Hi Matthew,
could you file a bug to drop java archs for dbus-java (in contrib), please?
Kind regards + TIA
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Eric,
before you're wondering what's keeping this back:
parted still depends on automake1.8 and while I believe the plan is to get
parted 1.8 into
unstable somewhat soonish (it is in experimental and depends on newer
automake), it probably
won't happen before the next d-i beta (says Otavio).
Hi Alexander,
could you shed some light for me on the reverse dependencies?
** nagiosgrapher has an unsatisfied dependency on alpha: nagios2
** ndoutils-nagios2-mysql has an unsatisfied dependency on alpha: nagios2
(not alpha-specific)
These would probably need serious bugs / be fixed before
, is there a good reason to keep an empty
ndoutils-nagios2-mysql package that is not a transitional package?
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin Pitt wrote:
** postgresql-filedump-8.2 has an unsatisfied build-dependency:
postgresql-server-dev-8.2
Maybe it's just me, but is there a removal bug missing here?
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Martin
I'm afraid that there are still a few bugs to file. Could you please look into
these?
Kind regards
T.
Working... done.
Will remove the following packages from unstable:
postgresql-8.2 |8.2.4-2 | hurd-i386
postgresql-8.2 |8.2.6-2 | m68k
postgresql-8.2 |8.2.7-2 | source
Hi Ludovic
I'm afraid that there are still a few bugs to file and fix. Could you please
look into these?
Kind regards
T.
Working... done.
Will remove the following packages from unstable:
libxmlada2 | 2.2-7 | source, alpha, amd64, hppa, i386, ia64, powerpc,
s390, sparc
libxmlada2-dev
Hi Manoj,
do you happen to know something about these three?
** emboss-explorer has an unsatisfied dependency on amd64: libcgi-perl
** mumble-server-web has an unsatisfied dependency on amd64: libcgi-perl
** mipe has an unsatisfied dependency on amd64: libcgi-perl
Kind regards
T.
--
To
On 2008-05-30 10:32:00.00 Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- We added some new and long-awaited pseudo packages.
Speaking of which, can you please also do the right thing and give
the Debian pseudo-packages list to the BTS admins,
where this really belongs, so that this too can stop
: gjdoc
source: kaffe
** classpath has an unsatisfied build-dependency: gjdoc (= 0.7.9)
** libcommons-attributes-java has an unsatisfied build-dependency: gjdoc
libjibx-java/contrib has an unsatisfied build-dependency: gjdoc
seem to want removal bugs.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http
and hppa and should be removed
from the archive. please reschedule the build on hppa.
Can you file a bug for the removal part, please?
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi,
I think scala needs a serious bug about build-depending on gcj-4.1 and then
gcj-4.1 is ready to go.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Ludovic,
--- Reason ---
RoM, superseded by libxmlada
--
Checking reverse dependencies...
** libaws-dev has an unsatisfied dependency on alpha: libxmlada2-dev
** libaws2.2 has an unsatisfied dependency on alpha:
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on armel: java-gcj-compat-dev
** default-jre-headless has an unsatisfied dependency on armel:
java-gcj-compat-headless
java-gcj-compat is built on armel; are these false positives?
Indeed. Sorry.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
build-dependency:
java-gcj-compat-dev
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Ondřej,
it seems that freej does depend and build-depend on xmlrpc++, so
we would need a different plan here.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
resolved as soon as possible.
Let's not and pretend to know why we don't.
Kind regards
T.
1. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/07/msg00013.html
2. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/03/msg00019.html
3. http://bugs.debian.org/372986
--
Thomas Viehmann, http
Hi Jon,
thanks for reporting this problem.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ HEAD -S
http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2008/05/
I'll tighten the conditions for redirecting, in the meantime please use
http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2008/
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas
Debian
(closes: #478650, #478722).
[...]
From: Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
Note that resorting to pregenerated documentation is not
appropriate.
The reason pregenerated manpages/HTML are problematic is because all material in
Debian need to be able to be produced from source
Package: libcrypt-eksblowfish-perl
Version: 0.005-1
Severity: important
Hi Ivan,
your package still (build-) depends on libxsloader-perl.
