Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Quoting Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>>Jérôme Marant wrote:
>>
>>>Sooner or later, Debian will have to decide if it definitely wants to
>>>leave the project in the hands of extremists. I hope the GR will lead
>>>us to the right path, that is getting rid of fund
Quoting Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Sooner or later, Debian will have to decide if it definitely wants to
> > leave the project in the hands of extremists. I hope the GR will lead
> > us to the right path, that is getting rid of fundamentalists.
>
>
> If Debian
Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Sooner or later, Debian will have to decide if it definitely wants to
> leave the project in the hands of extremists. I hope the GR will lead
> us to the right path, that is getting rid of fundamentalists.
If Debian goes down your "we don't give a damn about freedom" path,
Quoting Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Romain Francoise wrote:
> > Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >>Please remove these from 'main' ASAP.
> >
> >
> > Don't:
> >
> > http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001>
> >
> That's not directly relevant, since it's about t
Quoting Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > You don't have any kind of authority, as far as I know.
>
> I didn't say I did. I quoted "like debian-legal tells me it needs to be
> done," and noted that debian-legal had in fact said that. A clear
> majority at any rate. That's all.
debian-l
Romain Francoise wrote:
> Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>Please remove these from 'main' ASAP.
>
>
> Don't:
>
> http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001>
>
That's not directly relevant, since it's about the GFDL, and this bug isn't.
I suppose it would be sort of relev
Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>>And for whatever it's worth, as long as I'm maintaining the packages,
>>>these files will almost certainly not be removed unless there's some
>>>overwhelmingly convincing reason, like debian-legal tells me it needs
>>>to b
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> And for whatever it's worth, as long as I'm maintaining the packages,
>> these files will almost certainly not be removed unless there's some
>> overwhelmingly convincing reason, like debian-legal tells me it needs
>> to be done,
> We've done that.
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please remove these from 'main' ASAP.
Don't:
http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001>
--
,''`.
: :' :Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
`. `' http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
The repeatedly-confirmed GRs, the current Social Contract, debian-legal
consensus, and the stated opinion of the etch release team, are that
everything in 'main', with the special exception of license texts which
constitute the licenses to works in 'main', has to satisfy the DFSG. The
DFSG re
10 matches
Mail list logo
