> > As a consequence, this bug is not one..:-)
>
> Just because the behavior is documented doesn't mean it's not a bug. Not
> being able to use 'umount' is a bug. :)
Yes. There were more details on the bug merged with that one. So, I
finally also reopened the bug myself and usertagged it as "sm
reopen 169624
thanks
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 10:40:09PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Version: 3.0.24-6
> In #169524, it is reported that umount can't umount shares mounted as
> user with mount.smbfs.
> However all documentations explicitely explain that, for such cases,
> smbumount is to be
2 matches
Mail list logo
