Bug#1040472: p11-kit FTCBFS: AC_RUN_IFELSE

2023-07-10 Thread Andreas Metzler
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream On 2023-07-09 Helmut Grohne wrote: > On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 04:04:20PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > > Also wouldn't using AC_FUNC_STRERROR_R be a better fix? (I do not expect > > you to provide this, I asking for your opinion) > After having read the

Bug#1040472: p11-kit FTCBFS: AC_RUN_IFELSE

2023-07-09 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Andreas, On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 04:04:20PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > @@ -178,10 +179,13 @@ > > return strerror_r (EINVAL, buf, 32); > > } > > ]])], > > + [ac_cv_strerror_r_ret=xsi], >

Bug#1040472: p11-kit FTCBFS: AC_RUN_IFELSE

2023-07-09 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2023-07-06 Helmut Grohne wrote: > Source: p11-kit [...] > - [AC_RUN_IFELSE( > + [AC_CACHE_CHECK([strerror_r return > value],[ac_cv_strerror_r_ret],[ > + AC_RUN_IFELSE( > [AC_LANG_SOURCE([[ > #include

Bug#1040472: p11-kit FTCBFS: AC_RUN_IFELSE

2023-07-06 Thread Helmut Grohne
Source: p11-kit Version: 0.25.0-2 Severity: important Justification: breaks architecture bootstrap User: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftcbfs User: helm...@debian.org Usertags: rebootstrap Tags: patch upstream Hi, p11-kit gained a new AC_RUN_IFELSE check and that happens to break cross