Bug#306272: cpufreqd: Too high CPU load

2005-04-26 Thread Leonardo Macchia
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 11:08:58 +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: Shall I close this bug then? (or at least change its title and lower its priority to whishlist) Yes, you can close it. Hope someone will fix kernel's bug. Thank you again, Leonardo. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#306272: cpufreqd: Too high CPU load

2005-04-25 Thread Leonardo Macchia
Package: cpufreqd Version: 1.2.2-3 Severity: minor Hello. While cicle in main.c (inside get_running_programs, line 767) consumes lot of CPU (my 1 GHz laptop powers on every two-three second its fan because of cpufreqd); just a little sleep between each cycle should be better. Thanks, Leonardo

Bug#306272: cpufreqd: Too high CPU load

2005-04-25 Thread Leonardo Macchia
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 17:32:36 +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: ...Anyway :) did you already tried your solution? I'm sorry, I'm pretty sceptical because it's battery checking that usually sucks much cpu with ACPI because of the kernel doing busy wait, but it's a known issue. I have about 100

Bug#306272: cpufreqd: Too high CPU load

2005-04-25 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 02:33:00PM +0200, Leonardo Macchia wrote: Package: cpufreqd Version: 1.2.2-3 Severity: minor Hello. While cicle in main.c (inside get_running_programs, line 767) consumes lot of CPU (my 1 GHz laptop powers on every two-three second its fan because of cpufreqd);

Bug#306272: cpufreqd: Too high CPU load

2005-04-25 Thread Leonardo Macchia
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 17:32:36 +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: I'm sorry, I'm pretty sceptical because it's battery checking that usually sucks much cpu with ACPI because of the kernel doing busy wait, but it's a known issue. Yes, checking /proc/acpi/battery seems the problem. Maybe it's a

Bug#306272: cpufreqd: Too high CPU load

2005-04-25 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 05:46:12PM +0200, Leonardo Macchia wrote: On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 17:32:36 +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: ...Anyway :) did you already tried your solution? I'm sorry, I'm pretty sceptical because it's battery checking that usually sucks much cpu with ACPI because of

Bug#306272: cpufreqd: Too high CPU load

2005-04-25 Thread Leonardo Macchia
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 18:42:11 +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: if you have a modular acpi you could simply remove acpi_ac and/or acpi_battery to test if things are better. I found what is the problem: CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG=y in 2.6.11 (but not in 2.6.10) generates a lot of CPU load if you read