On 07.05.2023 03:44, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Sat, 06 May 2023, =?UTF-8?Q?Preu=C3=9...@buxtehude.debian.org wrote:
Hi Norbert,
fmtutil [ERROR]: not building luajithbtex due to missing engine: luajithbtex
fmtutil [ERROR]: not building luajittex due to missing engine: luajittex
Ah, you
On Sat, 06 May 2023, =?UTF-8?Q?Preu=C3=9...@buxtehude.debian.org wrote:
> fmtutil [ERROR]: not building luajithbtex due to missing engine: luajithbtex
> fmtutil [ERROR]: not building luajittex due to missing engine: luajittex
Ah, you probably did run it manually, right?
But the tex-common
Hi Hilmar,
On Sat, 06 May 2023, =?UTF-8?Q?Preu=C3=9...@buxtehude.debian.org wrote:
> fmtutil [ERROR]: not building luajithbtex due to missing engine: luajithbtex
> fmtutil [ERROR]: not building luajittex due to missing engine: luajittex
> fmtutil [INFO]: disabled formats: 2
Hmm, is fmtutil run
On 06.05.2023 08:15, Norbert Preining wrote:
Hi Norbert,
Or you could drop building luaJIT completely. fmtutil already ignores
errors from missing luajit* engines, so that would be an easy way.
And if Debian requires halfway decent machines, the it can be
reactived.
This is for fmtutil from
code that uses SSE2 instructions, so `texlive-binaries` was changed to
require `sse2-support`.
>> Hmm, so SSE2 is not a requirement on Debian?
No, indeed. And the `sse2-support` package is the embodiment of this fact.
There's a fairly good reason why SSE2 is not a requirement:
The
On 06.05.2023 08:15, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Wed, 03 May 2023, =?UTF-8?Q?Preu=C3=9...@buxtehude.debian.org wrote:
Hi Stefan, hi Norbert,
code that uses SSE2 instructions, so `texlive-binaries` was changed to
require `sse2-support`.
Hmm, so SSE2 is not a requirement on Debian?
Not
On Wed, 03 May 2023, =?UTF-8?Q?Preu=C3=9...@buxtehude.debian.org wrote:
> > code that uses SSE2 instructions, so `texlive-binaries` was changed to
> > require `sse2-support`.
Hmm, so SSE2 is not a requirement on Debian?
How does luajit itself work on your system, how does it behave?
> As I
>> In bug#1023007, we discovered that `luatex`'s JIT compiler generates
>> code that uses SSE2 instructions, so `texlive-binaries` was changed to
>> require `sse2-support`.
>>
> As I understood the situation it is not luatex, which does not work on
> your computer, but just the luajit... variants.
On 03.05.2023 16:40, Stefan Monnier wrote:
Hi Stefan,
In bug#1023007, we discovered that `luatex`'s JIT compiler generates
code that uses SSE2 instructions, so `texlive-binaries` was changed to
require `sse2-support`.
As I understood the situation it is not luatex, which does not work on
Package: texlive-binaries
Version: 2022.20220321.62855-5
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
In bug#1023007, we discovered that `luatex`'s JIT compiler generates
code that uses SSE2 instructions, so `texlive-binaries` was changed to
require `sse2-support`.
This was a quick way to avoid the
10 matches
Mail list logo
