Package: rageircd
Version: 2.0.0-2
Hi Marc,
Apologies for not getting back to you sooner - I've been working hard.
I've got around to the proper bug fix so bare with me.
Firstly, replace all the current VA_COPY declaration statements in
include/common.h with:
#ifdef HAVE___VA_COPY
#define
May 2005 14:43:06 BDTTo: Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: Bug#307231: RageIRCd build failure on s390 Package: rageircdVersion: 2.0.0-2Hi Marc,Apologies for not getting back to you sooner - I've been working hard.I've got around to the proper bug fix so bare
See messages forwarded below. Sent to the wrong bug report in error.Begin forwarded message:From: Alasdair McWilliam [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: 16 May 2005 14:45:15 BDTTo: Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Fwd: Bug#307231: RageIRCd build failure on s390 Package: rageircdVersion
* Alasdair McWilliam:
Change to:
AC_CHECK_FUNCS([times index rindex setlinebuf va_copy __va_copy])
va_copy is a macro, so this check won't work reliably.
On Debian, it's safe to use va_copy unconditionally because it's part
of GCC's stdarg.h header.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Hi Alasdair,
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 04:21:15PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Alasdair McWilliam:
Change to:
AC_CHECK_FUNCS([times index rindex setlinebuf va_copy __va_copy])
va_copy is a macro, so this check won't work reliably.
Florian usually knows what he is talking about, so I'd
* Marc Haber:
+#if defined(__GNUC__) || (defined(__powerpc__) defined(__FreeBSD__))
#define VA_COPY __va_copy
+#elif defined(__powerpc__) defined(__NetBSD__)
+#define VA_COPY va_copy
#else
#define VA_COPY(x, y) x = y
#endif
Would that be ok with both of you?
__va_copy is provided
I expect you know more than me about this so I'll go with the patch
you've given.
Thanks for your input on this issue too it's really appreciated. :-)
I'll re-fix the BLUEMOON branch tomorrow evening probably.
Is it possible to close the other bug associated with rageircd as
it's not really a
Hi,
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 10:19:08PM +0100, Alasdair McWilliam wrote:
I expect you know more than me about this so I'll go with the patch
you've given.
Thanks. So I can upload the patched version to unstable, fixing the
s390 issue?
Is it possible to close the other bug associated with
Thanks. So I can upload the patched version to unstable, fixing the
s390 issue?
Yes :-)
It is an issue which makes the current rageircd unsuitable for release
with a stable version. We have missed sarge anyway, so the package
wouldn't migrate from unstable to testing anyway. That bug report
Thiemo Seufer suggests replacing the entire VA_COPY detection code with:
#if defined(__GNUC__) || (defined(__powerpc__) defined(__FreeBSD__))
#define VA_COPY __va_copy
#elif defined(__powerpc__) defined(__NetBSD__)
#define VA_COPY va_copy
#else
#define VA_COPY(x, y) x = y
#endif
With that
tags #307231
thanks
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 11:44:56PM +0100, Alasdair McWilliam wrote:
The compile failure is in src/ircsprintf.c as follows.
cc -g -Wall -O2 -export-dynamic -I../adns -I../include -I../zlib -c
ircsprintf.c
ircsprintf.c: In function `ircvsprintf':
ircsprintf.c:29:
tags #307231
thanks
To help debugging you can configure with --enable-developer (either
manually with ./configure or specified in config when it asks for
additional arguments). This makes compile a bit more anally retentive
and will complain at more things. Hehe.
Alasdair
On 7 May 2005, at
Probably because I've made a wee booboo. ;-)
2.0.1 will be along quicker than planned as I was up until 3am doing
lots of tweaking and fixing here and there.
Give me a few days. (I've a better fix for the va_copy issue too,
will use autoconf.)
Thanks for responding
Alasdair
On 2 May 2005, at
Package: rageircdVersion: 2.0.0-2HiI've checked the build logs for rageircd 2.0.0-2 in unstable and have noticed that the actual rageircd binary doesn't build on the s390 architecture. Hence I am reporting it here.The compile failure is in src/ircsprintf.c as follows.cc -g -Wall -O2
severity #307231 serious
thanks
Justification: hidden FTBFS
Hi,
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 11:44:56PM +0100, Alasdair McWilliam wrote:
I've checked the build logs for rageircd 2.0.0-2 in unstable and have
noticed that the actual rageircd binary doesn't build on the s390
architecture. Hence
15 matches
Mail list logo
