Bug#1081259: libreoffice:FTBFS:build failure (test failed on riscv64)

Hi again, Am 10.09.24 um 06:15 schrieb Yue Gui: The patch is in the attachment. That "patch" just hides everything under the carpet on riscv64. Whereas this check exactly was added upstream in knowledge riscv64 had that problem. And yes, IMHO that needs to be tested, not blacked out on the

Bug#1079858: ITS: textdraw

Am 28.08.24 um 19:36 schrieb Andreas Tille: Could you please give some example for what you conaiser "quite nicely"? Not filing a RFS in the first place (with even already importing the stuff into a salvage team space, referring reasons fr salvaging which *all* do not apply in this package[1]

Bug#1079858: ITS: textdraw

[ greeting intentionally left out ] Am 28.08.24 um 10:53 schrieb Andreas Tille: I would like to salvage your package textdraw by following the Package Salvaging procedur which is described in Developers Reference[1]. Your package is fulfilling the following criteria for the salvage process:

Bug#1077806: libreoffice-core: libreoffice (i386) crashes on startup

Hi, Am 22.08.24 um 23:01 schrieb Andres Alla: reede, 2. august 2024 20:01:10 EEST kirjutas Rene Engelhard: Am 02.08.24 um 17:25 schrieb Andres Alla: [] I suspect it may be i386 specific. I suspect, too. Works definitely on amd64. It may be fixed in 24.8.0 but see below. After some

Bug#1079598: Right-clicking 'New Style' in inactive Writer window opens menu in active window on another monitor.

forwarded 1079598 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162620 thanks Hi, Am 25.08.24 um 07:18 schrieb Fabrice Quenneville: Upstream Bug Report I had already submitted before reading https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting#reportbug saying not to report upstream first :  - https

Bug#1074338: Bug#1073508: Bug#1074338: src:libxml2: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unresolved RC issue

Hi, Am 17.08.24 um 05:58 schrieb Aron Xu: After some research, I prefer making a t64-like transition for libxml2 for the following reasons: - Upstream is not prepared to bump the SONAME to something like libxml3. Given the long history of this function library, determining which APIs should be

Bug#1078568: RM: libreoffice-sdbc-hsqldb [armel] -- NBS; Java disabled

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove X-Debbugs-Cc: libreoff...@packages.debian.org, r...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:libreoffice Hi, please remove libreoffice-sdbc-hsqldb from unstable on armel, it is disabled since 4:24.2.5-

Bug#1078569: RM: ure-java [armel] -- NBS; Java disabled

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove X-Debbugs-Cc: libreoff...@packages.debian.org, r...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:libreoffice Hi, please remove ure-java from unstable on armel, it is disabled since 4:24.2.5-2. dak rm -a a

Bug#1078567: RM: libreoffice-report-builder-bin [armel] -- NBS; Java disabled

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove X-Debbugs-Cc: libreoff...@packages.debian.org, r...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:libreoffice Hi, please remove libreoffice-report-builder-bin from unstable on armel, it is disabled since 4

Bug#1078566: RM: libofficebean-java [armel] -- NBS; Java disabled

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove X-Debbugs-Cc: libreoff...@packages.debian.org, r...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:libreoffice Hi, please remove libofficebean-java from unstable on armel, it is disabled since 4:24.2

Bug#1078537: unblock: libreoffice/4:24.2.5-3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: Deiban Korean L10N , Debian Accessibility Team Control: affects -1 + src:libreoffice Hi, Please hint package libreoffice in (unblock is strictly speaking wrong here, but...)

Bug#1077806: libreoffice-core: libreoffice (i386) crashes on startup

tag 1077806 + unreproducible tag 1077806 + moreinfo thanks Hi, Am 02.08.24 um 17:25 schrieb Andres Alla: Package: libreoffice-core Version: 4:24.2.5-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, libreoffice (i386) crashes on startup (backtrace attached). Splash is shown and then nothing, applica

Bug#1077268: hunspell LIBDIR, USEROOODIR and OOO are either obsolete or wrong

Hi, Am 27.07.24 um 17:52 schrieb Jiri Belka: `hunspell -D' shows either MacOS, obsolete or incorrect paths: Mac OS and obsolete ones, yes. ---%>--- $ hunspell -D SEARCH PATH: .::/usr/share/hunspell:/usr/share/myspell: That is where the (system) dicts are /usr/share/myspell/dicts:/Library/Spe

Bug#1077190: Accepted curl 8.9.0-2 (source) into unstable

Hi again, Am 27.07.24 um 08:07 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 27.07.24 um 08:00 schrieb Rene Engelhard: b) even more, pbuilder disables the install of recommends. That means builds inside pbuilder still will fail. This doesn't even work in sbuild (and thus  the buildds). After I gave

