On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 02:12:40PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hi, ...
>
> it seems this bug is also affecting i386 and s390.
>
Ah, i found one hint on this.
I found that :
printf ("%s\n", L"STRING");
Doesn't print anything, and that the L-strings are
kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-kernel {sid,trunk} main
In the meantime, edit the postinst, remove the two die lines at line 393/394,
run dpkg-reconfigure or dpkg -a --configure, and make sure the old link in
/boot is not broken. (in particular the initrd.img.old link is broken then).
Friendly
l installer Xavier was working on.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
; i386 and s390 AFAIK
13:51 < svenl> waldi: the bug is : 392767
13:51 < svenl> oh.
13:51 < svenl> so it doesn't touch only powerpc.
13:52 < svenl> can you comment something on bug 392767 about this ? Include
this log or something.
13:52 < svenl> waldi: i was wonde
d lately ? I think mips/mipsel, and some other arch where concerned.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 12:55:45AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 23:59:18 +0100 Sven Luther wrote:
>
> [...]
> > Nope, because you can ship the source code and the object file if you
> > wanted.
> >
> > Already now, major parts of debian/m
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 03:59:57PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 12:21:56AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > This bug is closed by the new kernel-package version, and linux-2.6 only
> > needs
> > to be rebuilt with it, which is scheduled for -4,
This bug is closed by the new kernel-package version, and linux-2.6 only needs
to be rebuilt with it, which is scheduled for -4, and amply discussed here
previously.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
error i may make in the future.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:06:50PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi Sven
>
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:32:02PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> ...CUT...
> > > Will all reverse engineered drivers with hardcoded values be considered
> > > as closed source? Must you alwa
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:36:54AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 03:30:23PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > So, i am not entirely sure how d-i handles the case at hand here, where
> > libraries are part of the actual image, but symbols are removed durin
documentation of the registers
may be more of a source for such binary blobs, but it would in any case be no
worse than any other reverse-engineering effort out there.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:09:46PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > My impression is that d-i loads the full libraries later on, or something
> > such.
>
> AFAIK, this never happens. The re
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:05:26AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 01:06:12PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > A version of gdb as .udeb, which could easily be loaded inside the d-i would
> > be very useful for developers. This would come in handy to debug va
having right now, in parted/libparted, which only are
apparent inside the d-i environment.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Ker
debian archive, to get all the .debs.
choose-mirror did not let me do this though, and gave me an error message
saying that my mirror doesn't support my architecture, and the log showed it
checked for the main .deb archive, not the .udeb one.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
D
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 02:11:56PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 02:35:36PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Indeed. But this is something which need to be thought about in a more
> > generic
> > way, and we probably need some generic way
hose are the intel macs, right, so nothing i could do on powerpc, right
?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 03:09:32PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > We really need a better way to handle bug reports which affect more than one
> > package, since cloning and merging is not the best way to go for those.
>
> In t
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 02:28:24PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > [ snipped paragraph about Manoj ]
>
> Quoting Julian Gilbey in the logs for this bug:
>
> > According to Manoj in the logs to bug#394661, which was blocking
ric
way, and we probably need some generic way to handle those cases.
For powerpc, the best way to fix this, is using the mkvmlinuz package, which
is depended upon by all powerpc kernels, and already does some sub-arch
detection.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
someone else (you
maybe), to follow up on bugs like this one, maybe he does also ignore the bug
just because i am affected by it, or something else so unproffesional. I
already pinged him twice on irc about this, and redirected the bug to
kernel-package.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: nobootloader
Version: 1.13
Severity: normal
Please commit the attached patch to svn.
Notice that i already uploaded the package with the fix, so only a commit is
necessary.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 01:33:55PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 26 October 2006 09:10, Sven Luther wrote:
> > That said, please also apply the first hunk of the attached patch,
> > which bumps the check to 1.4, as my colegues released a 1.3 firmware
> > from an old
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 03:25:33AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 October 2006 23:12, Sven Luther wrote:
> > It seems that nobootloader uses still devfs paths for some reason. The
> > following line :
>
> That is not so strange as that line is using th
a bootable pegasos system.
Please apply the below patch to fix this problem.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2
k etch install. I tried using yaird, but the problem persisted, so it
is not a initramfs-tools issue afterall, like Frans thought.
I commented out the two lines at 393/394 (die statements, i suppose they are
checks for older versions of the kernel or something), and was able to manage
installing the
modprobing of the
parent modules in the depmod tree, and only load childrens if the parents
where successfull. But this is mostly cosmetic, and will not change the
functionality in any way.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Index: debian/changelog
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Please apply the following patch, which adds the fancontrol modules to the
powerpc netboot and cdrom images, in order to stop the fans from going into
full speed and have the installed box sound like an aircraft after a few
minutes.
