-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Btw, it's better to Cc the reporter if you want him to help ;) Reporters
don't receive the mails sent to the bugs automatically.
True. Totally slipped my mind.
Thanks anyway!
Cheers
- --
Leo costela Antunes
-BEGIN PGP
Package: opensync-plugin-sunbird
Version: 0.19-1
Severity: normal
I believe this package should probably be renamed to
opensync-plugin-iceowl, to follow the unfortunate Debian specific
naming scheme.
At the same time the Suggest:sunbird should probably become
Suggest:iceowl|iceowl-extention
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Orphaning for lack of contact with software and upstream inactivity
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale:
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I have absolutely no contact with this software anymore and upstream is
apparently dead.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU
Hi there,
The xgnokii split has been on my TODO list for a while. Hasn't done it yet
'cause when I adopted the package maintainance[1] it was in a pretty rough
shape and I didn't have enough time to work it out. Now that I know about
your (Matthias') packages, I'll take a look at how you solved
Hi,What's the status of this package? Why was it rejected from the NEW queue?Is there something you could use some help with?Cheers-- Leo Antunes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BitTorrent client. It features a
simple, intuitive interface on top on an efficient, cross-platformback-end.-- Leo Costela Antunes[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Dom, 2006-01-22 at 12:27 +0100, Alfredo Pironti wrote:
I can reproduce the bug with this sequence of commands:
apt-get source camorama
./configure
make
Oh, that's the problem.
The debian package has a patch to make it compile with gcc-4.0, it's
inside the debian/patches dir.
It you build
tags 348836 + unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
On Qui, 2006-01-19 at 11:23 +0100, Alfredo Pironti wrote:
You have to set CC=gcc-3.3 in order to compile.
It will not compile with gcc-4.0.
gcc-4.0 stops compiling at main, line 58, while
gcc-3.3 only gives a warning. Maybe the upstream source
On Ter, 2006-01-17 at 10:21 +0100, Amaya wrote:
Sure! It's your package, it wants *your* love! :*
Ok, cool, then I'll upload it right away.
Sorry to make you guys work on it and then suddenly come around and fix
it myself! And thanks a lot for the poke anyway!
damn... I'm a slacker :-(
Cheers
Are you guys still on this?
I had some time today and I think I'll upload this with another few
bugfixes.
(with all the thanks, of course! :-) )
That ok?
Cheers
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 17:29 +0100, Amaya wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
This is not an appropriate changelog entry, in an NMU or
I welcome your NMU! :-)
I've been backlogged and couldn't deal with this in a timely fashion.
Thank you for the help.
PS.: I think you forgot to attach the patch (not that it matters much)
On Dom, 2006-01-15 at 17:57 +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
Hi,
I intend to NMU camorama if you are not already
severity 337677 important
thanks
--
Check the severities list [1], this bug is not 'grave'.
Probably upstream, will look into it.
Thanks.
Cheers
[1] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
On Sb, 2005-11-05 at 19:07 +0100, Laurent CARON wrote:
Package: knockd
Version: 0.5-1
Apparently libgnomevfs2-dev (which my package build-deps on) also
build-deps on libgnutls11-dev.
I'll have to wait until this is sorted out to be able to compile and
upload camorama.
This email is mainly just for notekeeping, but if I got something wrong,
please let me know.
Cheers
--
Leo
/~costela/debian/
--
Leo Antunes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Agreed on all accounts, this package should be removed.
Should I file a bug myself for its removal?
On Dom, 2005-09-11 at 16:25 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Package: icukrell
Version: 2.0.0pre0.1-2
Severity: serious
snip
After 7 days without answer from you (the maintainer) we will
On Qui, 2005-08-25 at 02:33 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
But that was not the problem you mentioned at the beginning of this
discussion. My upstream archive contained the directory
'bluefish-1.0.3.orig' (which is normal, see e.g. cvs-buildpackage or
dh_make), the upstream tarball the directory
On Ter, 2005-08-23 at 04:15 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Uploaded to my server. See http://debian.wgdd.de/temp/bluefish/ for
source files. debian/control states, that you are the Uploader.
