On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 01:40:47AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
[...]
Also, any packages depending
on aspell-dictionary will unfortunately have to be updated to use
aspell6-dictionary instead. These packages are: abiword-common,
sylpheed, sylpheed-claws, ekg, ekg2.
Sorry for the long delay.
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 03:34:31PM +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 01:40:47AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
[...]
Also, any packages depending
on aspell-dictionary will unfortunately have to be updated to use
aspell6-dictionary instead. These packages are:
Brian Nelson wrote:
I'm going on a pseudo-vacation for the next two weeks and would really
like to upload the new packages when I return. I'd appreciate it if
someone would setup a staging area to collect all of the newly built
dictionaries so that they can all be uploaded together. Please
* Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-01-21 01:40]:
The one hurdle in the way is the binary format of the dictionaries has
incompatibly changed again. Thus, the old dictionaries compiled with
0.50 will not work and must be rebuilt.
The packages aspell-pt and aspell-pt-br built against
Re: Rafael Laboissiere in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The one hurdle in the way is the binary format of the dictionaries has
incompatibly changed again. Thus, the old dictionaries compiled with
0.50 will not work and must be rebuilt.
The packages aspell-pt and aspell-pt-br built against aspell
I've finally decided to put into motion a transition to Aspell 0.60 in
Debian. Aspell 0.60 is a major release in terms of functionality but
is a relatively minor change from a packaging perspective. In
particular, the libaspell soname has not changed, so no software using
the library will need
6 matches
Mail list logo