-- Syste
ostinst.
I suppose this is a kernel-package bug of some kind, reassigning there, as
well as bumping the severity to critical, as this makes the kernel unusable.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 05:10:46PM -0400, Michael Furr wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Just wondering if you can still reproduce this bug ?
> Yup :-(
>
> Unpacking linux-image-2.6.18-1-powerpc (from
> .../linux-image-2.6.18-1-powerpc_2.6.18
Package: rootskel
Version: [powerpc64] load the fan control modules.
Severity: normal
Load the fan control modules in order to not let the apple G5 fans go into
full speed and aircraft noise level after a few minutes.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing
h to do it better without risking breakage, so i will only provide this
functional patch.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Ke
the issue may be something
which is fixed in the 2.6.18.1 upstream release, and available in the upcoming
2.6.18-3 upload. Changelog entry says :
- bcm43xx: fix regressions in 2.6.18 (Closes: #392065)
If so, it is important you try the daily snapshot builds Bastian mentioned.
Friendly,
tags 392921 + patch
thanks
Hello,
Find here attached a patch which adds support for the apple fancontrol modules
in d-i, creating the fancontrol-modules .udeb.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Index: debian/changelog
===
--- debian/changelog
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:56:08PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 13 October 2006 13:43, Sven Luther wrote:
> > As the title says, an install on my XServe G5, with two brand new 320GB
> > sata disks, fails. I can manually setup the RAID partitions, but when i
> > go i
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 11:03:15AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 10:36:13AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Saturday 14 October 2006 09:41, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > The exact message is :
> > >
> > > Aucune partition de RAID disponible
>
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 10:36:13AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 14 October 2006 09:41, Sven Luther wrote:
> > The exact message is :
> >
> > Aucune partition de RAID disponible
> > Aucune partition de type << Linux RAID Autodetect >> n'est dis
Mmm, did you get the attachement, i got some reject mail.
I uploaded the tarball to http://people.debian.org/~luther/partman.tar.bz2
just in case.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
most knowledgeable of guys with regard
to their functioning or best practice, but i guess the above information
should be more usefull than a patch to be checked anyway.
Furthermore, the patch needs then to be added into the powerpc64 ramdisks too.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:53:48PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 13 October 2006 13:48, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Doing an install on an apple Xserve G5, using the LVM automatic
> > partitioning, fails to create a apple_bootstrap partition for the apple
> > bootloader.
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:56:08PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 13 October 2006 13:43, Sven Luther wrote:
> > As the title says, an install on my XServe G5, with two brand new 320GB
> > sata disks, fails. I can manually setup the RAID partitions, but when i
> > go i
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 11:58:29PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 13 October 2006 23:08, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Please check that the get_recipedir function in
> > > /lib/partman/recipes.sh selects an appropriate set of recipes for
> > > that box. You can debu
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:53:48PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 13 October 2006 13:48, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Doing an install on an apple Xserve G5, using the LVM automatic
> > partitioning, fails to create a apple_bootstrap partition for the apple
> > bootloader.
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:56:08PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 13 October 2006 13:43, Sven Luther wrote:
> > As the title says, an install on my XServe G5, with two brand new 320GB
> > sata disks, fails. I can manually setup the RAID partitions, but when i
> > go i
mac partition table,
but shows no partitions.
The partitions show up just right inside partman though, which uses libparted.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Sh
Package: partman-auto-lvm
Version: 63
Severity: important
Doing an install on an apple Xserve G5, using the LVM automatic partitioning,
fails to create a apple_bootstrap partition for the apple bootloader.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT
tition* part, PedPartitionFlag flag)
{
...
case PED_PARTITION_RAID:
Since this is consistently ok, i suppose there is some kind of brokeness in
the partman support.
If needed, i can provide full logs.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT
Hi, ...
Could you try the current etch beta3 or daily build installer ?
Also, it would be helpful if you gave more info about your hardware, since it
seems to be lacking in the bug report.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
Hi, ...
Just wondering if you can still reproduce this bug ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
h, if not more, the "powerpc kernel
maintainer" than me these past month, ever since you kicked me out of the d-i
project while i pleaded you to be comprehending, while my mother was dying
beside me. But, then, what can one expect from someone who lacks such basic
decency, as you have shown
massive testing.
> massive testing would be to have an debian-installer rc,
> with the specific option turned on. for that it is to late
> as the next d-i won't use 2.6.18.
