scratch, or copy parts from Nicolas' work on the old
source package? If you did it all yourself, just confirm that and I
will upload.
--
Sean Whitton
hen you've fixed these.
Otherwise, we should be good to go.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
496 and #921497.
You need to set Maintainer: and Uploaders: to be the same as the sway
package, since we're doing a split.
I haven't done a full review yet.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Tue 05 Feb 2019 at 05:09PM -07, Sean Whitton wrote:
> There is a new release of sway out, and it moves swayidle and swaylock
> into separate source packages.
>
> Those are all going to have to pass through NEW. Do you have time to
> prepare separate source packages for
Hello Birger,
There is a new release of sway out, and it moves swayidle and swaylock
into separate source packages.
Those are all going to have to pass through NEW. Do you have time to
prepare separate source packages for all these? We might as well do it
now rather than later.
--
Sean
Hello,
On Thu 31 Jan 2019 at 11:40AM +00, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#920970: dgit: should ensure .orig is not in the
> .changes when the .orig is already in DEFERRED"):
>> Hmm. After this, with both the -1 and -2 uploads in DEFERRED, I tried
>
be able to see the result here:
https://ftp-master.debian.org/deferred.html
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 07:24PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> When the user passes --delayed, dgit could check
> https://ftp-master.debian.org/deferred/status to see whether the .orig
> is already in DEFERRED, and if so, remove it from the .changes file.
>
> (I was able
control: tag -1 -pending
Hello Birger,
On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 04:44PM -07, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Pushed to DELAYED/14!
*sigh*
I have been fighting with Debian's upload queue for the past few hours
because I discovered that the -2 upload was not processed.
I was able to get it proces
he
changes, resigning the .changes and .dsc, and uploading again; I
appreciate this kind of messing about is discouraged with dgit, but I
was keen to avoid another roundtrip with my sponsee.)
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
that way.
> Yes, fixed and pushed in 0a31ddda to salsa
Pushed to DELAYED/14!
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
control: tag -1 -pending
Hello,
On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 02:42PM -07, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Thank you. I've pushed it to DELAYED/14, after which it will land in
> the NEW queue.
Er. After doing this, I immediately discovered this error in
d/copyright:
License: LGPL-2.1-or-later
control: tag -1 +pending
Hello Birger,
On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 09:13PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote:
> done in 0d9ddb3b ;)
Thank you. I've pushed it to DELAYED/14, after which it will land in
the NEW queue.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello Birger,
On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 08:47PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote:
> both fixed in ae7be33f. Thanks for your patience!
You need dch -r again ... sorry for the bureaucracy.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello Birger,
On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 07:24AM -07, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Thanks. I neglected to do a d/copyright check yesterday and have found
> some problems with d/copyright that need to be fixed before I can
> upload:
>
> - the Source: field is wrong
>
> - the protocols/
k yesterday and have found
some problems with d/copyright that need to be fixed before I can
upload:
- the Source: field is wrong
- the protocols/ dir needs accounting for (look in the files there)
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ading keyring.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Mon 28 Jan 2019 at 08:53PM +01, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Normally I would request a proper fix, but since this is haskell I went ahead
> and did the binNMU. But please file the bug at severity >= important.
Done, thanks.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Descrip
g.
Ah, okay. Here is the updated command:
nmu pandoc-citeproc-preamble_1.2.3 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against newer
libghc-pandoc-types-dev."
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Source: pandoc-citeproc-preamble
Version: 1.2.3
Hello,
To avoid the need for bugs like #920289, we should use the
haskell-devscripts infrastructure.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e from
autopkgtest into debian/rules?
It seems a shame to lose running the test suites on debci, but if it's
blocking other people's work then we'll just have to accept that.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Sat 26 Jan 2019 at 12:11AM +00, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 04:56:09PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> > which IMO is as good as it is. It also explicitly points to
>> > http://www.debian.org/devel/tech-ctte for detailed information.
>&g
t; which IMO is as good as it is. It also explicitly points to
> http://www.debian.org/devel/tech-ctte for detailed information.
At least for Policy bugs referred to the TC, they prefer a fresh bug
where the first message is a summary of the situation, rather than a clone.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Control: tags 816200 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for bitlbee (versioned as 3.5.1-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
Sean Whitton
diff -u bitlbee-3.5.1/debian/bitlbee-common.postinst bitlbee-3.5.1/debian
Hello,
On Thu 24 Jan 2019 at 05:08PM +01, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Sean Whitton wrote:
>
>> > Maybe more eye-candy theme (see https://sphinx-themes.org/) is good for
>> > policy-doc and other debian docs [..]
