Bug#303725: specter: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): syntax error before '{' token

2005-04-09 Thread Verdan
Hello specter upload is now completed with Your patch included, and bug is marked as done, but afer consultation with upstream, new patch has been released. We believe that it soloves problem with compilation on gcc-4 *and* gcc-2.95. I would be glad if You could take a look, and tell me if this

Bug#303725: specter: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): syntax error before '{' token

2005-04-09 Thread Andreas Jochens
Hello, On 05-Apr-09 11:51, Verdan wrote: specter upload is now completed with Your patch included, and bug is marked as done, but afer consultation with upstream, new patch has been released. We believe that it soloves problem with compilation on gcc-4 *and* gcc-2.95. I would be glad if You

Bug#303725: specter: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): syntax error before '{' token

2005-04-08 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: specter Version: 1.3-9 Severity: normal Tags: patch When building 'specter' on amd64/unstable with gcc-4.0, I get the following error: make[1]: Entering directory `/specter-1.3' x86_64-linux-gcc -O2 -Wall -g -I./libipulog/include -I./include

Bug#303725: specter: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): syntax error before '{' token

2005-04-08 Thread Verdan
Hello With the attached patch 'specter' can be compiled on amd64 using gcc-4.0. It's not so easy. It was done that way to allow specter compile on gcc 2.95. This patch makes it impossible, so I hesitate to apply it. Moreover fourth version of gcc is really experimental, and if I had to choose

Bug#303725: specter: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): syntax error before '{' token

2005-04-08 Thread Andreas Jochens
Hello, thank you for your reply to my bug report. On 05-Apr-08 18:04, Verdan wrote: With the attached patch 'specter' can be compiled on amd64 using gcc-4.0. It's not so easy. It was done that way to allow specter compile on gcc 2.95. This patch makes it impossible, so I hesitate to

Bug#303725: specter: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): syntax error before '{' token

2005-04-08 Thread Verdan
Hi. Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:44:18 +0200 Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think that 'wontfix' wonthelp much :) More seriously, the newer gcc-4.0 adheres more strictly to the official C/C++ standards. I think that C/C++ code should generally be based on the standards and not on