Hi,
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote:
> > If we let people install Thunderbird instead of Evolution, they might
> > not notice the difference for mail, but they would notice the
> > difference in terms of integration in the desktop.
> Yes, understand. However, this particula
4, Epiphany is just too ugly (call it "consistent" if U wish).
I'd never offer it to our users.
If it's ugly, that must be because of your desktop theme. It's difficult
to make a more neutral look than epiphany's.
Standard theme, untouched.
5, Epiphany imposes web compatibility problems
Sure. Please do consider the number of packages which are integrated
with the evolution address book for example:
If we let people install Thunderbird instead of Evolution, they might
not notice the difference for mail, but they would notice the
difference in terms of integration in the des
tags 275949 - wontfix
retitle 275949 [Apt with Recommends] Use Recommends instead of Depends
stop
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote:
> 1, I don't have any problem to claim, that at least 90% of users do use
> mail client just for the purposes of mail client. For them, T
Le jeudi 28 septembre 2006 à 11:08 +0200, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky a écrit :
> I see the arguments just alibistic, nothing more.
>
> 1, I don't have any problem to claim, that at least 90% of users do use
> mail client just for the purposes of mail client. For them, Thunderbird
> IS an equivalent for
I see the arguments just alibistic, nothing more.
1, I don't have any problem to claim, that at least 90% of users do use
mail client just for the purposes of mail client. For them, Thunderbird
IS an equivalent for Evolution. Moreover, Evolution is just too heavy
and complicated tool for them.
6 matches
Mail list logo