>>
>> Yup. We put out a call for thi
un/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ous that touching ``/run/reboot-required`` does not trigger
a reboot, and typical Debian systems never reboot by themselves. IMO
this paragraph is unnecessarily verbose. How about:
There are no guarantees provided by the ``/var/reboot-required``
convention as to when the required reboot will occur.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ms may manipulate these files to signal that a reboot
> +is required.
> +
This is a bit awkward. You describe this feature in terms of maintainer
scripts and then say that programs can use it too. It would be better
to put it in ch. 9 or ch. 10, I think, and describe it in more general
terms.
--
libc6 packages
> trigger reboot notification, but systemd does not.
It seems fine to document this in Policy.
A patch would be welcome.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Sat 12 Jan 2019 at 07:34PM +0100, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
> Hello, thanks for reporting and reassigning.
> I have done the changes needed:
Thank you for following up on this, Laura.
--
Sean Whitton
ion was not
found and is required by pdfminer.six
i.e. when OCRmyPDF tries to load pdfminer.six, pdfminer.six tries to
load pycryptodome.
Let me know what you decide to do, as it might be possible to reenable
pdfminer.six in OCRmyPDF.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
on, so it's just the website that needs to be updated.
Right, so this is for the website team to fix.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Fri 11 Jan 2019 at 10:02PM GMT, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I think the parts of an if and its consequence may not be separated by
> a semicolon.
You're right; I took it out of context.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: elpa-persp-projectile
Version: 1:0.2.0-2
Severity: grave
`perspectives-hash' is now a function that returns something which does
not pass `hash-table-p'. So patching is required.
Since this package is up for adoption, I won't be doing that patching
myself.
--
Sean Whitton
or not. Please excuse my limited
knowledge of python library packaging.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Mon 30 Jul 2018 at 12:04PM +0800, Sean Whitton wrote:
> James Clarke pointed out to me that the reasoning in #904862 applies
> just as well to sbuild's SOURCE_ONLY_CHANGES configuration key.
>
> dgit should pass --no-source-only-changes to sbuild, too.
With the re
eople. I think your (Paul's) analysis of this as a verb is correct
> (at least for general contemporary usage) and therefore Sean ought to
> agree with you that it should be `set up'. I am fine with it being
> changed.
Whoops, yes, it should be 'set up'. Thanks.
--
Sean Whitton
to delete them.
>
> And using -wgfa indeed makes it delete the files, and then succeed.
How about the "opt to disregard"?
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Sun 06 Jan 2019 at 01:07pm GMT, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes ("Re: Bug#857490: dgit: shouldn't fail when previous
> backport not mentioned in changelog"):
>> Suggesting that the user use --overwrite=2.13.0-1.1~bpo8+1, or `git
>> merge -s ours
ted me to file this bug. It can
just look for ~bpoNN in the version number that is missing from
d/changelog, and output a hint.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
g,
>before they said they were done, at which point their
> - tools made -/- (and maybe %) to convert to
> + tools made -/- (and maybe %) convert to
>the fast-forwarding interchange branch.
This is wrong. It changes the meaning to something other than what was
intended.
Otherwise, LGTM.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello Moritz,
On Thu 03 Jan 2019 at 11:06pm +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 10:02:39AM -0400, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> Hello Damyan,
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 08:58:38AM +, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
>> > When firefox hits unstable (probabl
Hello Ian,
On Tue 20 Nov 2018 at 03:24pm GMT, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#824495: debian-policy: Source packages "can"
> declare relationships"):
>> I still don't see how we can implement such new rules, though, because
>> of the pro
ompted me to report this bug
dgit -wgf sbuild
=> complaint from dgit that the tree is dirty
So, in fact, the bug seems to be that dgit is sometimes ignoring my
configured clean-mode.
My full ~/.gitconfig on this machine is here:
https://git.spwhitton.name/dotfiles/tree/.gitconfig?h=zephyr
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Perhaps you could share the wording you have in mind for such a note.
