On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:43:32PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
I don't think it should be assigned only to lvm2. Glibc should also
be fixed. However I downgrade #298488 into normal because lvm has the
actual critical bug, and if lvm needs to use kernel headers, lvm
should have such header
GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At Wed, 02 Mar 2005 19:50:19 +0100,
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Can your problem be fixed to define O_NOATIME in lvm2 or
linux-kernel-headers package?
Regards,
-- gotom
I assigned the bug is to both. The headers because they have the bug and
At Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:01:36 +0100,
Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:43:32PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
I don't think it should be assigned only to lvm2. Glibc should also
be fixed. However I downgrade #298488 into normal because lvm has the
actual critical bug, and if lvm
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 05:26:10PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:01:36 +0100,
Bastian Blank wrote:
Kernel headers? /usr/include/bits/fcntl.h is nothing supplied by the
kernel.
Ah, I misunderstood, you're right.
I first thought it can by fixed in asm/fcntl.h, but I was
At Wed, 02 Mar 2005 19:50:19 +0100,
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Can your problem be fixed to define O_NOATIME in lvm2 or
linux-kernel-headers package?
Regards,
-- gotom
I assigned the bug is to both. The headers because they have the bug and
lvm because it can work around it (thereby
5 matches
Mail list logo