Bug#1077190: Accepted curl 8.9.0-2 (source) into unstable

Hi, Am 27.07.24 um 08:00 schrieb Rene Engelhard: b) even more, pbuilder disables the install of recommends. That means builds inside pbuilder still will fail. This doesn't even work in sbuild (and thus the buildds). After I gave back libreoffice I got https://buildd.debian.org/s

Bug#1077190: Accepted curl 8.9.0-2 (source) into unstable

Hi, Am 27.07.24 um 08:00 schrieb Rene Engelhard: a) Is this needed for anything using liburls .pc. A pure --cflags now needs those. Even when not doing static linking. Recommends here is wrong. This needs to be a Depends. b) even more, pbuilder disables the install of recommends. That means

Bug#1077190: Accepted curl 8.9.0-2 (source) into unstable

reopen 1077197 reopen 1077190 thanks Hi, Am 27.07.24 um 06:34 schrieb Debian FTP Masters:    * debian/control: make libcurl*-dev packages Recommends -dev packages. (Closes: #1077197, #1077190) This is not  going to work. a) Is this needed for anything using liburls .pc. A pure --cf

Bug#1077190: breaks build of uncounted packages

severity 1077190 serious thanks Now really... Am 26.07.24 um 18:04 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Hi, this bug means that uncounted packages (anything directly or indirectly using libcurl via pkg-config) now FTBFS in unstable. Raising the severity ti serious Regards, Rene

Bug#1077190: breaks build of uncounted packages

Hi, this bug means that uncounted packages (anything directly or indirectly using libcurl via pkg-config) now FTBFS in unstable. Raising the severity ti serious Regards, Rene

Bug#1076720: "Insert symbol" and libreoffice-gtk3

retitle 1076720 "Insert symbol" in tabbed ui doesn't appear with libreoffice-gtk3 thanks Hi, Am 22.07.24 um 22:05 schrieb Stefano: See attachment for the steps to reproduce on it_IT.UTF-8 locale. I am unsure what more information to offer I see. That is not standard UI but the ribbon stu

Bug#1076720: "Insert symbol" and libreoffice-gtk3

[ please don't uselessly mail stuff you don't need to CC. Especially submit@ and -done and control ] Hi, Am 22.07.24 um 20:09 schrieb Stefano: The tab and button actually read "Inserisci" and "Simbolo", respectively. Which tab and button? *I* mean the menu, did you mean something else?

Bug#1076720: "Insert symbol" and libreoffice-gtk3

Hi, Am 22.07.24 um 19:51 schrieb Stefano: Which one? Maybe it's even locale-specific? (tried de_DE and en_US here.) it_IT Hmm. Inseirici -> Cattatere speciale... also works here in it_IT.UTF-8 locale. Regards, Rene

Bug#1076720: "Insert symbol" and libreoffice-gtk3

tag 1076720 + moreinfo tag 1076720 + unreproducible thanks Hi, Am 22.07.24 um 15:33 schrieb Stefano Volpe: Package: libreoffice-gtk3 Version: 4:7.4.7-1+deb12u3 When libreoffice-gtk3 is not installed, the "Insert -> Symbols" menu of LibreOffice Writer (4:7.4.7-1+deb12u3) can be opened corre

Bug#1076014: RM: python-ooolib -- RoQA; explicitly unmaintained; RC-buggy

Hi, Am 09.07.24 um 17:04 schrieb Bastian Germann: Please remove python-ooolib from unstable. It did not make it to bookworm because RC fixes were actively removed by the only active uploader, who commented on the two RC bugs: "How is it unclear that noone seriously cares about this package? Ol

Bug#1059158: fixed in 4:7.4.7-1+deb12u3, too

# mark bugs fixed in  4:7.4.7-1+deb12u3 correctly, didn't get done # because they were already archived unarchive 1059158 fixed 1059158 4:7.4.7-1+deb12u3 unarchive 1069835 fixed 1069835 4:7.4.7-1+deb12u3

Bug#1071826: bookworm-pu: package libreoffice/4:7.4.7-1+deb12u3

Hi again, Am 17.06.24 um 20:29 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Apologies if I'm missing something, but +    - recommend kio >> 5.103.0-1 in -kf5 makes the package uninstallable on a default bookworm setup (i.e. Recommends are installed by APT). apt TTBOMK doesn't complain if a

Bug#1071826: bookworm-pu: package libreoffice/4:7.4.7-1+deb12u3

Hi, Am 17.06.24 um 19:05 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed On Sat, 2024-06-15 at 17:44 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, Am 15.06.24 um 17:28 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Sat, 2024-05-25 at 10:35 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: I'd

Bug#1071826: bookworm-pu: package libreoffice/4:7.4.7-1+deb12u3

Hi, Am 15.06.24 um 17:28 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Sat, 2024-05-25 at 10:35 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: I'd like to fix 2 libreoffice bugs in stable. Most important is the SMB fix (which - for kf5 - also needs a kio stable update, but those can be do

Bug#1071834: same with zlib

Hi, same with zlib: Package 'zlib', required by 'libxml-2.0', not found (from https://ci.debian.net/packages/i/igraph/testing/amd64/47001876/) Regards, Rene

Bug#1071834: libxml2-dev: missing Depends on liblzma-dev (used by pkg-config file)

Hi, Am 25.05.24 um 14:00 schrieb Rene Engelhard: root@frodo:/# pkg-config --cflags libxml-2.0 Package liblzma was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `liblzma.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable Package 'liblzma

Bug#1071834: libxml2-dev: missing Depends on liblzma-dev (used by pkg-config file)

Package: libxml2-dev Severity: serious Version: 2.12.7+dfsg-1 root@frodo:/# dpkg -l | grep lzma ii liblzma5:amd64 5.6.1+really5.4.5-1 amd64XZ-format compression library root@frodo:/# pkg-config --cflags libxml-2.0 Package liblzma was not found in the pkg-conf

Bug#1071826: bookworm-pu: package libreoffice/4:7.4.7-1+deb12u3

;s subsumed in libmerged on 64bit archs anyway which we definitely + need to keep anyway (similar as libuuilo.so). +- recommend kio >> 5.103.0-1 in -kf5 + + -- Rene Engelhard Fri, 24 May 2024 21:06:45 +0200 + libreoffice (4:7.4.7-1+deb12u2) bookworm-security; urgency=high * debian/

Bug#1070888: PLEASE IGNORE

Hi, Am 11.05.24 um 13:45 schrieb Emmanuel Charpentier: In fact, both submission worked, but the second is but a duplicate of the first. My apologies for the noise... No problem, I already merged them. :)  (Intestestingly 1070888 only made it to the BTS and not to the mailing list where 107

Bug#1070862: and this looses files

severity 1070862 serious thanks Hi, this is even worse. It looses the library file for the "non-main" libraries after cleanup: Clean testing chroot. # apt install libpoppler-dev libpoppler-cpp-dev [...] # apt update # apt dist-upgrade The following packages were automatically installed and

Bug#1069835: libreoffice-kf5: documents may get lost on SMB shares

# splt up the LO and kio parts properly clone 1069835 -1 reassign -1 kio retitle -1 kio: Don't leak existing file handles to newly spanwed KIO workers block 1069835 by -1 # LOs part is done, at least for this one. close 1069835 4:24.2.2-1 thanks Am 03.05.24 um 10:54 schrieb Andreas B. M

Bug#1069835: needs a fix in KIO as well

Hi, Am 26.04.24 um 10:02 schrieb Sune Stolborg Vuorela: https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kio/-/commit/ 45b306dc0653fa42672e8a49afe8f42d24585ed4 is also needed for it to work. Thanks for mentioning this. As talked about on IRC this morning, that commit is only for kf6s kio. So unless that

Bug#1069835: libreoffice-kf5: documents may get lost on SMB shares

Hi, Am 25.04.24 um 18:37 schrieb Andreas B. Mundt: On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 05:43:29PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: Am 25.04.24 um 17:03 schrieb Andreas B. Mundt: For now, we traced the issue back to libreoffice-kf5. If this package is removed, neither the document disappears on closing

Bug#1069835: libreoffice-kf5: documents may get lost on SMB shares

Hi, Am 25.04.24 um 17:03 schrieb Andreas B. Mundt: For now, we traced the issue back to libreoffice-kf5. If this package is removed, neither the document disappears on closing libreoffice nor the popup is shown when 'nobrl' is removed from the mount options. Which doesn't do IO itself though?

Bug#1069835: libreoffice-kf5: documents may get lost on SMB shares

close 1069835 4:24.2.2-1 forwarded 1069835 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 tag 1069835 + moreinfo thanks Am 25.04.24 um 17:03 schrieb Andreas B. Mundt: Package: libreoffice-kf5 Version? Severity: grave Come on... Not downgrading just yet, but I don't believe

Bug#1069554: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#1069554: this is no bug in the package, bug in the script doing the rebuild?

