Bug#1037547: rpmdb

The fapolicyd.conf file contains trust = rpmdb,file Since debian doesn't, by default, have an rpm database. Even when you install rpm on debian the database doesn't include most OS executables.

Bug#1010879: reportbug: mmh is not co-installable with nmh

Package: mmh Version: mmh-0.4.4 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, I want to use a more modern version of MH but retain the refile command from nmh because I use the rmmproc functionality. Attempting to install mmh with apt install mmh says it will remove nmh. I was hoping the two would be

Bug#867690: calibre: Cannot connect to calibre server - UTF encoding errors

Package: calibre Version: 3.31.0+dfsg-1~bpo9+1 Followup-For: Bug #867690 Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? * What was the outcome of this action? * What outcome did you expect instead? I'm

Bug#803497: u-boot-sunxi: Lack of documentation of appropriate fw_env.config values

Package: u-boot-sunxi Version: 2014.10+dfsg1-5 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, I'm trying to migrate an existing (mixed armel/armhf) system from a CuBox to a BananaPro. I used dd to copy the appropriate u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin to an offset of 8k from the start of the sdcard. I copied

Bug#795639: assword fails with "Decryption error: Decryption failed"

Might this be a symptom of bug #772897 ?

Bug#786964: calibre: Calibre server doesn't work if password set

Package: calibre Version: 2.5.0+dfsg-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I was trying to use my e-reader's (FBReader on Android) opds facility to retreive the list of books available from calibre so I could download a new one. It reported a 500 error each time I tried. I was expecting it to

Bug#782458: closed by Ricardo Mones mo...@debian.org (Re: Bug#782458: claws-mail: Moving large volumes of mail not robust against dropped connections)

On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:25:20 +0200 Ricardo Mones mo...@debian.org wrote: That's not possible. IMAP clients have not a clue about how the server deals with messages. The current operations are already Yes they do per RFC3501: RFC3501 The server completion result response indicates the

Bug#782458: closed by Ricardo Mones mo...@debian.org (Re: Bug#782458: claws-mail: Moving large volumes of mail not robust against dropped connections)

Thus Spake ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System): Debian Bug Tracking System writes: Hi William, Sorry but what you're suggesting here would be extremely inefficient and would make the movement of more than a few mails an everlasting process. I think you have that backwards.

Bug#782458: claws-mail: Moving large volumes of mail not robust against dropped connections

Package: claws-mail Version: 3.10.1-2~bpo70+1 Severity: normal Tags: upstream Dear Maintainer, When trying to move a large number of mails from one IMAP folder to another after first selecting them via the search folder a problem occurs if the connection is dropped by the server. Some but not