The latter has, as you know, become a virtual package. As such, I think
that you need to change the (build-) dependencies to
perl-base (= 5.10) |
tag 471071 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Niko,
according to my information, libmime-charset-perl (build-) depends on
libencode-perl.
Could you check that and file a blocking bug?
Kind regards
T.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
tag 480458 moreinfo
thanks
Hi, with a huge number of reverse build-dependencies, I think this needs a
better
plan.
** spf-tools-perl has an unsatisfied dependency on i386: libversion-perl
** libconfig-json-perl has an unsatisfied dependency on i386: libversion-perl
** libconfig-std-perl has an
retitle 479532 RM: gnunet-gtk [ia64] -- RoM: build-dep on guile not available
anymore on ia64
thanks
Hi Daniel,
it appears that you want removal of gnunet-gtk (not gnunet!) binaries from
unstable(!, see the
developer's reference). Also, it would really help if you could include a
removal
Hi Isaac,
just for your future reference: Please use the source package name in
removal requests (here haskell-cabal instead of libghc6-cabal-dev).
Kind regards
T.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity 478032 serious
thanks
Hi,
I'm afraid that until someone fixes gnat-4.2, keeping it just for the
benefit of ghdl is not much of an option. With gnat-4.2 removal
imminent, I'm raising the severity.
Kind regards
T.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
to a comparatively
short span of searching for a new maintainer before removing it.
Pan Yongzhi wrote:
But it has been done. Would it be undone if someone adopted it?
While the removal cannot be undone, 4digits can always be reintroduced in the
same way NEW packages enter Debian.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas
Hi Thomas,
thanks for filing these, but I do think all of them should be *unstable*
removals. If you have more of them, could you file them without the /testing,
please? (And if you are bored, retitle the existing ones...)
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net
bugs, does not work, and has better workarounds.
I am not going to waste time on this package anymore.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
block 478215 by 478722
thanks
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:45:12 +, Thomas Viehmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Checking reverse dependencies...
** tcltrf has an unsatisfied build-dependency: c2man
Please do care about your reverse build-dependency. Best would
have
the burden of maintaining it (might be small) and users might try to use it and
fail (might be a greater problem).
Naturally, it's your decision, but I am tempted to think that in the long run it
might be better to change the way you generate documentation.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas
opportunity that is not met with
objections by the release team.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
What engine is used for managing Debian mailing lists?
I guess it's a home-grown system?
No, its based on smartlist, although modifications may have occured.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Hi Arthur,
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Arthur Loiret wrote:
newlib-m68hc1x binary package is currently built from newlib-m68hc1x
source
package. I'd like to build it from newlib source package now, there is no
reason to have the same source in the archive twice.
gcc-m68hc1x will have a broken
Hi Manoj,
c2man |2.41-17 | source, alpha, amd64, arm, armel, hppa, hurd-i386,
i386, ia64, m68k, powerpc, s390, sparc
c2man | 2.41-17+b1 | mips, mipsel
--- Reason ---
RoM: old, broken, dead upstream, superseded
in the upstream tarball but
not the .deb.
May I suggest that the package could do with more testing before upload?
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2008-04-27 23:05:09.00 Ricardo Mones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugs.debian.org/478160 (s-c-ghostcript-viewer)
http://bugs.debian.org/478163 (s-c-maildir-plugin)
http://bugs.debian.org/478164 (s-c-pgpinline-plugin)
http://bugs.debian.org/478165 (sylpheed-claws-themes is also
Mike Hommey wrote:
Just a small remark. Not that it bothers me particularly, especially
with the announcement of a transition that impacts 3 of the packages I
(co)maintain (they don't require new express uploads), uploading some of
my packages take a significant amount of time, and I would
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
as discussed with Matthias, I'm orphaning sqlrelay.
Kind regards
T.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retitle 477128 RM: liblingoteach -- RoM; orphaned, abandoned upstream
retitle 477129 RM: liblingoteach-ui -- RoM; orphaned, abandoned upstream
reassign 477128 ftp.debian.org
reassign 477129 ftp.debian.org
forcemerge 477128 463848
Hi Kęstutis, Alberto,
thanks for your attention to this.
