Bug#1039617: liblopsub: reproducible-builds: timestamps in gzip headers for changelog and manpage

2023-07-09 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2023-07-09, Andre Noll wrote: > On Thu, Jun 29, 19:45, Andre Noll wrote >> > It also needs someone to upload to Debian. Looks like Adam Borowski >> > has sponsored in the past, but if you need someone >> > else to sponsor the upload, I could too. >> >> Yes, Adam uploaded all previous versions

Bug#1039617: liblopsub: reproducible-builds: timestamps in gzip headers for changelog and manpage

2023-07-09 Thread Andre Noll
On Thu, Jun 29, 19:45, Andre Noll wrote > > It also needs someone to upload to Debian. Looks like Adam Borowski > > has sponsored in the past, but if you need someone > > else to sponsor the upload, I could too. > > Yes, Adam uploaded all previous versions so far. But of course it's > also fine

Bug#1039617: liblopsub: reproducible-builds: timestamps in gzip headers for changelog and manpage

2023-06-29 Thread Andre Noll
On Thu, Jun 29, 08:27, Vagrant Cascadian wrote > >> Given that this change was accepted in 2019, would you consider > >> uploading a version with the fixes applied to Debian, either by making a > >> new upstream version, or applying the patches to an older version? > > > > Will do. FWIW: There are

Bug#1039617: liblopsub: reproducible-builds: timestamps in gzip headers for changelog and manpage

2023-06-29 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2023-06-28, Andre Noll wrote: > On Tue, Jun 27, 14:55, Vagrant Cascadian wrote >> > This issue was addressed already four years ago when Chris Lamb (CC) >> > submitted an analogous patch, see below. His patch has been part of the >> > master branch since then, although no new version has been

Bug#1039617: liblopsub: reproducible-builds: timestamps in gzip headers for changelog and manpage

2023-06-28 Thread Andre Noll
On Tue, Jun 27, 14:55, Vagrant Cascadian wrote > > This issue was addressed already four years ago when Chris Lamb (CC) > > submitted an analogous patch, see below. His patch has been part of the > > master branch since then, although no new version has been released. > > > > I therefore assume

Bug#1039617: liblopsub: reproducible-builds: timestamps in gzip headers for changelog and manpage

2023-06-27 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2023-06-27, Andre Noll wrote: > On Tue, Jun 27, 12:57, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > >> The attached two patches (one patching the upstream Makefile, the other >> patching debian/rules) fix this by passing -n to the gzip calls used to >> compress changelog.Debian and the various manpages. >> >>

Bug#1039617: liblopsub: reproducible-builds: timestamps in gzip headers for changelog and manpage

2023-06-27 Thread Andre Noll
On Tue, Jun 27, 12:57, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > The attached two patches (one patching the upstream Makefile, the other > patching debian/rules) fix this by passing -n to the gzip calls used to > compress changelog.Debian and the various manpages. > > According to my local tests, with these

Bug#1039617: liblopsub: reproducible-builds: timestamps in gzip headers for changelog and manpage

2023-06-27 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
Source: liblopsub Severity: normal Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org The build timestamp is included in various gzip headers: