Bug#1032771: libzim7: Package name is wrong, should be 'libzim'

2023-05-20 Thread Kunal Mehta
tags 1032771 - wontfix thanks Hi, On 3/22/23 11:41, Bastian Germann wrote: Control: tags -1 wontfix On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 20:12:26 -0400 James Valleroy wrote: Note that this request is about changing the source package name, from "zimlib" to "libzim". The bug was accidentally filed on the

Bug#1032771: libzim7: Package name is wrong, should be 'libzim'

2023-03-17 Thread James Valleroy
On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 11:47:02 +0530 Vasudev Kamath wrote: I’m no loner active maintainer of zimlib but I’m just talking from pacakaging convention followed by Debian - a library is named based on lib where major version is major part of soname. And that is precisely followed here libzim7

Bug#1032771: libzim7: Package name is wrong, should be 'libzim'

2023-03-11 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Hi Emmanuel, I’m no loner active maintainer of zimlib but I’m just talking from pacakaging convention followed by Debian - a library is named based on lib where major version is major part of soname. And that is precisely followed here libzim7 indicating 7 as major release number. I don’t think

Bug#1032771: libzim7: Package name is wrong, should be 'libzim'

2023-03-11 Thread Emmanuel Engelhart
Package: libzim7 Version: 7.2.2+git202205172048.c010ab7~focal Severity: minor X-Debbugs-Cc: kel...@kiwix.org Many years ago we have changed our library name from "zimlib" to "libzim". But Debian is one of the last places where the old name is still used. We have a ticket open - since almost 3