You got
Julien Cristau wrote:
Looks like I forgot sparc:
xserver-xorg-video-intel-dbg | 2:2.1.1-4 | unstable | sparc
(no idea why the -dbg package is there but the other one isn't)
Can you remove that too?
Done.
Kind regards
T.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Please find attached a patch to fix this bug. I think it adds the so
link, but please double check.
Uh. I missed that when changing the installation order. That mixes well with
rushing people to upload substandard patches...
Sorry, Alex!
Thanks Kumar for correcting me on
Arthur Loiret wrote:
newlib-m68hc1x binary package is currently built from newlib-m68hc1x source
package. I'd like to build it from newlib source package now, there is no
reason to have the same source in the archive twice.
gcc-m68hc1x will have a broken Suggests on newlib-m68hc1x until newlib
** kaffe-pthreads has an unsatisfied dependency on alpha: gjdoc
** kaffe-jthreads has an unsatisfied dependency on alpha: gjdoc
** java-gcj-compat-dev has an unsatisfied dependency on alpha: gjdoc (= 0.7.8)
** java-gcj-compat-dev has an unsatisfied dependency on arm: gjdoc (= 0.7.8)
**
Hi,
some things seem to need fixing before this can be done:
Removing
ecj | 3.3.0+0728-8 | alpha, arm, hppa
ecj-gcj | 3.3.0+0728-8 | alpha, arm, hppa
ecj1 | 3.3.0+0728-8 | alpha, arm
libecj-java-gcj | 3.3.0+0728-8 | alpha, arm, hppa
creates the following problems:
** eclipse-gcj
Hi Barry,
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 463848 ftp.debian.org,liblingoteach
Bug#463848: O: liblingoteach -- runtime library for LingoTeach
Bug reassigned from package `wnpp' to `ftp.debian.org,liblingoteach'.
retitle 463848 RM:
Hi,
for your information: a removal request for the package howl-xml
has been filed as bug #475798[1].
Unless you follow up soon, the ftp master will remove the package from the
Debian archive.
Kind regards
T.
1. http://bugs.debian.org/475798
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net
Matthias Klose wrote:
** eclipse-gcj has an unsatisfied dependency on alpha: ecj-gcj
** eclipse-gcj has an unsatisfied dependency on arm: ecj-gcj
** eclipse-gcj has an unsatisfied dependency on hppa: ecj-gcj
strange, eclipse didn't build on alpha, arm, hppa:
ant-gcj |1.7.0-5 | unstable | hppa
ant-optional-gcj |1.7.0-5 | unstable | hppa
cantlr |2.7.7-2 | unstable | hppa
libantlr-dev |2.7.7-2 | unstable | hppa
libaxis-java-gcj | 1.4-3 | unstable | hppa
libparsifal-dev | 1.2.0.dfsg-2 | unstable |
Hi Matthias,
in addition to the list of arch packages built from sources
declaring build-depends on binaries of java-gcj-compat, there
also is libplplot9-java declaring a depends.
Either this needs a good plan or I'm missing something.
Kind regards
T.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Anand, the Debian Developer's reference asks you to attend to RC bugs within two
weeks, I think there has been some slacking on your part, here.
Anand Kumria wrote:
Yes, I do object.
Is this a I object and will restart taking proper care which I haven't up to
now-objection or just a
tag 473935 - patch
thanks
Hi,
testing shows that the diff causes the package to build, but still
only build python2.4 extensions.
As this is not what we are looking for, the patch is unsuitable for
NMUing.
I'll try to produce a correct patch, so I keep the pending tag for
now.
Kind
Package: lcms
Version: 1.16-8
Severity: serious
Hi,
your extension handling does not follow python policy.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: lcms
Version: 1.16-8
Severity: serious
Hi,
shipping .a .la for python extensions is not called for, in
particular not in /usr/lib.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
Package: lcms
Version: 1.16-8
Severity: serious
Hi,
your installation scheme (dump everything in the -dev package,
install from there, then delete there) makes the package FTBFS too
easy, e.g. when the default python version changes.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http
to deal with these bugs within two weeks.
You will have to decide whether to maintain it or not. Basements are good
excuses to take an additional week or two, not 48.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On 2008-04-12 14:22:46.00 Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, thanks for the info. I didn't get a REJECT mail. Fortunately,
the
last upload today worked.