Has this package been generated with a different source file?
I tried using the source file from the
generates a perfect package with very simple
changes, take a look at:
http://people.debian.org/~costela/debian/
You can download the dsc, diff and changes files from this site and the
tarball from upstream and run 'dpkg-source -x bluefish_1.0.3-1.dsc'.
It's clean, simple and cruft-free[1
Package: mergeant
Version: 0.52-1
Severity: wishlist
There's a new upstream version available at:
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/mergeant/
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:
Package: libgnomedb
Severity: wishlist
There's a new upstream version available at:
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/libgnomedb/
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked
On Qua, 2005-08-10 at 16:25 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Just one hour ago, I did the 1.0.2 package, I'll upload it to my
webserver when I come home this evening :) However, I would like to
maintain it for real, so can I persuade you for a co-maintainership?
Independently from that, I would
[it took me a while to understand it was a different 'Daniel' ;-) ]
On Qua, 2005-08-10 at 18:48 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Short advice: The source contains obsolete bluefish_icon1.xpm and
doubled (bluefish.)postinst and (bluefish.)postrm.
Cool, I didn't want to step on Evo's shoes by
On Qua, 2005-08-10 at 21:48 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Is the version on your (Daniel Leidert's) site already cleaned up?
These packages always contain some additional stuff (to send bug-reports
regarding my packages to me and not to the official BTS). The files in
the upstream source
Actually, I believe they're just in the wrong place:
/usr/X11R6/lib/pkgconfig/xcomposite.pc
instead of:
/usr/lib/pkgconfig/xcomposite.pc
This applies for libxdamage and libxfixes too.
Cheers
--
Leo Antunes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description:
OK, hadn't notivced that, I'm going to contact debian-release and see if
we can get the new version pushed into Sarge.
Thanks for the heads up
On Sáb, 2005-06-04 at 23:30 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Package: gaim-encryption
Version: 2.36-3
Severity: grave
Tags: sarge
This is a reminder
Package: gnokii
Version: 0.6.5-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi
Since Pawel doesn't really update the news section of the Gnokii site
when something new happens, I assume you're not aware of version 0.6.7
being available at:
http://www.gnokii.org/download/gnokii/
If you are aware disregard this
On Qui, 2005-05-19 at 18:08 +0200, Pawel Kot wrote:
I send the message to the people maitaining gnokii packages in various
distributions few days before the release. The message was not sent
before 0.6.7 (it was before 0.6.6) because it really fixed non-issues
for Linux systems.
Oh, I see, I
Hi,
A couple of news of interest:
Firstly, gaim-encryption has finally been uploaded to Debian's unstable
branch. It's now instalable by all Debian users, there's no more need
for my personal repository to contain Gaim-encryption's packages.
This might actually generate a lot of bug reports[1]
This had completely slipped my mind.
Sorry for the noise, I received the bug report and forwarded it to you
without giving it the proper attention. I should have remembered this
before.
Anyway, no harm no foul.
Another very small thing that crossed my mind: when compiled with a
diferent Gaim
I think it's a safe bet:
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/faq.html#q3.1
No harm, no foul.
Cheers and thanks again
On Qua, 2005-03-23 at 23:05 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 10237 March 1977, Leo Antunes wrote:
About this bug, where is gaim-encryption linked with OpenSSL?
Subject: amavis-ng: Fails to start with perl errors
Package: amavis-ng
Version: 0.1.6.9-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
After an upgrade, amavis started spewing a lot of emergency errors and
stoped working (bringing down all mail delivery with it).
I use the Courier
Package: libpam-radius-auth
Version: 1.3.16-3
Severity: wishlist
I just got the idea that libpam-radius could use some debconf questions
(taking the least intrusive path) about automatic integration with PAM,
for example, you could provide three options:
- use RADIUS authentication before local
-
anyway.
Take a look at the packages[1] and if you don't have any major problem
with it, I'll upload.
Cheers
[1] http://people.debian.org/~costela/index.php?page=packages.php
--
Leo Costela
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
you must cut down the mightiest tree
301 - 334 of 334 matches
Mail list logo