I'm still inclined to prioritise unblocking people, by giving them a way
of resolving disputes between versions of the document without asking on
d-policy, but let's see.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
a bug against the English version about the mistake.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ext. By contrast,
the text you are replacing has a lot more details and is easy to
understand.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ly. Not so for changes to the English text.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
control: tag -1 +patch
Hello,
On Sat 08 Dec 2018 at 02:13pm -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> If you are following dgit-maint-debrebase(7) for a new package that
> requires DFSG-filtering, it will have you prepare a DFSG-clean branch
> and then use `git debrebase new-upstream` to import th
control: tag -1 +patch
Hello,
On Sat 08 Dec 2018 at 02:13pm -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> If you are following dgit-maint-debrebase(7) for a new package that
> requires DFSG-filtering, it will have you prepare a DFSG-clean branch
> and then use `git debrebase new-upstream` to import th
Hello Adam,
On Sun 30 Dec 2018 at 03:39pm +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 02:07:25PM +0000, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> Ideally, this would be reviewed and seconded by people working on init
>> stuff, so I'm not going to second it myself unless we don't get intere
-compat build dependency. This
patch fixes it. Possibly other support/*/detect also need updating in
this way.
Thanks.
--
Sean Whitton
From 2627d9bd95ad10927ccaa563e7098f4d4bf2ae43 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sean Whitton
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 14:05:25 +
Subject: [PATCH] Update support
sts it, and
letting it decide whether to skip.
I'm sorry that I did not include all this information in my original
report. Thank you for your patience.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello Adam,
On Fri 28 Dec 2018 at 12:36pm +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 06:28:04PM +0000, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> Could you provide an actual diff to be applied to policy.git, please?
>
> Sure, what about:?
Thanks.
Ideally, this would be reviewed and sec
Hello,
On Sat 29 Dec 2018 at 11:10am +0100, Lukas Straub wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
> Any status on this?
Unless someone has exactly the device mentioned in the original report,
it's not reproducible so not fixable, unfortunately.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
vider (currently pam-systemd)
Could you provide an actual diff to be applied to policy.git, please?
Please follow the style for the other default-* packages listed there.
Ansgar's suggestion should probably be included, too.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
an alternative
> implementation.
>
> Adam/other elogind maintainers, please clarify/improve wording if this was
> somehow inaccurate.
There seems to be a consensus (and this is not really controversial), to
please file a bug against Policy with a patch to the virtual package
list for s
Hello David,
On Mon 24 Dec 2018 at 08:20am +0900, David Bremner wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes:
>
>> In addition to running upstream test suites, dh_elpa_test could test
>> whether the package's elisp can be bytecompiled against the version of
>> Emacs in sid -- Emacs is a
control: tag -1 +patch
Hello,
Ubuntu has a fix:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/vm/+bug/1763377
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/364804904/vm-emacs26.patch
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
elpa-persp-projectile
The line in persp-projectile that generates this is `(require
'perspective)`; the bug is in that package.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
of bugs earlier.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
on to
emacsclient. I.e. a simple `systemctl --user enable emacs.socket` would
not be sufficient to make plain emacsclient work.
Exactly what units it would be beneficial to be shipped should be
discussed upstream, it would seem.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
nerate a debian/tests/control to pass
back to autopkgtest.
The reason I believe this is that with older sbuild, when there is no
d/tests/control, autopkgtest successfully runs the test suite. So it
must be that it is invoking autodep8.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello Johannes,
On Thu 20 Dec 2018 at 08:37pm +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Quoting Sean Whitton (2018-12-20 15:30:12)
>> sbuild in stretch unconditionally invokes autopkgtest even if the file
>> debian/tests/control is not present in the source package. Newer sbuild
>
control: severity -1 serious
Hello,
Emacs 26.1 has reached Debian unstable (sooner than expected; sorry for
all the e-mails).
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
since stretch. Perhaps, at least, there
could be an option to revert to always invoking autopkgtest when
--run-autopkgtest is passed? --definitely-run-autopkgtest?
Thank you.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Source: s-el
Version: 1.12.0-2
Severity: normal
Tags: help
The 1.12.0-2 upload disabled the test suite -- see comment in
d/elpa-test. The problem should be fixed and the test suite re-enabled.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
2
This bug will likely become RC before the upcoming transitions freeze,
as we expect to ship Emacs 26.1 in buster.
--
Sean Whitton
vm_8.2.0b-4
Description: Binary data
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>'
make: *** [/usr/share/cdbs/1/class/makefile.mk:77:
debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2
This bug will likely become RC before the upcoming transitions freeze,
as we expect to ship Emacs 26.1 in buster.
--
Sean Whitton
sdic_2.1.3-22
ing transitions freeze,
as we expect to ship Emacs 26.1 in buster.
--
Sean Whitton
libhpptools_1.1.1-2
Description: Binary data
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
1101 - 1200 of 2912 matches
Mail list logo