Hi, Am 24.04.24 um 21:35 schrieb Peter B: Why is it bad?  The nogui's are lighter dependencies than the gui packages. Exactly. That#s why they should be used in package building for converting stuff. One or the other is needed. Surely better to use the nogui if its available? It is available

Bug#1069554: this is no bug in the package, bug in the script doing the rebuild?

Hi Lucas, this is no bug in the package AFAICS. libreoffice-draw-nogui is clearly only in Build-Depends-Indep: Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13), fpc, libgtk2.0-dev, lcl, lcl-qt5, Build-Depends-Indep: libreoffice-draw-nogui, libreoffice-writer, So it's only needed for _all builds. S

Bug#1069123: RM: libreoffice != 24.3/experimental [armhf ppc64el s390x mips64el riscv64] -- ROM, NVIU; obsolete cruft

Package: ftp.debian.org Hi, The following packages are cruft: $ rmadison -s experimental -S libreoffice | grep -v 24\.2\.3 fonts-opensymbol | 4:102.12+LibO7.5.4~rc2-1 | experimental | all fonts-opensymbol | 4:102.12+LibO7.5.5~rc1-2 | experimental | al

Bug#1069121: RM: libuno-sal3 libuno-cppu3 ibuno-salhelpergcc3-3 libuno-cppuhelpergcc3-3 libuno-purpenvhelpergcc3-3 -- ROM, NBS; obsolete cruft pre-t64

Package: ftp.debian.org Hi, please remove rene@frodo:~$ rmadison -s unstable libuno-sal3 libuno-cppu3 libuno-salhelpergcc3-3 libuno-cppuhelpergcc3-3 libuno-purpenvhelpergcc3-3 libuno-cppu3 | 4:24.2.0-1 | unstable | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x libuno-cppuhelpergcc3-3 | 4

Bug#1069120: RM: ure-java libofficebean-java libreoffice-sdbc-hsqldb libreoffice-report-builder libreoffice-report-builder-bin [armhf ppc64el s390x] -- ROM, ANAIS; obsolete cruft

Package: ftp.debian.org Hi, The following packages have been ANAIS for loong (sincd 7.6.x times.). $ rmadison -s unstable ure-java libofficebean-java libreoffice-sdbc-hsqldb libreoffice-report-builder libreoffice-report-builder-bin | grep -v 24 libofficebean-java | 4:7.5.9~rc1-1 | unstabl

Bug#1068609: (no subject)

{mysql,firebird}.ucf: add * debian/control.in: add Breaks: -sdbc-{mysql,firebird} (<< 4:24.2.2-2) to libreoffice-common -- Rene Engelhard Sat, 30 Mar 2024 09:30:30 + even though -2 was never attempted on armhf due to that build-dep (-3 was built then)

Bug#1068609: failure log for reference

Hi, for the sake of this bug (since it misses the mail history) this is the FTBFS: Test name: testContentGnumeric::TestBody assertion failed - Expression: xServiceInfo->supportsService("com.sun.star.sheet.SpreadsheetDocument") Failures !!! Run: 64 Failure total: 1 Failures: 1 Errors:

Bug#1068609: libreoffice: FTBFS on arrmhf: testContentGnumeric assertion failed,- Expression: xServiceInfo->supportsService("com.sun.star.sheet.SpreadsheetDocument")

Source: libreoffice Version: 4:24.2.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: trixie ftbfs Hi, Am 30.03.24 um 12:56 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 30.03.24 um 08:49 schrieb Rene Engelhard: That would mean a bin-NMU of liborcus would work and then a rebuild of libreoffice (gb, but I need a new upload anyway

Bug#1068479: cynically closed by Rene Engelhard (Re: Bug#1068479: libreoffice-writer: space between paragraphs missing in spacing and indentation)

Hi, Am 07.04.24 um 20:59 schrieb José Luis González: Am 06.04.24 um 00:34 schrieb José Luis González: The setting for spacing between paragraphs is missing in the spacing and indentation tab of the paragraph dialog. ? It's definitely there. Format -> Paragraph has spacing "after/before". I

Bug#1068595: libreoffice-writer: insert space missing

tag 1068595 + moreinfo thanks Am 07.04.24 um 20:02 schrieb José Luis González: Space insertion is missing in the insert menu. Huh? What? Normal space is "Space". Non breaking space is Insert -> Formatting Mark -> Non breaking space if you want to use the menu. One can argue that it's not

Bug#1068479: libreoffice-writer: space between paragraphs missing in spacing and indentation

Hi, Am 06.04.24 um 11:43 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 06.04.24 um 11:31 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 06.04.24 um 11:11 schrieb Rene Engelhard: See https://people.debian.org/~rene/libreoffice/1068479-works.png Just for avoidance of doubt since the screenshot is in German: [...] And the first