Ah, sorry. It seems that with the check for the changes version, dak
refuses to take the uploader from the changes. With the
to maintain this package, please
close this bug, preferably in an upload also fixing the other issues.
Thank you,
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: snes9express
Version: 1.42-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
with the immanent removal of snes9express on powerpc your package becomes
uninstallable.
You might want to look into having more of an eye on the status of your package
across the
various architechtures, see
Hi,
are there any news on inkscape 0.46 in Debian?
With #475071 it seems to become urgent to do do an upload of
inkscape, I see that you have tagged bugs like 470832 pending for 10
days.
Please let me know if you need help / a sponsor and please consider
adding a second (or more)
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix double build FTBFS. Closes: #424107.
+- Clean up autotools patch.
+- Regenerate html documentation removed by make distclean.
+- Add missing oo-only.texi from upstream cvs.
+
+ -- Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 06 Apr 2008 10:51:27 +0200
Hi,
for your information: a removal request for the package teapop
has been filed as bug #474099[1].
Unless you follow up soon, the ftp master will remove the package from the
Debian archive.
Kind regards
T.
1. http://bugs.debian.org/474099
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net
Hi,
for your information: a removal request for the package serpento
has been filed as bug #473855[1].
Unless you follow up soon, the ftp master will remove the package from the
Debian archive.
Kind regards
T.
1. http://bugs.debian.org/473855
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net
Hi,
for reference, here are some things we might want so see resolved before
removal:
Checking reverse dependencies...
libcgal-dev/non-free has an unsatisfied dependency on amd64: atlas3-base-dev
|libatlas-3.so
libcgal-dev/non-free has an unsatisfied dependency on hppa: atlas3-base-dev
So we want to remove
libgcc1 | 1:3.3.6-15 | unstable | hppa, m68k
libstdc++5 | 1:3.3.6-15 | unstable | alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, ia64,
m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
It seems that we best do this separately for both packages.
I see the following reverse dependencies
Hi,
could you please elaborate a bit?
Note that filing against ftp.debian.org is only for unstable,
too...
Kind regards
T.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Matthias,
do you know something about the reverse dependencies of
sablevm-classlib?
Kind regards
T.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Working... done.
Will remove the following packages from unstable:
libsablevm-classlib1-java | 1.13-2 | all
libsablevm-native1 | 1.13-2 | alpha, amd64, arm, armel, hppa, hurd-i386,
i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
sablevm-classlib | 1.13-2 | source
Maintainer:
Hi Riku,
thanks for acting quickly on these.
On 2008-04-02 12:58:57.00 Riku Voipio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 10:45:59AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
libcgal-dev/non-free has an unsatisfied dependency on amd64:
atlas3-base-dev |libatlas-3.so
libcgal-dev/non-free has
On 2008-04-02 13:45:51.00 Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
afaiu this is not required for recent versions of the lsb.
OK, let's see what the lsb experts say.
** gtklookat has an unsatisfied dependency on mipsel: libstdc++5
(= 1:3.3.1-1)
Would that need a binNMU?
On 2008-04-02 14:40:00.00 Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 6:45 AM, Matthias Klose
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll let the hurd maintainers comment on the hurd packages; can
the
other few binaries just be removed?
My understanding is that libstdc++5 is
block 473289 by 473284
thanks
On 2008-04-02 13:55:13.00 Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMO classpath-tools and free-java-sdk should be removed as well.
For free-java-sdk, #473284 is filed, but it is blocked by bigloo.
I've tried to ask for help on #debian-java, but noone immediately
Hi Steve,
sorry for not being more verbose (this was a filtered verbatim pipe
into mail, more for my own reference than expected to be news to you).
Is this an adequate explanation, or should I understand your
message as
requiring that all of the RC-buggy reverse-dependencies be fixed in
Working... done.
Will remove the following packages from unstable:
openldap2 | 2.1.30.dfsg-13.5 | source
Maintainer: Torsten Landschoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Will also close bugs: 473047
Will also send CCs to: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Reason ---
RoM;
Hi,
for your information: a removal request for the package mudnames
has been filed as bug #473250[1].
Unless you follow up soon, the ftp master will remove the package from the
Debian archive.
Kind regards
T.
1. http://bugs.debian.org/473250
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net
clone 473280 -1
# Please remove the hppa binaries built from gcc-3.4: gcc-3.4-base,
# cpp-3.4, gcc-3.4.
retitle 473280 RM: gcc-3.4 [hppa] -- RoM: Architecture not built
anymore
Then please remove the gcc-4.0 source and libgcc2 (hppa only).
retitle -1 RM: gcc-4.0 -- RoM: obsolete
thanks
Hi
Package: partman-auto
Version: 75
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
thanks for the installer. I just used lenny Beta 1 and it worked well
for me!
One thing I would like to have had was all Guided recipies (crypt,
lvm) in a variant that only uses the free space instead of the full
disk.
Kind
have not had the time to work on
migrating the existing packages to the newer versions in a seamless
manner for the end users.
Thanks for the quick reply. jabber-jit will be removed soon, then.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Hi,
for your information: a removal request for the package stratagus
has been filed as bug #472278[1].
Unless you follow up soon, the ftp master will remove the package from the
Debian archive.
Kind regards
T.
1. http://bugs.debian.org/472278
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net
Hi,
for your information: a removal request for the package bos
has been filed as bug #472277[1].
Unless you follow up soon, the ftp master will remove the package from the
Debian archive.
Kind regards
T.
1. http://bugs.debian.org/472277
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net
Hi,
for your information: a removal request for the package jabber-jit
has been filed as bug #472280[1].
Unless you follow up soon, the ftp master will remove the package from the
Debian archive.
Kind regards
T.
1. http://bugs.debian.org/472280
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net
Hi,
for your information: ignoring m68k, we are down to the following
reverse dependencies on octave2.9:
** shogun-octave on arm: octave2.9 (= 2.9.17)
** qtoctave has on armel: octave2.9
** octave-plplot on mipsel: octave2.9 (= 2.9.18)
Kind regards
T.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
in standard perl but I needs
something like Encoding::HanExtra from CPAN.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reassign 471666 bash-completion
thanks
Hi,
On 2008-03-19 13:46:02.00 Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please could you change the priority of bash-completion to
important? As you
know, it used to be part of an required/Essential package, and now
it isn't
even included in the default
lists that you already did some analysis. Do you
also have a (partial?) patch yet?
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
not be released with Debian 5.0 if it remains unfixed),
that would not hinder reinclusion if someone steps up to maintian
it again.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hi,
On 2008-03-18 12:27:16.00 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working myself on the package for 4.24 adapting the one from
4.22-1 and fixing the lintian warnings. However I'm not sure what
to
do once finished (two or three days at most).
Good to hear. If you hare happy
.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diligent in not uploading stuff to Debian that is obsolete on the day
you upload it, in particular, if you are aware of that because you
were monitoring this. This package served no one and just wasted
time of others.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net
it would be trivial to strip the
brackets that always surround Message-IDs off for convenience.
indeed.
As I have a second version of msgid-search (allowing for faster
searching) ready to be deployed very soon, I'll postpone adding this
to after that is done.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann
Hi Steve,
you tagged the bug about python 2.5-support in boost pending ten days
ago, but it is without comment or action since. Is an upload
immanent? If you did hit unexpected problems, do you want anyone to
help out?
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net
Package: mindi
Version: 2.24-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
ms-sys has been removed from Debian (see #470678), so you have to fix mindi.
Kind regards
T.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On 2008-03-13 15:51:15.00 Julian Andres Klode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The package ndiswrapper-1.1 contains an old version of the
ndiswrapper userspace tools. The newer version can be found in
ndiswrapper.
- The package has already been removed in Ubuntu
- The package has no reverse
On 2008-03-11 19:14:13.00 Olivier Berger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI, package name is TouchFreeze, not ToucheFreeze, so this bug may
need
to be renamed ?
I don't think it matters much. The bug is more about removal of
*synaptic than about TouchFreeze. I should hope that users wondering
I removed xenman. Note that the usual way of doing this is building
a transitional package for the benefit of users upgrading, particularly
if the package had been part of a stable release.
Then removal of the old source happens autimatically, too.
Kind regards
T.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
the
package from the archive at least for the time being.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
401 - 500 of 835 matches
Mail list logo