Which is an error, since we plan to release with a 2.6.18 kernel, and doing an
d-i rc round with a kernel we won
and
> just silently finishes without producing the requested output file.
Indeed, they show only up if -v is enabled, we need to add explicit check for
each step, and output a verbose message.
As above, patches are welcome.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
the patch proposed for
> this bug?
Fine with me, we should even make an upload of it rather quickly.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
part, this is commonly understood to mean micro-code, and as
thus it is indeed code for which there is most probably another source formwat
than the above as "prefered source of modification", probably some C code or
some human readable kind of assembly mnemonic list.
Friendly,
Sven Luthe
an do this post-etch, as the current GRs propose
?
Fact is d-i will not have support for non-free firmware in etch, which means
qlogic will be unsupported, and any such firmware we move out is in the same
case. Frans's "No way" and corresponding statement from Joey Hess make this
rather a definitive situation.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 06:56:06PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> On Oct 2, 2006, at 2:28 PM, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > I am building a new image, and uploading it, stay tuned.
>
> I tried the new image (from http://people.debian.org/~luther/g-i/
> powerpc/gtk-miniiso/mi
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 12:24:09PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> On Oct 2, 2006, at 3:34 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >>>When I tried this mini.iso on a G4/533MHz "QuickSilver" tower with
> >>>"ATY Rage128" graphics, I saw the white-on-
-i "s/^#disable-module=radeon/disable-module=radeon/"
> /etc/directfbrc
> +fi
> +
> +#disabling linux_input DFB module except for "PowerBook6,7"
> +if grep "PowerBook6,7" /proc/cpuinfo ; then
> + sed -i "s/^#disable-module=linux_input/disa
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 09:22:24AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 02:48:50AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> >
> > On Oct 1, 2006, at 7:34 PM, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > >I have built the images, and tested it on radeon with the 9200SE, i
> &g
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 02:48:50AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> On Oct 1, 2006, at 7:34 PM, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >I have built the images, and tested it on radeon with the 9200SE, i
> >confirm
> >that disable-module=radeon is uncomented, and the bugs (white-on-
&
The g5_defconfig .config works fine, so there is something wrong with the
debian config on those machines. I will investigate this.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 12:04:12AM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> >On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 11:31:05PM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> >
> >>About the "sed -i" thing, this is to keep coherency with other parts of
> >>the i
the packages including those
changes, and then do a call for tester on debian-powerpc.
Of especial interest would be testers with nvidia graphic cards, since we
don't yet have feedback for those.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
edback.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
> Index: rootskel-gtk/src/etc/directfbrc
> ===
> --- rootskel-gtk/src/etc/directfbrc (revisione 41145)
> +++ rootskel-gtk/src/etc/directfbrc (copia locale)
> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> no-hardwar
've forgotten something.
Notice that cdrom64 and netboot64 have gone away (patch from me, commited by
Colin Watson), and the powerpc64 flavours are now building from the main
netboot/cdrom config options, but i guess you noticed that, and applied the
patches from Andreas to the cdrom/netboot dir
related, just want to add my own datapoint.
Notice also that Attilio mentioned that the gtk 2.10 based debconf-gtk solves
this issue, but we should keep 2.8 because of the BOOM bug, which is since
then solved i think.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
02111466
Device tree struct 0x02112000 -> 0x02134000
Calling quiesce ...
returning from prom_init
Invalid memory access at SRR0: .0140399c SRR1: 1000.00083030
Apple RackMac3,1 5.1.7f2 BootROM built on 12/09/04 at 10:58:45
...
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Deb
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 04:48:51PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> On Sep 26, 2006, at 4:04 PM, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 04:01:15PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> >>OK. I have a G4 PowerMac with
> >>
> >>:00:10.0 VGA compa
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 04:01:15PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> On Sep 24, 2006, at 5:52 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 04:17:58AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> >>
> >>On Sep 23, 2006, at 6:13 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
> >>
> >&
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 04:17:58AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> On Sep 23, 2006, at 6:13 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >
> >>>Also, about the console font corruption with radeonfb, i would be
> >>>interested
> >>>in feedback of if it is a powerp
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 10:46:05PM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> >On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 12:45:10PM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> >
> >>looking at DFB's supported-hardware page
> >>
> >>http://www.directfb.org/index.php
this would be nice. Maybe you can introduce the problem, and i give a
full summary of what i have experienced thus far ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ppc stuff ?
> >
> >No idea, i on no radeon boards :(
>
> $ lspci | grep ATI
> :00:10.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV350
> [Mobility Radeon 9600 M10]
So, do you see the garbage in the console too ?