Bug#1068479: libreoffice-writer: space between paragraphs missing in spacing and indentation

Hi again, Am 06.04.24 um 11:11 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 06.04.24 um 11:03 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 06.04.24 um 00:34 schrieb José Luis González: The setting for spacing between paragraphs is missing in the spacing and indentation tab of the paragraph dialog. ? It's definitely

Bug#1068479: libreoffice-writer: space between paragraphs missing in spacing and indentation

Hi, Am 06.04.24 um 11:31 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 06.04.24 um 11:11 schrieb Rene Engelhard: See https://people.debian.org/~rene/libreoffice/1068479-works.png Just for avoidance of doubt since the screenshot is in German: That is the second part "Absatz". First is "above&quo

Bug#1068479: libreoffice-writer: space between paragraphs missing in spacing and indentation

Hi again, Am 06.04.24 um 11:11 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 06.04.24 um 11:03 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 06.04.24 um 00:34 schrieb José Luis González: The setting for spacing between paragraphs is missing in the spacing and indentation tab of the paragraph dialog. ? It's definitely

Bug#1068479: libreoffice-writer: space between paragraphs missing in spacing and indentation

Hi, Am 06.04.24 um 11:03 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 06.04.24 um 00:34 schrieb José Luis González: The setting for spacing between paragraphs is missing in the spacing and indentation tab of the paragraph dialog. ? It's definitely there. Format -> Paragraph has spacing "after/

Bug#1068479: libreoffice-writer: space between paragraphs missing in spacing and indentation

tag 1068479 + moreinfo tag 1068479 + unreproducible severity 1068479 important thanks Hi, Am 06.04.24 um 00:34 schrieb José Luis González: The setting for spacing between paragraphs is missing in the spacing and indentation tab of the paragraph dialog. ? It's definitely there. Format ->

Bug#1036805: Processed: Severity for 1036805 was serious and we even released with it

severity 1036805 important thanks Hi, > Serious severity because it has a major effect on the usability of the > package without rendering it completely unusable, not minor No, it's not. "serious" has it's own meaning though and that's not it. At most it's important but I don't buy this sin

Bug#1068023: libreoffice: libreoffice does not work under Wayland (no X11) using gtk4

Hi, Also see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=977857 Regards, Rene

Bug#1068023: libreoffice: libreoffice does not work under Wayland (no X11) using gtk4

reassign 1068023 libreoffice-gtk4 thanks Hi, Am 29.03.24 um 21:04 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Package: libreoffice if it happens only with gtk4, isn't it better suited at libreoffice-gtk4? I use other gtk applications (e.g. evince, audacity, inkscape, firefox) in this same environment

Bug#1068023: libreoffice: libreoffice does not work under Wayland (no X11) using gtk4

Package: libreoffice Version: 4:24.2.0-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: Daniel Kahn Gillmor I have qtwayland5 5.15.10-2+b1 installed. I do not have XWayland installed at all. I'm running from within a Wayland session, using sway 1.9-1 as a compositor. When i try to launch libreoffice using t

Bug#970021: Seeking a small group to package Apache Arrow (was: Bug#970021: RFP: apache-arrow -- cross-language development platform for in-memory analytics)

Hi, Am 25.03.24 um 19:17 schrieb Julian Gilbey: * Reading and writing file formats (like CSV, Apache ORC, and Apache Parquet) liborcus supports this (Apache Parquet) if built with Apache Arrow. And thus makes LibreOffice being able to handle it. I didn't invest any time in Apache Ar

Bug#1058545: due to #1058653

block 1058545 by 1058653 tag 1058545 + patch thanks Hi, This is due to > dh_installdocs: error: Cannot find (any matches for) "doc/Esnacc.pdf" (tried in .) which is due to (cd /home/rene/esnacc-1.8.1/doc && unzip eSNACCManuals.zip && libreoffice --headless --convert-to pdf Esnacc.doc) Arc

Bug#1066970: FTBFS: error: implicit declaration of function 'InitNibbleMem' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: esnacc Version: 1.8.1-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, esnacc FTBFS: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I./asn1specs -I./asn1specs -I./c-lib/inc -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declar

Bug#1066473: multitail: FTBFS: mt.c:707:25: error: implicit declaration of function ‘waddnwstr’; did you mean ‘waddnstr’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

tag 1066473: + pending thanks Hi, Am 13.03.24 um 12:53 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Interesting. I almost wanted to tag it unreproducible since it didn't happen in my already-existing chroot... But it definitely does

