I've checked out 1.2.1 source tarball, and noticed that
latex source to documentation in doc/ dir is replaced with
ps/html/dvi/pdf/info documentation.
This qualifies the documentation as non-free in Debian terms;
and I will be forced to split the package into non-free
documentation
I can of course release the source of the documentation.
I was just not aware of the problem. I let you know when it is done.
Thanks for your consideration.
There has been a lot of debate going on even within Debian on
whether to handle 'documentation' different from 'software source',
Hi Didier
Thanks for your response.
(Thinking about it, it is kind of stupid not to make the documentation
sources available. ---I think I did not do it to avoid too many
dependencies.)
I make a new version 1.2.2 with the source documentation added. It requires
ActiveDvi because I use
BTW, I can find advi.sty in ADVI, but I do not seem to be able to find
adviedit.sty; is it whizzedit.sty in the examples dir you mention?
Sorry, it adviedit.sty is not need, it is only the command \adviedit
of the file advi.sty that is needed.
Files advi-annot.sty and bubble.sty are also
Hi,
BTW, I can find advi.sty in ADVI, but I do not seem to be able to find
adviedit.sty; is it whizzedit.sty in the examples dir you mention?
Sorry, it adviedit.sty is not need, it is only the command \adviedit
of the file advi.sty that is needed.
Files advi-annot.sty and bubble.sty
Hi,
I've checked out 1.2.1 source tarball, and noticed that
latex source to documentation in doc/ dir is replaced with
ps/html/dvi/pdf/info documentation.
This qualifies the documentation as non-free in Debian terms;
and I will be forced to split the package into non-free
documentation
6 matches
Mail list logo