Ah, but i suppose you don't use radeonfb, but vesafb, right ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 10:13:10PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 12:45:10PM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> > looking at DFB's supported-hardware page
> >
> > http://www.directfb.org/index.php?path=Main%2FSupport%2FGraphics
>
> Well, ...
so maybe the
above guess was bad, and something else funny happened, since that was with a
2.6.18 kernel.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Package: partman-md
Severity: normal
FYI, so partman-md doesn't break once 2.6.18 is uploaded to unstable and
migrated to testing, especially important since 2.6.18 is the etch target
release kernel.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT pr
Package: kernel-wedge
Version: 1.20
Severity: normal
As subject says, please find attached patch.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 05:09:15PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 23 September 2006 16:17, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Is there some place where we can do some kind of framebuffer device
> > detection, and loading of the appropriate modules ? Where is it done
> > for vesa
?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 01:56:40PM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
>
>
>
> >>>>Yes, i saw the vanished lines in your screenshots and i belive this may
> >>>>be #385026, which is GTKDFB 2.8.x related and affects all HW platf
hem. nvidia is evil and should be
> >boycotted anyway :)
>
> On my PReP 7043/140 box i experienced success in running unaccelerated
> DFB applications with a Matrox card some times ago, but i never managed
> to test GTKDFB applications.
The problem on PReP is getting it to load the huge g-i initrd, not really
running apps afterward, altough this would indicate there is a serious problem
with matroxfb maybe.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 12:07:45PM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
>
>
>
> >>I belive disabling hw acceleration on PPC machines is a good choice, as
> >>we're interested in stability, not performance, and i also belive
> >>perf
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 10:53:56AM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 10:40:34PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> >
> >>On Friday 22 September 2006 21:32, Sven Luther wrote:
> >>
> >>>We did never implement
; sure that is harmless.
>
> > > what are your bootargs?
> >
> > ramdisk_size=8192 video=atyfb:vmode:13,cmode:16
>
> hmm what about passing an root bootarg??
> svenl i'm not familiar with that box, please explain how. :)
Probably in yaboot.conf's ap
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 10:40:34PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 22 September 2006 21:32, Sven Luther wrote:
> > We did never implement the thingy which disables the acceleration in
> > the directfbrc, right ?
>
> I've committed a patch now that always di
, this happens also.
Ok, that is all for now, i will propose a patch later on which always enables
no-hardware on powerpc, so we can at least get some testing done, and then
would be happy to do some more advanced debuging to tackle the bug and/or also
the console font issue.
Friendly,
Sven
Well,
My first naive test with the unstable g-i, gives just a blue screen. I can
alt-ctr-f2 away, and check a bit.
We did never implement the thingy which disables the acceleration in the
directfbrc, right ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:52:24PM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >>Last times the g-i was tested on PPC, it turned tout that
> >>
> >> Known good : radeonfb, vesafb (or whatever x86 uses).
> >
> >
> >vesafb is not bui
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 09:37:28AM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 03:32:28PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> >
> >>severity 342053 important
> >>thanks
> >>
> >>Lowering the severity of this bug to impor
Patch attached ...
Index: debian/nobootloader.templates
===
--- debian/nobootloader.templates (revision 40806)
+++ debian/nobootloader.templates (working copy)
@@ -7,10 +7,10 @@
Type: note
#flag:translate!:3,6
_Descrip
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 05:08:59PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 21 September 2006 15:39, Sven Luther wrote:
> > You will only need to do this once. Afterwards, enter the "boot"
> > command or reboot the system to proceed to the next installation stage.
>
>
en solved
already :).
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:52:29AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:06:54AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:00:21AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> > > nono, not debconf please.
> >
> > Why not debconf
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:54:34PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 21 September 2006 13:55, Sven Luther wrote:
> > The attached patch clarifies the wording of the nobootloader
> > chrp_pegasos case, in order to adapt to future non-pegasos Genesi
> > models.
>
>
Package: nobootloader
Version: 1.10
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i, patch
The attached patch clarifies the wording of the nobootloader chrp_pegasos
case, in order to adapt to future non-pegasos Genesi models.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT
do you think of a facility like that ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:00:21AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 10:17:12AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > What about backuping the currently running one ? Or keeping load of backups
> > ?
> >
> > But the idea was to ask this in a debconf q
f available kernels :
...
Then the user can change either the default or backup kernels, and how many he
would like to save and so on.
ramdisk generators, bootloaders and co should share in this scheme, and
everything will work happily thereafter.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 09:22:45PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> tags 388296 pending
> thanks
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 07:41:45PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Can you please check the attached patch and commit it in both ubuntu and
> > debian if it seems ok to you.
201 - 300 of 1356 matches
Mail list logo