Bug#1065893: libreoffice: Please drop dependencies on python3-distutils

Hi again, Am 10.03.24 um 19:59 schrieb Rene Engelhard: BTW, What is the replacement for it? setuptools._distutils? As in the following patch? OK, so discussion on IRC gave: 19:51 < tumbleweed> _rene_: distutils is removed in 3.12 19:51 < tumbleweed> if you need distutils, tr

Bug#1065893: libreoffice: Please drop dependencies on python3-distutils

Hi, Am 10.03.24 um 19:44 schrieb Rene Engelhard: and similar stuff in upstreams configure.     python_include=`$PYTHON -c "import distutils.sysconfig; print(distutils.sysconfig.get_config_var('INCLUDEPY'));"`     python_version=`$PYTHON -c "import di

Bug#1065893: libreoffice: Please drop dependencies on python3-distutils

tag 1065893 - ftbfs tag 1065893 + moreinfo thanks Hi, Am 10.03.24 um 18:49 schrieb Graham Inggs: Severity: important Tags: ftbfs Nope. As demonstrated below it does NOT FTBFS if I ran it to the end. Actually did once. This package has dependencies, build-dependencies and/or autopkgtest dep

Bug#1065461: libreoffice-common: disabling libreoffice-evolution has moved evolocal.odb to libreoffice-common

Hi, Am 05.03.24 um 00:47 schrieb Andreas Beckmann: Preparing to unpack .../libreoffice-common_4%3a24.2.1-3_all.deb ... Unpacking libreoffice-common (4:24.2.1-3) over (4:24.2.0-1) ... dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/libreoffice-common_4%3a24.2.1-3_all.deb (--unpac

Bug#1065447: unneeded libreoffice Build-Depends (libreoffice, ure-java, default-jre), -writer and -calc are enough

g 2024-03-04 21:50:28.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +winff (1.6.3+dfsg-1.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * only build-depend on needed libreoffice-draw, libreoffice-writer; +remove extraneous libreoffice, ure-java, default-jre + + -- Rene Engelhard Mon, 04 Mar 2024 20:50:28 + +

Bug#1065448: libreoffice-common: soffice builds of pdf files are unreproducible

forwarded 1065448 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160033 thanks Hi, Am 04.03.24 um 21:58 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Package: libreoffice-common Version: 4:24.2.0-1 Severity: normal Tags: upstream Then you should have filed it upstream :). Didn't write the reportbug

Bug#1065448: libreoffice-common: soffice builds of pdf files are unreproducible

Package: libreoffice-common Version: 4:24.2.0-1 Severity: normal Tags: upstream X-Debbugs-Cc: pe...@pblackman.plus.com Dear Maintainer, When creating pdf files from odt files, soffice writes a CreationDate field which contains the actual build date/time. This varies with every build. For an ex

Bug#1065321: lasso: unfullfillable Build-Depends (unneeded explicit Build-Depends on libxmlsec1-openssl)

Hi, Am 02.03.24 um 18:42 schrieb Rene Engelhard: So as  this library is now libxmlsec1t64-openssl this Build-Depends: is now unfullfillable. At least for 32bit archs like armel/armhf (which don't have Provides: libxmlsec1-openssl) or a future package-named package due to ABI changes

Bug#1065321: lasso: unfullfillable Build-Depends (unneeded explicit Build-Depends on libxmlsec1-openssl)

Source: lasso Severity: serious Version: 2.8.2-1 Tags: patch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Hi, I just saw lasso has libxmlsec1-dev, libxmlsec1-openssl, in Build-Depends. What for? If this was versioned this could be understandable, but it isn't. And give

Bug#1064890: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#1064890: libxmlsec1-dev, libxmlsec1-doc: both ship /usr/share/doc/libxmlsec1-dev/examples/*

Hi, Am 27.02.24 um 11:43 schrieb Andreas Beckmann via debian-xml-sgml-pkgs: Package: libxmlsec1-dev,libxmlsec1-doc Version: 1.2.39-2 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install because it tries t

Bug#1064776: bogusly redirects Bugs to debian-openoff...@lists.debian.org instead of the BTS

Source: libreoffice Version: 4:24.2.0-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 4:24.2.0-3 Am 23.02.24 um 17:14 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Hi, Am 23.02.24 um 08:02 schrieb HIGUCHI Daisuke (VDR dai): Sorry, resending to BTS, not to debian-openoffice. No problem, that -1 redirects the bug

Bug#1064494: libreoffice-calc: forcing "Wrap text automatically" when moving cells

Hi, Am 23.02.24 um 08:02 schrieb HIGUCHI Daisuke (VDR dai): Sorry, resending to BTS, not to debian-openoffice. No problem, that -1 redirects the bug reports to debian-openoffice is a bug. (Fixed in later versions but those are stuck after the t64 transition.) Regards, Rene

Bug#1063733: no -D_TIME_BITS=64 on builds where t64 support is supposed to be done

Hi, Am 11.02.24 um 22:10 schrieb Rene Engelhard: I just tried a rebuild of libreoffice with DEB_HOST_MAINT_OPTIONS="abi=+time64" to actually see what happens. DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS of course. I set the correct one (and libreoffice and xmlsec1 did pick it up) but just "th

Bug#1063733: no -D_TIME_BITS=64 on builds where t64 support is supposed to be done

Source: gpgme1.0 Version: 1.18.0-4.1~exp1 Severity: important [ let's no get into a discussion on  the sense of this transition. I actually believe this isn't needed and we can leave 32 bit die in 2038 but anyways... The transition is ongoing now in experimental. So be it ] Hi, I just tri

Bug#1063734: no -D_TIME_BITS=64 on builds where t64 support is supposed to be done

Source: gnutls28 Version: 3.8.3-1.1~exp1 Severity: important [ let's no get into a discussion on the sense of this transition. I actually believe this isn't needed and we can leave 32 bit die in 2038 but anyways... The transition is ongoing now in experimental. So be it ] Hi, I just tried

Bug#1063732: hurd-i386 twice in java_unsupported_architectures

Package: java-common Version: 0.75 Severity: minor Hi, $ grep java_unsupported_architectures /usr/share/java/java_defaults.mk java_unsupported_architectures = hppa hurd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 hurd-i386 powerpcspe s390 sparc [...] hurd-i386 is here twice. Regards, Rene

Bug#1020482: libreoffice-dictionaries: Package the Qt WebEngine binary dictionary files from your Hunspell source

tag 1020482 + pending thanks Am 24.01.24 um 23:44 schrieb Soren Stoutner: Control: tags -1 + patch I submitted an MR at: https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice-dictionaries/-/merge_requests/6

Bug#1061242: libreoffice-impress: impress cannot start. Its display an error loading a dll that is installed

Hi, oops. Am 21.01.24 um 15:35 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Here the new libxml2 removes functions and symbol versions used by gazillions of packages over the whole of the Debian archive. And no, the exact point of Debian library package names is that they HAVE to change on ABI changes

Bug#1061242: libreoffice-impress: impress cannot start. Its display an error loading a dll that is installed

Hi, Am 21.01.24 um 15:27 schrieb Eric Valette: On 21/01/2024 14:49, Rene Engelhard wrote: Exactly that is the point of #1059040. The binary packages have to be renamed. (Then rebuild against libxml2-WHATEVERNEW). Then a rebuild LO will have a proper dependency on libxml2-WHATEVERNEW. I

Bug#1061242: libreoffice-impress: impress cannot start. Its display an error loading a dll that is installed

Hi, Am 21.01.24 um 14:44 schrieb Eric Valette: ii  libxml2 2.12.3+dfsg-0exp1 And this one *from experimental* changed ABI (see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1059040). Don't install it on systems you don't want breakage in. Bingo you got it. However this means that dep

Bug#1059040: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#1059040: libxml2: ABI change? (undefined references)

Hi, Am 12.01.24 um 17:56 schrieb Thorsten Glaser: On Fri, 12 Jan 2024, Rafael Laboissière wrote: experimental, the configure script does detect the absence of the xmlNanoFTPNewCtxt function in the libxml2 library (version 2.12.3+dfsg-0exp1) and disables the call to the xmlNanoFTP* functions. H

Bug#1020482: libreoffice-dictionaries: Package the Qt WebEngine binary dictionary files from your Hunspell source

Am Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 11:50:25AM -0700 schrieb Soren Stoutner: > Would you be interested in a patch to implement this functionality? You can do that, for sure. (Actually during debconf last year I did a quick and dirty solution to this - excluding the special-case-needed ones, but dropped the b

Bug#1060255: Instead of certain text, squares are displayed in the interface

tag 1060255 + unreproducible tag 1060255 + moreinfo thanks Hi, Am 08.01.24 um 11:32 schrieb Артём: Package: libreoffice-l10n-ru Version: 4:7.4.7-1+deb12u1 Severity: |important| |Tags: ||l10n| | | For example, in LibreOffice Start Center, some text in the options Which "text in the options"?

Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

Hi, Am 07.01.24 um 04:38 schrieb Steve Langasek: The ordering here would be: - dpkg will be uploaded to experimental with 64-bit time_t in the default flags - the source packages which need an ABI change ("source-packages"+"lfs-and-depends-time_t") and do not already have versions in e

Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

Hi, Am 07.01.24 um 02:01 schrieb Steve Langasek: If you say you are going to fix eventual breakage (and not ignoring the test results!) and if that means fixing asm on all affected archs, then it's OK :) Well, yes; though I hope we would see some help from e.g. arm porters if there were actual

Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

Hi, Am 06.01.24 um 06:51 schrieb Steve Langasek: - dpkg will be uploaded to experimental with 64-bit time_t in the default flags [...] What about the suggestion to not push changes to experimental for packages that already have new versions in experimental, and do the binary package renames

Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

Hi Steve, Am 06.01.24 um 06:51 schrieb Steve Langasek: - dpkg will be uploaded to experimental with 64-bit time_t in the default flags I  think at that point in time one should know what breaks and whatnot. Archive rebuild? (Probably in stages) What kind of breakage are you looking to

Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

Hi, Am 05.01.24 um 09:17 schrieb Steve Langasek: - Packages that could not be analyzed for whatever reason are still assumed to have an ABI that's sensitive to time_t and have to be included in the transition. Happily, due to improvements in this run of the number of packages that coul

Bug#974220: libreoffice-writer: Double paste in Writer

forwarded 974220 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140652 tag 974220 + upstream thanks Am 05.01.24 um 15:01 schrieb Claudio Ferreira: Yes. I have this software. Is common in the Brazilian market. I tried now to past a text and it works as expected. For me, this bug can be

Bug#1059805: clucene-core: please apply LibreOffice patch to alllow not writing random timestamps into generated files, making them unreproducible

Hi, Am 03.01.24 um 16:47 schrieb James Addison: Source: clucene-core Followup-For: Bug #1059805 X-Debbugs-Cc: r...@debian.org, thorsten.behr...@allotropia.de On Mon, 1 Jan 2024 18:24:19 +0100, Rene wrote: LibreOffice created a patch to clucene to make their help pages reproducible. Maybe we sh

Bug#1059805: clucene-core: please apply LibreOffice patch to alllow not writing random timestamps into generated files, making them unreproducible

Source: clucene-core Version: 2.3.3.4+dfsg-1.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps randomness Affects: libreoffice-help-en-us libreoffice-help-ca libreoffice-help-cs libreoffice-help-da libreoffice-help-de libreoffice-help-dz libreo

Bug#1059535: transition: abseil

Hi, Am 27.12.23 um 19:15 schrieb Benjamin Barenblat: Although doing a transition now will break some packages in sid, I believe waiting is likely to cause more issues. Upstreams (LibreOffice in particular) are starting to use features from the new version of Abseil, Actually it's not LibreOffi

Bug#1059040: libxml2: ABI change? (undefined references)

Hi, Am 25.12.23 um 22:57 schrieb Rene Engelhard: I didn't file it for the plain build issue. Nevertheless, if it broke so many projects you probably should do a full-fledged rebuild and send Well, mitigated by 2.12.3, but still. But again, this is completely off-topic to what I fil

Bug#1059040: libxml2: ABI change? (undefined references)

Hi, Am 25.12.23 um 22:33 schrieb Rene Engelhard: The tests are still failing and there is no patch anywhere yet, see Sorry, link got lost: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158423 and c) you ignore the actual issue here at hand and that is that the new libxml2 breaks the

Bug#1059040: libxml2: ABI change? (undefined references)

Hi, Am 25.12.23 um 16:31 schrieb Aron Xu: Hi Rene, On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 3:39 AM Rene Engelhard wrote: Am Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 08:03:56PM +0100 schrieb Rene Engelhard: LibreOffice builds (patch available), but doesn't yet build with 2.12. "... but doesn't yet succeed the

Bug#1059158: libreoffice-core-nogui: Can't open a spreadsheet from python uno because libforuilo.so is missing.

retitle 1059158 libreoffice-core-nogui: Can't open a spreadsheet from python uno on 32bits because libforuilo.so is missing. thanks Hi, Am 20.12.23 um 18:42 schrieb Gerard Henri Pille: * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? So this is even 32bi

Bug#1052740: graphite2: FTBFS: graph_legend.dot:1: error: Problems running dot: exit code=1, command='dot', arguments='"/<>/build/doc/doxygen/html/graph_legend.dot" -Tpng -o "/<

Hi, Am 23.12.23 um 11:43 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Hi, Am 23.12.23 um 02:40 schrieb Bastian Germann: graph_legend.dot should have quotes around the font name references. Ah, thanks. Unfortunately this is a generated file... And yes, I also noticed that the FreeSans.ttf is at fault. Indeed I

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >